Social psychology, terrorism, and identity: a preliminary re-examination of theory, culture, self, and society.
This article relies upon structural symbolic interactionism and five of its organizing concepts (i.e. symbols, the definition of the situation, roles, socialization and role-taking, and the self) to put forth a novel conceptual framework for understanding the terrorist identity. In order to demonstrate the practical utility of the framework, applications to various terrorist groups around the globe are incorporated into the analysis. Overall, both the theoretical and application work help reorient the academic and practitioner behavioral science communities to the importance of culture, self, and society when investigating one's membership in and identity through militant extremist organizations. Given the unique approach taken by this article, several provisional implications are delineated. In particular, future research on terrorism, strategies linked to counter-terrorism, legal and public policy reform, and the relevance of utilizing a sociologically animated social psychology in the assessment of other forms of criminal behavior are all very tentatively explored.
Arena
Michael P
MP
Department of Criminal Justice, University of North Carolina, Charlotte, NC 28223, USA.
Arrigo
Bruce A
BA
D003469:Culture; D006801:Humans; D008962:Models, Theoretical; D011593:Psychology, Social; D012380:Role; D012649:Self Concept; D012933:Social Identification; D023481:Terrorism / Q000523:psychology