[Rapid diagnosis of rotavirus infections: comparative prospective study of two techniques for antigen detection in stool].
The ability of two commercially available diagnosis rapid assays in detecting rotavirus antigen was compared in a prospective study conducted from September 2002 to May 2003. Five hundred and twelve faecal specimens were studied by IDEIA Rotavirus enzyme immunoassay test (EIA) and Diarlex MB immunochromatographic test (ICG). Specimens giving discrepant results were examined by electron microscopy (EM) and clinical data reconsidered. Out of 512 stool specimens, 155 (30.3%) were positive and 332 (64.8%) negative with the two assays. Discrepant results were obtained for 25 (4.88%) specimens (24 children, 1 adult), with EIA giving more positive results. The retrospective examination by EM, possible for fifteen stools on the 25 that gave discrepant results, confirmed the presence of rotavirus in 7/14 stools which were positive only by EIA and in the stool specimen that was found positive only by ICG. The 25 clinical observations re-examination showed the presence of GEA signs in all cases. The statistical analysis shows an excellent concordance between the EIA and the ICG tests (kappa = 0.89, IC(95%) = [0.85-0.93]) in spite of the underestimation of ICG test in comparison with EIA test (P < 0.0001).
Regagnon
C
C
Service de virologie médicale, centre de biologie, CHU de Clermont-Ferrand, 58, rue Montalembert, 63003 Clermont-Ferrand, France. cregagnon@chu-clermontferrand.fr
Chambon
M
M
Archimbaud
C
C
Charbonné
F
F
Demeocq
F
F
Labbé
A
A
Aumaître
O
O
Ughetto
S
S
Peigue-Lafeuille
H
H
Henquell
C
C
D000328:Adult; D000942:Antigens, Bacterial / Q000032:analysis*; D002648:Child; D002845:Chromatography / Q000379:methods; D005243:Feces / Q000737:chemistry*; D006801:Humans; D007124:Immunoenzyme Techniques; D012401:Rotavirus / Q000302:isolation & purification*; D012400:Rotavirus Infections / Q000175:diagnosis*
D000942:Antigens, Bacterial