title: Transcapsular adenomectomy(Millin): a comparative study, extraperitoneal laparoscopy versus open surgery.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  To demonstrate the safety of the Millin extraperitoneal laparoscopic adenomectomy by comparing the laparoscopic and open approaches.
  
  
  METHODS
  From January 2003 to April 2005, patients, with indication of prostatic adenomectomy, were offered the chance to choose between 2 types of procedure: Millin adenomectomy with open or extraperitoneal laparoscopic approach. Forty patients were included in this prospective non-randomised study. The patients were divided into 2 Groups. Group A (20 patients) underwent extraperitoneal laparoscopic adenomectomy, while Group B (20 patients) was treated by open surgery. Pre-operative, peri-operative and post-operative parameters were evaluated. Group A was subdivided in two sub-groups (first ten and last ten) and peri-operative parameters were considered in order to determine the learning curve.
  
  
  RESULTS
  In terms of pre-operative parameters considered, the 2 study groups are comparable (p>0.3). As far as peri and post-operative parameters are concerned: mean blood loss for Group A was 411.6+/-419 ml, for Group B 687.5+/-298.6 ml (p=0.004). For all the other parameters no significant statistical differences were recorded (p>0.4). Mean operative time was 107.2+/-34.9 min in Group A, and 95.5+/-22.5 min in Group B. Mean adenoma weight in Group A was: 69,5+/-21.5 g, in Group B: 88.1+/-43.8 g. Mean haemoglobin levels in Group A was: 11.2+/-1.8 g/dl, Group B: 11.6+/-1.2 (10-13.4) g/dl. Mean Analgesic consuming (Tramadol) during the post-operative stay was 385+/-36 mg in Group A, versus 430+/-108 mg in Group B. Mean catheterization time was 6.3+/-3.7 days in Group A, 5.6+/-1.1 days in Group B. The mean hospital stay was 7.8+/-4.1 days in Group A, and 7+/-1.6 days in Group B. One patient (5%) from Group A was re-operated for bleeding and clot retention, whilst in Group B patients did not present complications which required any further intervention. As far as peri-operative and post-operative parameters of the two sub-Groups A (first ten patients and last ten patients) are concerned, the statistical evaluation shows a significant difference only on operative time (p=0.01). The p-value for the other parameters was not significant (p>0.1).
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The extraperitoneal laparoscopic adenomectomy is a safe technique presenting results comparable to open surgery with the advantage of significantly lower peri-operative blood loss.
authors.affiliation: Department of Urology, University of Turin, San Luigi Hospital, Regione Gonzole 10, 10043, Orbassano, Torino, Italy. porpiglia@libero.it
authors.forename: Francesco
authors.initials: F
authors.lastname: Porpiglia
authors.forename: Carlo
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Terrone
authors.forename: Julien
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Renard
authors.forename: Susanna
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Grande
authors.forename: Francesca
authors.initials: F
authors.lastname: Musso
authors.forename: Marco
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Cossu
authors.forename: Francesca
authors.initials: F
authors.lastname: Vacca
authors.forename: Roberto Mario
authors.initials: RM
authors.lastname: Scarpa
mesh_terms: D000368:Aged; D006801:Humans; D010535:Laparoscopy / Q000379:methods; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D010537:Peritoneum; D011446:Prospective Studies; D011468:Prostatectomy / Q000379:methods*; D011470:Prostatic Hyperplasia / Q000601:surgery*