title: A survey of U.S. prosthodontists and dental schools on the current materials and methods for final impressions for complete denture prosthodontics.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  The purpose of this study was to survey members of The American College of Prosthodontists (ACP) to evaluate current materials and methods for final impressions for complete denture prosthodontics in the United States. In addition, those methods were compared with methods and materials taught in U.S. dental schools via a second survey sent to the chairpersons of prosthodontic/restorative departments.
  
  
  METHODS
  An anonymous questionnaire was mailed to all 1762 active ACP members in the United States in 2003. A slightly modified questionnaire was also distributed to chairpersons of prosthodontic/restorative departments in the 54 U.S. dental schools. Data analysis was performed via frequency distribution and chi-square statistics.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Nine hundred and forty-five questionnaires were returned by members of the ACP (54% return rate) and 42 questionnaires were returned by the U.S. dental schools (78% return rate). The majority of the reporting prosthodontists (88%) and dental schools (98%) use a border-molded custom tray for final impressions for complete denture prosthodontics. The most popular material for border molding was plastic modeling compound (67% of reporting ACP members, and 95% of the responding dental schools). Variability of the materials used for final impressions was observed, with the most popular materials being polyvinylsiloxane for the ACP members (36%) and polysulfide for the dental schools (64%). Statistically significant differences were found in the materials used for border molding by prosthodontists based on the time elapsed since completion of prosthodontic training. No differences were found in the materials used for impression of edentulous arches based on years of experience. Geographic location did not influence the materials and methods used by prosthodontists for complete denture final impressions.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  There was variability of the materials and techniques used for final impressions by ACP members and dental schools; however, overall there was an agreement on the materials and techniques used by prosthodontists and dental schools. Distinct trends for increasing use of polyvinylsiloxane and polyether for border molding procedures and impressions of edentulous arches were observed both in members of the ACP and in the U.S. dental schools.
authors.affiliation: Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, University of Missouri-Kansas City, Kansas City, MO 64108, USA. petriec@umkc.edu
authors.forename: Cynthia S
authors.initials: CS
authors.lastname: Petrie
authors.forename: Mary P
authors.initials: MP
authors.lastname: Walker
authors.forename: Karen
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Williams
mesh_terms: D003760:Dental Impression Materials; D003761:Dental Impression Technique / Q000295:instrumentation; D003824:Denture, Complete; D006801:Humans; D010969:Plastics; D011145:Polyvinyls; D011476:Prosthodontics / Q000193:education; D012575:Schools, Dental; D012833:Siloxanes; D013440:Sulfides; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires; D013997:Time Factors; D014481:United States
chemical_list: D003760:Dental Impression Materials; D010969:Plastics; D011145:Polyvinyls; D012833:Siloxanes; D013440:Sulfides; C034183:vinyl polysiloxane; C032915:polysulfide