title: Can arguments address concerns?
abstract: People have concerns, and ethicists often respond to them with philosophical arguments. But can conceptual constructions properly address fears and anxieties? It is argued in this paper that while it is possible to voice, clarify, create and-to a certain extent-tackle concerns by arguments, more concrete practices, choices, and actions are normally needed to produce proper responses to people's worries. While logical inconsistencies and empirical errors can legitimately be exposed by arguments, the situation is considerably less clear when it comes to moral, cultural, and emotional norms, values, and expectations.
authors.affiliation: School of Law, The University of Manchester, Williamson Building, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PL, UK. matti.hayry@manchester.ac.uk
authors.forename: M
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Häyry
mesh_terms: D001294:Attitude to Health; D026688:Bioethical Issues; D032921:Consensus; D004992:Ethics, Medical; D008128:Logic; D010686:Philosophy, Medical; D010817:Physician-Patient Relations; D012926:Social Control, Formal / Q000379:methods; D035502:Trust