title: Comparison of respiratory event detection by a polyvinylidene fluoride film airflow sensor and a pneumotachograph in sleep apnea patients.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  Compare the ability of a polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) thermal sensor and a pneumotachograph to detect respiratory events in patients with obstructive sleep apnea.
  
  
  METHODS
  Single night of monitoring, single blinded scorer.
  
  
  METHODS
  Veterans Affairs medical center.
  
  
  METHODS
  Ten male subjects with obstructive sleep apnea.
  
  
  METHODS
  Nasal-oral airflow was simultaneously detected by a PVDF thermal sensor attached to the upper lip and a pneumotachograph in a mask over the nose and mouth.
  
  
  METHODS
  Events were scored from display views showing only the airflow tracings of the sensor in question and the events scored from that sensor. The apnea-hypopnea index was computed using two definitions for hypopnea. Hypopnea-1 was defined as a 50% reduction in flow for > or = 10 s in duration. Hypopnea-2 was defined as any reduction in airflow for > or = 10 s associated with a 3% drop in the arterial oxygen saturation or followed by an arousal. The level of agreement (kappa) for the sensors was determined by comparing whether or not they identified candidate events determined by a second blinded scorer.
  
  
  RESULTS
  For the apnea-hypopnea-1 index (mean +/- SD), the event rate for the pneumotachograph (26.0 +/- 27.9 events/h) was slightly greater than that for the PVDF sensor (20.1 +/- 27.1 events/h; p < 0.05). For the apnea-hypopnea-2 index, the event rate for the pneumotachograph (29.4 +/- 26.8 events/h) and for that of the PVDF sensor (26.4 +/- 25.9 events/h) were similar (difference not significant). The mean +/- 2 SD difference was 3.0 +/- 8.5 events/h. The level of agreement between the sensors was in the "good range," whereby kappa = 0.69. For 20 randomly selected breaths per patient, the maximum deflections of the PVDF sensor varied linearly with pneumotachograph airflow deflections.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The PVDF sensor compared favorably with a "gold standard" method of detecting respiratory events during sleep in patients with obstructive sleep apnea.
authors.affiliation: Department of Medicine, Box 100225 HSC, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32610, USA. sleep_doc@msn.com
authors.forename: Richard B
authors.initials: RB
authors.lastname: Berry
authors.forename: Gary L
authors.initials: GL
authors.lastname: Koch
authors.forename: Steven
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Trautz
authors.forename: Mary H
authors.initials: MH
authors.lastname: Wagner
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D003948:Diagnostic Techniques, Respiratory System / Q000295:instrumentation*; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D010092:Oximetry; D017286:Polysomnography; D011145:Polyvinyls; D016037:Single-Blind Method; D020181:Sleep Apnea, Obstructive / Q000175:diagnosis*; D014159:Transducers; D005465:Fluorocarbon Polymers
chemical_list: D011145:Polyvinyls; C024865:polyvinylidene fluoride; D005465:Fluorocarbon Polymers