Contingency awareness in human aversive conditioning involves the middle frontal gyrus.
In contrast to the wealth of data describing the neural mechanisms underlying classical conditioning, we know remarkably little about the mechanisms involved in acquisition of explicit contingency awareness. Subjects variably acquire contingency awareness in classical conditioning paradigms, in which they are able to describe the temporal relationship between a conditioned cue and its outcome. Previous studies have implicated the hippocampus and prefrontal cortex in the acquisition of explicit knowledge, although their specific roles remain unclear. We used functional magnetic resonance imaging to track the trial-by-trial acquisition of explicit knowledge in a concurrent trace and delay conditioning paradigm. We show that activity in bilateral middle frontal gyrus and parahippocampal gyrus correlates with the accuracy of explicit contingency awareness on each trial. In contrast, amygdala activation correlates with conditioned responses indexed by skin conductance responses (SCRs). These results demonstrate that brain regions known to be involved in other aspects of learning and memory also play a specific role, reflecting on each trial the acquisition and representation of contingency awareness.
Carter
Ronald McKell
RM
MC216-76 Division of Biology, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA. mckell@klab.caltech.edu
O'Doherty
John P
JP
Seymour
Ben
B
Koch
Christof
C
Dolan
Raymond J
RJ
D000328:Adult; D001362:Avoidance Learning / Q000502:physiology*; D001364:Awareness / Q000502:physiology*; D003214:Conditioning, Classical; D005260:Female; D005625:Frontal Lobe / Q000502:physiology*; D005712:Galvanic Skin Response / Q000502:physiology; D006624:Hippocampus / Q000502:physiology; D006801:Humans; D008279:Magnetic Resonance Imaging; D008297:Male; D008570:Memory, Short-Term / Q000502:physiology; D017397:Prefrontal Cortex / Q000502:physiology; D012054:Reinforcement, Psychology