title: [Radical prostatectomy: open or "minimally invasive"? Our experience with open surgery and related comments].
abstract: Radical prostatectomy remains the gold standard for treatment of localised prostate cancer. Standardisation of the open retro-pubic anatomic prostatectomy by P Walsh allows skilled but not expert surgeons to achieve a high standard of performance. Learning curve is short with this technic, with minor morbidity. Rates of incontinence are low and impotency is now rather uncommon in the younger patient while oncological control is optimal for histologicaly organ confined cancer. "Mini invasive technics", laparoscopy and robot-assisted laparoscopy, have a longer learning curve, including a higher rate of complications that are unusual with open surgery. Operating time remains longer, costs are superior to the open technic and oncological control is not yet clearly validated while rates of classical late complications are not lower. Consequently, most urologist still prefer the open approach
authors.affiliation: stephane.rohner@bluewin.ch
authors.forename: S
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Rohner
authors.forename: J F
authors.initials: JF
authors.lastname: Bolle
authors.forename: N
authors.initials: N
authors.lastname: Reverdin
authors.forename: Y
authors.initials: Y
authors.lastname: Tuchschmid
mesh_terms: D003363:Cost Control; D017048:Health Care Costs; D006801:Humans; D010535:Laparoscopy / Q000379:methods*; D007813:Laparotomy; D008297:Male; D019060:Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures; D011183:Postoperative Complications; D011468:Prostatectomy / Q000379:methods*; D011471:Prostatic Neoplasms / Q000601:surgery*; D016896:Treatment Outcome