title: Two-year evaluation of restorations of a packable composite placed in UK general dental practices.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  The aim of this study was to assess the clinical performance at two years of 100 Solitaire 2 restorations placed in five United Kingdom dental practices by members of a practice-based research group.
  
  
  METHODS
  Restorations were assessed after two years by a trained evaluator and the dental practitioner who had placed the material, for anatomic form, marginal adaptation, surface roughness, gingival condition and the presence or absence of secondary caries. In addition, the patients completed a questionnaire requesting details of the comfort and performance of the Solitaire 2 restoration(s).
  
  
  RESULTS
  A total of 88 (58 Class II and 30 Class I) restorations of Solitaire 2 placed in 49 patients (mean age 43 years) were assessed. Twelve restorations could not be evaluated because of patient unavailability for the dates of the examinations. Two Class II restorations (2%) had failed by the time of the two-year evaluation and the remaining 86 restorations were found to be intact with no secondary caries. A high percentage of optimal scores were recorded for anatomic form and surface roughness. The colour match of two restorations (2%) was recorded as an obvious mismatch, but otherwise no unacceptable scores were recorded.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  After two years of clinical service a high proportion (96%) of the Solitaire 2 restorations that were available for re-examination, placed in general dental practice settings, were found to be performing satisfactorily.
authors.affiliation: Primary Dental Care, The University of Birmingham School of Dentistry, St Chad's Queensway, Birmingham B4 6NN, UK. f.j.t.burke@bham.ac.uk
authors.forename: F J T
authors.initials: FJ
authors.lastname: Burke
authors.forename: R J
authors.initials: RJ
authors.lastname: Crisp
authors.forename: M
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Balkenhol
authors.forename: T J
authors.initials: TJ
authors.lastname: Bell
authors.forename: J J
authors.initials: JJ
authors.lastname: Lamb
authors.forename: K
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: McDermott
authors.forename: C
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Siddons
authors.forename: B
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: Weller
mesh_terms: D000269:Adhesives; D000328:Adult; D003188:Composite Resins; D001840:Dental Bonding; D019232:Dental Restoration Failure; D003793:Dental Restoration, Permanent / Q000379:methods*; D017220:Dentin-Bonding Agents; D004852:Epoxy Compounds; D005260:Female; D005500:Follow-Up Studies; D005792:General Practice, Dental; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008689:Methacrylates; D017063:Outcome Assessment, Health Care; D019279:Resin Cements; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires; D006113:United Kingdom
chemical_list: D000269:Adhesives; D003188:Composite Resins; D017220:Dentin-Bonding Agents; D004852:Epoxy Compounds; C408265:Gluma One Bond; D008689:Methacrylates; D019279:Resin Cements; C407604:Solid Bond; C469658:Solitaire 2 composite resin