Methodology is more than research design and technology.
The Society for Computers in Psychology has been at the forefront of disseminating information about advances in computer technology and their applications for psychologists. Although technological advances, as well as clean research designs, are key contributors to progress in psychological research, the justification of methodological rules for interpreting data and making theory choices is at least as important. Historically, methodological beliefs and practices have been justified through intuition and logic, an approach known as foundationism. However, naturalism, a modern approach in the philosophy of science inspired by the work of Thomas S. Kuhn, indicates that all aspects of scientific practice, including its methodology, should be evaluated empirically. This article examines implications of the naturalistic approach for psychological research methods in general and for the current debate that is often framed as one of qualitative versus quantitative methods.
Proctor
Robert W
RW
Department of Psychological Sciences, Purdue University, 703 Third Street, West Lafayette, IN 47907-1364, USA. proctor@psych.purdue.edu
D003201:Computers; D003205:Computing Methodologies; D006801:Humans; D011584:Psychology; D012106:Research; D013672:Technology