Can human error theory explain non-adherence?
OBJECTIVE
To apply human error theory to explain non-adherence and examine how well it fits.


METHODS
Patients who were taking chronic medication were telephoned and asked whether they had been adhering to their medicine, and if not the reasons were explored and analysed according to a human error theory.


RESULTS
Of 105 patients, 87 were contacted by telephone and they took part in the study. Forty-two recalled being non-adherent, 17 of them in the last 7 days; 11 of the 42 were intentionally non-adherent. The errors could be described by human error theory, and it explained unintentional non-adherence well, however, the application of 'rules' was difficult when considering mistakes. The consideration of error producing conditions and latent failures also revealed useful contributing factors.


CONCLUSIONS
Human error theory offers a new and valuable way of understanding non-adherence, and could inform interventions. However, the theory needs further development to explain intentional non-adherence.
Barber
Nick
N
Department of Practice and Policy, The School of Pharmacy, London, UK. nick@nickbarber.org
Safdar
A
A
Franklin
Bryoney D
BD
D004358:Drug Therapy / Q000523:psychology*; D006801:Humans; D012646:Self Administration / Q000523:psychology; D016312:Treatment Refusal / Q000523:psychology*