Causal beliefs and behaviour change post-myocardial infarction: how are they related?
BACKGROUND
Weinman, Petrie, Sharpe, and Walker (2000) showed that the causal attributions of a sample of first-time myocardial infarction (MI) patients and their spouses from Auckland, New Zealand, were associated with changes in health-related behaviour over the first 6 months post-MI. However, their analyses did not control for pre-MI health-related behaviour.


METHODS
This paper reports a re-analyses of the Auckland data, and a replication study conducted with 155 first-time MI patients in Brighton, United Kingdom (UK), to investigate whether baseline attributions for MI were related to health-related behaviour change at 6 months (N=132). Spouses (N=85) also completed the attribution questionnaire at baseline.


RESULTS
There was no consistent relationship between the causal attributions of patients and subsequent behaviour change in Auckland and Brighton. For both samples, causal attributions were associated with pre-MI behaviour.


CONCLUSIONS
The data from both samples suggest that the causal attributions of MI patients and their spouses may be realistic, but not predictive of subsequent changes in behaviour.
French
David P
DP
School of Sport and Exercise Sciences, University of Birmingham, UK. d.p.french.1@bham.ac.uk
James
Delyth
D
Horne
Rob
R
Weinman
John
J
D000368:Aged; D015984:Causality; D003469:Culture; D004739:England; D015444:Exercise / Q000523:psychology; D005247:Feeding Behavior / Q000523:psychology; D005260:Female; D015438:Health Behavior; D006306:Health Surveys; D006801:Humans; D007389:Internal-External Control; D008019:Life Style; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D009203:Myocardial Infarction / Q000209:etiology / Q000517:prevention & control / Q000523:psychology*; D009520:New Zealand; D055502:Secondary Prevention; D013223:Statistics as Topic; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires