title: [Differential diagnosis of focal liver lesions using contrast-enhanced MRI with SHU 555 A in comparison with unenhanced MRI and multidetector spiral-CT].
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  To evaluate the ability of contrast-enhanced MRI with SHU 555 A to provide additional information for characterization of focal liver tumors compared with non-enhanced MRI and multislice spiral CT.
  
  
  METHODS
  In a prospective manner the images of 45 patients who underwent multislice spiral CT, unenhanced MRI alone and unenhanced and SHU 555 A-enhanced MRI including dynamic imaging at a field strength of 1.0 T were analyzed in a blinded reading. The readers had to determine on a scale from 1 to 5 whether a tumor was benign or malignant. Furthermore, the readers had to give a definitive diagnosis for each lesion. A true cut needle biopsy served as gold standard against which all imaging procedures were compared.
  
  
  RESULTS
  The sensitivity for differentiation malignant vs. benign lesion was 77 % with spiral CT, 72 % with unenhanced MRI and 94 % with SHU 555 A-enhanced MRI, respectively (p < 0.05). The specificity for spiral CT was 73 %, for unenhanced MRI 83 % and for contrast-enhanced MRI 83 %, respectively (n. s.). Compared with the histopathologic results, the correct diagnosis was made with spiral CT in 25/45 (56 %), unenhanced MRI in 16/45 (36 %) and contrast-enhanced MRI in 32/45 (71 %) of the patients (p < 0.05). For the subgroup of patients with liver cirrhosis, the correct diagnosis was established with spiral CT in 16/23 (70 %), unenhanced MRI in 9/23 (39 %) and contrast-enhanced MRI in 19/23 (83 %) of the patients (p < 0.05).
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Contrast-enhanced MRI with SHU 555 A has the ability to improve the differential diagnosis of focal liver tumors compared with unenhanced MRI and multislice spiral CT.
authors.affiliation: Institut für Diagnostische Radiologie, Heinrich-Heine-Universität, Düsseldorf. Jung@med.uni-duesseldorf.de
authors.forename: G
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Jung
authors.forename: L
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Poll
authors.forename: M
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Cohnen
authors.forename: A
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Saleh
authors.forename: H
authors.initials: H
authors.lastname: Vogler
authors.forename: M
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Wettstein
authors.forename: R
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Willers
authors.forename: U
authors.initials: U
authors.lastname: Mödder
authors.forename: J-A
authors.initials: JA
authors.lastname: Koch
mesh_terms: D001707:Biopsy, Needle; D006528:Carcinoma, Hepatocellular / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging / Q000473:pathology; D003287:Contrast Media; D003911:Dextrans; D003937:Diagnosis, Differential; D005260:Female; D052203:Ferrosoferric Oxide; D006801:Humans; D007501:Iron; D008099:Liver / Q000473:pathology; D008113:Liver Neoplasms / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging* / Q000473:pathology / Q000556:secondary; D008279:Magnetic Resonance Imaging / Q000379:methods* / Q000592:standards; D058185:Magnetite Nanoparticles; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D009367:Neoplasm Staging; D010087:Oxides; D011446:Prospective Studies; D012680:Sensitivity and Specificity; D036542:Tomography, Spiral Computed / Q000379:methods* / Q000592:standards
chemical_list: D003287:Contrast Media; D003911:Dextrans; D058185:Magnetite Nanoparticles; D010087:Oxides; D007501:Iron; C065507:ferumoxides; D052203:Ferrosoferric Oxide