title: Did prohibition really work? Alcohol prohibition as a public health innovation.
abstract: The conventional view that National Prohibition failed rests upon an historically flimsy base. The successful campaign to enact National Prohibition was the fruit of a century-long temperance campaign, experience of which led prohibitionists to conclude that a nationwide ban on alcohol was the most promising of the many strategies tried thus far. A sharp rise in consumption during the early 20th century seemed to confirm the bankruptcy of alternative alcohol-control programs. The stringent prohibition imposed by the Volstead Act, however, represented a more drastic action than many Americans expected. Nevertheless, National Prohibition succeeded both in lowering consumption and in retaining political support until the onset of the Great Depression altered voters' priorities. Repeal resulted more from this contextual shift than from characteristics of the innovation itself.
authors.affiliation: Huron University College, 1349 Western Road, London, Ontario N6G 1H3, Canada. jblocker@uwo.ca
authors.forename: Jack S
authors.initials: JS
authors.lastname: Blocker
mesh_terms: D000428:Alcohol Drinking / Q000266:history* / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence; D049673:History, 20th Century; D007880:Legislation, Drug / Q000266:history*; D011634:Public Health / Q000266:history* / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence; D011640:Public Policy; D013695:Temperance / Q000266:history* / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence; D014481:United States