title: Can a web-based curriculum improve students' knowledge of, and attitudes about, the interpreted medical interview?
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  To develop and evaluate a web-based curriculum to introduce first year medical students to the knowledge and attitudes necessary for working with limited English proficient (LEP) patients through interpreters.
  
  
  METHODS
  Six hundred and forty first year medical students over 4 consecutive years took this curriculum as part of their Patient Physician and Society course. They viewed 6 patient-physician-interpreter video vignettes, gave open text analyses of each vignette, and compared their responses to those generated by experts, thereby receiving immediate formative feedback. They listened to video commentaries by a cultural expert, lawyer, and ethicist about working with LEP patients, completed pre- and postmodule questionnaires, which tested relevant knowledge and attitudes, and were provided a summative assessment at the end of the module. Students completed an optional survey assessing the educational value of, and providing open text commentary about, the module.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Seventy-one percent (n=456) of first year students who completed the module consented to have their data included in this evaluation. Mean knowledge (19 items) scores improved (46% pre- to 62% postmodule, P<.001), reflecting improvements in knowledge about best interpreter practices and immigration demographics and legal issues. Mean scores on 4 of 5 attitude items improved, reflecting attitudes more consistent with culturally sensitive care of LEP patients. Mean satisfaction with the educational value of the module for 155 students who completed the postmodule survey was 2.9 on a scale of 1 to 4.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Our web-curriculum resulted in short-term improvement in the knowledge and attitudes necessary to interact with LEP patients and interpreters. The interactive format allowed students to receive immediate formative feedback and be cognizant of the challenges and effective strategies in language discordant medical encounters. This is important because studies suggest that the use of these skills in patient encounters leads to greater patient and provider satisfaction and improved health outcomes.
authors.affiliation: Section of Primary Care, Division of General Internal Medicine, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA. ak41@nyu.edu
authors.forename: Adina L
authors.initials: AL
authors.lastname: Kalet
authors.forename: Debjani
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Mukherjee
authors.forename: Karla
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Felix
authors.forename: Sarah E
authors.initials: SE
authors.lastname: Steinberg
authors.forename: Martin
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Nachbar
authors.forename: Amy
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Lee
authors.forename: Joytsna
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Changrani
authors.forename: Francesca
authors.initials: F
authors.lastname: Gany
mesh_terms: D001294:Attitude to Health; D003479:Curriculum; D007722:Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice; D006801:Humans; D020407:Internet; D007407:Interviews as Topic; D009519:New York City; D010817:Physician-Patient Relations; D013337:Students, Medical