Outcomes of interfacility critical care adult patient transport: a systematic review.
BACKGROUND
We aimed to determine the adverse events and important prognostic factors associated with interfacility transport of intubated and mechanically ventilated adult patients.


METHODS
We performed a systematic review of MEDLINE, CENTRAL, EMBASE, CINAHL, HEALTHSTAR, and Web of Science (from inception until 10 January 2005) for all clinical studies describing the incidence and predictors of adverse events in intubated and mechanically ventilated adult patients undergoing interfacility transport. The bibliographies of selected articles were also examined.


RESULTS
Five studies (245 patients) met the inclusion criteria. All were case-series and two were prospective in design. Due to the paucity of studies and significant heterogeneity in study population, outcome events, and results, we synthesized data in a qualitative manner. Pre-transport severity of illness was reported in only one study. The most common indication for transport was a need for investigations and/or specialist care (three studies, 220 patients). Transport modalities included air (fixed or rotor wing; 66% of patients) and ground (31%) ambulance, and commercial aircraft (3%). Transport teams included a physician in three studies (220 patients). Death during transfer was rare (n = 1). No other adverse events or significant therapeutic interventions during transport were reported. One study reported a 19% (28/145) incidence of respiratory alkalosis on arrival and another study documented a 30% overall intensive care unit mortality, while no adverse events or outcomes were reported after arrival in the three other studies.


CONCLUSIONS
Insufficient data exist to draw firm conclusions regarding the mortality, morbidity, or risk factors associated with the interfacility transport of intubated and mechanically ventilated adult patients. Further study is required to define the risks and benefits of interfacility transfer in this patient population. Such information is important for the planning and allocation of resources related to transporting critically ill adults.
Fan
Eddy
E
Interdepartmental Division of Critical Care Medicine, University of Toronto, 399 Bathurst Street, F2-150, Toronto, Ontario, M5T 2S8, Canada.
MacDonald
Russell D
RD
Adhikari
Neill K J
NK
Scales
Damon C
DC
Wax
Randy S
RS
Stewart
Thomas E
TE
Ferguson
Niall D
ND
D000328:Adult; D000401:Aircraft; D000552:Ambulances; D003422:Critical Care; D006801:Humans; D010360:Patient Transfer / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D012720:Severity of Illness Index; D016896:Treatment Outcome