title: Evaluation of surgical malpractice in Turkey.
abstract: The aim of this retrospective study was to differentiate complications from malpractices in surgical cases and to help specialists who work as court experts in malpractice litigations. We reviewed 366 malpractice cases notified to The Higher Health Council by Criminal Courts between 1995 and 2000. Of these, 93 had General surgical malpractice cases. The data showed that a large proportion of malpractice litigations against surgeons resulted from deviations of the surgeons from their own field of study. The surgeons did not obtain informed consent from patients in the majority of the cases. The rate of autopsy in deaths from malpractices was 79.6%. Fifty percent of malpractice litigations were groundless. It can be suggested that incessant exposure to criticisms and complaints may make innocent surgeons less willing to take risks for patients.
authors.affiliation: Department of Forensic Medicine, Hacettepe University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.
authors.forename: Ali Riza
authors.initials: AR
authors.lastname: Tümer
authors.forename: Cenap
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Dener
mesh_terms: D001344:Autopsy / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D016304:Hospitals, Private; D006779:Hospitals, Public; D006801:Humans; D007258:Informed Consent; D008318:Malpractice / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D019300:Medical Errors / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D012189:Retrospective Studies; D013043:Specialties, Surgical / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D014421:Turkey