title: Patterns of financing for the largest hospital systems in the United States.
abstract: The ten large systems reviewed in this column have greater degrees of financial leverage than do most freestanding hospitals. Larger firms typically have both greater capital access and lower costs of financing. Both voluntary and IO systems make extensive use of variable rate financing, but the percentage of variable rate financing is slightly higher for voluntary systems. This difference may be attributable to larger yield curve spreads for tax-exempt versus taxable securities. Interest rate swaps were used by 70 percent of the systems, but the actual amount swapped was relatively minor. This may change in the future as financial officers become more comfortable and familiar with interest rate swap arrangements. When compared to IO systems, voluntary systems have extensive levels of cash relative to their debt positions. Cash balances are more critical in the bond-rating process for voluntary hospitals, and the ability to raise new equity is much more limited in the voluntary sector. Very little capital leasing was used in any of the systems.
authors.affiliation: Cleverley & Associates, Worthington, Ohio, USA. wcleverley@cleverleyassociates.com
authors.forename: William O
authors.initials: WO
authors.lastname: Cleverley
authors.forename: Sarah Jane
authors.initials: SJ
authors.lastname: Baserman
mesh_terms: D002202:Capital Financing / Q000458:organization & administration*; D006276:Health Facility Size; D006777:Hospitals, Proprietary / Q000191:economics*; D006788:Hospitals, Voluntary / Q000191:economics*; D014481:United States