The role of prosody in the interpretation of structural ambiguities: a study of anticipatory eye movements.
An eye-tracking experiment examined whether prosodic cues can affect the interpretation of grammatical functions in the absence of clear morphological information. German listeners were presented with scenes depicting three potential referents while hearing temporarily ambiguous SVO and OVS sentences. While case marking on the first noun phrase (NP) was ambiguous, clear case marking on the second NP disambiguated sentences towards SVO or OVS. Listeners interpreted case-ambiguous NP1s more often as Subject, and thus expected an Object as upcoming argument, only when sentence beginnings carried an SVO-type intonation. This was revealed by more anticipatory eye movements to suitable Patients (Objects) than Agents (Subjects) in the visual scenes. No such preference was found when sentence beginnings had an OVS-type intonation. Prosodic cues were integrated rapidly enough to affect listeners' interpretation of grammatical function before disambiguating case information was available. We conclude that in addition to manipulating attachment ambiguities, prosody can influence the interpretation of constituent order ambiguities.
Weber
Andrea
A
Saarland University, FR 4.7 Psycholinguistik, 66041 Saarbrücken, Germany. aweber@coli.uni-sb.de
Grice
Martine
M
Crocker
Matthew W
MW
D003071:Cognition; D005133:Eye Movements; D006801:Humans; D012660:Semantics; D013067:Speech Perception; D014796:Visual Perception