Prehospital prediction of intensive care unit stay and mortality in blunt trauma patients.
BACKGROUND
The success of a trauma system relies on transfer of patients from the field to the most appropriate hospital for definitive care. However, no consensus has been reached regarding the best criteria or triage tool for identifying patients injured seriously enough to warrant transfer to a trauma center.


METHODS
Predictors of mortality and intensive care unit stay were identified and prediction models developed in a design data set. The performance of these models was evaluated in a test data set and compared with current trauma triage guidelines, derived from the American College of Surgeons model.


RESULTS
The newly developed prediction models performed comparably with the current trauma triage guidelines.


CONCLUSIONS
Although the performance of newly developed triage models was promising, their performance did not exceed that of the current trauma triage guidelines. In particular, the anatomic injury criteria appeared to be the key component of the current trauma triage guidelines.
Gabbe
Belinda J
BJ
Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia. belinda.gabbe@med.monash.edu.au
Cameron
Peter A
PA
Wolfe
Rory
R
Simpson
Pam
P
Smith
Karen L
KL
McNeil
John J
JJ
D003661:Decision Support Techniques; D017052:Hospital Mortality; D006801:Humans; D007362:Intensive Care Units / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D007902:Length of Stay; D017063:Outcome Assessment, Health Care; D010360:Patient Transfer / Q000592:standards* / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D017410:Practice Guidelines as Topic; D011379:Prognosis; D012041:Regional Medical Programs; D012042:Registries; D014218:Triage / Q000592:standards*; D014739:Victoria / Q000453:epidemiology; D014949:Wounds, Nonpenetrating / Q000401:mortality*