Recognition performance and perceived quality of video enhanced for the visually impaired.
Subjects with central field loss (CFL) individually selected enhancement parameters to improve visibility of static video images. The effect of enhancement on performance and on perceived quality of motion video was assessed. Performance, e.g. recognition of visual details, was assessed by having subjects answer questions regarding visual information contained in the video motion segments that were enhanced using the individually-selected parameters. Enhancement did not improve subject performance on questions about video content. This result might be due to a ceiling effect limitation of the performance assessment method. In a second procedure, subjects' continuous perceptions of quality (using an adjective-based rating scale) were made while the enhancement parameters were abruptly switched among multiple values; these included the individually-selected enhancements, as well as unenhanced, over-enhanced, and degraded segments. The results indicate that adaptive enhancement (individually-tuned using a static image) adds significantly to perceived image quality when viewing motion video. Subjects who selected stronger contrast enhancement also perceived the enhancement to provide a larger benefit in image quality.
Peli
Eli
E
The Schepens Eye Research Institute, Harvard Medical School, 20 Staniford Street, Boston, MA 02114-2500, USA. eli@vision.eri.harvard.edu
D015350:Contrast Sensitivity; D006801:Humans; D007089:Image Enhancement; D008029:Lighting; D009039:Motion Perception; D012372:ROC Curve; D014741:Video Recording; D014786:Vision Disorders / Q000523:psychology*; D014787:Vision Tests; D014796:Visual Perception