title: Discrepancies between the isolation of Salmonella from mesenteric lymph nodes and the results of serological screening in slaughter pigs.
abstract: Most Salmonella control programmes are based on serological testing in the slaughterhouse. However, from a point of view of carcass contamination, it is rather the presence of Salmonella spp. in the animal at the time of slaughter that is important. The aim of this cross-sectional study was to investigate the possible discrepancies between the isolation of Salmonella spp. in the mesenteric lymph nodes and the results of serological screening. In total, 1821 fattening pigs originating from 60 Belgian farrow-to-finish herds were sampled in the slaughterhouse. The serum samples were analysed using an indirect mix-ELISA for the presence of Salmonella antibodies and evaluated at 3 cut-off values namely 10, 20, and 40% Optical Density (OD). All mesenteric lymph node samples were submitted to qualitative Salmonella isolation and a representative number of isolates was serotyped. From each herd, 30 animals were screened both serologically and bacteriologically and the herd was considered as positive when at least one sample was positive. At the herd level, 83.6% (cut-off OD 40%) to 100.0% (cut-off OD 10%) of the herds from which Salmonella had been isolated were evaluated as seropositive. At the individual level, only 34.5% (cut-off OD 40%) to 82.8% (cut-off OD 10%) of the animals from which Salmonella had been isolated were seropositive. Overall, a weak agreement was found between bacteriology and serology for Salmonella diagnosis. If pig herds are categorised using serological tests in the slaughterhouse, one should be aware of the fact that slaughter pigs can still harbour Salmonella spp. in the mesenteric lymph nodes, without being detected in serological tests. The cut-off value used to evaluate a sample as serologically positive and the number of samples per herd are of major importance to classify herds correctly in order to protect human health.
authors.affiliation: Department of Veterinary Public Health and Food Safety, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, Salisburylaan 133, 9820 Merelbeke, Belgium. nathalie.nollet@UGent.be
authors.forename: Nathalie
authors.initials: N
authors.lastname: Nollet
authors.forename: Dominiek
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Maes
authors.forename: Luc
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Duchateau
authors.forename: Veerle
authors.initials: V
authors.lastname: Hautekiet
authors.forename: Kurt
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Houf
authors.forename: Jan
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Van Hoof
authors.forename: Lieven
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: De Zuttera
authors.forename: Aart
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: De Kruif
authors.forename: Rony
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Geers
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D002353:Carrier State / Q000662:veterinary; D008198:Lymph Nodes / Q000382:microbiology*; D012475:Salmonella / Q000302:isolation & purification*; D012481:Salmonella Infections, Animal / Q000382:microbiology*; D012698:Serologic Tests / Q000662:veterinary*; D013552:Swine / Q000382:microbiology*; D013553:Swine Diseases / Q000382:microbiology*