Dissociation between judgments and outcome-expectancy measures in covariation learning: a signal detection theory approach.
A number of studies using trial-by-trial learning tasks have shown that judgments of covariation between a cue c and an outcome o deviate from normative metrics. Parameters based on trial-by-trial predictions were estimated from signal detection theory (SDT) in a standard causal learning task. Results showed that manipulations of P(c) when contingency (deltaP) was held constant did not affect participants' ability to predict the appearance of the outcome (d') but had a significant effect on response criterion (c) and numerical causal judgments. The association between criterion c and judgment was further demonstrated in 2 experiments in which the criterion was directly manipulated by linking payoffs to the predictive responses made by learners. In all cases, the more liberal the criterion c was, the higher judgments were. The results imply that the mechanisms underlying the elaboration of judgments and those involved in the elaboration of predictive responses are partially dissociable.
Perales
José C
JC
Facultad de Psicología Experimental, Departamento de Psicologia Experimental, Universidad de Granada, Granada, Spain. jcesar@ugr.es
Catena
Andrés
A
Shanks
David R
DR
González
José A
JA
D001290:Attitude; D006801:Humans; D007600:Judgment; D007858:Learning; D017603:Signal Detection, Psychological