Modified Exeter technique in revision hip surgery: does distal fixation of the stem affect allograft transformation?
Promising results have made the Exeter technique a valuable alternative in hip replacement revision. However, even with this technique, subsidence remains a difficult problem because it may lead to additional revision if it is not mild and self-limited. We propose a technical modification that achieves primary stability by cementing the distal portion of the stem directly to the host bone. We conducted a prospective study on 45 hips. After an average of 46 (range, 18-72) months of follow-up monitoring, no hips required or underwent revision for aseptic loosening of the prosthesis. Four stems subsided <5 mm. In each case, distal cementation was only fair, so implant strength was decreased. Allograft transformation occurred in 36 hips and was associated with host bone remodeling in 11. This technical modification appears to be reliable, as satisfactory distal cementation was achieved in 41 hips (91%), and the modification did not interfere with allograft transformation.
de Thomasson
Emmanuel
E
Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Paris, France.
Williams
Jay B
JB
Marmorat
Jean Luc
JL
Guigand
Olivier
O
Mazel
Christian
C
D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D019644:Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip; D016025:Bone Transplantation / Q000379:methods*; D005260:Female; D005269:Femur / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging / Q000601:surgery*; D005500:Follow-Up Studies; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D011446:Prospective Studies; D011859:Radiography; D012086:Reoperation / Q000379:methods; D014184:Transplantation, Homologous