title: Comparison of 2 surgical techniques of posterolateral corner reconstruction of the knee.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Various surgical techniques to treat posterolateral knee instability have been described. To date, the recommended treatment is an anatomical form of reconstruction, in which the 3 key structures of the posterolateral corner are addressed: the lateral collateral ligament, the popliteofibular ligament, and the popliteus tendon.
  
  
  OBJECTIVE
  Two methods of surgical reconstruction will restore posterolateral knee instability, in terms of static laxity as well as dynamic 6 degrees of freedom kinematics, to statistically significant levels compared with the intact state.
  
  
  METHODS
  Controlled laboratory study.
  
  
  METHODS
  Two surgical techniques (A and B) were used to reconstruct the posterolateral structures in 10 cadaveric knees. Static tests were performed on the intact, sectioned, and reconstructed knees at 30 degrees and 90 degrees of flexion for anterior-posterior laxity and external rotational laxity, as well as at 0 degrees and 30 degrees of flexion for varus laxity; dynamic 6 degrees of freedom kinematic testing, through a path of motion from 90 degrees of flexion to full extension, was also performed.
  
  
  RESULTS
  For the static varus tests, external rotation and varus laxity were significantly increased after the posterolateral structures were cut. Both reconstruction techniques restored external rotation and varus laxity to levels not significantly different from the intact state. For technique B, dynamic testing did not show any significant difference for all degrees of freedom kinematics compared with the intact state. However, for technique A, a significant internal tibial rotation was observed throughout the entire path of motion from 0 degrees to 90 degrees of knee flexion.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Both surgical techniques for anatomical posterolateral corner reconstruction showed good results in the static laxity tests. The anatomical reconstruction of all structures, including the popliteus tendon, resulted in an abnormal internal tibial rotation during dynamic testing.
authors.affiliation: Laboratoire de Recherche en Imagerie et Orthopédie, Centre de Recherche du CHUM, Hopital Notre-Dame, Montréal, Canada. thnau@hotmail.com
authors.forename: Thomas
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Nau
authors.forename: Yan
authors.initials: Y
authors.lastname: Chevalier
authors.forename: Nicola
authors.initials: N
authors.lastname: Hagemeister
authors.forename: Jacques A
authors.initials: JA
authors.lastname: Deguise
authors.forename: Nicolas
authors.initials: N
authors.lastname: Duval
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D001696:Biomechanical Phenomena; D001863:Bone Screws; D002102:Cadaver; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007593:Joint Instability / Q000601:surgery*; D007719:Knee Joint / Q000601:surgery*; D008023:Ligaments, Articular / Q000601:surgery; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D019637:Orthopedic Procedures / Q000379:methods*; D016059:Range of Motion, Articular; D012399:Rotation; D013710:Tendons / Q000637:transplantation*