The statue of security: human rights and post-9/11 epidemics.
Following the attacks of September 11, 2001(9/11), there have been increasingly divisive proposals for Americans to sacrifice liberty for safety. "Health and human rights" provides a much more constructive and effective framework than fear on which to base both routine public health actions and responses to public health emergencies. This can be illustrated by the failure of bioterrorism-based government initiatives at both the state and federal levels since 9/11, as well as the worldwide response to the post-9/11 SARS epidemic. Effective public health work can only occur with a population that trusts its public health officials. 9/11 can serve as a catalyst to reform public health by adopting the health and human rights framework that can move it from a fragmented state and local activity to one that is federal and coordinated, and ultimately one that is global and based on transparency, trust, science, and respect for human rights.
Annas
George J
GJ
Department of Health Law, Bioethics, and Human Rights, Boston University School of Public Health, USA.
D023482:Bioterrorism; D004196:Disease Outbreaks; D006806:Human Rights / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D006801:Humans; D011634:Public Health / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence; D012637:Security Measures; D014481:United States / Q000453:epidemiology