Agreement between reported use of interventions for liver diseases and research evidence in Cochrane systematic reviews.
OBJECTIVE
This study evaluates the agreement between reported use of interventions for patients with liver diseases and research evidence in Cochrane systematic reviews.


METHODS
In July 2002, the Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group had completed 28 systematic reviews on 36 interventions that were available in Denmark. Based on the reviews, three interventions (n-acetylcysteine for paracetamol overdose, terlipressin for bleeding oesophageal varices, and antibiotics for patients with cirrhosis and gastrointestinal bleeding) with significant beneficial effects on clinical outcomes were classified as 'evidence-based', whereas 19 were classified as 'possibly evidence-based', and 14 as 'not evidence-based'. Questionnaires on reported use and perceived intervention effects were mailed to 108 physicians practising in Danish hospitals. Sixty-six returned their questionnaire.


RESULTS
The proportion of physicians who reported that they never used the three evidence-based interventions varied considerably (2, 62, and 57%, respectively). The perceived intervention effect, duration of clinical experience, employment as head of department, and university hospital employment were significant predictors of more frequent use of evidence-based interventions. Physicians also reported that they used the interventions that were not evidence-based more often if they were employed at a university hospital.


CONCLUSIONS
Considerable disagreements between reported use and research evidence were identified. Additional research on methods to introduce evidence-based medicine in practice seems warranted.
Kürstein
Pia
P
DSI Danish Institute for Health Services Research, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Gluud
Lise L
LL
Willemann
Marlene
M
Olsen
Kim R
KR
Kjellberg
Jakob
J
Sogaard
Jes
J
Gluud
Christian
C
D019317:Evidence-Based Medicine; D006801:Humans; D008107:Liver Diseases / Q000150:complications / Q000209:etiology / Q000628:therapy*; D011364:Professional Practice; D012196:Review Literature as Topic