title: Two-stage case-control studies: precision of parameter estimates and considerations in selecting sample size.
abstract: A two-stage case-control design, in which exposure and outcome are determined for a large sample but covariates are measured on only a subsample, may be much less expensive than a one-stage design of comparable power. However, the methods available to plan the sizes of the stage 1 and stage 2 samples, or to project the precision/power provided by a given configuration, are limited to the case of a binary exposure and a single binary confounder. The authors propose a rearrangement of the components in the variance of the estimator of the log-odds ratio. This formulation makes it possible to plan sample sizes/precision by including variance inflation factors to deal with several confounding factors. A practical variance bound is derived for two-stage case-control studies, where confounding variables are binary, while an empirical investigation is used to anticipate the additional sample size requirements when these variables are quantitative. Two methods are suggested for sample size planning based on a quantitative, rather than binary, exposure.
authors.affiliation: Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada. james.hanley@mcgill.ca
authors.forename: James A
authors.initials: JA
authors.lastname: Hanley
authors.forename: Ilona
authors.initials: I
authors.lastname: Csizmadi
authors.forename: Jean-Paul
authors.initials: JP
authors.lastname: Collet
mesh_terms: D016022:Case-Control Studies; D003110:Colonic Neoplasms / Q000517:prevention & control; D015986:Confounding Factors, Epidemiologic; D005260:Female; D020249:Hormone Replacement Therapy; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D015233:Models, Statistical; D009203:Myocardial Infarction / Q000209:etiology; D012107:Research Design; D018401:Sample Size; D014659:Vasectomy / Q000009:adverse effects