Learning processes in matching and oddity: the oddity preference effect and sample reinforcement.
Eight pigeons learned either matching (to sample) or oddity (from sample) with or without reward for sample responding. The training stimuli were coarse-white, fine-black, or smooth-mauve gravels in pots with buried grain as the reinforcer. Oddity without sample reward was learned most rapidly, followed by matching with sample reward, oddity with sample reward, and matching without sample reward. Transfer was related to acquisition rate: The oddity group without sample reward showed full (equal to baseline) color and texture transfer; the matching group with sample reward showed partial texture transfer; other groups showed no transfer. Sample reward was shown to determine rate of acquisition of matching and oddity and the oddity preference effect. The results are discussed in terms of item-specific associations operating early in learning prior to any relational learning between sample and comparison stimuli.
Wright
Anthony A
AA
Department of Neurobiology and AnatomyUniversity of Texas Medical School at Houston, Houston, TX 77225, USA. anthony.a.wright@uth.tmc.edu
Delius
Juan D
JD
D000704:Analysis of Variance; D000818:Animals; D001070:Appetitive Behavior; D001522:Behavior, Animal; D003118:Color Perception; D010856:Columbidae; D004193:Discrimination Learning / Q000502:physiology*; D010364:Pattern Recognition, Visual / Q000502:physiology*; D012054:Reinforcement, Psychology; D014163:Transfer, Psychology