title: Making sense of pragmatic criteria for the selection of geriatric rehabilitation measurement tools.
abstract: In geriatric rehabilitation, the selection of the most appropriate measurement tools involves pragmatic as well as psychometric considerations. However, there is no consensus about the conceptual and operational definitions of the pragmatic criteria involved in this selection. The objective of this research was to identify such operational criteria through a literature search between 1995 and 2004. Results identified operational criteria that were grouped under four categories using a conceptual mapping methodology: respondent burden, examiner burden, score distribution and format compatibility. We recommend the umbrella term applicability to refer to this grouping of pragmatic qualities of a measurement tool. Examining the applicability of measurement tools should assist clinicians and researchers in selecting the most appropriate for use in geriatric rehabilitation.
authors.affiliation: Research Center, Institut Universitaire de Gériatrie de Montréal, 4565 Queen Mary Road, Montreal, Que., Canada H3W 1W5. claudine.auger@umontreal.ca
authors.forename: Claudine
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Auger
authors.forename: Louise
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Demers
authors.forename: Bonnie
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: Swaine
mesh_terms: D000368:Aged; D015577:Geriatric Assessment / Q000145:classification / Q000379:methods*; D005853:Geriatrics / Q000379:methods*; D006801:Humans; D017063:Outcome Assessment, Health Care; D011594:Psychometrics; D012046:Rehabilitation / Q000458:organization & administration*; D009626:Terminology as Topic