Further evidence for the role of inferential reasoning in forward blocking.
Previous studies on human causal learning (De Houwer & Beckers, 2003; De Houwer, Beckers, & Glautier, 2002) showed that secondary task difficulty (performing an easy vs. a difficult secondary task during the main causal learning task) and ceiling information (outcome occurs with a maximal vs. submaximal intensity) had an influence on forward blocking (i.e., lower causal ratings for cue T when AT+ trials are preceded by A+ trials than when no A+ trials are presented). We extended these studies by also examining self-reports of participants about the reasons behind their causal ratings. Blocking was found only for participants who reported an appropriate blocking inference. Furthermore, secondary task difficulty and ceiling information influenced the number of participants who reported an appropriate blocking inference. These findings point to a major impact of inferential reasoning in human causal learning.
Vandorpe
Stefaan
S
Department of Psychology, Ghent University, Belgium. stefaan.vandorpe@ugent.be
De Houwer
Jan
J
Beckers
Tom
T
D006801:Humans; D007600:Judgment; D007858:Learning; D011340:Problem Solving; D011930:Reaction Time