title: [Female condom or male condom: offer a choice!].
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  As in the entire Ile-de-France, the Val-de-Marne is facing an increase in female contamination by HIV, a clear increase in STI and furthermore the number of legal abortions is still high. Various recent studies have emphasized the decrease in condom use since 1998. Can the possibility of proposing another condom, more specifically controlled by women, boost condom use?
  
  
  METHODS
  The conseil général (local government authority) thus initiated a study in the general population, from January 1st 2001 to December 31st 2001, in order to study the criteria of acceptability of the female condom (FC).
  
  
  RESULTS
  Although the women coming to consultation had no specific requests a quarter finally tested the female condom during sexual intercourse. Among them 4 out of 10 are ready to use it again. Curiosity was the primary motivation of those who accepted to test the female condom (77 %). Women who were more at ease with their sexuality were twice more likely to test the female condom. Three main advantages were put forward by the women who tested the FC: the strength of the FC, the fact that insertion was possible prior to the sexual act and the possibility of postponing removal, the latter being considered a supplementary advantage. The disadvantages most frequently cited before use were its appearance and difficult insertion process. The frequency of utilisation of the FC was multiplied by three when women practised putting the condom in place in a non-sexual context. However, even when they recognized one or several disadvantages women accepted to test it. In addition, whenever a woman finds at least one advantage before use she is twice more likely to test it. This is where counselling by professionals in charge of presenting the FC becomes a deciding factor.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The chance of using at least one sort of condom is increased when a choice of condoms is available. When both male and female condoms are available, the responsibility for prevention is better balanced within the couple: each partner can then be in charge of his or her own health. However the adoption of a barrier method such as the condom, means that the individual is conscious of such a need and finds that there are benefits mainly staying in good health. However the insufficient number of prevention and health promotion campaigns in France does not favour such an awareness. The availability of inexpensive female condoms in pharmacies, supermarkets as well as free distribution by certain institutions remains an unresolved question.
authors.affiliation: Service de protection maternelle et infantile (PMI), conseil général du Val-de-Marne, 13/15, rue Gustave-Eiffel, 94011 Créteil cedex, France. muriel.prudhomme@cg94.fr
authors.forename: M
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Prudhomme
authors.forename: J
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Boucher
authors.forename: P
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Delberghe
authors.forename: H
authors.initials: H
authors.lastname: Christman
authors.forename: M-C
authors.initials: MC
authors.lastname: Leroux
mesh_terms: D000163:Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome / Q000517:prevention & control; D000328:Adult; D003075:Coitus; D017280:Condoms / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D019111:Single-Use Internal Condom / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D003258:Consumer Behavior; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male