title: The role of pre-operative B mode ultrasound in the evaluation of the axillary lymph node metastases in the initial staging of breast carcinoma.
abstract: The lymph node status of a breast cancer is one of the main prognostic criterias. This status is very important to determine the therapeutic approach. Physical examination alone is not sufficient to assess axillary metastases. Mammographic examination can give us an idea about breast cancer and axillary involvement. Ultrasonographic evaluation can improve the sensitivity of clinical and mammographic examination in assessing axillary lymph node status. 42 patients operated on for breast cancer between January 2000-January 2003 were included in this prospective study. In the study, we used axillary B mode ultrasound to evaluate the axillary lymph nodes. There are several sonographic features to categorize them. Axillary B mode ultrasound was performed to evaluate the axillary lymph nodes for metastatic involvement. In the evaluation of lymph nodes, the sonographic criteria were centric echogenity, thickening of cortex, length/width ratio (L/W) and the diameter of lymph nodes. Hyperechogenic hilus was accepted as a benign finding. The thickening of the cortex less than 50% of the thickening of the centric echogenic hilus was also accepted as a benign finding. L/W ratio below 2 and parameters above 2 cm were accepted as malignant findings. 168 lymph nodes in 42 patients were evaluated pre-operatively with axillary B mode ultrasound. As a result, these lymph nodes were defined as benign in 19 patients (45.2%) and malignant in 23 patients (54.8%). Axillary lymph node status was found as benign in 18 patients (42.9%) and malignant in 24 patients (57.1%) pathologically . Comparative results of ultrasound and axillary lymph node status can be seen on Table III. As a result, the sensitivity of axillary B mode ultrasound to show the metastases was found as 79.1%, specificity was 77.7%, positive predictive value 82.6% and negative predictive value 73.6%. We think some better results may be obtained in the future and these developments may affect the surgeon's decisions concerning axillary dissection for breast cancer operations.
authors.affiliation: Pathology Department, Sisli Etfal Training and Research Hospital, Sisli, Istanbul, Turkey.
authors.forename: A
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Kebudi
authors.forename: C
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Calişkan
authors.forename: G
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Yetkin
authors.forename: S
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Celebi
authors.forename: A
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Işgör
authors.forename: A
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Mesrur Halefoğlu
authors.forename: R
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Ezdeşir
authors.forename: I
authors.initials: I
authors.lastname: Akgün
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D001365:Axilla; D001943:Breast Neoplasms / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging* / Q000473:pathology*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008207:Lymphatic Metastasis / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging*; D008875:Middle Aged; D009367:Neoplasm Staging / Q000379:methods*; D011300:Preoperative Care; D012680:Sensitivity and Specificity; D014463:Ultrasonography / Q000379:methods