title: Who I am, who we are, and why: links between emotions and causal attributions for self- and group discrepancies.
abstract: Discrepancies between people's ought selves and their actual selves and their ideal selves and actual selves predict the emotions that individuals experience. The authors predicted that internal versus external causal attributions for self-discrepancies should moderate the relationship between self-discrepancies and emotions, resulting in more refined predictions for both agitation- and dejection-related emotions and for two additional types of emotion, namely, anger-related and discontent-related emotions. Results of two studies generally supported the predictions that agitation-related emotions and dejection-related emotions were positively associated with actual-ought discrepancies and actual-ideal discrepancies, respectively, only when causal attributions for the discrepancies were internally based. Anger-related emotions and emotions of discontent were positively associated with actual-ought and actual-ideal discrepancies, respectively, primarily when causal attributions were externally based. Study 2, which addressed group discrepancies and group-based emotions, generally replicated the findings when group identification was high, yielding a more complex model of the link between discrepancies and emotions.
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, Indiana University Bloomington, 47405, USA. jpetroce@indiana.edu
authors.forename: John V
authors.initials: JV
authors.lastname: Petrocelli
authors.forename: Eliot R
authors.initials: ER
authors.lastname: Smith
mesh_terms: D015984:Causality; D003220:Conflict, Psychological; D003674:Defense Mechanisms; D004644:Emotions; D006801:Humans; D008960:Models, Psychological; D012044:Regression Analysis; D012649:Self Concept; D012933:Social Identification; D014481:United States