title: Magnetic resonance colonography without bowel cleansing using oral and rectal stool softeners (fecal cracking)--a feasibility study.
abstract: The aim of our study was to assess the effect of oral and rectal stool softeners on dark-lumen magnetic resonance (MR) colonography without bowel cleansing. Ten volunteers underwent MR colonography without colonic cleansing. A baseline examination was performed without oral or rectal administration of stool softeners. In a second set, volunteers ingested 60 ml of lactulose 24 h prior to MR examination. In a third examination, water as a rectal enema was replaced by a solution of 0.5%-docusate sodium (DS). A fourth MR examination was performed, in conjunction with both oral administration of lactulose and rectal application of DS. A T1-weighted data set was acquired at scanning times of 0, 5 and 10 min after colonic filling. A fourth data set was acquired 75 s after i.v. injection of contrast agent. Signal intensity of stool was calculated for all colonic segments. Without oral ingestion of lactulose or rectal enema with DS stool signal intensity was high and did not decrease over time. However, lactulose and DS caused a decrease in stool signal intensity. Both substances together led to a decreasing signal intensity of feces. Combination of lactulose and DS provided the lowest signal intensity of stool. Thus, feces could hardly be distinguished from dark rectal enema allowing for the assessment of the colonic wall.
authors: Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital of Essen, Hufelandstrasse 55, 45122, Essen, Germany. Waleed.ajaj@uni-essen.de
authors: Waleed
authors: W
authors: Ajaj
authors: Thomas C
authors: TC
authors: Lauenstein
authors: Hubert
authors: H
authors: Schneemann
authors: Christiane
authors: C
authors: Kuehle
authors: Christoph U
authors: CU
authors: Herborn
authors: Susanne C
authors: SC
authors: Goehde
authors: Stefan G
authors: SG
authors: Ruehm
authors: Mathias
authors: M
authors: Goyen
mesh_terms: D000284:Administration, Oral; D000285:Administration, Rectal; D000328:Adult; D003106:Colon / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging*; D023881:Colonography, Computed Tomographic / Q000379:methods; D003287:Contrast Media / Q000008:administration & dosage; D004143:Dioctyl Sulfosuccinic Acid / Q000008:administration & dosage* / Q000009:adverse effects; D004733:Enema; D005240:Feasibility Studies; D005243:Feces; D005260:Female; D005765:Gastrointestinal Agents / Q000008:administration & dosage* / Q000009:adverse effects; D006801:Humans; D007091:Image Processing, Computer-Assisted; D021621:Imaging, Three-Dimensional; D007275:Injections, Intravenous; D007792:Lactulose / Q000008:administration & dosage* / Q000009:adverse effects; D008279:Magnetic Resonance Imaging; D008297:Male; D008536:Meglumine / Q000008:administration & dosage / Q000031:analogs & derivatives; D008875:Middle Aged; D009942:Organometallic Compounds / Q000008:administration & dosage; D012016:Reference Values; D013501:Surface-Active Agents / Q000008:administration & dosage* / Q000009:adverse effects
chemical_list: D003287:Contrast Media; D005765:Gastrointestinal Agents; D009942:Organometallic Compounds; D013501:Surface-Active Agents; D004143:Dioctyl Sulfosuccinic Acid; C064572:gadobenic acid; D007792:Lactulose; D008536:Meglumine