AAPM Task Group 103 report on peer review in clinical radiation oncology physics.
This report provides guidelines for a peer review process between two clinical radiation oncology physicists. While the Task Group's work was primarily focused on ensuring timely and productive independent reviews for physicists in solo practice, these guidelines may also be appropriate for physicists in a group setting, particularly when dispersed over multiple separate clinic locations. To ensure that such reviews enable a collegial exchange of professional ideas and productive critique of the entire clinical physics program, the reviews should not be used as an employee evaluation instrument by the employer. Such use is neither intended nor supported by this Task Group. Detailed guidelines are presented on the minimum content of such reviews, as well as a recommended format for reporting the findings of a review. In consideration of the full schedules faced by most clinical physicists, the process outlined herein was designed to be completed in one working day.
Halvorsen
Per H
PH
Department of Radiation Oncology, Middlesex Hospital, Middletown, Connecticut 06457, USA. per@halvorsen.name
Das
Indra J
IJ
Fraser
Martin
M
Freedman
D Jay
DJ
Rice
Robert E
RE
Ibbott
Geoffrey S
GS
Parsai
E Ishmael
EI
Robin
T Tydings
TT
Thomadsen
Bruce R
BR
D006283:Health Physics / Q000592:standards*; D010380:Peer Review / Q000592:standards*; D011361:Professional Competence / Q000592:standards*; D011785:Quality Assurance, Health Care / Q000592:standards*; D018787:Radiation Oncology / Q000592:standards*; D014481:United States