title: [Retrospective study of medicojuridical complications through the expertise. Elements to take into consideration by plastic surgeons].
abstract: The majority of the incidents declarations made to Afssaps are the flats and the ruptures of the breasts implants, but this incident type is rarely the lawsuit. So, the litigation origins brought in front of the courts, we find more often a result of imperfection, a prothetic malposition or even the succession of interventions bringing about an increase insatisfaction. To condemn the surgeon, the Magistrate is generally based on the defect of information. This one, underline the necessity to have delivered full information and to have a writing proof and signed of the effective delivery of this information.
authors.forename: J-C
authors.initials: JC
authors.lastname: Dardour
authors.forename: J-L
authors.initials: JL
authors.lastname: Goin
authors.forename: G
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Flageul
mesh_terms: D019928:Breast Implantation / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D002983:Clinical Competence; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D012189:Retrospective Studies; D013518:Surgery, Plastic / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*