Hepatic metastases: detection with multi-detector row CT, SPIO-enhanced MR imaging, and both techniques combined.
OBJECTIVE
To retrospectively compare the accuracy in detection of hepatic metastases among contrast material-enhanced multi-detector row computed tomography (CT) alone, superparamagnetic iron oxide (SPIO)-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) imaging alone, and a combination of contrast-enhanced CT and SPIO-enhanced MR imaging.


METHODS
The ethics committee did not require its approval or informed consent for this retrospective study, which was compliant with Declaration of Helsinki principles. Data in 38 patients (22 men, 16 women; mean age, 64.5 years; range, 35-78 years) suspected of having hepatic metastases who underwent both contrast-enhanced CT and SPIO-enhanced MR imaging were retrospectively analyzed. Twenty-one of the 38 patients had 61 metastases. Seventeen of the 61 metastases were confirmed histologically; the remaining 44 metastases were defined with imaging follow-up. At MR imaging, SPIO-enhanced heavily T1-weighted images, T2*-weighted gradient echo images, and T2-weighted fast spin-echo images were evaluated. Contrast-enhanced multi-detector row CT images obtained in the portal phase were evaluated. Four blinded observers independently reviewed CT images, MR images, and the combination of CT and MR images. Diagnostic accuracy was evaluated by using the alternative free-response receiver operating characteristic (AFROC) method. Sensitivities and positive predictive values were also analyzed with the Fisher protected least significant difference test and generalized estimating equations.


RESULTS
The mean area under the AFROC curve for the combined approach (0.70) was significantly higher than that for SPIO-enhanced MR imaging alone (0.58, P < .05, Fisher protected least significant difference test), and there was no significant difference between each of them and that for contrast-enhanced CT alone (0.66). For all lesions, the mean sensitivity of combined imaging (0.59) was significantly higher than that of CT (0.48) or MR imaging (0.43) alone (P < .05, Fisher protected least significant difference test and generalized estimating equations). For all lesions, the mean positive predictive values were 0.82, 0.89, and 0.81, for combined MR and CT, CT alone, and MR alone, respectively.


CONCLUSIONS
The addition of SPIO-enhanced MR imaging to contrast-enhanced multi-detector row CT (ie, combined analysis of SPIO-enhanced MR images and contrast-enhanced CT images) can improve sensitivity in the detection of hepatic metastases, although this improvement in sensitivity was not significant at AFROC analysis.
Onishi
Hiromitsu
H
Department of Radiology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Murakami
Takamichi
T
Kim
Tonsok
T
Hori
Masatoshi
M
Iannaccone
Riccardo
R
Kuwabara
Masatomo
M
Abe
Hisashi
H
Nakata
Saki
S
Osuga
Keigo
K
Tomoda
Kaname
K
Passariello
Roberto
R
Nakamura
Hironobu
H
D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D003287:Contrast Media; D003911:Dextrans; D005260:Female; D052203:Ferrosoferric Oxide; D006801:Humans; D007501:Iron; D008113:Liver Neoplasms / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000556:secondary*; D008279:Magnetic Resonance Imaging / Q000379:methods; D058185:Magnetite Nanoparticles; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D010087:Oxides; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D012189:Retrospective Studies; D014057:Tomography, X-Ray Computed
D003287:Contrast Media; D003911:Dextrans; D058185:Magnetite Nanoparticles; D010087:Oxides; C097921:ferumoxtran-10; D007501:Iron; D052203:Ferrosoferric Oxide