Resonance frequency analysis and damping capacity assessment. Part I: an in vitro study on measurement reliability and a method of comparison in the determination of primary dental implant stability.
OBJECTIVE
The aims of this in vitro study were to evaluate reliability of the Osstell and Periotest devices in the assessment of implant stability and to perform a method comparison.


METHODS
Commercial dental implants were inserted into bovine rib segments of different anatomical origins and densities. Repeated measurements were performed, varying (a) the torque-in force of the devices' attachment screw (the Osstell transducer and the ball attachment, insert for the Periotest device), (b) the insertion site bone quality, and (c) the thread exposure in simulated peri-implant bone defects.


RESULTS
Both methods were comparably reliable and showed a strong association to each other in the classification of implant stability. As opposed to torque-forced screw attachment, the variations in bone composition, differences in inter-implant stability of adjacent implants, and peri-implant bone reduction were statistically significant for both methods.


CONCLUSIONS
Both non-invasive diagnostic devices seem to be useful in the long-term follow-up of implant integration.
Lachmann
Stefan
S
Department of Prosthodontics, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany. stefan.lachmann@med.uni-tuebingen.de
Jäger
Berthold
B
Axmann
Detlef
D
Gomez-Roman
German
G
Groten
Martin
M
Weber
Heiner
H
D000818:Animals; D002417:Cattle; D003748:Dental Equipment; D003758:Dental Implantation, Endosseous; D015921:Dental Implants; D017267:Dental Prosthesis Design; D017268:Dental Prosthesis Retention; D019232:Dental Restoration Failure; D003799:Dental Stress Analysis / Q000295:instrumentation*; D020007:Implants, Experimental; D016348:Osseointegration; D010474:Percussion / Q000295:instrumentation*; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D012272:Ribs / Q000601:surgery; D019415:Torque; D014159:Transducers; D014732:Vibration
D015921:Dental Implants