title: Shock wave lithotripsy versus ureteroscopy for distal ureteral calculi: a prospective study.
abstract: We performed a prospective, non-randomised study to determine the appropriate first-line treatment modality for distal ureteral stones. Between 2003 and 2004, a total of 124 patients with distal ureteral calculi were entered into the study (mean age 48 years, 35 women and 99 men). Sixty-two patients were treated with shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) and 62 patients with ureteroscopy (URS). The average stone size was 6.9 mm (3-33 mm) for SWL and 7.2 mm (3-30 mm) for URS. The treatment decision depended on the patients' preference and clinical parameters (i.e. contraindications for anaesthesia). URS was performed under general anaesthesia, using semirigid 8 Fr instruments. SWL was performed under analgo-sedation using a Modulith SLX. Of patients treated with SWL, 84% had a treatment success within 7 days, 98% after URS. These results show a significant success (P=0.005) in favour of URS. The average in-patient stay after SWL was 3 days and for URS 4 days (not significant). The results show a high efficacy and a low complication rate for both modalities. The attained stone-free rate shows a significant advantage for primary URS.
authors.affiliation: Department of Urology, Mannheim University Hospital, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68135, Mannheim, Germany. Patrick.honeck@uro.ma.uni-heidelberg.de
authors.forename: P
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Honeck
authors.forename: A
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Häcker
authors.forename: P
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Alken
authors.forename: M S
authors.initials: MS
authors.lastname: Michel
authors.forename: T
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Knoll
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008096:Lithotripsy; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D011446:Prospective Studies; D014514:Ureteral Calculi / Q000628:therapy*; D018666:Ureteroscopy