Pseudo cluster randomization: a treatment allocation method to minimize contamination and selection bias.
In some clinical trials, treatment allocation on a patient level is not feasible, and whole groups or clusters of patients are allocated to the same treatment. If, for example, a clinical trial is investigating the efficacy of various patient coaching methods and randomization is done on a patient level, then patients who are receiving different methods may come into contact with each other and influence each other. This would create contamination of the treatment effects. Such bias might be prevented by randomization on the coaches level. The patients of a coach constitute a cluster and all the subjects in that cluster receive the same treatment. Disadvantages of this approach may be reduced statistical efficiency and recruitment bias, as the treatment that a subject will receive is known in advance. Pseudo cluster randomization avoids this, because in pseudo cluster randomization, not everybody in a certain cluster receives the same treatment, just the majority. There are two groups of clusters: in one group the majority of subjects receive treatment A, while a limited number receive treatment B. In the other group of clusters the proportions are reversed. The statistical properties of this method are described. When contamination is present, the method appears to be more efficient than randomization on a patient level or on a cluster level.
Borm
George F
GF
Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. g.borm@epib.umcn.nl
Melis
René J F
RJ
Teerenstra
Steven
S
Peer
Petronella G
PG
D015982:Bias; D001699:Biometry; D016000:Cluster Analysis; D006801:Humans; D015233:Models, Statistical; D011897:Random Allocation; D016032:Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*