title: Reoperation versus observation in men with major bleeding after radical retropubic prostatectomy.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  To compare the postoperative and quality-of-life outcomes for men experiencing major bleeding after radical retropubic prostatectomy that was managed with reoperation or observation.
  
  
  METHODS
  A total of 916 men underwent radical retropubic prostatectomy by a single surgeon between October 2000 and August 2004. Of the 916 men, 15 (1.6%) experienced major bleeding, defined as the transfusion of 3 U or more of allogeneic blood within the first 36 hours after radical prostatectomy. The outcomes were compared between the 5 men undergoing reoperation (group 1) and the 10 men whose bleeding was managed with observation (group 2).
  
  
  RESULTS
  The mean total number of allogeneic blood units transfused was significantly greater in group 1 (7.4 U) than in group 2 (4.1 U; P = 0.002). Group 1 also experienced a significantly longer hospital stay (4.6 versus 2.6 days). Those men undergoing reoperation had a significantly lower probability of moderate to severe extravasation on initial cystogram compared with group 2 (0% versus 70%). In addition, the urinary catheter was indwelling for a shorter interval (9.6 versus 23.5 days). We also found a suggestion of better continence in group 1.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Reoperation for major bleeding after radical retropubic prostatectomy facilitates both healing of the vesicourethral anastomosis and removal of the urinary catheter.
authors.affiliation: Department of Urology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York 10016, USA.
authors.forename: Jeremy D
authors.initials: JD
authors.lastname: Kaufman
authors.forename: Herbert
authors.initials: H
authors.lastname: Lepor
mesh_terms: D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D019106:Postoperative Hemorrhage / Q000209:etiology / Q000601:surgery*; D011468:Prostatectomy / Q000009:adverse effects*; D012086:Reoperation