title: Comparison of radial forearm with fibula and scapula osteocutaneous free flaps for oromandibular reconstruction.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  To compare our experience with the osteocutaneous radial forearm free flap (group 1) (n = 108) with other commonly used osteocutaneous free flaps (group 2) (n = 56) such as the fibula and scapula in single-stage oromandibular reconstruction.
  
  
  METHODS
  Retrospective case review.
  
  
  METHODS
  Tertiary-care academic medical center.
  
  
  METHODS
  One hundred sixty-three consecutive patients who underwent 164 mandibular reconstructions with osteocutaneous free flaps.
  
  
  METHODS
  Assessment of preoperative and intraoperative variables for both groups. We compared recipient-site complication rate, intensive care unit stay, total hospital stay, and postoperative function.
  
  
  RESULTS
  The most common donor site used was the radius (n = 108 [66%]), followed by the fibula (n = 36 [22%]) and scapula (n = 20 [12%]). Mean follow-up was 29 months (range, 1-116 months). Group 2 patients had larger soft tissue and/or bony defects. Surgical and medical complication rates and major donor site morbidity in group 1 were similar or better when compared with those in group 2. The lengths of the intensive care unit (4 vs 7 days; P = .009) and hospital stays (13 vs 15 days; P = .06) were shorter in group 1. Although the microvascular success rate was similar in both groups, the local wound complication rate was significantly better for group 1. The difference for the length of intensive care unit stay was statistically significant and potentially amounts to more than 6000 dollars of savings. Functional outcomes, including the ability to tolerate oral diet, tracheostomy presence, and dental rehabilitation, were similar between the groups.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The primary site long-term morbidity, donor site morbidity, and postoperative function of osteocutaneous radial forearm free flaps are comparable to those of other commonly used osteocutaneous free flaps such as the fibula and scapula when used in single-stage oromandibular reconstruction.
authors: Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City 66160, USA.
authors: Oleg N
authors: ON
authors: Militsakh
authors: Andreas
authors: A
authors: Werle
authors: Nadia
authors: N
authors: Mohyuddin
authors: E Bruce
authors: EB
authors: Toby
authors: J David
authors: JD
authors: Kriet
authors: Derrick I
authors: DI
authors: Wallace
authors: Douglas A
authors: DA
authors: Girod
authors: Terance T
authors: TT
authors: Tsue
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D005260:Female; D005360:Fibula; D005500:Follow-Up Studies; D005542:Forearm; D006801:Humans; D007362:Intensive Care Units / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D007902:Length of Stay; D008297:Male; D008334:Mandible / Q000601:surgery*; D008875:Middle Aged; D011884:Radius; D019651:Plastic Surgery Procedures / Q000191:economics / Q000379:methods* / Q000534:rehabilitation; D012189:Retrospective Studies; D012540:Scapula; D013524:Surgical Flaps; D016896:Treatment Outcome