title: Could a randomised trial answer the controversy relating to elective caesarean section? National survey of consultant obstetricians and heads of midwifery.
authors.affiliation: Department of Midwifery Studies, University of Central Lancashire, Preston PR1 2HE. tinalav@yahoo.co.uk
authors.forename: Tina
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Lavender
authors.forename: Carol
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Kingdon
authors.forename: Anna
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Hart
authors.forename: Gill
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Gyte
authors.forename: Mark
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Gabbay
authors.forename: James P
authors.initials: JP
authors.lastname: Neilson
mesh_terms: D001291:Attitude of Health Personnel; D001294:Attitude to Health; D002585:Cesarean Section; D003253:Consultants; D017558:Elective Surgical Procedures; D004739:England; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008505:Medical Staff, Hospital / Q000523:psychology*; D008880:Midwifery; D009721:Nurse Midwives / Q000523:psychology*; D009774:Obstetrics; D011247:Pregnancy; D016032:Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic