Assessment of PACS display systems.
This work describes our experience in reviewing the performance criteria for display systems and how we have implemented a practical approach to the assessment of the workstation environment in a large tertiary care hospital. The acceptance criteria contained in the draft report of Topic Group 18 of the American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM) were used as a basis for assessment of primary and secondary displays. A telescopic photometer was used to measure the maximum luminance and the contrast ratio of the image for the displays used in our radiology department and in the operating and emergency rooms using the standard Society of Motion Picture and Television Engineers (SMPTE) pattern, in ambient light and with light decreased as much as possible. About half of the displays met the AAPM criteria for minimum luminance and contrast ratio in low light. None of the systems met the contrast ratio criteria in ambient light. The challenges in improving the performance and calibrating displays are discussed.
Aldrich
John E
JE
Department of Radiology, Vancouver Hospital, 899 West 12th Avenue, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 1M9, Canada. john.aldrich@vch.ca
Rutledge
John D
JD
D016288:Computer Terminals / Q000592:standards*; D003626:Data Display / Q000592:standards*; D004636:Emergency Service, Hospital; D008027:Light; D009873:Operating Rooms; D011786:Quality Control; D011872:Radiology Department, Hospital; D011873:Radiology Information Systems / Q000295:instrumentation* / Q000592:standards