Responses to discrimination: the role of emotion and expectations for emotional regulation.
The present study examined the role of emotion in women's perceptions of discrimination and their endorsement of behavioral responses to change the status quo. In an experimental simulation involving a situation of sex discrimination, women (N = 108) were primed to experience a particular emotion (sad, angry, control condition) and were subsequently instructed to either suppress or express (or neither) their emotional responses. Women primed to feel sad and told to suppress their emotions reported the least discrimination, whereas angered women who were permitted to express themselves reported the greatest discrimination. Furthermore, when encouraged to express their emotions, women primed to feel sad were more likely to endorse normative actions to rectify the situation, whereas women induced to feel angry were more likely to endorse collective actions to change the status quo. These findings have implications for the role of emotions and expectations regarding their expression on collective action taking.
Gill
Ritu
R
Department of Psychology, Carleton University, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. ritu.gill@sympatico.ca
Matheson
Kimberly
K
D000339:Affect; D001290:Attitude; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D011287:Prejudice; D012737:Sex Factors; D012938:Social Perception; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires