The right to parenthood: an argument for a narrow interpretation.
The paper argues for two kinds of limitations on the right of parenthood. First, it claims that the right to parenthood does not entail a right to have as many children as one desires. This conclusion follows from the standard justifications for the right to parenthood, none of which establishes the need to grant special protection to having as many children as one desires. Second, with respect to the right to receive assistance from the state in IVF, it is suggested that the state should also be allowed to take non-medical considerations into account in determining whether or not an applicant is entitled to this service, particularly in cases where the applicant seems to lack mothering ability.
Statman
Daniel
D
Dept. of Philosophy, University of Haifa, Haifa 31905, Israel. dstatman@research.haifa.ac.il
D002648:Child; D002649:Child Abuse / Q000517:prevention & control; D002668:Child Rearing; D026689:Ethical Analysis; D005191:Family Characteristics; D005260:Female; D005307:Fertilization in Vitro / Q000941:ethics; D005380:Financing, Government; D015276:Health Care Rationing / Q000941:ethics; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D010290:Parents; D018579:Patient Selection / Q000941:ethics; D011640:Public Policy; D016079:Refusal to Treat / Q000941:ethics; D012098:Reproduction / Q000941:ethics*; D046269:Reproductive Rights / Q000941:ethics*; D027724:Reproductive Techniques, Assisted / Q000941:ethics*