Measurement of clinical wear of two packable composites after 6 months in service.
Original large-particle composites exhibited poor wear characteristics. With the packable composites, there has been a reintroduction of large particles. The clinical wear characteristics of such packable composites are relatively unknown. The purpose of this study was to compare wear between two types of packable composites: Alert (Jeneric Pentron) and Surefil (Dentsply Caulk). Each material was compared with and without a surface sealant. Fifty-two subjects were included. Subjects had to have two to four eligible teeth, be 21 years of age, in good health and in need of moderate to large class 2 restorations on molars, and/or a two-surface class 1 on molars. Wear was assessed, using the Moffa-Lugassy (ML) scale, by evaluating stone models made from polyvinyl siloxane (PVS) impressions taken at baseline and 6 months. Rating was done by four calibrated examiners using a forced consensus model. The use of a surface sealant with Alert significantly reduced the median wear rate at 6 months compared with that of the SureFil restorations.
Blalock
J S
JS
Division of Operative Dentistry and Clinical Research, Department of Oral Rehabilitation, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, GA, USA. jblalock@mail.mcg.edu
Chan
D C N
DC
Browning
W D
WD
Callan
R
R
Hackman
S
S
D000328:Adult; D003188:Composite Resins / Q000737:chemistry*; D019554:Dental Restoration Wear; D003793:Dental Restoration, Permanent / Q000379:methods*; D006801:Humans; D008422:Materials Testing / Q000379:methods; D008963:Molar; D010895:Pit and Fissure Sealants / Q000737:chemistry*
C406265:Alert composite resin; D003188:Composite Resins; D010895:Pit and Fissure Sealants; C403464:SureFil packable composite