Autonomy, informed consent and advance directives: a study of physician attitudes.
The rights of patients to make decisions concerning their care have been promoted by ethical guidelines under the banner of respect for autonomy, and by legal statutes that address informed consent requirements and advance directives. Given these trends, this study investigated the opinions of 90 physicians specializing in family practice and internal medicine at the Joan C. Edwards Marshall University School of Medicine and the West Virginia University School of Medicine in relation to physician-patient communication. Beliefs and attitudes of these physicians with respect to the participation of patients and family members in medical decisions were explored, using a survey instrument with closed questions. Although physicians surveyed showed respect for the primary elements of informed consent and supported stronger patients' rights, many respondents reported a willingness to override the explicit directives of patients, based on the requests of surrogates. These results reveal a conflict between current ethical and legal standards and the moral intuitions of many practicing physicians. More research focusing explicitly on the role and authority of surrogate decision-makers is warranted.
Sypher
Blake
B
Dept. of Family and Community Health, Joan C. Edwards Marshall University School of Medicine, Huntington, USA.
Hall
Robert T
RT
Rosencrance
Gregory
G
D000328:Adult; D016223:Advance Directives / Q000941:ethics*; D001291:Attitude of Health Personnel; D001294:Attitude to Health; D003142:Communication; D003469:Culture; D005260:Female; D019538:Health Care Surveys; D006801:Humans; D007258:Informed Consent / Q000941:ethics*; D008297:Male; D010358:Patient Participation; D026684:Personal Autonomy; D010820:Physicians / Q000941:ethics / Q000523:psychology*; D011368:Professional-Family Relations; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires; D014903:West Virginia