Canada's Assisted Human Reproductive Act: is it scientific censorship, or a reasoned approach to the regulation of rapidly emerging reproductive technologies?
After more than a decade of study, discussion and debate, the Canadian House of Commons and Senate have approved the Assisted Human Reproduction Act. Building on the earlier Bill C-47, which died on the order paper in 1997, the Act bans human cloning for reproductive or therapeutic purposes, payment for surrogacy arrangements, and trading in human reproductive materials or their use without informed consent. In addition, the Act significantly restricts research using human reproductive materials. This article compares the Act to legislative regimes in other nations with advanced human reproductive science. It concludes that while the Act has many laudable goals, it is flawed in that it tries to cover too much legislative ground. As a result it unreasonable impairs the ability of Canadian scientists to compete in areas such as stem cell research, and area that is expected to yield significant new approaches to treating human disease.
University of Saskatchewan, Canada.
Colin
C
Rasmussen
D001315:Australia; D002170:Canada; D019976:Cloning, Organism / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D003431:Cross-Cultural Comparison; D033041:Embryo Research / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D004622:Embryo, Mammalian / Q000166:cytology; D005060:Europe; D005307:Fertilization in Vitro / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence; D033161:Government Regulation; D006801:Humans; D038622:Internationality; D007883:Legislation, Medical; D027724:Reproductive Techniques, Assisted / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D013234:Stem Cells; D014481:United States