title: [Management of Lagrange and Rigault stage IV extension type supracondylar fracture of the humerus in children].
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  Lagrange and Rigault stage IV extension type supracondylar fracture of the humerus (Gartland and Wilkins type III) involves major displacement, making treatment difficult. Several therapeutic methods have been described but indications vary considerably between teams. We conducted a retrospective analysis in order to evaluate the results of different methods, identify the most adapted technique, and detail the conditions necessary for good results with the collar and cuff immobilization method described by Blount.
  
  
  METHODS
  Forty-four children (30 boys and 14 girls), mean age seven years six months, were treated between January 1990 and December 2001. The collar and cuff immobilization technique was used for sixteen children (including four who underwent open revision for early secondary displacement), percutaneous pinning for two, and open crossed pinning for thirty (including four who developed secondary displacement after collar and cuff immobilization). One out of two collar and cuff treatments was instituted within six hours of injury. The four secondary displacements after collar and cuff immobilization treatment occurred after fracture reduction more than six hours after injury. The proportion of open reductions increased with longer delay to reduction after injury. Mean immobilization was three and a half weeks. The Flynn criteria were used to assess outcome at mean seven years eight months follow-up.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Outcome was satisfactory in all children treated with definitive collar and cuff immobilization and by percutaneous pinning; the rate was 97% after open procedures (persistent sequelae of radial palsy in one child).
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Early treatment before six hours increased the chances of success with the collar and cuff method which remains the technique of choice for Lagrange and Rigault stage IV extension type supracondylar fractures. In the event of failure or complications, other classical methods should be discussed, including percutaneous pinning or direct access for open osteosynthesis.
authors.affiliation: Clinique Chirurgicale Pédiatrique de l'Université, American Memorial Hospital, CHU de Reims, 47, rue Cognacq-Jay, 51092 Reims Cedex.
authors.forename: G K
authors.initials: GK
authors.lastname: Akakpo-Numado
authors.forename: M
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Mal-Lawane
authors.forename: M
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Belouadah
authors.forename: B
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: Kabore
authors.forename: G
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Lefort
authors.forename: S
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Daoud
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D002648:Child; D002675:Child, Preschool; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D006810:Humeral Fractures / Q000145:classification* / Q000628:therapy*; D008297:Male; D012189:Retrospective Studies