Comparison of sagittal contour and posterior disc height following interbody fusion: threaded cylindrical cages versus structural allograft versus vertical cages.
OBJECTIVE
Segmental restoration of sagittal contour is recognized as critical for improved long-term success following instrumented lumbar fusions. As such, the use of wedged implants has become more popular. Few studies exist to assess the postoperative lordotic and disc height changes following these varied techniques in spinal fusion. An observational radiographic study examining lumbar sagittal contour and posterior intervertebral disc space height following posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) or transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) was conducted using vertical cages (VCs), wedged structural allograft (WSA), and threaded cylindrical cages (TCCs).


METHODS
Forty-nine consecutive patients (59 spinal segments) were evaluated following single- or two-level interbody fusion with either stand-alone TCCs (n = 18 levels), WSA with posterior transpedicular compression instrumentation (n = 25 levels), or VCs with posterior transpedicular compression instrumentation (n = 16 levels). Standing lumbar radiographs were measured by two independent observers preoperatively, immediately postoperatively (within 1 week), at 6-week follow-up (range 4-8 weeks), and postoperatively (at 1-year follow-up) for segmental lordosis at each level undergoing posterior interbody arthrodesis and posterior intervertebral disc space height to assess indirect nerve root decompression.


RESULTS
At the 1-year follow-up, postoperative lordosis was improved in the VC group (+5.3 degrees ; P < 0.005), whereas it decreased in the WSA group (-0.9 degrees ; P = 0.407) and TCC group (-3.5 degrees ; P < 0.005). The posterior disc space height decreased in the VC group (-0.5 mm; P = 0.109), whereas it increased for both the WSA group (+1.2 mm; P = 0.05) and the TCC group (+0.8 mm; P = 0.219).


CONCLUSIONS
PLIF with stand-alone TCC and PLIF (or TLIF) with WSA and posterior transpedicular instrumentation results in an increased posterior disc height and thus improved indirect nerve root decompression. PLIF (or TLIF) with VC and posterior transpedicular instrumentation results in an overall decrease in posterior disc height. However, TCC and WSA resulted in a loss of lumbar lordosis, whereas VC resulted in an increase in lumbar lordosis.
Groth
Adam T
AT
Orthopaedic Surgery Service, Walter Reed Army Medical Center, Washington, DC 20007, USA. adam.groth@na.amedd.army.mil
Kuklo
Timothy R
TR
Klemme
William R
WR
Polly
David W
DW
Schroeder
Teresa M
TM
D000328:Adult; D016025:Bone Transplantation / Q000009:adverse effects; D004867:Equipment Design; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D016268:Internal Fixators / Q000009:adverse effects; D007403:Intervertebral Disc / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging*; D008141:Lordosis / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging; D008159:Lumbar Vertebrae / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging* / Q000601:surgery*; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D011184:Postoperative Period; D011859:Radiography; D013123:Spinal Fusion / Q000009:adverse effects / Q000295:instrumentation / Q000379:methods*; D013131:Spine / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging*; D014184:Transplantation, Homologous