title: Rapid prescreening of Papanicolaou smears: a practical and efficient quality control strategy.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Efficient quality control (QC) is essential to ensure high sensitivity of Papanicolaou (Pap) smears. For this purpose, rescreening of 10% random negative smears is ineffective. Rapid rescreening (RR) of all negative Pap smears is more practical and has received widespread acceptance, especially in Europe, although its sensitivity is difficult to monitor and its retrospective nature may influence the vigilance of the screeners. The method of rapid prescreening (RPS) overcomes these drawbacks because rapid review of Pap smears occurs before routine full screening.
  
  
  METHODS
  All routine conventional Pap smears over 2 months underwent RPS by 12 cytotechnologists. Approximately 30 seconds were allowed to prescreen each slide. The presence of abnormal cells (atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance [ASCUS] or above), infection or endometrial cells detected on RPS was documented. All slides subsequently underwent routine full screening. Results of both screening methods were compared.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Of a total of 8364 Pap smears, 310 (3.7%) cases were categorized as abnormal after final diagnosis. Of those, 135 were also detected on RPS (sensitivity of 43.5%). Seventeen abnormal cases were detected only on RPS: these consisted of 13 ASCUS cases, 3 low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions, and 1 high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion. The sensitivity of RPS for infections and endometrial cells was 51.6% and 28.3%, respectively. Implementation of RPS did not significantly impact the work flow in our laboratory.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  RPS is an efficient and practical QC tool. It is a reliable method with which to monitor sensitivity and reduce the false-negative rate, and because it is done before finalizing the case, it allows for timely corrections to the diagnosis and avoids the need to amend reports.
authors.affiliation: Department of Pathology, McGill University Health Center and McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
authors.forename: Amina
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Djemli
authors.forename: Karim
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Khetani
authors.forename: Manon
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Auger
mesh_terms: D005188:False Negative Reactions; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008403:Mass Screening / Q000379:methods / Q000592:standards; D065006:Papanicolaou Test; D011786:Quality Control; D012680:Sensitivity and Specificity; D002583:Uterine Cervical Neoplasms / Q000517:prevention & control*; D014626:Vaginal Smears / Q000379:methods / Q000592:standards*