title: [Infection in hernia surgery].
abstract: Traditionally, the operation of hernia is considered as a clean operation due to expected, low incidence of infection, on the spot of surgical work (SSI). The incidence of SSI in hernia surgery is more frequent then it is assumed. The important risk factors for SSI are the following: type of hernia (inguinal, incisional), operative approach (open - laparoscopic), usage of the prosthetic material and drainage. Comparing to inguinal hernia repair, incisional hernia repair, is more frequently followed by the infection. The laparoscopic operations are followed with the lower incidence of SSI then in the case of open operations. The usage of the mesh does not increase the incidence of SSI, although the consequences of the mesh infection may be severe. A type I of the prosthesis is more resistant to the infection then prosthesis II and III. The mesh infection (type I) never involves its body but it is present around sutures and bended edges. The mesh infection Type II involves entire prosthesis while in the case of Type III it is present in its peripheral part. In the case of SSI, a prosthesis Type I is possible to be saved, while prosthesis Type II must be removed completely; and the same is for the Type III (the partial removal is rarely suggested). The defect that remained after excision of non-resorptive prosthesis is a long-term and very complicated surgical problem. In regard to the position of the mesh, SSI is more common if the mesh is placed subcutaneously then in the case of sub-aponeurotic premuscular, pre-aponeurotic retromuscular or pre-peritoneal mesh placemen. If the infection is present the nontension techniques using non-resorptive prosthetic implants are not recommended. The presence of drainage and its duration increases the incidence of SSI. It is more common for incisional hernioplasty then for inguinal hernia repair. If there is an indication for drainage it should be as short as possible. The cause of SSI for elective operations are bacteria's that arrives from the skin, while in the case of opening of various organs dominant bacteria's originate from them. The superficial infection does not lead to the recurrence, while it is very possible in the case for deep infection. There are no prospective studies that justify the usage of antibiotic prophylaxes in hernia surgery. The antibiotic prophylaxis is indicated for the clean operations when placing the implants and when severe complication is expected. The appearance of SSI increases the price of treatment and may lead to the recurrence.
authors.affiliation: Institut za bolesti digestivnog sistema KSC, Beograd.
authors.forename: M
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Zuvela
authors.forename: M
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Milićević
authors.forename: D
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Galun
authors.forename: N
authors.initials: N
authors.lastname: Lekić
authors.forename: D
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Basarić
authors.forename: D
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Tomić
authors.forename: M
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Petrović
authors.forename: I
authors.initials: I
authors.lastname: Palibrk
mesh_terms: D000900:Anti-Bacterial Agents / Q000627:therapeutic use; D046449:Hernia, Abdominal / Q000601:surgery*; D006552:Hernia, Inguinal / Q000601:surgery*; D006801:Humans; D010535:Laparoscopy; D012307:Risk Factors; D013526:Surgical Mesh; D013530:Surgical Wound Infection / Q000382:microbiology / Q000517:prevention & control / Q000628:therapy
chemical_list: D000900:Anti-Bacterial Agents