Retinal damage by optical radiation. An alternative to current, ACGIH-inspired guidelines.
BACKGROUND
The ACGIH guidelines for protection against retinal damage by optical radiation are often difficult to apply due to their lack of transparency. The less known guidelines by the Netherlands Health Council (HCN), dating from 1978 and updated in 1993, might offer a way out in many cases.


METHODS
A comparison is made of these guidelines, embedded in a short sketch of the history. They are illustrated by examples of applications.


RESULTS
In most cases the HCN guidelines produce results that hardly deviate from those obtained with the ACGIH guidelines but in some cases the results diverge and in other cases HCN gives an answer where ACGIH seems to fall short.


CONCLUSIONS
The HCN guidelines form a good alternative to those of ACGIH.
Vos
J J
JJ
TNO Human Factors, Soesterberg, The Netherlands.
van Norren
D
D
D005135:Eye Protective Devices / Q000592:standards*; D006801:Humans; D007834:Lasers / Q000009:adverse effects*; D009907:Optometry / Q000295:instrumentation; D017410:Practice Guidelines as Topic; D012160:Retina / Q000293:injuries / Q000528:radiation effects*; D012164:Retinal Diseases / Q000209:etiology* / Q000517:prevention & control