title: Automated methods of predicting the function of biological sequences using GO and BLAST.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  With the exponential increase in genomic sequence data there is a need to develop automated approaches to deducing the biological functions of novel sequences with high accuracy. Our aim is to demonstrate how accuracy benchmarking can be used in a decision-making process evaluating competing designs of biological function predictors. We utilise the Gene Ontology, GO, a directed acyclic graph of functional terms, to annotate sequences with functional information describing their biological context. Initially we examine the effect on accuracy scores of increasing the allowed distance between predicted and a test set of curator assigned terms. Next we evaluate several annotator methods using accuracy benchmarking. Given an unannotated sequence we use the Basic Local Alignment Search Tool, BLAST, to find similar sequences that have already been assigned GO terms by curators. A number of methods were developed that utilise terms associated with the best five matching sequences. These methods were compared against a benchmark method of simply using terms associated with the best BLAST-matched sequence (best BLAST approach).
  
  
  RESULTS
  The precision and recall of estimates increases rapidly as the amount of distance permitted between a predicted term and a correct term assignment increases. Accuracy benchmarking allows a comparison of annotation methods. A covering graph approach performs poorly, except where the term assignment rate is high. A term distance concordance approach has a similar accuracy to the best BLAST approach, demonstrating lower precision but higher recall. However, a discriminant function method has higher precision and recall than the best BLAST approach and other methods shown here.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Allowing term predictions to be counted correct if closely related to a correct term decreases the reliability of the accuracy score. As such we recommend using accuracy measures that require exact matching of predicted terms with curator assigned terms. Furthermore, we conclude that competing designs of BLAST-based GO term annotators can be effectively compared using an accuracy benchmarking approach. The most accurate annotation method was developed using data mining techniques. As such we recommend that designers of term annotators utilise accuracy benchmarking and data mining to ensure newly developed annotators are of high quality.
authors.affiliation: Australian Centre for Plant Functional Genomics, University of Adelaide, South Australia, 5064, Australia. craig@cs.adelaide.edu.au
authors.forename: Craig E
authors.initials: CE
authors.lastname: Jones
authors.forename: Ute
authors.initials: U
authors.lastname: Baumann
authors.forename: Alfred L
authors.initials: AL
authors.lastname: Brown
mesh_terms: D019985:Benchmarking; D016009:Chi-Square Distribution; D003625:Data Collection; D030541:Databases, Genetic; D016002:Discriminant Analysis; D016247:Information Storage and Retrieval / Q000379:methods; D016415:Sequence Alignment; D017421:Sequence Analysis / Q000379:methods*; D012984:Software