title: Stimulus-response compatible orienting and the effect of an action not taken: perception delayed is automaticity denied.
abstract: Orienting to a signal source is widely viewed as automatic in the sense that it is triggered by the stimulus. However, this behavior is typically assessed in a context in which the subject knows beforehand what he or she has to do. In the present experiments, the role of task set was investigated by having the response vary randomly from trial to trial. On some trials, a cue signaled the subject to respond, and on the remaining trials, another cue signaled the subject to withhold a response. Stimulus contrast and temporal overlap between task cue and target were manipulated. The effect of a reduction in stimulus contrast was sometimes absorbed into the time taken to decode the cue, but critically, other times not. These results highlight the theoretical importance of considering task set as an essential element in processing, and they undermine the theoretical claim that putatively automatic processes are not subject to interference from other mental activities.
authors.affiliation: Psychology Department, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada. dbesner@watarts.uwaterloo.ca
authors.forename: Derek
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Besner
authors.forename: Evan F
authors.initials: EF
authors.lastname: Risko
mesh_terms: D001332:Automatism; D003216:Conditioning, Operant; D006801:Humans; D014796:Visual Perception