Institutional challenges for EIA implementation in China: a case study of development versus environmental protection.
This paper provides a complete case study analysis of environmental impact assessment (EIA) implementation in China from planning to legal challenge, which is typical but rarely reported. The analysis takes an historical perspective on the regulatory and institutional structures through which EIA has been implemented in China, in order to evaluate the extent to which EIA has matured over the last 10 years. The case study relates to a proposed recreation/tourist development at Dianshan Lake, a protected water resource for Shanghai. Legal and administrative challenge began in 1993, when the case was initiated with a letter from the public, and concluded in 1996, when the case was decided in a court judgment. More recent follow-up research indicates that many issues have continued to be problems for EIA implementation in China. Policy implications in terms of regulatory structure, institutional arrangement, EIA procedure, EIA practitioners, and public participation can be drawn, and lessons learned for both the government and the developers. The study emphasizes the problem of relying on reorientation of existing institutions to promote new (environmental) priorities.
Gu
Lixin
L
Environmental Policy and Management Group, Department of Environmental Science and Technology, South Kensington Campus, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, UK.
Sheate
William R
WR
D002681:China; D004777:Environment; D004787:Environmental Pollution / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence* / Q000517:prevention & control*; D006801:Humans; D019982:Organizational Case Studies; D011050:Policy Making