Social context and stakeholders' values in building diagnostic systems.
Beginning with an acknowledgment of the scientific aspects of developing classifications for psychopathology, this essay describes how diagnostic classifications (DCs) also function as public policy. Using the methods of philosophical analysis and a brief review of pertinent literature, the paper describes the regulatory and prescriptive functions of official DCs like the DSM and ICD manuals, functions that de facto serve as public policies. This background then provides for a comparison of the values involved in good science alongside the values involved in good public policy. Important areas of overlap are described, and these point to areas, relevant to stakeholders' interest, worth considering in developing future DCs.
Sadler
John Z
JZ
The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas, Dallas, TX 75390-9070, USA. John.Sadler@UTSouthwestern.edu
D039721:Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders; D006801:Humans; D038801:International Classification of Diseases; D001523:Mental Disorders / Q000145:classification* / Q000175:diagnosis*; D010684:Philosophy; D011057:Politics; D011640:Public Policy; D012924:Social Conditions