New neuroscience, old problems: legal implications of brain science.
Despite a large and growing interest in applying brain science to the ends of justice, the implications of neuroscience for the law are still unclear. But Stephen Morse argues that, unless discoveries about the brain radically change our conception of ourselves, they are unlikely to fundamentally alter legal doctrine. For most challenges the findings might raise to justice, equality, and liberty, he writes, the law has rich theoretical resources with which to address them. On the other hand, the author acknowledges, one can easily imagine substantial changes in particular doctrines.
Morse
Stephen J
SJ
D001519:Behavior; D001921:Brain; D002961:Civil Rights; D003416:Criminal Law; D003417:Criminal Psychology / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D005610:Freedom; D006708:Homicide / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence; D006801:Humans; D007298:Insanity Defense; D016743:Mental Competency; D009488:Neurosciences / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D028723:Personhood; D012941:Social Responsibility