title: Process and economic analysis of pretreatment technologies.
abstract: Five pretreatment processes (dilute acid, hot water, ammonia fiber explosion (AFEX), ammonia recycle percolation (ARP), and lime) for the liberation of sugars from corn stover are compared on a consistent basis. Each pretreatment process model was embedded in a full bioethanol facility model so that systematic effects for variations in pretreatment were accounted in the overall process. Economic drivers influenced by pretreatment are yield of both five and six carbon sugars, solids concentration, enzyme loading and hemicellulase activity. All of the designs considered were projected to be capital intensive. Low cost pretreatment reactors in some pretreatment processes are often counterbalanced by higher costs associated with pretreatment catalyst recovery or higher costs for ethanol product recovery. The result is little differentiation between the projected economic performances of the pretreatment options. Additional process performance data, especially involving the identification of optimal enzyme blends for each pretreatment approach and conditioning requirements of hydrolyzates at process-relevant sugar concentrations resulting from each pretreatment may lead to greater differentiation in projected process economics.
authors.affiliation: Neoterics International, 2319 S. Ellis Ct., Lakewood, CO 80228, USA. time@frii.com
authors.forename: Tim
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Eggeman
authors.forename: Richard T
authors.initials: RT
authors.lastname: Elander
mesh_terms: D018533:Biomass; D017610:Calcium Compounds; D002241:Carbohydrates / Q000737:chemistry; D002482:Cellulose / Q000737:chemistry*; D003198:Computer Simulation; D018803:Models, Economic; D010087:Oxides; D013464:Sulfuric Acids; D014867:Water
chemical_list: D017610:Calcium Compounds; D002241:Carbohydrates; D010087:Oxides; D013464:Sulfuric Acids; D014867:Water; D002482:Cellulose; C016538:lime; C033158:sulfuric acid