Sex differences in eye gaze and symbolic cueing of attention.
Observing a face with averted eyes results in a reflexive shift of attention to the gazed-at location. Here we present results that show that this effect is weaker in males than in females (Experiment 1). This result is predicted by the 'extreme male brain' theory of autism (Baron-Cohen, 2003), which suggests that males in the normal population should display more autism-like traits than females (e.g., poor joint attention). Indeed, participants' scores on the Autism-Spectrum Quotient (Baron-Cohen, Wheelwright, Stott, Bolton, & Goodyear, 2001) negatively correlated with cueing magnitude. Furthermore, exogenous orienting did not differ between the sexes in two peripheral cueing experiments (Experiments 2a and 2b). However, a final experiment showed that using nonpredictive arrows instead of eyes as a central cue also revealed a large gender difference. This demonstrates that reduced orienting from central cues in males generalizes beyond gaze cues. These results show that while peripheral cueing is equivalent in the male and female brains, the attention systems of the two sexes treat noninformative symbolic cues very differently.
Bayliss
Andrew P
AP
School of Psychology, Centre for Cognitive Neuroscience, University of Wales, Bangor, LL57 2AS, UK. a.bayliss@bangor.ac.uk
di Pellegrino
Giuseppe
G
Tipper
Steven P
SP
D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D001288:Attention; D003463:Cues; D005145:Face; D005260:Female; D005403:Fixation, Ocular; D019416:Head Movements; D006801:Humans; D007100:Imitative Behavior; D008297:Male; D009949:Orientation; D010364:Pattern Recognition, Visual; D012727:Sex Characteristics; D013561:Symbolism