2D/3D image (facial) comparison using camera matching.
A problem in forensic facial comparison of images of perpetrators and suspects is that distances between fixed anatomical points in the face, which form a good starting point for objective, anthropometric comparison, vary strongly according to the position and orientation of the camera. In case of a cooperating suspect, a 3D image may be taken using e.g. a laser scanning device. By projecting the 3D image onto a 2D image with the suspect's head in the same pose as that of the perpetrator, using the same focal length and pixel aspect ratio, numerical comparison of (ratios of) distances between fixed points becomes feasible. An experiment was performed in which, starting from two 3D scans and one 2D image of two colleagues, male and female, and using seven fixed anatomical locations in the face, comparisons were made for the matching and non-matching case. Using this method, the non-matching pair cannot be distinguished from the matching pair of faces. Facial expression and resolution of images were all more or less optimal, and the results of the study are not encouraging for the use of anthropometric arguments in the identification process. More research needs to be done though on larger sets of facial comparisons.
Goos
Mirelle I M
MI
Netherlands Forensic Institute, 2490 AA, The Hague, The Netherlands.
Alberink
Ivo B
IB
Ruifrok
Arnout C C
AC
D000886:Anthropometry; D003415:Crime; D005145:Face / Q000033:anatomy & histology*; D018732:Forensic Anthropology; D006801:Humans; D021621:Imaging, Three-Dimensional; D010363:Pattern Recognition, Automated; D010781:Photography; D015203:Reproducibility of Results