Non-heart-beating donors: is it worthwhile?
OBJECTIVE
Due to organ shortage in renal transplantation, many transplant centers attempt to increase the donor pool. Non-heart-beating donors seem to be a promising alternative.


METHODS
We performed 14 renal transplantations from 8 non-heart-beating donors. 2, 1, 3 and 2 donors were from groups 1, 2, 3 and 4, respectively, according to Maastricht classification.


RESULTS
In 6 of the patients' warm ischemia time was over 30 minutes. Three of them had primary non-function. In 6 patients delayed graft function was seen. The remaining 5 kidneys functioned immediately. Two patients whose kidney functioned returned to hemodialysis in the I I and 13th months after their transplantations. One of the patients with primary non-function died. 9 kidneys function well in their follow-up period between 5-111 months. 1 and 5-year graft survival rates were 69.8 and 61.1 percent, respectively. The mean graft survival time is 69.9 +/- 14.5 months.


CONCLUSIONS
Despite the high primary non-function rate, we think that non-heart-beating donors especially in Maastricht classification 3 and 4 should be used due to dramatic shortage of organs.
Gurkan
Alp
A
SSK Tepecik Hospital, Organ Transplantation Unit, Izmir, Turkey.
Kacar
Serdar H
SH
Varilsuha
Can
C
Karaca
Cezmi
C
Kose
Sukran
S
Karaoglan
Muharrem
M
Akman
Fatih
F
Basak
Kemal
K
D000328:Adult; D051799:Delayed Graft Function; D006085:Graft Survival; D006323:Heart Arrest; D006801:Humans; D007668:Kidney / Q000503:physiopathology; D016030:Kidney Transplantation / Q000009:adverse effects / Q000401:mortality; D008875:Middle Aged; D006435:Renal Dialysis; D051437:Renal Insufficiency / Q000209:etiology / Q000628:therapy; D013997:Time Factors; D014019:Tissue Donors; D052096:Warm Ischemia