Induction of labor using a foley balloon, with and without extra-amniotic saline infusion.
OBJECTIVE
To compare transcervical Foley bulb with and without extra-amniotic saline infusion for induction of labor in patients with an unfavorable cervix.


METHODS
Women who presented for induction of labor with Bishop score less than 5 were randomly assigned to receive Foley alone or Foley with extra-amniotic saline infusion for induction of labor. Primary outcome was time from start of induction to vaginal delivery. Secondary outcomes were cesarean delivery rates, incidence of chorioamnionitis, Apgar scores at 1 and 5 minutes, and adverse events.


RESULTS
One hundred forty women completed the study. Time from induction to vaginal delivery was 16.58 (+/- 7.55) hours in the extra-amniotic saline infusion group compared with 21.47 (+/- 9.95) hours in the Foley group (P < .01). Chorioamnionitis occurred in 4 of 66 (6.1%) women in the extra-amniotic saline infusion group compared with 12 of 74 (16.2%) women in the Foley group (P = .067). Cesarean delivery rate was 21.2% versus 20.1% in the extra-amniotic saline infusion and Foley groups, respectively (P = 1.0). Median 1-minute and 5-minute Apgar scores were 9 in both groups. Adverse events were rare and unrelated to method of induction.


CONCLUSIONS
Induction of labor by using Foley with extra-amniotic saline infusion results in shorter induction-to-vaginal-delivery time than Foley alone, without affecting cesarean delivery rates.


METHODS
II-I
Karjane
Nicole W
NW
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Virginia Commonwealth University Medical Center, Richmond, 23298, USA. nwkarjane@vcu.edu
Brock
Ellen L
EL
Walsh
Scott W
SW
D000328:Adult; D000650:Amnion; D002404:Catheterization / Q000295:instrumentation*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007263:Infusions, Parenteral; D007751:Labor, Induced / Q000295:instrumentation* / Q000379:methods*; D011247:Pregnancy; D012965:Sodium Chloride / Q000008:administration & dosage*
D012965:Sodium Chloride