[Cardiac pacing for the prevention of atrial fibrillation. A current review].
Several prospective randomized clinical trials have reported that atrial-based "physiological" pacing is associated with a lower incidence of paroxysmal and permanent atrial fibrillation than single-chamber ventricular pacing in patients with conventional pacemaker indication. Whether atrial pacing itself is antiarrhythmic remains still uncertain. By contrast, right ventricular pacing is considered to beget atrial fibrillation, even in preserved AV synchrony during dual-chamber pacing. A number of clinical trials investigated the impact of sitespecific atrial pacing and advanced atrial pacing algorithms on the secondary prevention of atrial fibrillation. Multisite pacing (dual-site right atrial or biatrial pacing) was demonstrated to add only minimal benefit for the prevention of atrial fibrillation. By contrast, in some studies septal pacing and specific atrial pacing algorithms were reported to reduce the recurrence of atrial fibrillation in selected patients. At present, however, it remains unclear how to identify these patients. In clinical practice, the effectiveness of specific atrial pacing algorithms and/or septal pacing has to be tested out in the individual case. These therapeutic options should be considered in patients with a conventional indication for antibradycardia pacing and, additionally, symptomatic atrial fibrillation.
Yang
Alexander
A
Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik II, Universitätsklinikum Bonn. Alexander.Yang@web.de
Bitzen
Alexander
A
Schwab
Jörg Otto
JO
Schrickel
Jan
J
Lüderitz
Berndt
B
Lewalter
Thorsten
T
D000465:Algorithms; D001281:Atrial Fibrillation / Q000517:prevention & control*; D002304:Cardiac Pacing, Artificial / Q000379:methods* / Q000639:trends*; D002986:Clinical Trials as Topic; D006801:Humans; D017410:Practice Guidelines as Topic; D010818:Practice Patterns, Physicians' / Q000639:trends; D013813:Therapy, Computer-Assisted / Q000379:methods*