Depression, responsibility, and criminal defenses.
The concepts of voluntary action, agency, free will, and responsibility, while central to moral and legal institutions, are generally poorly understood. Philosophers of law such as H.L.A. Hart, Joel Feinberg, and Robert F. Schopp have contributed significantly to understanding of these concepts through their work on the foundations of criminal defenses, including excuses based on mental illness. In this paper, I summarize and present their valuable insights, in the context of an argument (influenced by personal experience) that clinical depression, even when non-psychotic, may in some cases constitute a legitimate excuse for criminal or otherwise immoral failures to act.
Hannan
Barbara
B
Department of Philosophy, University of New Mexico, MSC03 2140 Albuquerque, NM 87131-0001, USA. bhannan@unm.edu
D003415:Crime / Q000523:psychology*; D003863:Depression / Q000523:psychology*; D006801:Humans; D012941:Social Responsibility