title: Psychology and phenomenology: a clarification.
abstract: Controversies are rampant in contemporary psychology concerning the appropriate method for observing consciousness and the role inner experience should play in psychological theorizing. These conflicting orientations reflect, in part, methodological differences between natural science and human science interpretations of psychology. Humanistic psychology and philosophical phenomenology both employ a human science approach to psychology that seeks to explain behavior in terms of a person's subjective existence. Maslow's and Heidegger's formulations are both fulfillment theories in that they specify moral values that suggest how life ought to be lived. Natural science methodology rejects the possibility that moral imperatives can be validated, whereas human science methodology allows phenomenological convictions to justify recommendations about a fulfilled life and a good society. The social role of psychology is analyzed within the framework of phenomenological convictions and scientific truth.
authors.affiliation: University of California, Santa Barbara, CA, USA. kendler@psych.ucsb.edu
authors.forename: Howard H
authors.initials: HH
authors.lastname: Kendler
mesh_terms: D001527:Behaviorism; D003243:Consciousness; D006801:Humans; D009014:Morals; D011584:Psychology / Q000941:ethics / Q000379:methods*