Contrast sensitivity for letter optotypes vs. gratings under conditions biased toward parvocellular and magnocellular pathways.
This study examined the extent to which letter optotypes and grating stimuli provide equivalent measures of contrast sensitivity under conditions designed to favor the magnocellular (MC) and parvocellular (PC) pathways. The contrast sensitivity functions (CSFs) of three visually normal observers were measured for Sloan letters and Gabor patches, using steady- and pulsed-pedestal paradigms to bias processing toward MC and PC pathways, respectively. CSFs for Gabor patches were low-pass for the steady-pedestal paradigm and band-pass for the pulsed-pedestal paradigm, in agreement with previous reports. However, CSFs for letters were low-pass for both testing paradigms. CSFs for letters restricted in frequency content by spatial filtering were equivalent to those for Gabor patches for both testing paradigms. Results indicate that conventional letter optotypes can provide a misleading measure of contrast sensitivity, especially under conditions emphasizing the PC pathway. The use of spatially band-pass filtered letters can provide a more appropriate evaluation of spatial contrast sensitivity while maintaining some of the potential advantages of letters.
McAnany
J Jason
JJ
Department of Psychology, University of Illinois at Chicago, 1007 W. Harrison Street, 60612, USA.
Alexander
Kenneth R
KR
D000328:Adult; D015350:Contrast Sensitivity / Q000502:physiology*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D010364:Pattern Recognition, Visual / Q000502:physiology*; D010775:Photic Stimulation / Q000379:methods; D011601:Psychophysics; D014787:Vision Tests / Q000379:methods; D014795:Visual Pathways / Q000502:physiology*