Comparative epistemology: contours of a research program.
This article addresses the question whether and how literary documents can be used to further our understanding of a number of key issues on the agenda of the philosophy of biology such as "complexity" and "reductionism". Kant already granted a certain respectability to aesthetical experiences of nature in his third Critique. Subsequently, the philosophical movement known as phenomenology often used literary sources and literary techniques to criticize and question mainstream laboratory science. The article discusses a number of literary documents, from Moby-Dick to Jurassic Park, that explicitly stage a confrontation between scientific and non-scientific ways of experiencing and understanding the natural world. Special attention is given to the work of Michael Crichton. Its relevance for the philosophy of biology is pointed out.
Zwart
Hub
H
Department of Philosophy and Science Studies, Faculty of Science, Radboud University Nijmegen, P.O. Box 9010, NL-6500, GL, Nijmegen. haezwart@sci.kun.nl
D000818:Animals; D001695:Biology; D006801:Humans; D019359:Knowledge; D008091:Literature; D010684:Philosophy; D012107:Research Design