title: Counteraction between overshadowing and degraded contingency treatments: support for the extended comparator hypothesis.
abstract: Four experiments using rats in a Pavlovian lick-suppression preparation investigated the effects of combining 2 treatments known for their response-decrementing effects, namely, overshadowing and degraded contingency. Contrary to most contemporary learning theories, the extended comparator hypothesis predicts that these 2 treatments will counteract each other, and therefore, less of a decrement in conditioned responding should be observed than with either treatment alone. Experiments 1 and 2 confirmed this prediction in first-order conditioning and sensory preconditioning preparations, respectively. Experiment 3 demonstrated that posttraining extinction of the training context resulted in a recovery from degraded contingency and reversed the counteractive effect on overshadowing. Finally, Experiment 4 demonstrated that posttraining extinction of the overshadowing stimulus resulted in recovery from simple overshadowing and also reversed the counteractive effect on degraded contingency. These results are consistent with the extended comparator hypothesis but not traditional or recent acquisition-focused models.
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, State University of New York, Binghamton, NY 13902-6000, USA.
authors.forename: Gonzalo P
authors.initials: GP
authors.lastname: Urcelay
authors.forename: Ralph R
authors.initials: RR
authors.lastname: Miller
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D001522:Behavior, Animal / Q000502:physiology*; D003214:Conditioning, Classical; D005108:Extinction, Psychological; D005260:Female; D008297:Male; D011582:Psychological Theory; D011897:Random Allocation; D051381:Rats; D017207:Rats, Sprague-Dawley