Not all stereotyping is created equal: differential consequences of thoughtful versus non-thoughtful stereotyping.
Much research emphasizes heuristic use of stereotypes, though stereotypes have long been considered as capable of influencing more thoughtful processing of social information. Direct comparisons between thoughtful and non-thoughtful stereotyping are lacking in the literature. Recent research in attitude change emphasizes the different consequences of judgments arising from relatively thoughtful versus non-thoughtful processes. Therefore, increased thought could not only fail to decrease stereotyping but might also create stereotypic perceptions that are more likely to have lasting impact. The current studies demonstrate thoughtful and non-thoughtful stereotyping within the same setting. More thoughtful stereotyping is more resistant to future attempts at change and to warnings of possible bias. Implications are discussed for the typical research questions asked after observing stereotypic judgements.
Wegener
Duane T
DT
Department of Psychological Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907-1364, USA. wegener@psych.purdue.edu
Clark
Jason K
JK
Petty
Richard E
RE
D001290:Attitude; D003071:Cognition; D006801:Humans; D012938:Social Perception; D013240:Stereotyping; D013850:Thinking