title: The experimental task influences cue competition in human causal learning.
abstract: Participants were shown A+ and C- trials followed by AB+ and CD+ trials. These trials were embedded in a causal learning task in which participants had to learn either the relationship between different foods and allergic reactions or the relationship between different stocks and an increase in the stock market index. The authors orthogonally varied the manner in which the different cues were presented to participants during training. Cue competition was related to the causal learning scenario but not to the manner in which the different cues were presented. These results question claims of a human bias toward configural processing that were based on difficulties in finding cue competition in some previous causal learning experiments.
authors.affiliation: Psychologisches Institut, Universität Zürich, Zurich, Switzerland. k.melchers@psychologie.unizh.ch
authors.forename: Klaus G
authors.initials: KG
authors.lastname: Melchers
authors.forename: Metin
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Ungör
authors.forename: Harald
authors.initials: H
authors.lastname: Lachnit
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000704:Analysis of Variance; D001245:Association Learning / Q000502:physiology*; D015984:Causality; D003210:Concept Formation; D003463:Cues; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007600:Judgment / Q000502:physiology*; D008297:Male; D011337:Probability Learning