Effect of cell-photosensitizer binding and cell density on microbial photoinactivation.
Photodynamic therapy involves the use of nontoxic dyes called photosensitizers and visible light to produce reactive oxygen species and cell killing. It is being studied as an alternative method of killing pathogens in localized infections due to the increasing problem of multiantibiotic resistance. Although much has been learned about the mechanisms of microbial killing, there is still uncertainty about whether dyes must bind to and penetrate various classes of microbe in order to produce effective killing after illumination. In this report, we compare the interactions of three antimicrobial photosensitizers: rose bengal (RB), toluidine blue O (TBO), and a poly-L-lysine chlorin(e6) conjugate (pL-ce6) with representative members of three classes of pathogens; Escherichia coli (gram-negative bacteria), Staphylococcus aureus (gram-positive bacteria), Candida albicans (yeast). We compared fluence-dependent cell survival after illumination with the appropriate wavelengths of light before and after extracellular dye had been washed out and used three 10-fold dilutions of cell concentration. pL-ce6 was overall the most powerful photosensitizer, was equally effective with and without washing, and showed a strong dependence on cell concentration. TBO was less effective in all cases after washing, and the dependence on cell concentration was less pronounced. RB was ineffective after washing (except for S. aureus) but still showed a dependence on cell concentration. The overall order of susceptibility was S. aureus>E. coli>C. albicans, but C. albicans cells were 10 to 50 times bigger than the bacteria. We conclude that the number and mass of the cells compete both for available dye binding and for extracellularly generated reactive oxygen species.
Demidova
Tatiana N
TN
Massachusetts General Hospital, BAR314B, 40 Blossom Street, Boston, MA 02114-2698, USA.
Hamblin
Michael R
MR
D002176:Candida albicans / Q000187:drug effects / Q000254:growth & development* / Q000378:metabolism; D002735:Chlorophyllides; D004926:Escherichia coli / Q000187:drug effects* / Q000254:growth & development / Q000378:metabolism; D008027:Light; D008826:Microbial Sensitivity Tests; D017319:Photosensitizing Agents / Q000737:chemistry / Q000378:metabolism* / Q000494:pharmacology*; D011107:Polylysine / Q000737:chemistry / Q000378:metabolism / Q000494:pharmacology; D011166:Porphyrins / Q000737:chemistry / Q000378:metabolism / Q000494:pharmacology; D011838:Radiation-Sensitizing Agents / Q000737:chemistry / Q000378:metabolism / Q000494:pharmacology; D012395:Rose Bengal / Q000737:chemistry / Q000378:metabolism / Q000494:pharmacology; D013211:Staphylococcus aureus / Q000187:drug effects* / Q000254:growth & development / Q000378:metabolism; D014048:Tolonium Chloride / Q000737:chemistry / Q000378:metabolism / Q000494:pharmacology
D002735:Chlorophyllides; D017319:Photosensitizing Agents; D011166:Porphyrins; D011838:Radiation-Sensitizing Agents; D014048:Tolonium Chloride; D012395:Rose Bengal; D011107:Polylysine; C062985:phytochlorin