title: Interval timing with gaps: gap ambiguity as an alternative to temporal decay.
abstract: C. V. Buhusi, D. Perera, and W. H. Meck (2005) proposed a hypothesis of timing in rats to account for the results of experiments that have used the peak procedure with gaps. According to this hypothesis, the introduction of a gap causes the animal's memory for the pregap interval to passively decay (subjectively shorten) in direct proportion to the duration and salience of the gap. Thus, animals should pause with short, nonsalient gaps but should reset their clock with longer, salient gaps. The present authors suggest that the ambiguity of the gap (i.e., the similarity between the gap and the intertrial interval in both appearance and relative duration) causes the animal to actively reset the clock and prevents adequate assessments of the fate of timed intervals prior to the gap. Furthermore, when the intertrial interval is discriminable from the gap, the evidence suggests that timed intervals prior to the gap are not lost but are retained in memory.
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40506, USA. zentall@uky.edu
authors.forename: Thomas R
authors.initials: TR
authors.lastname: Zentall
authors.forename: Daren H
authors.initials: DH
authors.lastname: Kaiser
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D001522:Behavior, Animal; D004192:Discrimination, Psychological / Q000502:physiology*; D008568:Memory / Q000502:physiology*; D051381:Rats; D013998:Time Perception / Q000502:physiology*