title: Where is the evidence for pancultural self-enhancement? A reply to Sedikides, Gaertner, and Toguchi (2003).
abstract: C. Sedikides, L. Gaertner, and Y. Toguchi (2003) maintained that the self-enhancement motivation (as defined by tendencies to view oneself in overly positive terms) is universal. The present article challenges their claim. A review of the literature revealed that many studies contradict their findings regarding the domain-specific nature of East Asian self-enhancement. It is argued that Sedikides et al. did not replicate past research because they did not measure self-enhancement in their studies. The present article provides a theoretical basis for understanding cross-cultural differences in self-enhancement and considers the question of universality by exploring 2 different conceptualizations of positive self-regard.
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. heine@psych.ubc.ca
authors.forename: Steven J
authors.initials: SJ
authors.lastname: Heine
mesh_terms: D001290:Attitude / Q000208:ethnology*; D003431:Cross-Cultural Comparison; D003469:Culture; D006801:Humans; D009042:Motivation; D012649:Self Concept; D012928:Social Desirability