title: Morphometric analysis of particulate debris extracted by four different embolic protection devices from coronary arteries, aortocoronary saphenous vein conduits, and carotid arteries.
abstract: Different embolic protection devices have been introduced for endovascular interventions: filters or balloon occlusion and aspiration systems. Despite widening use in a variety of vascular beds and clinical syndromes, little is known about the particulate burden liberated from different vascular beds and caught by different protection devices. We performed histologic and morphometric analyses of particulate debris captured during stenting of degenerated saphenous vein bypass grafts and native coronary arteries during acute myocardial infarction or during elective intervention and carotid arteries to assess the relative performance of different protection devices. We analyzed 232 interventions (90 saphenous vein bypass grafts, 77 native coronary arteries, and 65 carotid arteries) with 4 different devices (65 FilterWires, 99 Interceptors, 41 GuardWires, and 27 Proxis catheters) using the RapidVue particle analyzer. No difference in embolic volume retrieved was demonstrated between devices in saphenous vein bypass grafts and carotid interventions. A smaller volume of particulate debris was retrieved by the GuardWire compared with the FilterWire and the Proxis catheter in native coronary artery interventions. The Interceptor and the GuardWire captured more smaller particles than did the FilterWire or Proxis catheter. During saphenous vein bypass graft or carotid intervention, different embolic protection strategies were performed similarly. In native coronary artery stenting, however, proximal embolic protection retrieved larger amounts of debris than did distal filters or occlusion devices. These data may allow greater tailoring of embolic protection device development and application in specific anatomic locales.
authors.affiliation: Cardiovascular Division (Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory), Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA.
authors.forename: Vu-Hung
authors.initials: VH
authors.lastname: Quan
authors.forename: Rany
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Huynh
authors.forename: Philip A
authors.initials: PA
authors.lastname: Seifert
authors.forename: Arun
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Kuchela
authors.forename: Wai-Hong
authors.initials: WH
authors.lastname: Chen
authors.forename: Gabor
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Sütsch
authors.forename: Andrew C
authors.initials: AC
authors.lastname: Eisenhauer
authors.forename: Campbell
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Rogers
mesh_terms: D001157:Arterial Occlusive Diseases / Q000601:surgery; D019917:Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation / Q000295:instrumentation; D002339:Carotid Arteries / Q000473:pathology* / Q000601:surgery; D001026:Coronary Artery Bypass / Q000009:adverse effects*; D003331:Coronary Vessels / Q000473:pathology* / Q000601:surgery; D004617:Embolism / Q000209:etiology / Q000473:pathology / Q000517:prevention & control*; D005374:Filtration / Q000295:instrumentation; D006801:Humans; D017202:Myocardial Ischemia / Q000601:surgery; D012086:Reoperation; D012189:Retrospective Studies; D012501:Saphenous Vein / Q000473:pathology* / Q000637:transplantation; D012720:Severity of Illness Index; D015607:Stents; D013396:Suction / Q000295:instrumentation; D016896:Treatment Outcome