title: The case against no-suicide contracts: the commitment to treatment statement as a practice alternative.
abstract: This article reviews the literature on the use of "no-suicide contracts" in clinical practice, including conceptual discussions, patient and clinician surveys, and a few empirical studies on clinical utility. Our primary conclusion is that no-suicide contracts suffer from a broad range of conceptual, practical, and empirical problems. Most significantly, they have no empirical support for their effectiveness in the clinical environment. The authors provide and illustrate the commitment to treatment statement as a practice alternative to the no-suicide contract.
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology & Neuroscience, Baylor University, TX 97334, USA. M_Rud@baylor.edu
authors.forename: M David
authors.initials: MD
authors.lastname: Rudd
authors.forename: Michael
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Mandrusiak
authors.forename: Thomas E
authors.initials: TE
authors.lastname: Joiner
mesh_terms: D032982:Contracts; D006801:Humans; D010818:Practice Patterns, Physicians'; D015397:Program Evaluation; D013405:Suicide; D014481:United States