Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry with goldman applanation tonometry over a wide range of central corneal thickness.
OBJECTIVE
To compare dynamic contour tonometry with Goldmann applanation tonometry in structurally normal corneas over a wide range of central corneal thickness (CCT).


METHODS
Twenty-five patients each with normal CCT (group A), thin corneas (group B), and thick corneas (group C) had IOP measured with the Goldmann (GAT) and dynamic contour tonometer (DCT).


RESULTS
In group A (mean CCT = 552 +/- 16 microm) the mean GAT was 15.9 +/- 3.1 mm Hg and mean DCT was 16 +/- 3.3 mm Hg (P = 0.91). In group B (mean CCT = 491 +/- 19 microm) the mean GAT was 13.2 +/- 3.5 mm Hg and the mean DCT was 15.9 +/- 3.5 mm Hg (P = 0.009). For group C (mean CCT = 615 +/- 22 microm), the mean GAT was 17.4 +/- 3.8 mm Hg and the mean DCT was 17.4 +/- 3.5 mm Hg (P = 0.95). The 95% agreement limits for DCT were -3.1 mm Hg to 2.9 mm Hg. The mean GAT-DCT difference was -2.6 mm Hg in thin corneas and -0.06 mm Hg in thick corneas. Below 520 microm reduction of 10 microm in CCT appears to result in a significant underestimation of the GAT IOP by 0.7 mm Hg (P < .001) and above 580 microm a non-significant overestimation of 0.2 mm Hg per 10 microm increase in CCT (P = 0.27).


CONCLUSIONS
Dynamic contour tonometer agrees well on average with GAT but the agreement limits are wide. In structurally normal thin corneas DCT may give a more accurate assessment of the true IOP but it does not appear to have any benefit over GAT in thick corneas.
Doyle
Aoife
A
Institut du Glaucome Fondation, Hopital St. Joseph, Paris, France. aoife@fusio.net
Lachkar
Yves
Y
D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D003315:Cornea / Q000033:anatomy & histology*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007429:Intraocular Pressure / Q000502:physiology*; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D011446:Prospective Studies; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D014065:Tonometry, Ocular / Q000379:methods*