Training in laparoscopic appendectomy.
BACKGROUND
The role of laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) in surgical training is unclear. Although LA as a therapeutic modality is potentially superior to open surgery, it has failed to become established as standard in training hospitals. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the outcome of LA performed by inexperienced surgeons in a training environment.


METHODS
A retrospective analysis of all attempted LA performed over a 12-month period was undertaken. Data collected included operator grade (experienced and inexperienced), conversion rate and duration of surgery, complications, and postoperative stay.


RESULTS
During the study period, 169 appendectomies were performed. The conversion rate to open surgery declined significantly from 28% in the first quarter to 9% in the last quarter, with no difference in the conversion rate between experienced and inexperienced surgeons. Operative time shortened significantly in the inexperienced group. Postoperative complications occurred in 8% of patients, independent of operative grade.


CONCLUSIONS
Our findings demonstrate that LA may be safely introduced as a teaching procedure. Time-to-train should not preclude institutions from adopting the laparoscopic approach in the treatment of acute appendicitis.
Sweeney
Karl J
KJ
Department of Surgery, Adelaide and Meath Hospital, Dublin, Ireland. karlsweeney@eircom.net
Dillon
Mary
M
Johnston
Sean M
SM
Keane
Frank B
FB
Conlon
Kevin C
KC
D000328:Adult; D000704:Analysis of Variance; D001062:Appendectomy / Q000379:methods*; D016009:Chi-Square Distribution; D002983:Clinical Competence; D004503:Education, Medical, Graduate; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D010535:Laparoscopy; D007902:Length of Stay / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D008297:Male; D011183:Postoperative Complications / Q000453:epidemiology; D012189:Retrospective Studies