title: Measurement validity in ophthalmology.
abstract: Measurements in ophthalmic research may be of parameters such as visual functions, quality of life or physical measures and can involve different types of instruments such as questionnaires and mechanical, chemical or electronic devices. Whatever the mode of measurement, however, all these devices require sufficient evidence for validity before inferences can be made on the basis of their findings. This article explores the nature and often overlooked importance of validity and explains some of the terminology involved. It discusses the main forms that ophthalmologists should be aware of before they can assess whether the instruments, old and new, are providing results upon which inferences can be made with any level of confidence. The literature search involved use of Medline, PubMed and Ovid as well as referenced papers in journals and books. Searches were comprehensive and international. Foreign texts were translated.
authors: Manchester Eye Hospital, Manchester, England, U.K. TAslam@aol.com
authors: Tariq M
authors: TM
authors: Aslam
authors: Niall
authors: N
authors: Patton
mesh_terms: D003625:Data Collection / Q000592:standards*; D004812:Epidemiologic Methods; D006801:Humans; D009885:Ophthalmology; D011788:Quality of Life; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires; D014792:Visual Acuity