title: Criminal investigations of child abuse: the research behind "best practices".
abstract: This article reviews the research relevant to seven practices considered by many to be among the most progressive approaches to criminal child abuse investigations: multidisciplinary team investigations, trained child forensic interviewers, videotaped interviews, specialized forensic medical examiners, victim advocacy programs, improved access to mental health treatment for victims, and Children's Advocacy Centers (CACs). The review finds that despite the popularity of these practices, little outcome research is currently available documenting their success. However, preliminary research supports many of these practices or has influenced their development. Knowledge of this research can assist investigators and policy makers who want to improve the response to victims, understand the effectiveness of particular programs, or identify where assumptions about effectiveness are not empirically supported.
authors.affiliation: University of New Hampshire, USA.
authors.forename: Lisa M
authors.initials: LM
authors.lastname: Jones
authors.forename: Theodore P
authors.initials: TP
authors.lastname: Cross
authors.forename: Wendy A
authors.initials: WA
authors.lastname: Walsh
authors.forename: Monique
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Simone
mesh_terms: D002648:Child; D002650:Child Abuse, Sexual / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence* / Q000517:prevention & control; D002651:Child Advocacy / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence; D002652:Child Behavior / Q000523:psychology; D002662:Child Health Services / Q000458:organization & administration*; D002669:Child Welfare / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence; D002983:Clinical Competence; D005555:Forensic Psychiatry / Q000379:methods; D006801:Humans; D011369:Professional-Patient Relations; D015397:Program Evaluation; D002666:Psychology, Child; D011785:Quality Assurance, Health Care; D014481:United States