title: Asbestosis in an asbestos composite mill at Mumbai: a prevalence study.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Of an estimated 100,000 workers exposed to asbestos in India, less than 30 have been compensated. The reasons for such a small number are: refusal by management sponsored studies to grant medical certifications to workers suffering from occupational diseases, lack of training for doctors in diagnosis of occupational lung diseases, deliberate misdiagnosis by doctors of asbestosis as either chronic bronchitis or tuberculosis and the inherent class bias of middle class doctors against workers. The aim of the study was to identify workers suffering from Asbestosis (parenchymal and pleural non-malignant disease) among the permanent workers of the Hindustan Composites Factory and assess their disability and medically certify them, whereupon they could avail of their basic rights to obtain compensation and proper treatment.
  
  
  METHODS
  The study was conducted by the Occupational Health and Safety Centre and the Workers' Union. Asbestosis was diagnosed if they had an occupational history of asbestos exposure for at least 15 years and showed typical radiographic findings.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Of 232 workers in the factory, 181 participated in the survey. 22% of them had asbestosis. All the asbestos affected workers had at least 20 years of exposure. 7% had rhonchi, 34% had late basal inspiratory rates, 82% had more than 80% of Forced Expiratory Volume in the first second (FEV1)/Forced Vital capacity (FVC) ratio and 66% had FVC less than 80% of the predicted value. On radiology 7% had only pleural disease, 10% had both pleural and parenchymal disease and 82% had only parenchymal disease. The association of pleural disease with chest pain was statistically significant.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  We found the prevalence of asbestosis among exposed workers to be less than that anticipated for the number of years of exposure due to "Healthy Worker Effect". We suggest that all affected asbestos workers (including those who have been forced to leave) in India be medically certified and compensated. We also recommend better control of asbestos use in India. We also implore the management to provide all information about the work process and its hazards, conduct medical checkups as mandated by law and give the medical records to the workers.
authors.affiliation: Department of Surgery, LTM Medical College, Sion, Mumbai 400 022, India. murlidharv@gmail.com
authors.forename: V
authors.initials: V
authors.lastname: Murlidhar
authors.forename: Vijay
authors.initials: V
authors.lastname: Kanhere
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D001195:Asbestosis / Q000175:diagnosis / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging / Q000191:economics / Q000453:epidemiology*; D002568:Certification; D004185:Disability Evaluation; D019652:Extraction and Processing Industry; D006306:Health Surveys; D015989:Healthy Worker Effect; D006801:Humans; D007194:India / Q000453:epidemiology; D007750:Labor Unions; D008875:Middle Aged; D016273:Occupational Exposure / Q000009:adverse effects / Q000191:economics; D015995:Prevalence; D011859:Radiography; D014942:Workers' Compensation