Seatbelt non-use and car crash injury: an interview study.
OBJECTIVE
To examine the relationship between seatbelt non-use at the time of a crash, habitual non-use of seatbelts, and car crash injury; and to calculate the population attributable risk for car crash injury due to seatbelt non-use.


METHODS
A population-based case control, interview study in Auckland, New Zealand, with 571 injured or killed drivers as cases and 588 population-based controls randomly selected from the driving population.


RESULTS
Unbelted drivers had 10 times the risk of involvement in an injury crash compared to belted drivers after adjustment for multiple confounders. Habitual non-users were likely to be unbelted when involved in a crash. The population attributable risk for seatbelt non-use was 13%.


CONCLUSIONS
Non-use of seatbelts is very strongly associated with increased injury crash involvement. Even where seatbelt use rates are higher than 90%, there remains a small group of habitual non-users who are at high risk; these drivers may benefit from targeted interventions.
Blows
Stephanie
S
The George Institute for International Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia. sblows@thegeorgeinstitute.org
Ivers
Rebecca Q
RQ
Connor
Jennie
J
Ameratunga
Shanthi
S
Ameratunga
Mark
M
Norton
Robyn
R
D000063:Accidents, Traffic; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007407:Interviews as Topic; D008297:Male; D012307:Risk Factors; D012622:Seat Belts / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D014947:Wounds and Injuries / Q000209:etiology* / Q000401:mortality