title: Scintigraphic sentinel node detection in breast cancer patients: paired and blinded comparison of 99mTc dextran 500 and 99mTc phytate.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Breast cancer surgery has evolved towards minimizing morbidity, maximizing cure rates and stratifying treatments according to disease stage. Sentinel lymph node biopsy is becoming standard practice in most centres. However, no standard radiopharmaceutical exists.
  
  
  OBJECTIVE
  To blindly compare 99mTc dextran 500 and 99mTc phytate in the scintigraphic detection of sentinel lymph nodes. Endpoints were the detection of axillary or internal mammary lymph nodes, number of lymph nodes detected, detectability in the first versus the second hour of evaluation and the relationship between rate of detection and age or body mass index.
  
  
  METHODS
  Forty-six patients with histological diagnosis of early breast cancer, without previous surgical treatment, were enrolled in our study. Each patient underwent lymphoscintigraphy twice: on one day with 99mTc dextran 500 and on another day with 99mTc phytate. Images were acquired 1 h and 2 h after tracer administration.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Eighty-eight lymphoscintigraphic studies were performed in 44 patients. On the first image (taken at 1 h), 34 patients from the 99mTc dextran group showed sentinel nodes compared with 28 positive examinations using 99mTc phytate (P = 0.113). On the second image (taken at 2 h) 39 patients from the 99mTc dextran group showed positive results compared to 30 positive examinations using 99mTc phytate (P = 0.036). There was no statistically significant correlation between the body mass index or age and the result of the lymphoscintigraphy.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  99mTc dextran 500 is better than 99mTc phytate for use in a 2 h interval scintigraphic protocol because it demonstrates the sentinel node in a significantly higher number of patients and also showed more lymph nodes suitable for pathological examination.
authors.affiliation: Department of Nuclear Medicine, Universidade Federal do rio Grande do Sul, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, Brazil. prmasiero@hotmail.com
authors.forename: Paulo R
authors.initials: PR
authors.lastname: Masiero
authors.forename: Nilton L
authors.initials: NL
authors.lastname: Xavier
authors.forename: Bernardo L
authors.initials: BL
authors.lastname: Spiro
authors.forename: Maria F
authors.initials: MF
authors.lastname: Detanico
authors.forename: Miguel da C
authors.initials: Mda C
authors.lastname: Xavier
authors.forename: Ana L A
authors.initials: AL
authors.lastname: Pinto
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D015992:Body Mass Index; D001940:Breast / Q000473:pathology; D001943:Breast Neoplasms / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000473:pathology*; D003911:Dextrans / Q000494:pharmacology*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008198:Lymph Nodes / Q000473:pathology; D008207:Lymphatic Metastasis; D008875:Middle Aged; D010833:Phytic Acid / Q000494:pharmacology*; D019275:Radiopharmaceuticals; D021701:Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy / Q000379:methods*; D013667:Technetium / Q000494:pharmacology*; D013997:Time Factors
chemical_list: D003911:Dextrans; D019275:Radiopharmaceuticals; D013667:Technetium; D010833:Phytic Acid