title: Image quality and diagnostic accuracy of 16-slice multidetector computed tomography for the detection of coronary artery disease in obese patients.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Cardiac multislice spiral computed tomography (MSCT) scanners permit visualization of the coronary arteries with an overall good sensitivity (sens) and specificity (spec). However, in obese patients (pts), who are at higher risk to develop coronary artery disease (CAD), image quality of MSCT is supposed to be limited. At present, there are no data whether the accuracy of MSCT depends on the body mass index (BMI). Thus, we compared the catheter-controlled MSCT results from normal weight and obese pts in a cohort of 117 pts with regard to sens, spec, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) and image quality.
  
  
  METHODS
  In all, 21 normal weight pts (group I: BMI<25, 64.6+/-11.1 years, number of risk factors 2.1+/-1.1), 60 pts with mild overweight (group II: BMI 25-30, 64.6+/-8.9 years, number of risk factors 3.4+/-1.0) and 36 obese pts (group III: BMI >30, 63.0+/-8.5 years, number of risk factors 3.4+/-0.9) were examined by MSCT (Sensation 16 Speed 4 D((R)), Siemens, Germany, gantry rotation time 375 ms) and invasive coronary angiography. MSCT results were compared blinded to the results of the coronary angiography with regard to the presence or absence of a significant stenosis (>50%) in a modified AHA 13 segment (sgt) model. Image quality was assessed on a qualitative scale between 1 (very good) and 5 (insufficient image quality) for each sgt.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Sens, spec, PPV and NPV were statistically not different in all three groups (I: 0.88/0.97/0.91/0.96, II: 0.83/0.97/0.88/0.95, III: 0.87/0.99/0.96/0.96). 3 pts (group I 1, group II 2) had to be excluded from analysis due to technical problems. Group I had significantly less risk factors (P < 0.001) and image quality was significantly better than in group II and III (P < 0.05). Group II and III did not differ with regard to risk factors or image quality.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Overweight and obesity have an impact on MSCT image quality but did not hamper the diagnostic accuracy. Thus, MSCT is a noninvasive method to detect or rule out CAD also in pts with higher BMI. These retrospective data have to be confirmed in larger prospective trials.
authors.affiliation: Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Eberhard-Karls-University Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.
authors.forename: C
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Burgstahler
authors.forename: T
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Beck
authors.forename: A
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Kuettner
authors.forename: A
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Reimann
authors.forename: A F
authors.initials: AF
authors.lastname: Kopp
authors.forename: M
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Heuschmid
authors.forename: C D
authors.initials: CD
authors.lastname: Claussen
authors.forename: S
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Schroeder
mesh_terms: D000368:Aged; D015992:Body Mass Index; D017023:Coronary Angiography / Q000379:methods; D003324:Coronary Artery Disease / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging* / Q000209:etiology; D004812:Epidemiologic Methods; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D009765:Obesity / Q000150:complications*; D036542:Tomography, Spiral Computed / Q000379:methods*