title: Why is that? Structural prediction and ambiguity resolution in a very large corpus of English sentences.
abstract: Previous psycholinguistic research has shown that a variety of contextual factors can influence the interpretation of syntactically ambiguous structures, but psycholinguistic experimentation inherently does not allow for the investigation of the role that these factors play in natural (uncontrolled) language use. We use regression modeling in conjunction with data from the British National Corpus to measure the amount and specificity of the information available for disambiguation in natural language use. We examine the Direct Object/Sentential Complement ambiguity and the closely related issue of complementizer use in sentential complements, and find that both ambiguity resolution and complementizer use can be predicted from contextual information.
authors.affiliation: Center for Research in Language, University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, California, CA 92093-0526, USA. droland@crl.ucsd.edu
authors.forename: Douglas
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Roland
authors.forename: Jeffrey L
authors.initials: JL
authors.lastname: Elman
authors.forename: Victor S
authors.initials: VS
authors.lastname: Ferreira
mesh_terms: D003071:Cognition; D006801:Humans; D008037:Linguistics; D016015:Logistic Models; D008960:Models, Psychological; D011578:Psycholinguistics; D012660:Semantics; D013067:Speech Perception