Analysis of the learned irrelevance effect in appetitive pavlovian conditioning.
In Experiments 1 and 2 rats received uncorrelated presentations of a light conditioned stimulus (CS) and a food unconditioned stimulus (US) on each day of a preexposure phase. Control subjects received the same number of USs during the first half of preexposure and the same number of CSs during the second. Uncorrelated preexposure retarded inhibitory conditioning. Experiment 3 showed, however, that the different patterns of US preexposure experienced by the two groups could in itself influence the course of subsequent inhibitory conditioning. When this factor was equated by restricting the uncorrelated treatment to the first half of the pre-exposure phase (Experiment 2) or by extending the control treatment throughout the phase (Experiment 4) it was found that uncorrelated preexposure retarded excitatory conditioning, but facilitated inhibitory conditioning. This outcome challenges an interpretation in terms of the concept of learned irrelevance, which predicts that uncorrelated preexposure should retard both forms of conditioning.
Bonardi
Charlotte
C
University of York, York, UK. cmb@psychology.nottingham.ac.uk
Hall
Geoffrey
G
Ong
Siaw Yann
SY
D000818:Animals; D001070:Appetitive Behavior; D001245:Association Learning; D001288:Attention; D003214:Conditioning, Classical; D005793:Generalization, Psychological; D006185:Habituation, Psychophysiologic; D007266:Inhibition, Psychological; D008297:Male; D011337:Probability Learning; D013223:Statistics as Topic; D014163:Transfer, Psychology