title: When parents refuse consent to treatment for children and young persons.
abstract: One of the most difficult ethical dilemmas in paediatric practice is parental refusal to consent to life-saving treatment for their children. The ethical principles in such situations are complex. Although the 'best interests' of the child are of primary concern, these must be understood widely, as including all and not just medical interests. Though ultimately the courts must decide on a course of action where refusal is continued, we believe that in non-emergency cases consultation with a properly constituted multidisciplinary group will be of assistance. A national group of this kind has been recommended for New Zealand. This will ensure that all aspects of the cases are considered and can lessen the sense of 'parent versus medical profession' opposition. If this does not lead to a resolution, the opinion of the courts may be of assistance. Following a brief discussion of important ethical considerations, this article outlines a suggested constitution for an advisory committee and a set of guidelines for clinicians faced with parental refusal of treatment for their children.
authors: Starship Children's Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand. ralphp@adhb.govt.nz
authors: Ralph
authors: R
authors: Pinnock
authors: Jan
authors: J
authors: Crosthwaite
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D002648:Child; D002675:Child, Preschool; D006801:Humans; D007258:Informed Consent; D009520:New Zealand; D033282:Parental Consent; D010290:Parents; D010372:Pediatrics / Q000941:ethics*; D013222:State Medicine; D016312:Treatment Refusal