title: Feature Selection for Classification of SELDI-TOF-MS Proteomic Profiles.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Proteomic peptide profiling is an emerging technology harbouring great expectations to enable early detection, enhance diagnosis and more clearly define prognosis of many diseases. Although previous research work has illustrated the ability of proteomic data to discriminate between cases and controls, significantly less attention has been paid to the analysis of feature selection strategies that enable learning of such predictive models. Feature selection, in addition to classification, plays an important role in successful identification of proteomic biomarker panels.
  
  
  METHODS
  We present a new, efficient, multivariate feature selection strategy that extracts useful feature panels directly from the high-throughput spectra. The strategy takes advantage of the characteristics of surface-enhanced laser desorption/ionisation time-of-flight mass spectrometry (SELDI-TOF-MS) profiles and enhances widely used univariate feature selection strategies with a heuristic based on multivariate de-correlation filtering. We analyse and compare two versions of the method: one in which all feature pairs must adhere to a maximum allowed correlation (MAC) threshold, and another in which the feature panel is built greedily by deciding among best univariate features at different MAC levels.
  
  
  RESULTS
  The analysis and comparison of feature selection strategies was carried out experimentally on the pancreatic cancer dataset with 57 cancers and 59 controls from the University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA. The analysis was conducted in both the whole-profile and peak-only modes. The results clearly show the benefit of the new strategy over univariate feature selection methods in terms of improved classification performance.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Understanding the characteristics of the spectra allows us to better assess the relative importance of potential features in the diagnosis of cancer. Incorporation of these characteristics into feature selection strategies often leads to a more efficient data analysis as well as improved classification performance.
authors.affiliation: Department of Computer Science, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USAUniversity of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
authors.forename: Milos
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Hauskrecht
authors.forename: Richard
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Pelikan
authors.forename: David E
authors.initials: DE
authors.lastname: Malehorn
authors.forename: William L
authors.initials: WL
authors.lastname: Bigbee
authors.forename: Michael T
authors.initials: MT
authors.lastname: Lotze
authors.forename: Herbert J
authors.initials: HJ
authors.lastname: Zeh
authors.forename: David C
authors.initials: DC
authors.lastname: Whitcomb
authors.forename: James
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Lyons-Weiler