title: Prospective audit of 106 consecutive human bite injuries: the importance of history taking.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  Some patients attempt to conceal human bites with factitious mechanisms of injury. Follow up questioning allows patients to modify their histories. This practice was prospectively audited.
  
  
  METHODS
  Patients with cutaneous wounds who did not present with a history of human bite were asked a follow up question. Those who then gave a history of human bite were noted.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Certain groups of patients with human bites were significantly more likely to provide a factitious history and/or delay presentation.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Follow up questioning dramatically increased the case-detection rate, prompting specific management.
authors.affiliation: Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Queen Victoria Hospital, East Grinstead, West Sussex, UK. c.g.wallace@gmail.com
authors.forename: C G
authors.initials: CG
authors.lastname: Wallace
authors.forename: C E
authors.initials: CE
authors.lastname: Robertson
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D001734:Bites, Human / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000453:epidemiology; D004636:Emergency Service, Hospital; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D015994:Incidence; D008297:Male; D008485:Medical Audit; D008487:Medical History Taking; D008875:Middle Aged; D011446:Prospective Studies; D012867:Skin / Q000293:injuries*; D014342:Truth Disclosure