title: Overview of avian influenza DIVA test strategies.
abstract: The use of vaccination in poultry to control avian influenza has been increasing in recent years. Vaccination has been primarily with killed whole virus-adjuvanted vaccines. Proper vaccination can reduce or prevent clinical signs, reduce virus shedding in infected birds, and increase the resistance to infection. Historically, one limitation of the killed vaccines is that vaccinated birds cannot be differentiated serologically from naturally infected birds using the commonly available diagnostic tests. Therefore, surveillance for avian influenza becomes much more difficult and often results in trade restrictions because of the inability to differentiate infected from vaccinated animals (DIVA). Several different DIVA strategies have been proposed for avian influenza to overcome this limitation. The most common is the use of unvaccinated sentinels. A second approach is the use of subunit vaccines targeted to the hemagglutinin protein that allows serologic surveillance to the internal proteins. A third strategy is to vaccinate with a homologous hemagglutinin to the circulating field strain, but a heterologous neuraminidase subtype. Serologic surveillance can then be performed for the homologous NA subtype as evidence of natural infection. The fourth strategy is to measure the serologic response to the nonstructural protein 1 (NS1). The NS1 protein is produced in large quantities in infected cells, but it is not packaged in the virion. Since killed vaccines for influenza are primarily made with whole virions, a differential antibody response can be seen between naturally infected and vaccinated animals. However, poultry vaccines are not highly purified, and they contain small amounts of the NS1 protein. Although vaccinated chickens will produce low levels of antibody to the NS1 protein, virus infected chickens will produce higher levels of NS1 antibody, and the two groups can be differentiated. All four DIVA strategies have advantages and disadvantages, and further testing is needed to identify the best strategy to make vaccination a more viable option for avian influenza.
authors.affiliation: Southeast Poultry Research Laboratory, USDA/ARS, 934 College Station Road, Athens, GA 30605, USA. dsuarez@seprl.usda.gov
authors.forename: David L
authors.initials: DL
authors.lastname: Suarez
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D003937:Diagnosis, Differential; D005585:Influenza in Birds / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000276:immunology / Q000517:prevention & control; D009439:Neuraminidase / Q000276:immunology; D011200:Poultry; D014611:Vaccination / Q000662:veterinary*; D017361:Viral Nonstructural Proteins / Q000276:immunology; D014765:Viral Vaccines / Q000276:immunology
chemical_list: C085820:INS1 protein, influenza virus; D017361:Viral Nonstructural Proteins; D014765:Viral Vaccines; D009439:Neuraminidase