Branch-length prior influences Bayesian posterior probability of phylogeny.
The Bayesian method for estimating species phylogenies from molecular sequence data provides an attractive alternative to maximum likelihood with nonparametric bootstrap due to the easy interpretation of posterior probabilities for trees and to availability of efficient computational algorithms. However, for many data sets it produces extremely high posterior probabilities, sometimes for apparently incorrect clades. Here we use both computer simulation and empirical data analysis to examine the effect of the prior model for internal branch lengths. We found that posterior probabilities for trees and clades are sensitive to the prior for internal branch lengths, and priors assuming long internal branches cause high posterior probabilities for trees. In particular, uniform priors with high upper bounds bias Bayesian clade probabilities in favor of extreme values. We discuss possible remedies to the problem, including empirical and full Bayesian methods and subjective procedures suggested in Bayesian hypothesis testing. Our results also suggest that the bootstrap proportion and Bayesian posterior probability are different measures of accuracy, and that the bootstrap proportion, if interpreted as the probability that the clade is true, can be either too liberal or too conservative.
Yang
Ziheng
Z
Department of Biology, University College London, Darwin Building, Gower Street London WC1E 6BT, United Kingdom. z.yang@ucl.ac.uk
Rannala
Bruce
B
D001499:Bayes Theorem; D002965:Classification / Q000379:methods*; D003198:Computer Simulation; D003627:Data Interpretation, Statistical; D008957:Models, Genetic; D010802:Phylogeny; D010944:Plants / Q000235:genetics; D011336:Probability