List discrimination in associative recognition and implications for representation.
Four experiments tested the predictions made by the model outlined in A. H. Criss and R. M. Shiffrin (2004b). Participants studied 2 successive lists of pairs followed by a recognition memory test for the most recent list. Some items and some pairs were repeated across the 2 lists. Critically, a given item could be repeated in the same or different type of pair. For associative recognition, performance was only affected by repetitions in the same pair type. However, in single-item recognition confusions occurred for both types of repetitions. The results are as predicted and confirm the assumption that different associative representations were stored even when the same token repeated in different pair types, whereas similar item representations were used regardless of pair type.
Criss
Amy H
AH
Center for the Neural Basis of Cognition, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA. acriss@andrew.cmu.edu
Shiffrin
Richard M
RM
D001244:Association; D004192:Discrimination, Psychological; D006801:Humans; D008568:Memory; D010507:Periodicity; D021641:Recognition, Psychology; D014796:Visual Perception; D014825:Vocabulary