title: Why do they hate us, thick and thin?
abstract: Immediately after the September 11, 2001 terrorist strikes on the World Trade Center Towers, the Pentagon, and a plane over Pennsylvania, many in the West, but particularly the United States of America, felt urgently the pain of the question 'Why do they hate us?' in relation both to those who directly perpetrated those dreadful events and to those who sympathised with their perpetrators. In this paper, I will offer an account of some of the conceptual issues at stake in addressing seriously such a question as an opportunity for self-examination. I will argue that questions of this kind are the very warp and weft of international relations at their most serious levels and that the often glib demonisation of 'them' who hate us serves us badly in coming to terms with the problems the West faces in its relations with the Muslim world. I use this most pressing of international relations issues as a test of the prospects of Utilitarianism as a viable 'ethics of international relations' arguing that its notions of the good and its resources for criticism of desires and preferences are a cause for scandal in our inter-cultural negotiations with other traditions of civilization, particularly the Muslim civilization. In many ways, rather than being part of the solution, Utilitarianism is part of the problem.
authors.affiliation: School of Philosophy, ACU National, MSM Campus, Strathfield, Australia. j.quilter@mary.acu.edu.au
authors.forename: John G
authors.initials: JG
authors.lastname: Quilter
mesh_terms: D028663:Ethical Theory; D006791:Hostility; D006801:Humans; D038622:Internationality; D007514:Islam; D047851:September 11 Terrorist Attacks; D014481:United States; D019366:Western World