To house or not to house: the effects of providing housing to homeless substance abusers in treatment.
OBJECTIVE
Housing typically is not provided to homeless persons during drug abuse treatment. We examined how treatment outcomes were affected under 3 different housing provision conditions.


METHODS
We studied 196 cocaine-dependent participants who received day treatment and no housing (NH), housing contingent on drug abstinence (ACH), or housing not contingent on abstinence (NACH). Drug use was monitored with urine testing.


RESULTS
The ACH group had a higher prevalence of drug abstinence than the NACH group (after control for treatment attendance), which in turn had a higher prevalence than the NH group. All 3 groups showed significant improvement in maintaining employment and housing.


CONCLUSIONS
The results of this and previous trials indicate that providing abstinence-contingent housing to homeless substance abusers in treatment is an efficacious, effective, and practical intervention. Programs to provide such housing should be considered in policy initiatives.
Department of Psychology-CH415, University of Al-abama at Birmingham, 1530 3rd Ave S, Birmingham, AL 35294-1170, USA. jmilby@uab.edu
Jesse B
JB
Milby
Joseph E
JE
Schumacher
Dennis
D
Wallace
Michelle J
MJ
Freedman
Rudy E
RE
Vuchinich
D000328:Adult; D000407:Alabama; D019970:Cocaine-Related Disorders / Q000453:epidemiology / Q000628:therapy*; D005260:Female; D006703:Ill-Housed Persons / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D015995:Prevalence; D011638:Public Housing