title: Practice effects, workload, and reaction time in deception.
abstract: Cognitive theorists argue that deception may involve attentional capture, working memory load, or perceived incongruity with memory, whereas psychophysiologists argue for stimulus salience, arousal, and emotion. This article presents a comprehensive model of deception and assesses the effect of practice on deceptive responding. A three-session longitudinal study examined the effect of practice on reaction time (RT) in relation to deception and response congruity. Participants evaluated self-referent sentences and responded truthfully or deceptively. Findings indicate that deceptive responding generates longer RTs than does truthful responding and that this relationship remains constant with practice. We use these findings to support a cognitive model of deception.
authors.affiliation: University of South Carolina, Department of Psychology, Columbia 29209, USA. Vendemia@sc.edu
authors.forename: Jennifer M C
authors.initials: JM
authors.lastname: Vendemia
authors.forename: Robert F
authors.initials: RF
authors.lastname: Buzan
authors.forename: Eric P
authors.initials: EP
authors.lastname: Green
mesh_terms: D008192:Deception; D006801:Humans; D011214:Practice, Psychological; D011930:Reaction Time; D016526:Workload