title: Kyphoplasty versus vertebroplasty to increase vertebral body height: a cadaveric study.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  To prospectively compare the vertebral height restoration achieved with kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty in fresh cadavers by using multi-detector row computed tomography (CT).
  
  
  METHODS
  Institutional review board approval was not required because the donors had registered in and consented to an anatomic gift program prior to their death. Thirty-seven vertebrae were harvested from four donated cadavers of elderly female individuals (mean age, 82 years; age range at death, 73-87 years). The vertebrae were dissected free of the surrounding muscles and imaged with multi-detector row CT. Compression fractures were induced, and the vertebrae were again imaged. The vertebrae were randomized to be treated with kyphoplasty (n = 19) or vertebroplasty (n = 18) and were then imaged at multi-detector row CT. The anterior, central, and posterior vertebral body heights and wedge angles were measured in the midsagittal plane of the reformatted images. The amount of cement injected was determined by weighing the vertebrae before and after treatment. The statistical significance of changes in vertebral body height, wedge angle, and weight with the two treatment techniques was evaluated with the independent t test or Mann-Whitney U test.
  
  
  RESULTS
  The increase in vertebral height was greater with kyphoplasty than with vertebroplasty (5.1 mm vs 2.3 mm, respectively; P < .05). The original vertebral height was restored in 93% of vertebrae with kyphoplasty and in 82% with vertebroplasty (P < .05). There was a greater decrease in wedge angle with kyphoplasty than with vertebroplasty (3.1 degrees vs 1.6 degrees, respectively); however, this difference was not significant (P > .05). There was no significant difference in the amount of cement injected with kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty (P > .05).
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Kyphoplasty increased vertebral body height more than vertebroplasty in this model of acutely created fractures in fresh cadaver specimens.
authors.affiliation: Department of Radiology, University of Rochester Medical Center, 601 Elmwood Ave, Box 648, Rochester, NY 14642-8648, USA. Akia_Hiwatashi@urmc.rochester.edu
authors.forename: Akio
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Hiwatashi
authors.forename: Ravinder
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Sidhu
authors.forename: Ryan K
authors.initials: RK
authors.lastname: Lee
authors.forename: Ramon R
authors.initials: RR
authors.lastname: deGuzman
authors.forename: Diane T
authors.initials: DT
authors.lastname: Piekut
authors.forename: Per-Lennart A
authors.initials: PL
authors.lastname: Westesson
mesh_terms: D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D002102:Cadaver; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008159:Lumbar Vertebrae; D016103:Spinal Fractures / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging* / Q000601:surgery*; D018709:Statistics, Nonparametric; D013904:Thoracic Vertebrae; D014057:Tomography, X-Ray Computed