The dynamics of experimentally induced criterion shifts.
Investigations of decision making have typically assumed stationarity, even though commonly observed "context effects" are dynamic by definition. Mirror effects are an important class of context effects that can be explained by changes in participants' decision criteria. When easy and difficult conditions are blocked alternately and a mirror effect is observed, participants must repeatedly change their decision criteria. The authors investigated the time course of these criterion changes and observed the buildup of mirror effects on a trial-by-trial basis. The data are consistent with slow, systematic changes in decision criteria that lag behind stimulus changes. The length of this lag is considerable: analysis of a simple dynamic signal-detection model suggests participants take an average of around 14 trials to adjust to new decision environments. This trial-level measurement of experimentally induced changes has implications for traditional blockwise analyses of data and for models of decision making.
Brown
Scott
S
Department of Cognitive Sciences, University of California-Irvine, 3151 Social Sciences Plaza, Irvine, CA 92697-5100, USA. scottb@uci.edu
Steyvers
Mark
M
D001288:Attention; D002755:Choice Behavior; D003657:Decision Making; D003661:Decision Support Techniques; D004193:Discrimination Learning; D005246:Feedback; D006801:Humans; D010364:Pattern Recognition, Visual; D011340:Problem Solving; D011597:Psychomotor Performance; D011601:Psychophysics; D011930:Reaction Time; D011932:Reading; D012660:Semantics