Medical information, confidentiality and a child's right to privacy.
Following the Gillick case in 1986, it was recognised that mature minors were owed a duty of confidentiality in respect of their medical information. Subsequent cases confirmed that the duty was also owed to non-competent children, including infants, but without explaining the basis for finding the existence of such a duty and its scope. It is particularly unclear when and upon what legal basis a doctor could disclose information to parents when their child wished to keep it confidential. This paper will examine the law of confidentiality as it applies to children, identifying issues which are problematic. Developments in the law of personal confidences which have taken place as a result of the Human Rights Act 1998, and the recognition of Article 8 rights as part of the law, will be reviewed and analysed from the perspective of the duty of confidence owed to children in respect of their medical information. Finally, the paper will offer an explanation of a basis for disclosure to parents which minimises violations of a minor's autonomy.
Loughrey
Joan
J
University of Central Lancashire, UK.
D000293:Adolescent; D002648:Child; D002961:Civil Rights; D003219:Confidentiality / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D030881:Disclosure / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence; D006801:Humans; D007223:Infant; D007258:Informed Consent / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence; D016743:Mental Competency; D033242:Minors / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D035622:Parental Notification / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D010290:Parents; D010817:Physician-Patient Relations; D018907:Privacy / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence; D006113:United Kingdom