Diagnostic assessment of nonpalpable breast cancer--the difference in diagnostic approach for the clinical treatment of breast cancer between the Japanese Guidelines and the National Comprehensive Cancer Network(USA)Guidelines.
The detection of non-palpating breast cancer might improve the survival of patients with whole breast cancer because it can be diagnosed at an early stage. Therefore, to standardize the quality of patient care, a published assessment guideline is necessary in a clinical setting. For this purpose, Japan and USA have independent guidelines with different approaches. ''The evidence-based guideline for clinical treatment of breast cancer'' that was published in June 2005 by the Japanese breast cancer society, is the first set of integrated guidelines pertaining to breast cancer in Japan. These guidelines are presented in the research questions (RQ)format. This paper explains 7 RQs(out of 31 RQs)and also discusses the recommendations pertaining to the diagnosis of nonpalpable breast cancer. The National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN; USA)guidelines, which are widely recognized as one of the most reliable guidelines based on published evidences, also contain the diagnostic assessment of asymptomatic patients with a negative physical examination. This paper discusses pros and cons of each of the above mentioned guidelines as well as their clinical application. It is necessary to use both the Japanese and NCCN guidelines while understanding the differences between the two.
Tsunoda-Shimizu
Hiroko
H
St Luke's International Hospital Department of Radiology, 9-1 Akashi-cho, Chuo-ku, Tokyo 104-8560, Japan.
Nakamura
Seigo
S
D001943:Breast Neoplasms / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007564:Japan; D017410:Practice Guidelines as Topic; D011787:Quality of Health Care; D011859:Radiography; D012955:Societies, Medical; D014463:Ultrasonography; D014481:United States