Cluster randomized trials: another problem for cost-effectiveness ratios.
OBJECTIVE
This work has investigated under what conditions cost-effectiveness data from a cluster randomized trial (CRT) are suitable for analysis using a cluster-adjusted nonparametric bootstrap. The bootstrap's main advantages are in dealing with skewed data and its ability to take correlations between costs and effects into account. However, there are known theoretical problems with a commonly used cluster bootstrap procedure, and the practical implications of these require investigation.


METHODS
Simulations were used to estimate the coverage of confidence intervals around incremental cost-effectiveness ratios from CRTs using two bootstrap methods.


RESULTS
The bootstrap gave excessively narrow confidence intervals, but there was evidence to suggest that, when the number of clusters per treatment arm exceeded 24, it might give acceptable results. The method that resampled individuals as well as clusters did not perform well when cost and effectiveness data were correlated.


CONCLUSIONS
If economic data from such trials are to be analyzed adequately, then there is a need for further investigations of more complex bootstrap procedures. Similarly, further research is required on methods such as the net benefit approach.
Flynn
Terry N
TN
Department of Social Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK. terry.flynn@bristol.ac.uk
Peters
Tim J
TJ
D016000:Cluster Analysis; D003362:Cost-Benefit Analysis; D006302:Health Services Research / Q000191:economics* / Q000379:methods*; D006801:Humans; D016032:Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic / Q000191:economics* / Q000379:methods*; D012107:Research Design