title: Distal myocardial protection during percutaneous coronary intervention: when and where?
abstract: The discrepancy between angiographic success and microvascular perfusion has been recognized for some time. In the face of an open artery, the degree of microvascular perfusion determines post-infarct prognosis. Despite successful epicardial recanalization, tissue perfusion may be absent in up to 25% patients with acute myocardial infarction. Historically associated with saphenous vein graft intervention, embolization is increasingly recognized in native coronary arteries, particularly in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). With more than two million PCI procedures performed worldwide each year, there is enormous interest in protecting the left ventricular myocardium from embolization during PCI. This article reviews the evidence for distal myocardial protection and discusses the relative merits of the different available techniques.
authors.affiliation: Waller Cardiac Department, St. Mary's Hospital, London, United Kingdom. dgorog@aol.com
authors.forename: Diana A
authors.initials: DA
authors.lastname: Gorog
authors.forename: Rodney A
authors.initials: RA
authors.lastname: Foale
authors.forename: Iqbal
authors.initials: I
authors.lastname: Malik
mesh_terms: D015906:Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary / Q000009:adverse effects*; D021721:Balloon Occlusion / Q000295:instrumentation / Q000379:methods; D004617:Embolism / Q000209:etiology / Q000517:prevention & control*; D004867:Equipment Design; D006801:Humans