Teledentistry for screening new patient orthodontic referrals. Part 2: GDP perception of the referral system.
OBJECTIVE
To evaluate GDP opinion about a teledentistry system to screen new patient orthodontic referrals.


METHODS
Cross-sectional questionnaire.


METHODS
Two hundred general dental practitioners (GDPs) were approached from Stockport, Rochdale, Oldham, Bury and Bolton in Greater Manchester, and High Peak in Derbyshire.


METHODS
A questionnaire about a teledentistry system for new orthodontic patients was developed, following interviews with eight GDPs participating in a teledentistry trial. The questionnaire was posted to another 200 GDPs who were asked questions on issues such as the efficiency of a teledentistry system; the usefulness of a teledentistry system from the patients' point of view; their view of a teledentistry system; and any concerns they had relating to security, confidentiality and consent.


RESULTS
Seventy one per cent of GDPs thought teledentistry for orthodontic referrals would be a good idea. At least 90% of responders agreed or neither agreed nor disagreed that patients would benefit from such a system. Over half of GDPs agreed or strongly agreed that there would be implications on their surgery time, expense and equipment security.


CONCLUSIONS
GDPs generally supported a teledentistry system for new patient orthodontic referrals. Although perceived patient advantages were agreed, GDPs tended to be less sure about the impact on them in terms of set-up expenses, time in the surgery and appropriate remuneration.
Mandall
N A
NA
Orthodontic Department, University Dental Hospital of Manchester, Higher Cambridge Street, M15 6FH. nicky@fs1.den.man.ac.uk
Qureshi
U
U
Quereshi
U
U
Harvey
L
L
D001291:Attitude of Health Personnel; D005792:General Practice, Dental; D006801:Humans; D009970:Orthodontics; D012017:Referral and Consultation / Q000458:organization & administration*; D019114:Remote Consultation; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires; D006113:United Kingdom