title: Success, safety, and mechanisms of failure of percutaneous coronary intervention for occlusive non-drug-eluting in-stent restenosis versus native artery total occlusion.
abstract: We compared the procedural success, mechanism of failure, and safety of percutaneous coronary intervention in 235 procedures for de novo chronic total occlusions with 78 procedures for chronic occlusive in-stent restenosis. Despite similar rates of procedural success and safety profile, angiographic predictors of successful percutaneous coronary intervention for de novo chronic total occlusions played a limited role in patients who had chronic occlusive in-stent restenosis, and the mechanisms of failure were different.
authors.affiliation: William Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, Michigan 48073, USA.
authors.forename: Amr E
authors.initials: AE
authors.lastname: Abbas
authors.forename: Stacy D
authors.initials: SD
authors.lastname: Brewington
authors.forename: Simon R
authors.initials: SR
authors.lastname: Dixon
authors.forename: Judith
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Boura
authors.forename: Cindy L
authors.initials: CL
authors.lastname: Grines
authors.forename: William W
authors.initials: WW
authors.lastname: O'Neill
mesh_terms: D000368:Aged; D015906:Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary / Q000295:instrumentation*; D002908:Chronic Disease; D017023:Coronary Angiography; D023903:Coronary Restenosis / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging / Q000503:physiopathology / Q000628:therapy; D023921:Coronary Stenosis / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging / Q000503:physiopathology / Q000628:therapy*; D004562:Electrocardiography; D005240:Feasibility Studies; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D012189:Retrospective Studies; D012449:Safety; D015607:Stents; D017211:Treatment Failure