Number of solutions effects in stem decision: support for the distinction between identification and production processes in priming.
Three experiments explored the distinction between identification and production processes (e.g., Gabrieli et al., 1999). A stem decision test was introduced, in which participants were asked to state whether there were any English words that began with the presented three-letter stems. In Experiment 1, stem decision priming was robust for single-solution stems, but much reduced for many-solution stems. In Experiment 2, the solutions effect in stem decision was replicated in a within-subjects design, as was the contrast between the presence of priming in a many-solution stem completion test and the absence of priming in a many-solution stem decision test. In Experiment 3, for each critical many-solution stem in the stem decision test, participants studied three words that began with those three letters. Again, priming was not observed. These results were consistent with the notions that (a) many-solution stem completion relies on production processes, (b) the stem decision test eliminates production processes, and (c) single-solution priming relies on identification processes, regardless of whether the test is stem completion or stem decision.
Barnhardt
Terrence M
TM
Department of Psychology, Texas A and M University, College, TX 77843, USA. tmb@psych.tamu.edu
D003657:Decision Making; D006801:Humans; D008568:Memory; D010153:Paired-Associate Learning; D011581:Psychological Tests; D012660:Semantics; D014825:Vocabulary