Racial differences in socially desirable responding in selection contexts: magnitude and consequences.
Two studies were conducted to examine the magnitude and consequences of racial differences on social desirability (SD) scales. Study 1 included 1,063 job applicants, and Study 2 included 3 sets of incumbents (total N = 534). In both studies, participants were administered several personality measures and an SD scale. Across all samples, Whites scored lower on the SD scale than Blacks (average d = .37), Hispanics (average d = .47), and Asians (average d = 1.04), but these differences were not observed on the personality scales. The consequence of differences in socially desirable responding (SDR) is that fewer minority group members would be selected if SD scales were used to derive cut scores to eliminate individuals from the applicant pool or if the scales were used to correct personality test scores for SDR. However, applying the SD correction did not affect the validity of the personality test for any of the racial groups. Overall, our findings suggest that researchers and practitioners should consider the use of SD scales very carefully, as their use may have unintended consequences. These studies also demonstrate a need to closely examine the construct validity of SD measures across diverse groups.
Dudley
Nicole M
NM
Department of Psychology, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA 22030, USA. jdudley@gmu.edu
McFarland
Lynn A
LA
Goodman
Scott A
SA
Hunt
Steven T
ST
Sydell
Eric J
EJ
D000328:Adult; D000704:Analysis of Variance; D005006:Ethnicity / Q000523:psychology*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008014:Lie Detection; D008297:Male; D015146:Midwestern United States; D010555:Personality Inventory; D010560:Personnel Selection; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D012928:Social Desirability