Dimensional assessment of X-bearing and Y-bearing haploid and disomic human sperm with the use of fluorescence in situ hybridization and objective morphometry.
OBJECTIVE
To explore the dimensional attributes of haploid and disomic X-bearing and Y-bearing spermatozoa.


METHODS
Morphometric evaluation of more than 2,000 X-bearing and Y-bearing spermatozoa after identification of the genotype with fluorescence in situ hybridization.


METHODS
Academic clinical and research andrology laboratory.


METHODS
Sperm head area, perimeter, long axis, short axis, shape factor, elliptical form factor (long axis/short axis), and tail length.


RESULTS
We found no differences in dimensions or dimensional distributions between X-bearing and Y-bearing spermatozoa, whether in the native or the decondensed state, or in oligozoospermic or normozoospermic men. There were inconsistent differences and a 70% overlap in the dimensions of haploid and disomic spermatozoa. The other 30% of sperm with disomic nuclei were either smaller or larger compared to haploid spermatozoa.


CONCLUSIONS
There are no differences, or distinguishing characteristics, in dimensions or dimensional distributions between X-bearing and Y-bearing spermatozoa. Dimensional attributes do not discriminate between dysomic and haploid spermatozoa.
Zavaczki
Zoltan
Z
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Szent-Györgi University School of Medicine, Szeged, Hungary.
Celik-Ozenci
Ciler
C
Ovari
Laszlo
L
Jakab
Attila
A
Sati
G Leyla
GL
Ward
David C
DC
Huszar
Gabor
G
D048430:Cell Shape; D041321:Chromosomes, Human, X; D041322:Chromosomes, Human, Y; D005838:Genotype; D006238:Haploidy; D006801:Humans; D017404:In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence; D008297:Male; D008858:Microscopy, Phase-Contrast; D009845:Oligospermia / Q000473:pathology; D013077:Sperm Head; D013082:Sperm Tail; D013094:Spermatozoa / Q000648:ultrastructure*; D024182:Uniparental Disomy