MADCAP: a graphical method for assessing risk scoring systems.
OBJECTIVE
We set out to develop a method for assessing the performance of clinical risk models over the spectrum of risks and to assess the performance of the EuroSCORE risk model used in cardiac surgery.


METHODS
We developed a graphical method for assessing the performance of clinical risk models over the spectrum of risks. To illustrate the technique, we analysed retrospective data concerning 9268 patients that underwent cardiac surgery and for whom both the additive EuroSCORE prediction of risk of morality and vital status at 30 days were available.


RESULTS
The graphical tool developed, called MADCAP (Mean Adjusted Deaths Compared Against Predictions), can be used to highlight systematic features of the performance of a clinical risk model. Its use in the current study indicates that the additive version of the EuroSCORE model seems to underestimate risk amongst low-risk cases (0% and 1%). Otherwise the score systematically favours risk avoiding behaviour as the risk model underestimates mortality for 2--6% prediction but not at 7% and above.


CONCLUSIONS
The robustness of case-mix adjusted audit is dependent on the performance of the risk scoring system over the entire spectrum of risk. If we are to use risk adjustment of mortality rates when comparing outcomes obtained by different units or individual surgeons, it is essential that we continually review the performance of the risk adjustment method. The MADCAP method presented here provides a useful tool to this end.
Clinical Operational Research Unit, University College London, UK. s.gallivan@ucl.ac.uk
Steve
S
Gallivan
Martin
M
Utley
Domenico
D
Pagano
Tom
T
Treasure
D006348:Cardiac Surgical Procedures / Q000401:mortality*; D006305:Health Status Indicators; D017052:Hospital Mortality; D006801:Humans; D008485:Medical Audit / Q000379:methods; D008962:Models, Theoretical; D011446:Prospective Studies; D018570:Risk Assessment / Q000379:methods*