title: [Treatment of intertrochanteric femur fractures in elderly patients: internal fixation or hemiarthroplasty].
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  There is no consensus as to whether internal fixation or hemiarthroplasty is more appropriate for the treatment of intertrochanteric femur fractures in elderly patients. While the latter offers early mobilization, internal fixation preserves the hip joint and avoids long-term complications associated with the prosthesis. This retrospective study aimed to compare the early results of these treatment modalities.
  
  
  METHODS
  The study included 81 patients who were available for follow-up after surgery for intertrochanteric femur fractures. Of 38 patients (mean age 77.7 years; range 65 to 99 years) treated with internal fixation, 25 were alive; of 43 patients (mean age 80 years; range 67 to 97 years) treated with hemiarthroplasty, 22 were alive at the last follow-ups. The two groups were compared with regard to perioperative characteristics, mobilization time, complications, mortality, and daily activities according to the Barthel Activities of Daily Living Index. The mean follow-up was 22.7 months (range 6 to 39 months) in internal fixation, and 22.3 months (range 7 to 39 months) in hemiarthroplasty groups.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Subsequent to the operation, mortality occurred in 34.2% after a mean of 13 months (range 1 to 36 months) and in 48.8% after a mean of six months (range 1 to 24 months) in patients treated with internal fixation and endoprosthesis, respectively. There were no significant differences with respect to mobilization in bed, standing, weight bearing without support, complications, and daily activity scores. The only significant difference in favor of hemiarthroplasty was that full weight bearing with two crutches took a shorter time (p<0.05).
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Short-term results suggest that hemiarthroplasty is not an advantageous alternative to internal fixation; moreover, its postoperative survival is shorter and mortality rate is higher. Osteosynthesis seems to be the first choice in the treatment of elderly patients with intertrochanteric femur fractures.
authors.affiliation: Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology (Ortopedi ve Travmatoloji Anabilim Dali), Medicine Faculty of Cerrahpaşa, Istanbul University, Cerrahpaşa, Istanbul, Turkey. hkesmezacar@yahoo.com
authors.forename: Hayrettin
authors.initials: H
authors.lastname: Kesmezacar
authors.forename: Tahir
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Oğüt
authors.forename: M Gökhan
authors.initials: MG
authors.lastname: Bilgili
authors.forename: Selim
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Gökay
authors.forename: Yüksel
authors.initials: Y
authors.lastname: Tenekecioğlu
mesh_terms: D000203:Activities of Daily Living; D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D019644:Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D005260:Female; D005265:Femoral Neck Fractures / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging / Q000401:mortality / Q000473:pathology / Q000601:surgery*; D005593:Fracture Fixation, Internal / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D006299:Health Services for the Aged; D006622:Hip Prosthesis; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008499:Medical Records; D011859:Radiography; D016059:Range of Motion, Articular; D012189:Retrospective Studies; D016896:Treatment Outcome; D014421:Turkey / Q000453:epidemiology