title: Office hysteroscopic sterilization compared with laparoscopic sterilization: a critical cost analysis.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  To evaluate the actual cost difference in performing Essure hysteroscopic sterilization in the office compared with ambulatory surgery using laparoscopic sterilization in the operating room.
  
  
  METHODS
  Cost-comparison analysis (Canadian Task Force classification III).
  
  
  METHODS
  University hospital and affiliated outpatient office.
  
  
  METHODS
  Hysteroscopic placement of Essure device in an office setting and laparoscopic tubal ligation for permanent sterilization.
  
  
  RESULTS
  The various costs associated with the two procedures at our institution were compiled, and a direct cost comparison was made. We used actual institutional costs of the procedures, not billing or reimbursement. We found laparoscopic tubal ligations to cost 3449 dollars compared with hysteroscopic placement of the Essure device that costs 1374 dollars yielding a 2075 dollars difference between the procedures.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  In our institution and in our experience, office-hysteroscopic placement of the Essure device is a more cost-effective method than laparoscopic tubal ligation.
authors.affiliation: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Women's Health, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York 10467, USA. malevie@montefiore.org
authors.forename: Mark D
authors.initials: MD
authors.lastname: Levie
authors.forename: Scott G
authors.initials: SG
authors.lastname: Chudnoff
mesh_terms: D003365:Costs and Cost Analysis; D005260:Female; D017048:Health Care Costs; D006801:Humans; D015907:Hysteroscopy / Q000191:economics*; D010535:Laparoscopy / Q000191:economics*; D009519:New York City; D009819:Office Visits / Q000191:economics; D009873:Operating Rooms / Q000191:economics; D013246:Sterilization, Tubal / Q000191:economics* / Q000379:methods*