Maynard Smith: amplifying the reasons for signal reliability.
One of the many questions to which John Maynard Smith contributed was that of why most animal signals are reliable. He initially rejected the "handicap" argument but gradually accepted it, a process I briefly describe. This episode illustrated his preference for mathematical models over verbal ones, and the generosity with which he could change his mind. Even after accepting that some signals are reliable because of their strategic costs, he argued for a pluralistic approach to signal reliability. Signal complexity was a developing interest when he died. Signals usually involve several components, some of which appear to amplify other signal components. The terms "amplifier" and "index" require more thought to reduce the scope for semantic confusion. I conclude by describing Maynard Smith's fascination with peacocks Pavo cristatus.
Harper
D G C
DG
Centre for the Study of Evolution, School of Biological Sciences, University of Sussex, Falmer, Brighton & Hove BN1 9QG, UK. david@sussex.ac.uk
D000819:Animal Communication; D000818:Animals; D005075:Biological Evolution; D049673:History, 20th Century; D011584:Psychology / Q000266:history*; D012726:Sexual Behavior, Animal