G. H. Mead in the history of sociological ideas.
My aim is to discuss the history of the reception of George Herbert Mead's ideas in sociology. After discussing the methodological debate between presentism and historicism, I address the interpretations of those responsible for Mead's inclusion in the sociological canon: Herbert Blumer, Jürgen Habermas, and Hans Joas. In the concluding section, I assess these reconstructions of Mead's thought and suggest an alternative more consistent with my initial methodological remarks. In particular, I advocate a reconstruction of Mead's ideas that apprehends simultaneously its evolution over time and its thematic breadth. Such a historically minded reconstruction can be not only a useful corrective to possible anachronisms incurred by contemporary social theorists, but also a fruitful resource for their theory-building endeavors. Only then can meaningful and enriching dialogue with Mead begin.
da Silva
Filipe Carreira
FC
University of Coimbra, Portugal.
D001527:Behaviorism / Q000266:history; D049673:History, 20th Century; D011593:Psychology, Social / Q000266:history; D012961:Sociology / Q000266:history*; D014481:United States