title: South-East Scotland trabeculectomy survey.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  Assessment of trabeculectomy in South-East Scotland (SESTS) with comparison to National Survey of Trabeculectomy (NST) and outcomes of consultant and trainee surgery.
  
  
  METHODS
  A retrospective study of 304 consecutive, primary trabeculectomies, in two Scottish centres (Edinburgh and Dunfermline) with two glaucoma specialists and higher surgical trainees, was performed. The study group had primary open angle glaucoma (65.5%), pseudoexfoliation (6.9%), normal tension glaucoma (7.6%), pigment dispersion syndrome (1.6%), and other complicated glaucoma (18.4%). All patients underwent trabeculectomy by the glaucoma specialist (57.6%) and higher surgical trainee (42.4%) with close scrubbed supervision.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Compared to the NST, the waiting time for surgery (<3 months) was significantly less in the SESTS (P<0.001). There was also significantly more use of intraoperative antimetabolites (P<0.01), bleb intervention (P<0.001), and a higher rate of early complications (P<0.025). There was no significant difference in outcome at intraocular pressure (IOP)<2/3 listing IOP (qualified and unqualified) between the SESTS and the NST. Significantly, more patients achieved an unqualified success of IOP<21 mmHg (P<0.01) and an unqualified success of IOP<16 mmHg in the SESTS than the NST (P<0.05). At 1 year post surgery, visual loss of greater than one Snellen line was more common in the NST (P<0.01) as was the use of anti-glaucoma medication (P<0.001). Trainee cases returned to theatre more frequently (P<0.025) and merited more bleb intervention (P<0.01) than consultant cases, but the long-term outcome was similar.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Our study highlights significant changes in the practice and outcome of trabeculectomy compared to the national survey conducted a decade ago.
authors.affiliation: Princess Alexandra Eye Pavilion, Chalmers Street, Edinburgh, UK. pete@pdcackett.demon.co.uk
authors.forename: P
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Cackett
authors.forename: J
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Vallance
authors.forename: C
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Cobb
authors.forename: H
authors.initials: H
authors.lastname: Devlin
authors.forename: A
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Simpson
authors.forename: R
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Sanders
mesh_terms: D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D000959:Antihypertensive Agents / Q000008:administration & dosage; D002983:Clinical Competence; D003253:Consultants; D004334:Drug Administration Schedule; D005260:Female; D005901:Glaucoma / Q000188:drug therapy / Q000503:physiopathology / Q000601:surgery*; D019538:Health Care Surveys; D006801:Humans; D007429:Intraocular Pressure; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D012189:Retrospective Studies; D012606:Scotland; D014130:Trabeculectomy / Q000009:adverse effects / Q000379:methods* / Q000592:standards; D016896:Treatment Outcome; D014850:Waiting Lists
chemical_list: D000959:Antihypertensive Agents