Making a rational choice between ovariectomy and ovariohysterectomy in the dog: a discussion of the benefits of either technique.
OBJECTIVE
To determine if ovariectomy (OVE) is a safe alternative to ovariohysterectomy (OVH) for canine gonadectomy.


METHODS
Literature review.


METHODS
An on-line bibliographic search in MEDLINE and PubMed was performed in December 2004, covering the period 1969-2004. Relevant studies were compared and evaluated with regard to study design, surgical technique, and both short-term and long-term follow-up.


CONCLUSIONS
OVH is technically more complicated, time consuming, and is probably associated with greater morbidity (larger incision, more intraoperative trauma, increased discomfort) compared with OVE. No significant differences between techniques were observed for incidence of long-term urogenital problems, including endometritis/pyometra and urinary incontinence, making OVE the preferred method of gonadectomy in the healthy bitch.


CONCLUSIONS
Canine OVE can replace OVH as the procedure of choice for routine neutering of healthy female dogs.
Department of Clinical Sciences of Companion Animals, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands. bart.vangoethem@tiscali.be
Bart
B
van Goethem
Auke
A
Schaefers-Okkens
Jolle
J
Kirpensteijn
D000818:Animals; D004285:Dogs / Q000601:surgery*; D005260:Female; D007044:Hysterectomy / Q000009:adverse effects / Q000379:methods / Q000662:veterinary*; D010052:Ovariectomy / Q000379:methods / Q000662:veterinary*; D011183:Postoperative Complications / Q000453:epidemiology / Q000662:veterinary; D012449:Safety; D013245:Sterilization, Reproductive / Q000379:methods / Q000662:veterinary; D013997:Time Factors; D016896:Treatment Outcome