title: Religion and bioethics.
abstract: This paper discusses the role of religious arguments in public bioethical debate. It is argued that attempts to rule out religious arguments as valid contributions to the pubic debate fails for a number of reasons. There is no non-arbitrary way of dividing religious arguments from non-religious arguments, and all arguments refer ultimately to a background comprehensive worldview that is never fully consistent or coherent and which is furthermore always contested. There are thus no good arguments for treating religious arguments differently than any other type of argument.
authors.affiliation: Cardiff Law School, PO Box 427, Cardiff CF10 3XJ, Wales, UK. Holms@man.ac.uk
authors.forename: Soren
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Holm
mesh_terms: D001675:Bioethics; D005610:Freedom; D006801:Humans; D010684:Philosophy; D011050:Policy Making; D011057:Politics; D011640:Public Policy; D012067:Religion; D035621:Secularism