Comparison of atmospheric pressure photoionization, atmospheric pressure chemical ionization, and electrospray ionization mass spectrometry for analysis of lipids.
In this work, we compare the quantitative accuracy and sensitivity of analyzing lipids by atmospheric pressure photoionization (APPI), atmospheric pressure chemical ionization (APCI), and electrospray ionization (ESI) LC/MS. The target analytes include free fatty acids and their esters, monoglyceride, diglyceride, and triglyceride. The results demonstrate the benefits of using LC/APPI-MS for lipid analysis. Analyses were performed on a Waters ZQ LC/MS. Normal-phase solvent systems were used due to low solubility of these compounds in aqueous reversed-phase solvent systems. By comparison, APPI offers lower detection limits, generally highest signal intensities, and the highest S/N ratio. APPI is 2-4 times more sensitive than APCI and much more sensitive than ESI without mobile-phase modifiers. APPI and APCI offer comparable linear range (i.e., 4-5 decades). ESI sensitivity is dramatically enhanced by use of mobile phase modifiers (i.e., ammonium formate or sodium acetate); however, these ESI adduct signals are less stable and either are nonlinear or have dramatically reduced linear ranges. Analysis of fish oils by APPI shows significantly enhanced target analyte intensities in comparison with APCI and ESI.
Cai
Sheng-Suan
SS
Syagen Technology Inc., 1411 Warner Avenue, Tustin, CA 92780, USA.
Syage
Jack A
JA
D001274:Atmospheric Pressure; D005395:Fish Oils / Q000737:chemistry; D007477:Ions; D008055:Lipids / Q000032:analysis*; D010777:Photochemistry; D012015:Reference Standards; D012680:Sensitivity and Specificity; D021241:Spectrometry, Mass, Electrospray Ionization / Q000379:methods*
D005395:Fish Oils; D007477:Ions; D008055:Lipids