Discriminative stimuli that follow the absence of reinforcement are preferred by pigeons over those that follow reinforcement.
Clement, Feltus, Kaiser, and Zentall (2000) found that when pigeons have to work to obtain a discriminative stimulus that is followed by reinforcement, they prefer a discriminative stimulus that requires greater effort over one that requires less effort. The authors suggested that such a preference results from the greater change in hedonic value that occurs between the more aversive event and the onset of the stimulus that signals reinforcement, a contrast effect. It was hypothesized that any stimulus that follows a relatively more aversive event would be preferred over a stimulus that follows a relatively less aversive event. In the present experiment, the authors tested the counterintuitive prediction of that theory, that pigeons should prefer a discriminative stimulus that follows the absence of reinforcement over a discriminative stimulus that follows reinforcement. Results supported the theory.
Friedrich
Andrea M
AM
University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky 40506-0044, USA.
Clement
Tricia S
TS
Zentall
Thomas R
TR
D000818:Animals; D001522:Behavior, Animal / Q000502:physiology; D002755:Choice Behavior; D010856:Columbidae; D004193:Discrimination Learning; D012054:Reinforcement, Psychology