The perimetric boycott: a tool for tobacco control advocacy.
OBJECTIVE
To propose criteria to help advocates: (1) determine when tobacco related boycotts may be useful; (2) select appropriate targets; and (3) predict and measure boycott success.


METHODS
Analysis of tobacco focused boycotts retrieved from internal tobacco industry documents websites and other scholarship on boycotts.


RESULTS
Tobacco related boycotts may be characterised by boycott target and reason undertaken. Most boycotts targeted the industry itself and were called for political or economic reasons unrelated to tobacco disease, often resulting in settlements that gave the industry marketing and public relations advantages. Even a lengthy health focused boycott of tobacco industry food subsidiaries accomplished little, making demands the industry was unlikely to meet. In contrast, a perimetric boycott (targeting institutions at the perimeter of the core target) of an organisation that was taking tobacco money mobilised its constituency and convinced the organisation to end the practice.


CONCLUSIONS
Direct boycotts of the industry have rarely advanced tobacco control. Perimetric boycotts of industry allies offer advocates a promising tool for further marginalising the industry. Successful boycotts include a focus on the public health consequences of tobacco use; an accessible point of pressure; a mutual interest between the target and the boycotters; realistic goals; and clear and measurable demands.
Offen
N
N
University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA. naphtali.offen@ucsf.edu
Smith
E A
EA
Malone
R E
RE
D003254:Consumer Advocacy; D006801:Humans; D040541:Marketing; D011634:Public Health; D011641:Public Relations; D016540:Smoking Cessation / Q000379:methods*; D000074606:Smoking Prevention; D019460:Tobacco Industry