title: Mining and mendacity, or how to keep a toxic product in the marketplace.
abstract: The corruption of medical evidence about the hazards of asbestos began with the Canadian mines. Quebec at one time boasted ten of the 13 mines in Canada. Work conditions in the mines were harsh, and the mills were full of airborne fiber. Given the size of the industry, the Quebec mines were where occupational asbestosis should first have been identified, but research at the mines was done in company towns, where clinics were staffed by company doctors. Since the late 1920s U.S. parent companies and their Canadian subsidiaries have maintained that there is little if any disease among mine workers. Asbestosis in textile workers, they have claimed, has been due to the conditions in that industry and not the inherent dangers of asbestos. That fiction continues to shape the discourse about the usefulness of asbestos.
authors.affiliation: School of Social Science and Planning, RMIT University, Melbourne, Australia. jock.mcculloch@rmit.edu.au
authors.forename: Jock
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: McCulloch
mesh_terms: D017632:Asbestos, Serpentine / Q000009:adverse effects*; D001195:Asbestosis / Q000209:etiology*; D006801:Humans; D008906:Mining / Q000191:economics / Q000458:organization & administration*; D009784:Occupational Diseases / Q000209:etiology*; D012449:Safety
chemical_list: D017632:Asbestos, Serpentine