title: Team task analysis: identifying tasks and jobs that are team based.
abstract: This paper presents initial information on the development and validation of three team task analysis scales. These scales were designed to quantitatively assess the extent to which a group of tasks or a job is team based. During a 2-week period, 52 male students working in 4-person teams were trained to perform a complex highly interdependent computer-simulated combat mission consisting of both individual- and team-based tasks. Our results indicated that the scales demonstrated high levels of interrater agreement. In addition, the scales differentiated between tasks that were predetermined to be individual versus team based. Finally, the results indicated that job-level ratings of team workflow were more strongly related to team performance than were aggregated task-level ratings of team-relatedness or team workflow. These results suggest that the scales presented here are an effective means of quantifying the extent to which tasks or jobs are team based. A research and practical implication of our findings is that the team task analysis scales could serve as criterion measures in the evaluation of team training interventions or predictors of team performance.
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, Texas A&M University, College Station 77843-4235, USA. wea@psyc.tamu.edu
authors.forename: Winfred
authors.initials: W
authors.lastname: Arthur
authors.forename: Bryan D
authors.initials: BD
authors.lastname: Edwards
authors.forename: Suzanne T
authors.initials: ST
authors.lastname: Bell
authors.forename: Anton J
authors.initials: AJ
authors.lastname: Villado
authors.forename: Winston
authors.initials: W
authors.lastname: Bennett
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D003198:Computer Simulation; D006801:Humans; D007398:Interpersonal Relations; D008297:Male; D013647:Task Performance and Analysis