title: The Word Association Implications Test.
abstract: Three experiments (N = 144 college students) tested and documented the relationship between incidental learning of diagnostic schemata with performance on the Word Association Implications Test (WAIT). Moreover, Experiment 1 showed that instruction in diagnostic cues did not improve WAIT scores, although an incentive did. Experiment 2 supported the "developing schemata" concept by showing that subjects need to interpret WAIT protocols before they can generate possible diagnostic clues. Experiment 3 showed that inductive reasoning and viewing the task as more play- and game-like (vs. work- and test-like) predicted WAIT scores over and above the influence of incidental learning of schemata, in sum, results suggest that an heuristic discovery-oriented approach is most successful in learning "to read between the lines" of word associations. Discussion addresses the value of heuristic versus algorithmic approaches to the learning of personality assessment.
authors.affiliation: Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, USA.
authors.forename: S J
authors.initials: SJ
authors.lastname: Dollinger
authors.forename: E L
authors.initials: EL
authors.lastname: Levin
authors.forename: A E
authors.initials: AE
authors.lastname: Robinson