The effects of judicial admonitions on hearsay evidence.
Using a simulated civil case, this experiment investigated whether mock jurors: (a) are able to disregard hearsay evidence when admonished to do so, (b) experience psychological reactance and "backfire effects" in proportion to the strength of judicial admonition instructing them to disregard hearsay evidence, and (c) are able to recognize and disregard hearsay evidence without judicial instructions. Results indicate that jurors were unable to disregard inadmissible hearsay testimony in some legal decisions regardless of whether there were judicial instructions to do so. Jurors exhibited backfire effects paying more attention to inadmissible hearsay evidence when they were strongly instructed to disregard it. More specifically, juror backfire effects were evident in both their confidence in their liability verdicts and in their punitive damage awards. The legal and policy implications of these findings are discussed.
Ho Lee
Dae
D
Claremont Graduate University Claremont, California 91711, USA.
Krauss
Daniel A
DA
Lieberman
Joel
J
D000062:Accidents, Occupational / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D002140:California; D003256:Community Participation / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence / Q000523:psychology*; D035881:Compensation and Redress / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence; D003657:Decision Making; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D033222:Judicial Role; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D011287:Prejudice; D012106:Research