The electrical properties of epidural catheters: what are the requirements for nerve stimulation guidance?
We designed the present study to investigate the electrical resistance of commercially available epidural catheters and to search for products and procedures suitable for nerve stimulation-guided insertion. Four types of epidural catheters were evaluated: 2 nonwire-reinforced catheters (19-gauge and 20-gauge nylon) and 2 wire-reinforced catheters (19-gauge without stylet and 20-gauge with stylet). The resistance of a catheter was calculated from the voltage level proportional to the fixed resistance in series circuit. In case of physiologic saline, the resistance of nonreinforced catheters was more than 700 kOmega, whereas the wire-reinforced catheter was 14.4 +/- 0.20 kOmega without stylet and 10.1 +/- 0.42 kOmega with stylet. When the stylet was passed through a 20-gauge nylon catheter, the resistance decreased to 49.2 +/- 1.96 kOmega. When catheters were primed with 10% hypertonic saline, the resistance of both nonreinforced catheters decreased by one third compared with physiologic saline. The electrical resistance of the saline-filled epidural catheters significantly differed among products tested. We conclude that epidural catheterization that is guided by electrical stimulation should be performed only with catheters equipped with spiral stainless steel wire reinforcement or with a stainless steel stylet.
Tamai
Hisayoshi
H
Department of Anesthesiology, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Sawamura
Shigehito
S
Atarashi
Hidenao
H
Takeda
Kenji
K
Ohe
Kazuhiko
K
Hanaoka
Kazuo
K
D000767:Anesthesia, Epidural / Q000295:instrumentation* / Q000379:methods*; D002404:Catheterization; D004553:Electric Conductivity; D017097:Electric Impedance; D004558:Electric Stimulation; D004824:Epidural Space / Q000033:anatomy & histology; D006982:Hypertonic Solutions / Q000737:chemistry; D012965:Sodium Chloride / Q000737:chemistry
D006982:Hypertonic Solutions; D012965:Sodium Chloride