title: Challenges in using nonrandomized studies in systematic reviews of treatment interventions.
abstract: Randomized, controlled trials (RCTs) are firmly established as the standard for determining which medical treatments are effective. In some areas of health care, however, among them surgery, public health, and the organization of health care delivery, most evidence addressing the effectiveness of clinical or policy interventions rests on nonrandomized studies. We examine the use of study designs other than RCTs in Evidence-based Practice Center reports addressing questions of the effectiveness of treatment interventions. These reports offer the opportunity to examine the approaches used and the challenges faced by reviewers when nonrandomized studies are included and their quality assessed. We then offer recommendations for using these studies in systematic reviews of treatment interventions.
authors.affiliation: The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, Maryland 20850, USA. snorris@ahrq.gov
authors.forename: Susan L
authors.initials: SL
authors.lastname: Norris
authors.forename: David
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Atkins
mesh_terms: D002986:Clinical Trials as Topic / Q000592:standards / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D019317:Evidence-Based Medicine / Q000379:methods*; D006801:Humans; D012196:Review Literature as Topic; D009626:Terminology as Topic; D013812:Therapeutics / Q000592:standards*