DARPA on your mind.
Applied science may once again play a decisive role in changing the face of armed conflict, and the rest of human affairs, by shifting the battlefield to our very brains. The national-security establishment--and particularly the Pentagon's Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA)--supports research at the intersection of neuroscience and national security that could ultimately enable authorities to do things like enhance (or muddle, or erase) memory, monitor crowds for individuals whose brain patterns correlate with aggressive behaviors, or control weapons from afar merely with thoughts. What are the dangers of such information falling into "the wrong hands," and are there any "right hands" for this kind of knowledge? Is any extension of human abilities justified by the need for government to protect its society?
Jonathan D
JD
Moreno
D032763:Behavior Control / Q000941:ethics*; D035841:Behavioral Research / Q000941:ethics*; D024803:Biomedical Enhancement / Q000941:ethics*; D006077:Government Agencies; D006801:Humans; D008568:Memory; D008889:Military Personnel / Q000523:psychology; D009488:Neurosciences / Q000941:ethics*; D033281:Nontherapeutic Human Experimentation / Q000941:ethics*; D011619:Psychotropic Drugs; D011640:Public Policy; D012109:Research Support as Topic; D014481:United States; D014857:Warfare
D011619:Psychotropic Drugs