Value of electron microscopy in kidney biopsy diagnosis.
Kidney biopsy reports given during 2003 were collected from the authors' pathology database. A total of 111 biopsies were performed. Five tumor samples were not studied with electron microscopy (EM). Of the remaining 106 biopsies, 85 were studied with EM. EM was not performed in 10/24 transplant biopsies, or in 11/82 cases of suspected primary kidney disease. The role of EM was evaluated by grouping the samples in 3 categories: (1) EM was essential for diagnosis, (2) EM contributed to the interpretation and cleared uncertainties, and (3) EM had no influence on the diagnostic process. In transplant biopsies EM influenced the final diagnosis in 86% of cases (category 2). In biopsies performed for primary kidney disease EM was essential for diagnosis in 18.3% clearly contributed in 53.5%, and had no influence on the final diagnosis in 28.2% of cases. The study suggests that the importance of EM has not decreased during the last few years. Because only about 25% of the EM reports did not have any influence on the diagnostic process, it is recommended that kidney biopsy protocols should include EM in all biopsy cases, or at least tissue should be reserved for EM studies of all cases. Because of the influence of EM on the diagnostic process the need for EM in pathology training should be emphasized.
Collan
Y
Y
Department of Pathology, Turku University Central Hospital, Finland. yrjo.collan@utu.fi
Hirsimäki
P
P
Aho
H
H
Wuorela
M
M
Sundström
J
J
Tertti
R
R
Metsärinne
K
K
D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D001706:Biopsy; D003937:Diagnosis, Differential; D006801:Humans; D007668:Kidney / Q000648:ultrastructure*; D007674:Kidney Diseases / Q000175:diagnosis*; D016030:Kidney Transplantation / Q000473:pathology; D008297:Male; D046529:Microscopy, Electron, Transmission