[The critical role of research evidence in the framework of health technology assessment].
In spite of their different aims, evidence-based medicine (EBM) and health technology assessment (HTA) to some extent use similar methodologies for the assessment of a technology's efficacy. The decision to include only a certain quality of studies in a HTA report usually follows the hierarchy of evidence with different levels of evidence. Problems arise if study evidence is completely lacking or if it is extrapolated or transferred to other healthcare settings. As subjectivity is inevitable when critically appraising the evidence or combining it with other sources of information, HTA decisions should be presented with maximum transparency. Since physicians usually have only limited knowledge of research methodology and read only an average of 20 articles per year, a cooperative approach is required when appraising the evidence for HTA.
Sauerland
S
S
Universität Witten/Herdecke. S.Sauerland@uni-koeln.de
D020811:Biomedical Technology / Q000379:methods* / Q000458:organization & administration; D003659:Decision Making, Organizational; D019317:Evidence-Based Medicine / Q000379:methods* / Q000458:organization & administration; D005858:Germany; D010043:Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care / Q000379:methods* / Q000458:organization & administration; D012106:Research / Q000458:organization & administration; D012107:Research Design; D013673:Technology Assessment, Biomedical / Q000379:methods* / Q000458:organization & administration