Endografting increases total volume of AAA repairs but not at the expense of open surgery: experience in more than 1000 patients.
OBJECTIVE
To compare the volume of open graft replacements (OGR) for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) versus endovascular aneurysm repairs (EVAR) over time and after modifying selection criteria.


METHODS
A review was conducted of 1021 consecutive patients who underwent AAA repair from 1989 through 2002: 496 elective OGRs for infrarenal AAAs (STANDARD), 289 elective EVARs for infrarenal AAAs, 59 complex OGRs for suprarenal AAAs, and 177 emergent OGRs for ruptured AAAs. Patients from 1995 to 2002 were divided into 2 groups based on shifting treatment strategies; 454 patients were treated by STANDARD or EVAR at the surgeon's discretion between 1995 and 2000 (post EVAR). The second group comprised 161 patients treated in 2001-2002 after the introduction of "high-risk" screening criteria (age > or = 72 years, diabetes mellitus, renal dysfunction, impaired pulmonary function, or ASA class IV) that dictated EVAR whenever anatomically feasible. For comparison, 170 STANDARD repairs performed in the 6 years prior to EVAR served as a control.


RESULTS
While surgery for ruptured AAAs remained fairly stable over the 14-year period, the number of patients undergoing elective repair increased due to the implementation of EVAR. During the 6 years after its introduction, EVAR averaged 34.3 patients per year; after 2001, the annual frequency of EVAR increased to 41.5 (p > 0.05). In like fashion, the rate of STANDARD repairs increased to 41.3 patients per year versus 28.3 before EVAR (p = 0.032). ASA class IV patients increased by almost 9 fold in the recent period versus pre EVAR (p = 0.006). The overall mortality after elective infrarenal AAA repair decreased between the pre and post EVAR periods (6.5% versus 3.7%, p > 0.05) and fell still further to 1.2% in the most recent period (p = 0.021 versus pre EVAR).


CONCLUSIONS
The implementation of an EVAR program increases the total volume of AAA repairs but does not reduce open surgical procedures. By allocating patients to EVAR or open repair based their risk factors, mortality was markedly reduced.
Wolff
Klaus S
KS
Department of Vascular Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Austria.
Prusa
Alexander M
AM
Polterauer
Peter
P
Wibmer
Andreas
A
Schoder
Maria
M
Lammer
Johannes
J
Kretschmer
Georg
G
Huk
Ihor
I
Teufelsbauer
Harald
H
D000368:Aged; D017542:Aneurysm, Ruptured / Q000401:mortality / Q000601:surgery*; D017546:Angioscopy / Q000191:economics / Q000706:statistics & numerical data* / Q000639:trends; D017544:Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal / Q000401:mortality / Q000601:surgery*; D019917:Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation / Q000379:methods / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D005500:Follow-Up Studies; D006801:Humans; D007813:Laparotomy / Q000706:statistics & numerical data* / Q000639:trends; D019370:Observation; D017060:Patient Satisfaction; D011446:Prospective Studies; D012307:Risk Factors; D012422:Rupture, Spontaneous; D015996:Survival Rate / Q000639:trends; D016896:Treatment Outcome