title: Bone reconstruction: from bioceramics to tissue engineering.
abstract: Over the past 30 years, an enormous array of biomaterials proposed as ideal scaffolds for cell growth have emerged, yet few have demonstrated clinical efficacy. Biomaterials, regardless of whether they are permanent or biodegradable, naturally occurring or synthetic, need to be biocompatible, ideally osteoinductive, osteoconductive, integrative, porous and mechanically compatible with native bone to fulfill their desired role in bone tissue engineering. These materials provide cell anchorage sites, mechanical stability and structural guidance and in vivo, provide the interface to respond to physiologic and biologic changes as well as to remodel the extracellular matrix in order to integrate with the surrounding native tissue. Calcium phosphate ceramics and bioactive glasses were introduced more than 30 years ago as bone substitutes. These materials are considered bioactive as they bond to bone and enhance bone tissue formation. The bioactivity property has been attributed to the similarity between the surface composition and structure of bioactive materials, and the mineral phase of bone. The drawback in using bioactive glasses and calcium phosphate ceramics is that close proximity to the host bone is necessary to achieve osteoconduction. Even when this is achieved, new bone growth is often strictly limited because these materials are not osteoinductive in nature. Bone has a vast capacity for regeneration from cells with stem cell characteristics. Moreover, a number of different growth factors including bone morphogenetic proteins, have been demonstrated to stimulate bone growth, collagen synthesis and fracture repair both in vitro and in vivo. Attempts to develop a tissue-engineering scaffold with both osteoconductivity and osteoinductivity have included loading osteoinductive proteins and/or osteogenic cells on the traditional bioactive materials. Yet issues that must be considered for the effective application of bioceramics in the field of tissue engineering are the degree of bioresorption and the poor mechanical strength. The synthesis of a new generation of biomaterials that can specifically serve as tissue engineering scaffolds for drug and cell delivery is needed. Nanotechnology can provide an alternative way of processing porous bioceramics with high mechanical strength and enhanced bioactivity and resorbability.
authors.affiliation: Center for Biomedical Engineering, Graduate School and Center for Oral Health Research, University of Kentucky Dental School, Lexington, KY 40506, USA. arelgh2@uky.edu
authors.forename: Ahmed
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: El-Ghannam
mesh_terms: D001847:Bone Diseases / Q000503:physiopathology / Q000601:surgery* / Q000628:therapy*; D001861:Bone Regeneration; D018786:Bone Substitutes; D002516:Ceramics; D048091:Guided Tissue Regeneration / Q000295:instrumentation / Q000379:methods* / Q000639:trends; D006801:Humans; D045164:Mesenchymal Stem Cell Transplantation / Q000295:instrumentation / Q000379:methods* / Q000639:trends; D010012:Osteogenesis; D019651:Plastic Surgery Procedures / Q000295:instrumentation / Q000379:methods* / Q000639:trends; D023822:Tissue Engineering / Q000295:instrumentation / Q000379:methods* / Q000639:trends
chemical_list: D018786:Bone Substitutes