Does emotion help or hinder immediate memory? Arousal versus priority-binding mechanisms.
People recall taboo words better than neutral words in many experimental contexts. The present rapid serial visual presentation (RSVP) experiments demonstrated this taboo-superiority effect for immediate recall of mixed lists containing taboo and neutral words matched for familiarity, length, and category coherence. Under binding theory (MacKay et al., 2004), taboo superiority reflects an interference effect: Because the emotional reaction system prioritizes binding mechanisms for linking the source of an emotion to its context, taboo words capture the mechanisms for encoding list context in mixed lists, impairing the encoding of adjacent neutral words when RSVP rates are sufficiently rapid. However, for pure or unmixed lists, binding theory predicted no better recall of taboo-only than of neutral-only lists at fast or slow rates. Present results supported this prediction, suggesting that taboo superiority in immediate recall reflects context-specific binding processes, rather than context-free arousal effects, or emotion-linked differences in rehearsal, processing time, output interference, time-based decay, or guessing biases.
Hadley
Christopher B
CB
Psychology Department, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1563, USA. chadley@psych.ucla.edu
Mackay
Donald G
DG
D000328:Adult; D001143:Arousal; D001245:Association Learning; D001288:Attention; D004644:Emotions; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008570:Memory, Short-Term; D011578:Psycholinguistics; D012660:Semantics; D012691:Serial Learning; D012737:Sex Factors; D013609:Taboo