The motivational bases of right-wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation: relations to values and attitudes in the aftermath of September 11, 2001.
Research suggests that different motivational dynamics underlie right-wing authoritarianism (RWA) and social dominance orientation (SDO). These differences may be framed in the theory of basic human values. RWA may trace back to conservation versus openness-to-change values, and SDO to self-enhancement versus self-transcendence values. Based on a large-scale German survey, associations of RWA and SDO with personal values and attitudes in the aftermath of September 11, 2001, were analyzed. Results indicated that RWA related more strongly than SDO to conservation values and threat-related attitudes toward Islam as an expression of the motivational goals of social control and security, whereas RWA and SDO related equally to self-enhancement versus self-transcendence values and concern for negative consequences of military action as an expression of the motivational goal of altruistic concern. Thus, the motivational bases of RWA and SDO appear to be only partly different.
Cohrs
J Christopher
JC
Friedrich-Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Social Psychology Section, Germany. crcohrs@phil.uni-erlangen.de
Moschner
Barbara
B
Maes
Jürgen
J
Kielmann
Sven
S
D001290:Attitude; D001318:Authoritarianism; D006801:Humans; D020407:Internet; D009042:Motivation; D011057:Politics; D047851:September 11 Terrorist Attacks; D012930:Social Dominance; D012945:Social Values; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires