The proliferation of clinical practice guidelines: professional development or medicine-by-numbers?
In a medical milieu of extensive research, rapidly proliferating information, and a multitude of potential therapies, there has been an escalating trend toward the development and dissemination of clinical practice guidelines outlining investigative and management protocols for clinical problems. There are substantial benefits to providing educational directives and securing widespread adherence to specific clinical practice standards as a means to ensure a consistent acceptable standard-of-care. On the other hand, the increasing tendency to regard authoritative documents as dogma may hinder ongoing medical progress and facilitate the adoption of a "follow-the-recipe" approach to medical practice. A healthy tension between physician autonomy and recommended practice guidelines needs to be cultivated in primary care as well as in specialty clinical practice. In response to increasing concern surrounding issues of impartiality and commercial influence on the development of practice directives, a mechanism designed to assure integrity and credibility of guidelines is required.
Genuis
Stephen J
SJ
University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada. sgenuis@ualberta.ca
D016265:Conflict of Interest; D004345:Drug Industry; D015914:Estrogen Replacement Therapy; D019983:Guideline Adherence / Q000941:ethics; D006801:Humans; D016365:Liability, Legal; D017410:Practice Guidelines as Topic; D010818:Practice Patterns, Physicians'