title: Cemented versus uncemented hip replacement for fracture of the hip.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  Review cemented versus uncemented hemi-arthroplasty hip replacement regarding morbidity and long term results.
  
  
  METHODS
  A literature review searching PubMed and Medline was done. Publications applicable to hip fractures treated by hip replacement or hemi-arthroplasty replacement were reviewed.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Several articles compared cemented femoral stems to fracture fixation. There were few articles comparing cemented and uncemented stems. Some noted increased problems with uncemented stems but did consider design factors. Unreamed tapered stems may have may have fewer problems.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Prospective studies comparing cemented and uncemented femoral stems are needed to determine the best form of fixation for patients having hip surgery following hip fracture. Tapered uncemented stems may offer as good a result as cemented stems, with less morbidity.
authors.affiliation: Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Texas 75390-8883, USA.
authors.forename: Michael
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Hay
authors.forename: Frank
authors.initials: F
authors.lastname: Gottschalk
mesh_terms: D019644:Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip / Q000379:methods; D006620:Hip Fractures / Q000601:surgery*; D006622:Hip Prosthesis; D011474:Prosthesis Design; D016896:Treatment Outcome