Acquired distinctiveness and equivalence in human discrimination learning: evidence for an attentional process.
In a first stage of training, participants learned to associate four visual cues (two different colors and two different shapes) with verbal labels. For Group S, one label was applied to both colors and another to both shapes; for Group D, one label was applied to one color and one shape, and the other label to the other cues. When subsequently required to learn a task in which a given motor response was required to one of the colors and one of the shapes, and a different response to the other color and the other shape, Group D learned more readily than Group S. The task was designed so that the associations formed during the first stage of training could not generate differential transfer to the second stage. The results are consistent, however, with the proposal that training in which similar cues are followed by different outcomes will engage a learning process that boosts the attention paid to features that distinguish these cues.
Bonardi
Charlotte
C
University of York, York, England.
Graham
Steven
S
Hall
Geoffrey
G
Mitchell
Chris
C
D001245:Association Learning; D001288:Attention; D003118:Color Perception; D004193:Discrimination Learning; D006801:Humans; D010364:Pattern Recognition, Visual; D011214:Practice, Psychological; D011340:Problem Solving; D011597:Psychomotor Performance; D011930:Reaction Time; D014163:Transfer, Psychology