title: Informed consent in Canada: an empirical study.
abstract: The case of Reibl v. Hughes has significantly altered the law regarding informed consent in Canada. It might be expected, therefore, that its impact on the Canadian medical profession would be significant. However, in the first study to examine the practice of Canadian doctors in this respect, Professor Robertson concludes that the profession is largely unaware of either the decision or its importance. Further, the study examines doctors' current perceptions and opinions on the disclosure of risks to patients and the results, among others, raise serious questions regarding both the awareness and reception of important legal rulings.
authors.affiliation: Faculty of Law, University of Alberta, Canada.
authors.forename: G B
authors.initials: GB
authors.lastname: Robertson
mesh_terms: D001291:Attitude of Health Personnel; D002170:Canada; D030881:Disclosure / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D007722:Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice; D006801:Humans; D007258:Informed Consent / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D026706:Paternalism; D010817:Physician-Patient Relations; D010820:Physicians; D012306:Risk; D013514:Surgical Procedures, Operative; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires