title: Ulcer-free survival following management of foot ulcers in diabetes.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  Measures of healing rate may not give a complete indication of the effectiveness of overall management of diabetic foot ulcers. Apart from healing and speed of healing, the outcomes of greatest importance to the patient are avoidance of any amputation and remaining free from any recurrence. We have documented the number of patients presenting with diabetic foot ulcers who become ulcer free and examined the value of documenting ulcer-free survival.
  
  
  METHODS
  All referrals to a specialist diabetic foot clinic over a 31-month period were analysed and outcomes were determined after a minimum follow-up of 6 months.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Three hundred and seventy patients were referred with a total of 1031 ulcers. One hundred and twenty-one (32.7%) never became ulcer free: 56 (46.3% of 121) remained unhealed, the ulcers of 12 (9.9% of 121) had been resolved by amputation, two remained unhealed after amputation (1.7% of 121) and 51 (13.8% of 370) had died. Two hundred and thirty-one (62.4% of 370) became ulcer free at some stage. Five of these were excluded because of an earlier amputation. Ninety-one of the remaining 226 (40.3%) developed a recurrent or new ulcer after a median 126 days. Of the 135 who did not have a recurrence, 133 (58.8% of 226; 35.9% of 370) survived ulcer free and with limbs intact, while two died. Outcome was unknown in 18 (4.9%). Those who never became ulcer free were older (P < 0.001) and with a greater prevalence of ischaemia (P < 0.001). Those who healed but went on to suffer a new ulcer had a greater prevalence of neuropathy (P = 0.027) than those who remained ulcer free.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The use of ulcer-free survival can be used as an indication of the effectiveness of foot ulcer management. It could be adopted as a measure to compare performance between different specialist units.
authors.affiliation: Foot Ulcer Trials Unit, Department of Diabetes and Endocrinology, City Hospital, Nottingham, UK. npound@futu.co.uk
authors.forename: N
authors.initials: N
authors.lastname: Pound
authors.forename: S
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Chipchase
authors.forename: K
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Treece
authors.forename: F
authors.initials: F
authors.lastname: Game
authors.forename: W
authors.initials: W
authors.lastname: Jeffcoate
mesh_terms: D000367:Age Factors; D000368:Aged; D000671:Amputation, Surgical; D002908:Chronic Disease; D003922:Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 / Q000401:mortality / Q000503:physiopathology / Q000628:therapy; D003924:Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 / Q000401:mortality / Q000503:physiopathology / Q000628:therapy; D003925:Diabetic Angiopathies / Q000401:mortality / Q000503:physiopathology / Q000628:therapy; D017719:Diabetic Foot / Q000401:mortality / Q000503:physiopathology / Q000628:therapy*; D003929:Diabetic Neuropathies / Q000401:mortality / Q000503:physiopathology / Q000628:therapy; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D012008:Recurrence; D013997:Time Factors; D016896:Treatment Outcome; D014945:Wound Healing