The past, present, and future of bone morphometry: its contribution to an improved understanding of bone biology.
It was not until the 1950s that a better paradigm for bone biology evolved, which led to the birth of bone histomorphometry. Two clinicians, Harold Frost (1958-1964) and Lent Johnson (1964), were responsible for the paradigm stating that the primary function of bone is mechanical load bearing with subsidiary function to participate in plasma calcium homeostasis to support hematopoesis. Dynamic bone histomorphometry was born when Milch et al. (1958) discovered bone localization of tetracycline and Frost generated the methodology to study tetracycline-based dynamic histological analysis of cortical bone remodeling (1961-1965). Dynamic bone histomorphometry did not blossom until Frost, while a Sun Valley Workshop participant, developed it to address trabecular bone dynamics. The combination of Arnold (1948) producing thin sections of plastic-embedded undecalcified bone and Frost's (1977-1983) modification of dynamic cortical bone histology for cancellous bone made it possible to study tetracycline-based dynamic histomorphometry of cancellous bone. It led to the better understanding of basic metabolic unit (BMU) remodelling and to Frost's mechanostat hypothesis, and characterized the rat model to accelerate the development of several drugs in the treatment of bone diseases. Currently, dynamic bone histomorphometry has contributed to studies in bone's mechanical usage windows, mechanical usage setpoint hypothesis, muscle-bone relations, marrow-bone relations, the Utah paradigm of musculoskeletal physiology, apoptosis, genetics (transgenic mice) and bone structure, bone quality, the lacunocanalicular network and bone modelling, and remodeling hypothesis, osteocyte role as mechanosensory, chemosensory, and regulatory in bone maintenance, targeted and untargeted remodeling, the role of permissive agents, etc., items in bone biology expounded briefly by Lent Johnson (1965) and continuously by Harold Frost at the Sun Valley Workshop (1965-2003). Finally, "What's next?" covers how to improve and perpetuate the employing of qualitative histomorphometry in research opportunities in hard tissue research.
Jee
Webster S S
WS
Radiobiology Division, University of Utah School of Medicine, 729 Arapeen Drive, Suite 2338, Salt Lake City, UT 84108-1218, USA. webster.jee@hsc.utah.edu
D000818:Animals; D001695:Biology / Q000266:history / Q000639:trends; D015519:Bone Density; D001846:Bone Development / Q000502:physiology*; D016723:Bone Remodeling / Q000502:physiology*; D001842:Bone and Bones / Q000502:physiology*; D049673:History, 20th Century; D049674:History, 21st Century; D006801:Humans; D014589:Utah