title: [Prospective study of laparoscopic treatment of incisional hernia by means of the use of composite mesh: indications, complications, mesh fixation materials and results].
abstract: The aim of this study was to establish the indications, safety, efficacy, feasibility and reproducibility of laparoscopic techniques in the treatment of abdominal wall defects, even of the larger kind, in order to standardise procedures and confirm the performance of the composite mesh used (Parietex, Sofradim, Trevoux, France). From January 2001 to December 2004, 185 non-selected patients (109 females, 76 males), with a mean age of 56 years (range: 26-77) and a mean BMI of 30 (range: 26-40) were included in the study; 162 patients (87.5%) had incisional hernias and 23 patients (12.5%) primary wall defects. The size of the defects treated ranged from 4 cm to 26 cm (mean: 12.1 cm). All patients underwent laparoscopic repair and all meshes were placed intraperitoneally. Over a mean follow-up period of 29 months (range: 1-48), we observed 11 postoperative complications (6.7%): 7 seromas (4.3%) which were still present after 4 weeks, one of which turned septic after several attempts at percutaneous evacuation and in which the prosthesis had to be removed laparoscopically; 3 (1.8%) experienced persistent neuralgia which disappeared after 2 months' treatment with NSAIDs, and also one case of trocar-induced haematoma. We had 4 recurrences (2.4%), all within 1 to 3 months of surgery; 1 in the size group measuring less than 9 cm and 3 in the larger defect group. Adhesiolysis was performed in 98% of all incisional hernia cases and in 7 cases (4.3%) we had to repair iatrogenic lesions of the small bowel. In 4 patients (2.5%), because of thick adhesions (1 patient) or bowel loop fixation to the previous surgical scar (3 patients), we caused complete bowel perforation repaired by laparoscopic suture. Mean operative time was 65.6 minutes (range: 28-130) and the mean hospital stay was 2.1 days (range: 1-5). We had no conversions and no mortality. We also reviewed the main methods of mesh fixation and believe that the best system at the moment is the EndoAnchor (Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Cincinnati, Ohio) device, although in future the best option is likely to be fixation with non-traumatic biological glue (Tissucol, Baxter, Maurepas), which we have already used in a series of 16 patients with optimal results and no recurrences. The results emerging from this clinical trial confirm the safety and efficacy of laparoscopic repair techniques, of this kind of mesh and of the anchoring devices used as well as the reproducibility of this technique for the intraperitoneal repair of primary and incisional abdominal wall defects, including even those of large size.
authors.affiliation: II UO Chirurgia Generale, Centro di Chirurgia Laparoscopica e Minivasiva, Ospedale S. Gerardo, Monza, Milano.
authors.forename: Stefano
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Olmi
authors.forename: Luigi
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Erba
authors.forename: Stefano
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Magnone
authors.forename: Aimone
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Bertolini
authors.forename: Emanuele
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Mastropasqua
authors.forename: Paolo
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Perego
authors.forename: Diego
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Massimini
authors.forename: Guido
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Zanandrea
authors.forename: Roberto
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Russo
authors.forename: Enrico
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Croce
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D005240:Feasibility Studies; D005260:Female; D005500:Follow-Up Studies; D006555:Hernia, Ventral / Q000150:complications / Q000601:surgery*; D006801:Humans; D007558:Italy; D010535:Laparoscopy; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D011446:Prospective Studies; D013526:Surgical Mesh; D014014:Tissue Adhesives / Q000627:therapeutic use
chemical_list: D014014:Tissue Adhesives