Counterfactual and semifactual conditionals prime alternative possibilities.
The authors examined in 3 experiments the comprehension of counterfactuals, such as "If it had rained, the plants would have bloomed," and semifactuals, such as "Even if it had rained, the plants would have bloomed," compared with indicative conditionals, "If it rained, the plants bloomed." The first experiment showed that people read the negative conjunction, "not p and not q" faster when it was primed by a counterfactual than when it was primed by an indicative conditional. They read the affirmative conjunction, "p and q" equally quickly when it was primed by either conditional. The 2nd experiment showed that people read the negated-antecedent conjunction, "not p and q" faster when it was primed by a semifactual conditional. The 3rd experiment corroborated these results in a direct comparison of counterfactuals and semifactuals. The authors discuss the implications of the results for the mental representations of different conditionals.
Santamaría
Carlos
C
Department of Cognitive Psychology, University of La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain. csantam@ull.es
Espino
Orlando
O
Byrne
Ruth M J
RM
D003071:Cognition; D006801:Humans; D007802:Language; D011584:Psychology / Q000379:methods*