Guidelines for surgical audit in Australia and New Zealand.
Surgical audit is an important part of the process to measure performance, reduce clinical risk and improve quality of care. Recognizing this, the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons established a Surgical Audit Taskforce as a subcommittee of the Board of Continuing Professional Standards. This study aims to review the recommendations of the Taskforce for data collection and peer review. The minimum data for whole-practice, continuing audit have been defined. The method of data collection, devices and databases are personal choices for the individual surgeon. However, there are many benefits of developing an electronic surgical audit, and these include facilitating comparison and sharing of audit data between units. Surgical audits should not only report on work carried out but also ensure that outcomes include key performance indicators such as major complications, readmissions, reoperations, transfers, incident reports, complaints and mortalities. Effective clinical governance demands that issues raised by audit need to be documented and reported together with recommendations for improvement. Surgeons should be proactive in helping to find and implement solutions to the issues arising from surgical audit.
Watters
David A K
DA
Department of Clinical and Biomedical Sciences, University of Melbourne and Barwon Health, Geelong Hospital, Ryrie Street, Melbourne, Victoria 3220, Australia. davidw@barwonhealth.org.au
Green
Anthony J
AJ
van Rij
Andre
A
D001315:Australia; D003625:Data Collection; D013502:General Surgery / Q000592:standards*; D006801:Humans; D008485:Medical Audit / Q000458:organization & administration* / Q000592:standards; D009520:New Zealand; D017063:Outcome Assessment, Health Care / Q000458:organization & administration / Q000592:standards; D012984:Software