Extended follow up after isolated aortic valve replacement in the elderly.
The present paper reviews the extended follow up of all patients aged >/=70 who underwent isolated aortic valve replacement at our institution in the 1980s. Patients were identified from the surgical database and clinical information was gathered. Long-term follow up information was obtained from the patient, their family, or doctor. Ninety-three patients aged >/=70 years (median 73, range 70-80) comprised the study population. The indication for surgery was aortic stenosis in 68 patients (73%). Fifty-two patients (56%) received an allograft valve, 17 (18%) a bioprosthetic valve, and 24 (26%) a mechanical prosthesis. The median hospital stay was 12 days (range 0-105 days). Five surgical deaths occurred. Detailed follow up was obtained for the 71 patients who died later, and the 16 living patients (one patient lost). The median length of follow up was 6.8 years (range 0.1-18.9 years). Patients who received an allograft aortic valve had a significantly better long-term survival (median 10.6, 95% confidence intervals (CI) 8.1-13.8 years) compared to those receiving mechanical or bioprosthetic valves (median 6.5, 95% CI 4.7-11.9 years), P = 0.03. For the entire group, survival was similar to the age- and sex-matched population. Of the 16 patients alive at follow up (mean age 87, range 83-92), most were free of angina (12, 75%) and heart failure (10, 63%). The conclusion from the current study is that isolated aortic valve surgery in the elderly, particularly with an allograft valve, is associated with an excellent long-term outcome. A survival benefit was demonstrated comparing allograft aortic valve replacement to other valve types.
Wasywich
Cara A
CA
Departments of Cardiology and Cardiothoracic Surgery, Green Lane Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand.
Ruygrok
Peter N
PN
West
Teena M
TM
Haydock
David A
DA