Test-retest reliability and practice effects of a rapid screen of mild traumatic brain injury.
Test-retest reliabilities and practice effects of measures from the Rapid Screen of Concussion (RSC), in addition to the Digit Symbol Substitution Test (Digit Symbol), were examined. Twenty five male participants were tested three times; each testing session scheduled a week apart. The test-retest reliability estimates for most measures were reasonably good, ranging from .79 to .97. An exception was the delayed word recall test, which has had a reliability estimate of .66 for the first retest, and .59 for the second retest. Practice effects were evident from Times 1 to 2 on the sentence comprehension and delayed recall subtests of the RSC, Digit Symbol and a composite score. There was also a practice effect of the same magnitude found from Time 2 to Time 3 on Digit Symbol, delayed recall and the composite score. Statistics on measures for both the first and second retest intervals, with associated practice effects, are presented to enable the calculation of reliable change indices (RCI). The RCI may be used to assess any improvement in cognitive functioning after mild Traumatic Brain Injury.
De Monte
Veronica Eileen
VE
Cognitive Psychophysiology Laboratory, University of Queensland, Queensland 4006, Australia. comerf@psy.uq.edu.au
Geffen
Gina Malke
GM
Kwapil
Karleigh
K
D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D000704:Analysis of Variance; D001930:Brain Injuries / Q000503:physiopathology*; D003072:Cognition Disorders / Q000503:physiopathology*; D016001:Confidence Intervals; D006801:Humans; D007600:Judgment / Q000502:physiology; D008297:Male; D011939:Mental Recall / Q000502:physiology*; D009483:Neuropsychological Tests; D021641:Recognition, Psychology / Q000502:physiology; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D012680:Sensitivity and Specificity