title: Comparison of electron beam computed tomography and technetium stress testing in differentiating cause of dilated versus ischemic cardiomyopathy.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  The current reference standard for differentiating between nonischemic versus ischemic cardiomyopathy (CM) is angiography. The diagnostic accuracy of nuclear stress testing and electron beam tomography (EBT) was evaluated to differentiate between nonischemic and ischemic CM, using coronary angiography as the reference standard.
  
  
  METHODS
  A total of 56 patients who underwent technetium stress testing and coronary angiography for the evaluation of CM were enrolled. Patients then underwent EBT coronary scanning for coronary calcification (CC).
  
  
  RESULTS
  Of the 56 patients, 34 (61%) had angiographically significant disease. Using the criteria of ischemia (reversible defect) or infarct (fixed defect) to define a patient with ischemic CM, nuclear stress testing had a sensitivity of 97% (33 of 34 patients) but a specificity of only 18% (4 of 22 patients). Using the criteria of reversible ischemia only, the specificity of nuclear stress testing improved to 50% (P < 0.001); however, the sensitivity decreased to 56%. An EBT score >0 had a sensitivity of 97% (33 of 34 patients) and a specificity of 68% (15 of 22 patients) for defining ischemia. Overall diagnostic accuracy was significantly higher with EBT as compared with nuclear stress testing in this study of patients with reduced ejection fractions (84% vs. 64%; P = 0.009).
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Given the high sensitivity of nuclear testing and EBT, these tests may prove to be an effective screen before angiography in patients with congestive heart failure of unclear cause.
authors.affiliation: Division of Cardiology, Los Angeles Biomedical Institute at Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, CA 90502, USA. mbudoff@labiomed.org
authors.forename: Matthew J
authors.initials: MJ
authors.lastname: Budoff
authors.forename: Binu
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: Jacob
authors.forename: M Leila
authors.initials: ML
authors.lastname: Rasouli
authors.forename: Dale
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Yu
authors.forename: Roger S
authors.initials: RS
authors.lastname: Chang
authors.forename: David M
authors.initials: DM
authors.lastname: Shavelle
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D002114:Calcinosis / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging; D002311:Cardiomyopathy, Dilated / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging*; D017023:Coronary Angiography; D003937:Diagnosis, Differential; D005080:Exercise Test; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D017202:Myocardial Ischemia / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging*; D011237:Predictive Value of Tests; D012372:ROC Curve; D019275:Radiopharmaceuticals; D012307:Risk Factors; D012680:Sensitivity and Specificity; D017256:Technetium Tc 99m Sestamibi; D014057:Tomography, X-Ray Computed / Q000379:methods*
chemical_list: D019275:Radiopharmaceuticals; D017256:Technetium Tc 99m Sestamibi