Laparoscopy-assisted vaginal pelvic exenteration.
OBJECTIVE
The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility, morbidity and survival outcome of laparoscopy-assisted vaginal pelvic exenteration.


METHODS
Since 2000, we have performed 5 cases of en-bloc pelvic exenteration combining a vaginal or perineal approach and laparoscopic approach. All patients had received previous pelvic irradiation. One patient underwent a total type II exenteration with ileal-loop diversion, an omental flap and a temporary colostomy. Two patients underwent a middle and posterior exenteration: one was a type III exenteration with perineal rectal resection and a gracilis myocutaneous flap; the second one was a type II exenteration with a colorectal anastomosis and a vaginal reconstruction using a gluteal thigh flap. Two patients underwent a type I anterior and middle exenteration with continent Miami pouch and vaginal reconstruction by omental cylinder.


RESULTS
Mean time of the procedure was 6 h (range: 4.5-9). Peroperative bleeding was less than 500 cm3. Two patients presented minor complications: a perineal abscess after perineal rectal resection and an abdominal wound abscess. Mean length of hospital stay was 27 days. Three patients are free of disease. Two patients presented groin metastasis. One patient died of disease after 8 months.


CONCLUSIONS
Laparoscopic or laparoscopy-assisted vaginal pelvic exenteration followed by reconstruction is feasible with curative intent in selected patients.
Ferron
Gwénaël
G
Department of Surgical Oncology, Institut Claudius Regaud Cancer Center, 20-24, rue du Pont St Pierre, 31052 Toulouse Cedex, France. ferron@icr.fnclcc.fr
Querleu
Denis
D
Martel
Pierre
P
Letourneur
Benoit
B
Soulié
Michel
M
D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D005260:Female; D005833:Genital Neoplasms, Female / Q000601:surgery*; D006801:Humans; D010535:Laparoscopy / Q000009:adverse effects / Q000379:methods*; D008875:Middle Aged; D010385:Pelvic Exenteration / Q000009:adverse effects / Q000379:methods*; D013524:Surgical Flaps