A model of exact small-number representation.
To account for the size effect in numerical comparison, three assumptions about the internal structure of the mental number line (e.g., Dehaene, 1992) have been proposed. These are magnitude coding (e.g., Zorzi & Butterworth, 1999), compressed scaling (e.g., Dehaene, 1992), and increasing variability (e.g., Gallistel & Gelman, 1992). However, there are other tasks besides numerical comparison for which there is clear evidence that the mental number line is accessed, and no size effect has been observed in these tasks. This is contrary to the predictions of these three assumptions. Moreover, all three assumptions have difficulties explaining certain symmetries in priming studies of number naming and parity judgment. We propose a neural network model that avoids these three assumptions but, instead, uses place coding, linear scaling, and constant variability on the mental number line. We train the model on naming, parity judgment, and comparison and show that the size effect appears in comparison, but not in naming or parity judgment. Moreover, no asymmetries appear in primed naming or primed parity judgment with this model, in line with empirical data. Implications of our findings are discussed.
Verguts
Tom
T
Department of Experimental Psychology, Ghent University, H. Dunantlaan 2, 9000 Ghent, Belgium. tom.verguts@ugent.be
Fias
Wim
W
Stevens
Michaël
M
D032882:Comprehension; D003210:Concept Formation; D004193:Discrimination Learning; D006801:Humans; D007600:Judgment; D008962:Models, Theoretical; D016571:Neural Networks, Computer; D010364:Pattern Recognition, Visual; D011340:Problem Solving; D011930:Reaction Time; D012660:Semantics; D012858:Size Perception