title: Effect of individual or simultaneous curing on sealant bond strength.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  The objective of this study was to assess the shear bond strength of resin sealants to saliva-contaminated and noncontaminated enamel, comparing 2 curing protocols: (1) individual light-curing of the intermediate bonding agent layer and the sealant; or (2) simultaneous curing of both materials.
  
  
  METHODS
  Seventy-two enamel test surfaces were obtained from 24 third molars and randomly assigned to 2 groups (N=36): (A) saliva-contaminated; (B) noncontaminated. Each group was divided into 3 subgroups, according to the bonding technique: (1) Prime&Bond and Fluroshield were light cured separately; (2) Prime&Bond and Fluroshield were light cured together; (3) Fluroshield was applied alone. Shear bond strength was tested at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/minute.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Means (MPa) were: IA-15.61(+/-4.74); IIA-15.71(+/-6.18); IIIA-13.83(+/-1.50); IB-24.73(+/-4.34); IIB-22.41(+/-4.16); IIIB-18.20(+/-3.58). Statistical analysis revealed that overall bond strength to saliva-contaminated enamel was remarkably lower (P < .05) than that recorded under dry conditions. In both contaminated and noncontaminated groups, significantly higher shear bond strength (P < .05) was observed when the bonding agent was applied underneath the sealant. Comparing the curing protocols for contaminated specimens, no statistically significant difference (P > .05) was observed between individual and simultaneous curing. Conversely, for noncontaminated specimens, bond strength was higher and statistically different (P < .05) when the materials were light cured separately.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Individual or simultaneous curing of the intermediate bonding agent layer and the resin sealant does not seem to affect bond strength to saliva-contaminated enamel. When dry, noncontaminated conditions are maintained, however, the intermediary and the sealing materials should preferably be light cured separately.
authors.affiliation: Department of Pediatric Clinics, Preventive and Social Dentistry, School of Dentistry of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil. carolptorres@hotmail.com
authors.forename: Carolina Paes
authors.initials: CP
authors.lastname: Torres
authors.forename: Patrícia
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Balbo
authors.forename: Jaciara Miranda
authors.initials: JM
authors.lastname: Gomes-Silva
authors.forename: Renata Pereira
authors.initials: RP
authors.lastname: Ramos
authors.forename: Regina Guenka
authors.initials: RG
authors.lastname: Palma-Dibb
authors.forename: Maria Cristina
authors.initials: MC
authors.lastname: Borsatto
mesh_terms: D017438:Bisphenol A-Glycidyl Methacrylate / Q000528:radiation effects; D001840:Dental Bonding; D003743:Dental Enamel; D003799:Dental Stress Analysis; D006801:Humans; D008027:Light; D008422:Materials Testing; D044367:Phase Transition; D010895:Pit and Fissure Sealants / Q000528:radiation effects*; D011109:Polymethacrylic Acids / Q000528:radiation effects; D011140:Polyurethanes / Q000528:radiation effects; D019279:Resin Cements / Q000528:radiation effects*; D012463:Saliva; D033081:Shear Strength; D013674:Technology, Dental / Q000379:methods*
chemical_list: D010895:Pit and Fissure Sealants; D011109:Polymethacrylic Acids; D011140:Polyurethanes; C103500:Prime & Bond; D019279:Resin Cements; C086661:Fluoroshield; D017438:Bisphenol A-Glycidyl Methacrylate