Who's afraid of national laws? Pesticide corporations use trade negotiations to avoid bans and undercut public health protections in Central America.
The agrochemical industry is using trade agreements to block proposed bans on pesticides identified as the worst occupational health hazards by a multi-country illness surveillance program in Central America. Through privileged access to closed-door negotiations, industry inserted deregulatory mechanisms, including a regional pesticide registry that invalidates national laws, investors' rights protection, and increased intellectual property protections, into the draft Central American Customs Union and the Central American Free Trade Agreement. These agreements undermine health-based national pesticide registration requirements; weaken health ministries' role in pesticide control; block marketing of cheaper, less toxic pesticides; and have a chilling effect on future pesticide regulatory activity. So long as corporations have privileged access to the trade negotiations and civil society is excluded, the resulting agreements will benefit special interests at the expense of public health.
Rosenthal
Erika
E
erosenthal@earthjustice.org
D000383:Agriculture / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D002489:Central America; D002617:Chemical Industry / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D006801:Humans; D007391:International Cooperation; D010575:Pesticides; D011634:Public Health / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*
D010575:Pesticides