title: Treatment options for prostate cancer: evaluating the evidence.
abstract: Controversy surrounds the management options for localized prostate cancer-conservative management, prostatectomy, and radiation. Choosing among these options is difficult because of long-term side effects that include sexual, urinary, and bowel dysfunction. Some recent studies suggest that patients who have chosen treatment (i.e., radical prostatectomy or radiation) have longer disease-free survival compared with patients who have chosen conservative management (i.e., watchful waiting). However, several biases may artificially enhance the perceived value of treatment and make the interpretation of studies on treatment outcomes difficult. Sources of bias include lead time, length time, and patient selection. Because of the uncertain efficacy of management options and the risk of long-term treatment complications, family physicians need to engage their patients in the decision-making process.
authors.affiliation: Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, University of California, San Diego, School of Medicine, San Diego, California vbhatnagar@ucsd.edu
authors.forename: Vibha
authors.initials: V
authors.lastname: Bhatnagar
authors.forename: Robert M
authors.initials: RM
authors.lastname: Kaplan
mesh_terms: D003376:Counseling; D003657:Decision Making; D006801:Humans; D016365:Liability, Legal; D008297:Male; D010817:Physician-Patient Relations; D011471:Prostatic Neoplasms / Q000523:psychology / Q000628:therapy*