The effect of binocular and monocular distractors on saccades in participants with normal binocular vision.
We tested the effect of visual distractors presented monocularly and binocularly on saccade latency and accuracy to determine whether differences occur in saccadic planning with binocular or monocular visual input. For five participants with normal binocular single vision (BSV), saccade latency and accuracy were compared with distractors presented to the dominant eye, non-dominant eye or to both eyes. Eye movements of the dominant eye were recorded using a Skalar infra-red recorder. In the presence of normal BSV, the effect of distractors is significantly larger for saccade latency and accuracy with binocular distractor presentation than for monocular presentations, with no difference between distrators presented to the dominant or non-dominant eye. The implications of these results are discussed with regard to saccade programming.
Griffiths
Helen
H
Academic Unit of Ophthalmology and Orthoptics, University of Sheffield, UK. h.griffiths@sheffield.ac.uk
Whittle
Jon
J
Buckley
David
D
D000328:Adult; D001288:Attention / Q000502:physiology*; D006801:Humans; D009039:Motion Perception / Q000502:physiology*; D010775:Photic Stimulation / Q000379:methods; D011930:Reaction Time / Q000502:physiology; D012438:Saccades / Q000502:physiology*; D015348:Vision, Binocular / Q000502:physiology*; D015349:Vision, Monocular / Q000502:physiology