title: Model uncertainty--parameter uncertainty versus conceptual models.
abstract: Uncertainties in model structures have been recognised often to be the main source of uncertainty in predictive model simulations. Despite this knowledge, uncertainty studies are traditionally limited to a single deterministic model and the uncertainty addressed by a parameter uncertainty study. The extent to which a parameter uncertainty study may encompass model structure errors in a groundwater model is studied in a case study. Three groundwater models were constructed on the basis of three different hydrogeological interpretations. Each of the models was calibrated inversely against groundwater heads and streamflows. A parameter uncertainty analysis was carried out for each of the three conceptual models by Monte Carlo simulations. A comparison of the predictive uncertainties for the three conceptual models showed large differences between the uncertainty intervals. Most discrepancies were observed for data types not used in the model calibration. Thus uncertainties in the conceptual models become of increasing importance when predictive simulations consider data types that are extrapolates from the data types used for calibration.
authors.affiliation: Geological Survey of Denmark and Greenland (GEUS), Copenhagen. alh@geus.dk
authors.forename: A L
authors.initials: AL
authors.lastname: Højberg
authors.forename: J C
authors.initials: JC
authors.lastname: Refsgaard
mesh_terms: D003718:Denmark; D055593:Geological Phenomena; D005844:Geology; D008962:Models, Theoretical; D009010:Monte Carlo Method; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D035501:Uncertainty; D014872:Water Movements; D014881:Water Supply