The local lymph node assay being too sensitive?
The local lymph node assay (LLNA) and modifications thereof were recently recognized by the OECD as stand-alone methods for the detection of skin-sensitizing potential. However, although the validity of the LLNA was acknowledged by the ICCVAM, attention was drawn to one major problem, i.e., the possibility of false positive results caused by non-specific cell activation as a result of inflammatory processes in the skin (irritation). This is based on the fact that inflammatory processes in the skin may lead to non-specific activation of dendritic cells, cell migration and non-specific proliferation of lymph node cells. Measuring cell proliferation by radioactive or non-radioactive methods, without taking the irritating properties of test items into account, leads thus to false positive reactions. In this paper, we have compared both endpoints: (1) cell proliferation alone and (2) cell proliferation in combination with inflammatory (irritating) processes. It turned out that a considerable number of tests were "false positive" to the definition mentioned above. By excluding such false positive results the LLNA seems not to be more sensitive than relevant guinea pig assays. These various methods and results are described here.
Hans-Werner
Vohr
V
Toxicology, Bayer HealthCare AG, Aprather Weg, 42096 Wuppertal, Germany. Hans-werner.vohr@bayerhealthcare.com
Jürgen
Ahr Hans
AH
D000485:Allergens / Q000633:toxicity*; D000818:Animals; D049109:Cell Proliferation / Q000187:drug effects; D017449:Dermatitis, Allergic Contact; D005189:False Positive Reactions; D005260:Female; D006168:Guinea Pigs; D007509:Irritants / Q000633:toxicity*; D023441:Local Lymph Node Assay; D051379:Mice; D008815:Mice, Inbred Strains; D010328:Patch Tests; D011237:Predictive Value of Tests; D015203:Reproducibility of Results
D000485:Allergens; D007509:Irritants