Effects of mortality salience on evaluation of ingroup and outgroup sources: the impact of pro- versus counterattitudinal positions.
Past Terror Management Theory (TMT) research has demonstrated that mortality salience leads to favoritism toward ingroup members and derogation of outgroup members and to polarized attitudes toward the source of pro and counterattitudinal statements. In such research, the individual's group membership and the individual's worldview position were examined separately. Thus, when the individual's group membership was manipulated, one could normally assume that an outgroup member is counterattitudinal and an ingroup member is proattitudinal. It is unclear, therefore, whether ingroup members elicited favoritism from mortality salient participants because of their group membership or because of their presumably proattitudinal position, or both. The authors present two studies in which the individual's group membership and attitudinal position are jointly manipulated. Results showed that among mortality salient participants, the outgroup member received favorable or unfavorable evaluations depending on his position, whereas the ingroup member received moderately positive evaluations regardless of the position taken.
See
Ya Hui Michelle
YH
Department of Psychology, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210-1222, USA. see.39@osu.edu
Petty
Richard E
RE
D000704:Analysis of Variance; D001007:Anxiety / Q000523:psychology*; D001290:Attitude; D001293:Attitude to Death; D003643:Death; D005239:Fear / Q000523:psychology; D006126:Group Processes; D006127:Group Structure; D006801:Humans; D007398:Interpersonal Relations; D011287:Prejudice; D012919:Social Behavior; D012933:Social Identification; D012938:Social Perception; D013334:Students / Q000523:psychology; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires