title: How many dimensions underlie judgments of learning and recall? Evidence from state-trace methodology.
abstract: The authors used state-trace methodology to investigate whether a single dimension (e.g., strength) is sufficient to account for recall and judgments of learning (JOLs) or whether multiple dimensions (e.g., intrinsic and extrinsic factors) are needed. The authors separately manipulated the independent variables of intrinsic and extrinsic cues, determining their state traces for recall and JOLs. In contrast to the supposition that intrinsic cues have similar effects on both recall and JOLs whereas extrinsic cues affect JOLs less strongly than recall (i.e., 2 dimensions underlying recall and JOLs), the authors found repeated support for the sufficiency of a single dimension for both recall and JOLs (not only immediate JOLs but also delayed JOLs) across a variety of intrinsic and extrinsic cues.
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA. yjang@psyc.umd.edu
authors.forename: Yoonhee
authors.initials: Y
authors.lastname: Jang
authors.forename: Thomas O
authors.initials: TO
authors.lastname: Nelson
mesh_terms: D001288:Attention; D003463:Cues; D003657:Decision Making; D006801:Humans; D007600:Judgment; D007858:Learning; D016013:Likelihood Functions; D008570:Memory, Short-Term; D011939:Mental Recall; D010153:Paired-Associate Learning; D011930:Reaction Time