title: The history of psychological categories.
abstract: Psychological terms, such as 'mind', 'memory', 'emotion' and indeed 'psychology' itself, have a history. This history, I argue, supports the view that basic psychological categories refer to historical and social entities, and not to 'natural kinds'. The case is argued through a wide ranging review of the historiography of western psychology, first, in connection with the field's extreme modern diversity; second, in relation to the possible antecedents of the field in the early modern period; and lastly, through a brief introduction to usage of the words 'soul', 'mind', 'memory' and 'emotion'. The discussion situates the history of psychology within a large historical context, questions assumptions about the continuity of meaning, and draws out implications for the philosophical and social constitution of 'psychology' and 'the psychological' from the existing literature. The historical evidence, this paper concludes, does not support the conventional presumption that modern psychological terms describe 'natural kinds'.
authors.affiliation: 119021 Moscow, Obolenskii per. 2-66, Russian Federation. rsmith@mail.ru
authors.forename: Roger
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Smith
mesh_terms: D004644:Emotions; D006663:Historiography; D049672:History, 19th Century; D006801:Humans; D008568:Memory; D010684:Philosophy / Q000266:history*; D011584:Psychology / Q000145:classification / Q000266:history*; D009626:Terminology as Topic; D019366:Western World