All-inside meniscal repair using a new flexible, tensionable device.
BACKGROUND
A new generation of flexible all-inside meniscal repair devices is available, but clinical studies with these devices are lacking.


OBJECTIVE
The RapidLoc has an intermediate-term meniscal healing rate that is equivalent to literature reports of inside-out suture technique in patients undergoing concurrent anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.


METHODS
Case series; Level of evidence, 4.


METHODS
Retrospective analysis was performed for 75 meniscal tears in 66 consecutive patients undergoing anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction who underwent meniscal repair with the RapidLoc. Patients with at least 2 years' follow-up were evaluated for symptoms suggestive of a meniscal tear and were assessed with the International Knee Documentation Committee form and the Knee Disorders Subjective History visual analog scale. Subjects were asked to return for a clinical examination to include evaluation for an effusion and joint line tenderness as well as McMurray test and KT-1000 arthrometry readings. Patients with symptoms consistent with meniscal repair failure underwent magnetic resonance arthrography and repeat arthroscopy.


RESULTS
Twenty patients with 21 meniscal tears were excluded, resulting in 54 meniscal tears in 46 patients. At a mean follow-up of 34.8 months, the clinical success rate for meniscal repair was 90.7% (49/54), with 5 failures requiring meniscectomy. Univariate analysis revealed predictive variables for failure: bucket-handle configuration, multiplanar tears, tear length greater than 2 cm, and chronicity longer than 3 months. Non-predictive variables included compartment, zone, ligament graft choice, gender, age, follow-up, and visual analog scale score. Analysis of healed patients revealed a negative correlation between chronicity of tear and International Knee Documentation Committee score.


CONCLUSIONS
The RapidLoc has an acceptable intermediate-term clinical healing rate in patients undergoing concurrent anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Predictive variables for failure should be considered during operative decision making.
Quinby
J Scott
JS
Sports Medicine Clinic of North Texas, Dallas, Texas, USA.
Golish
S Raymond
SR
Hart
Jennifer A
JA
Diduch
David R
DR
D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D000704:Analysis of Variance; D016118:Anterior Cruciate Ligament / Q000601:surgery; D000070598:Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries; D001182:Arthroscopy; D050376:Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone Grafting / Q000295:instrumentation*; D004867:Equipment Design; D005260:Female; D005500:Follow-Up Studies; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008592:Menisci, Tibial / Q000601:surgery*; D009984:Orthopedic Fixation Devices; D010147:Pain Measurement; D011183:Postoperative Complications / Q000209:etiology / Q000601:surgery; D011237:Predictive Value of Tests; D012086:Reoperation; D012189:Retrospective Studies; D012421:Rupture / Q000601:surgery; D024162:Second-Look Surgery; D013536:Suture Techniques; D000070600:Tibial Meniscus Injuries; D017211:Treatment Failure; D014945:Wound Healing