Accelerometry-based feedback--can it improve movement consistency and performance in rowing?
The training and competition regimen of elite athletes demands rapid feedback about their performance. The aim of this study was to determine if real-time visual ipsative (comparison with oneself) feedback of instantaneous kinematic consistency improves overall kinematic consistency in rowing. Accelerometry-based data, representing the upper and lower body kinematics, were determined for 13 experienced rowers. Kinematic consistency data -- represented by percentage time outside the acceptable performance bandwidth, performance consistency -- represented by power-stroke dispersion, and several performance indicators were acquired for all the rowers for three 2000 m time trials on a RowPerfect ergometer with three different visual feedback interventions: no feedback, detailed feedback, and summary feedback. Results indicated significantly increased performance consistency for detailed feedback than for both no feedback (p < 0.01) and summary feedback (p < 0.05). No significant difference between summary feedback and no feedback was found (p = 0.173). We deemed feedback of detailed information to enhance kinematic consistency significantly more than both no feedback (p < 0.01) and summary feedback (p < 0.01) interventions, although summary feedback was shown to enhance kinematic consistency more than no feedback (p < 0.01). No improvements were found for performance-related parameters.
Anderson
Ross
R
Biomechanics Research Unit, College of Science, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.
Harrison
Andrew
A
Lyons
Gerard M
GM
D000054:Acceleration; D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D001696:Biomechanical Phenomena; D016552:Ergometry / Q000295:instrumentation*; D030141:Feedback, Psychological; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D009068:Movement / Q000502:physiology; D010806:Physical Education and Training / Q000379:methods*; D013177:Sports / Q000502:physiology* / Q000523:psychology*; D013647:Task Performance and Analysis