title: Family representative payeeship and violence risk in severe mental illness.
abstract: Although representative payeeship is prevalent among people with mental illness and shows promise to positively influence clinically relevant outcomes, research also suggests this legal mechanism could be implemented in ways that are problematic. The current study examined whether family representative payeeship was associated with elevated risk of family violence perpetrated by persons with severe mental illness (SMI). Data were collected every 4 months for 1 year in structured interviews with N = 245 persons with SMI who received disability benefits. Multivariate analyses showed that substance abuse, history of violence, frequency of family contact, and family representative payeeship were associated with elevated odds of family violence. Analyses also showed family contact and family representative payeeship had a cumulative effect on increasing the predicted probability of family violence (controlling for covariates such as violence history and substance abuse). The data shed light on the potential for family representative payeeship to be associated with increased risk of interpersonal conflict and violence in SMI.
authors.affiliation: Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, 27710, USA. eric.elbogen@duke.edu
authors.forename: Eric B
authors.initials: EB
authors.lastname: Elbogen
authors.forename: Jeffrey W
authors.initials: JW
authors.lastname: Swanson
authors.forename: Marvin S
authors.initials: MS
authors.lastname: Swartz
authors.forename: Richard
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Van Dorn
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D005190:Family; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007398:Interpersonal Relations; D008297:Male; D001523:Mental Disorders / Q000523:psychology*; D010344:Patient Advocacy; D012307:Risk Factors; D012720:Severity of Illness Index; D012932:Social Facilitation; D012944:Social Support; D014754:Violence