title: The logical basis of phylogenetic taxonomy.
abstract: Phylogenetic taxonomy, like modern Linnean taxonomy, was modeled on a phylogenetic tree rather than a cladogram and, like its predecessor, perpetuates the use of morphology as a means of recognizing clades. Both practices have generated confusion in graphical representation, operational terminology, and definitional rationale in phylogenetic taxonomy, the history of which is traced. The following points are made: (1) cladograms, rather than trees or hybrid cladogram-trees, provide the framework for the simplest graphical depiction of phylogenetic definitions; (2) a complete notational scheme for phylogenetic definitions is presented that distinguishes symbolic notation from shorthand and longhand versions; (3) phylogenetic definitions are composed of three components (paradigm, specifier, qualifier) arranged in two fundamental patterns-node and stem; (4) apomorphies do not constitute a fundamental definitional pattern but rather serve to qualify a stem-based definition (as do time and geographic range); (5) formulation of phylogenetic definitions involves three heuristic criteria (stability, simplicity, prior use); (6) reasoned definitional revision is encouraged and better defined (textual substitution, first-and second-order revision); and (7) a database, TaxonSearch, allows rapid recall of taxonomic and definitional information.
authors.affiliation: Department of Organismal Biology and Anatomy, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637, USA. dinosaur@uchicago.edu
authors.forename: Paul C
authors.initials: PC
authors.lastname: Sereno
mesh_terms: D002965:Classification / Q000379:methods*; D016208:Databases, Factual; D008128:Logic; D010802:Phylogeny; D013045:Species Specificity; D009626:Terminology as Topic