title: Contrast and the justification of effort.
abstract: When humans are asked to evaluate rewards or outcomes that follow unpleasant (e.g., high-effort) events, they often assign higher value to that reward. This phenomenon has been referred to as cognitive dissonance or justification of effort. There is now evidence that a similar phenomenon can be found in nonhuman animals. When demonstrated in animals, however, it has been attributed to contrast between the unpleasant high effort and the conditioned stimulus for food. In the present experiment, we asked whether an analogous effect could be found in humans under conditions similar to those found in animals. Adult humans were trained to discriminate between shapes that followed a high-effort versus a low-effort response. In test, participants were found to prefer shapes that followed the high-effort response in training. These results suggest the possibility that contrast effects of the sort extensively studied in animals may play a role in cognitive dissonance and other related phenomena in humans.
authors.affiliation: University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40506-0044, USA.
authors.forename: Emily D
authors.initials: ED
authors.lastname: Klein
authors.forename: Ramesh S
authors.initials: RS
authors.lastname: Bhatt
authors.forename: Thomas R
authors.initials: TR
authors.lastname: Zentall
mesh_terms: D001364:Awareness; D003071:Cognition; D004192:Discrimination, Psychological; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires; D014796:Visual Perception