Electroosmotic dewatering of dredged sediments: bench-scale investigation.
The Indiana Harbor (Indiana, USA) has not been dredged since 1972 due to lack of a suitable disposal site for dredged sediment. As a result of this, over a million cubic yards of highly contaminated sediment has accumulated in the harbor. Recently, the United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) has selected a site for the confined disposal facility (CDF) and is in the process of designing it. Although dredging can be accomplished rapidly, the disposal in the CDF has to be done slowly to allow adequate time for consolidation to occur. The sediment possesses very high moisture content and very low hydraulic conductivity, which cause consolidation to occur slowly. Consolidation of the sediment is essential in order to achieve adequate shear strength of sediments and also to provide enough air space to accommodate the large amount of sediment that requires disposal. Currently, it has been estimated that if a one 3-foot (0.9-m) thick layer of sediment was disposed of at the CDF annually, it would take approximately 10 years to dispose of all the sediment that is to be dredged from the Indiana Harbor. This study investigated the feasibility of using an electroosmotic dewatering technology to accelerate dewatering and consolidation of sediment, thereby allowing more rapid disposal of sediment into the CDF. Electroosmotic dewatering essentially involves applying a small electric potential across the sediment layer, thereby inducing rapid flow as a result of physico-chemical and electrochemical processes. A series of bench-scale electrokinetic experiments were conducted on actual dredged sediment samples from the Indiana Harbor to investigate dewatering rates caused by gravity alone, dewatering rates caused by gravity and electric potential, and the effects of the addition of polymer flocculants on dewatering of the sediments. The results showed that electroosmotic dewatering under an applied electric potential of 1.0VDC/cm could increase the rate of dewatering and consolidation by an order of magnitude as compared to gravity drainage alone. Amending the sediment with polymers at low concentrations (0.5-1% by dry weight) will enhance this dewatering process; however, the optimal polymer concentration and the cost-effectiveness of using polymers should be investigated further.
Reddy
Krishna R
KR
Department of Civil and Materials Engineering, University of Illinois at Chicago, 842 West Taylor Street, Chicago, IL 60607, USA. kreddy@uic.edu
Urbanek
Adam
A
Khodadoust
Amid P
AP
D000180:Acrylic Resins / Q000737:chemistry; D001151:Arsenic / Q000032:analysis; D003890:Desiccation / Q000379:methods*; D004563:Electrochemistry; D005427:Flocculation; D019015:Geologic Sediments / Q000737:chemistry*; D006112:Gravitation; D007196:Indiana; D008670:Metals / Q000032:analysis; D009995:Osmosis; D011084:Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons / Q000032:analysis; D018505:Waste Management / Q000379:methods*; D014867:Water / Q000032:analysis; D014874:Water Pollutants, Chemical / Q000032:analysis; D000099166:Polyacrylamides
D000180:Acrylic Resins; D001151:Arsenic; D008670:Metals; D011084:Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons; D014867:Water; D014874:Water Pollutants, Chemical; D000099166:Polyacrylamides; C006903:carbopol 940