Unidimensionality and bandwidth in the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression (CES-D) Scale.
In this study, we compared classical test theory (CTT) and item response theory (IRT) approaches in analyzing the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression (CES-D) Scale (Radloff, 1977). Standard item analyses, as well as Rasch (1960) analyses, both revealed item departures from unidimensionality in a sample of 2,455 older persons responding to the CES-D. Positive affect items in the scale performed poorly overall, their removal reducing the scale's bandwidth only slightly. Modeling depression scores derived from Rasch measures and raw totals showed subtle but important differences for statistical inference. The assessment of depressive risk was slightly enhanced by using 16-item scale measures obtained from the results of the Rasch analysis as the dependent variable. Confirmatory factor analysis and parallel analysis verified the advantages of removing positively worded items. IRT and CTT techniques proved to be complementary in this study and can be usefully combined to improve measuring depression.
Stansbury
James P
JP
Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA. jstansbu@jhsph.edu
Ried
L Douglas
LD
Velozo
Craig A
CA
D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D003863:Depression / Q000175:diagnosis*; D005260:Female; D005431:Florida; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008962:Models, Theoretical; D018570:Risk Assessment; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires