Imaging osteoarthritis: magnetic resonance imaging versus x-ray.
Until recently, imaging evaluation of osteoarthritis has relied primarily on conventional radiography. Using radiography in clinical practice or clinical research, however, has been fraught with difficulty. Techniques for reproducibly acquiring serial radiographs of joints have improved considerably over the past several years. However, the greatest promise for advancing knowledge about osteoarthritis and its treatment lies in MRI and its unique ability to examine the joint as a whole organ. In contrast to conventional radiography, MRI can directly visualize the articular cartilage, synovium, menisci, and other intra-articular structures important to the functional integrity of joints. There have been considerable advances in MRI of articular cartilage in particular over the past several years. However, much of this has come from small cross-sectional studies. Larger, longitudinal studies are ongoing, and publications are just emerging. This paper reviews the current status of x-ray and MRI in osteoarthritis and points to where changes might be anticipated in the future.
Peterfy
Charles
C
Scientific Client Services, Synarc San Francisco, 575 Market Street, 17th Floor, San Francisco, CA 94105, USA.
Kothari
Manish
M
D001175:Arthrography / Q000639:trends*; D003430:Cross-Sectional Studies; D006801:Humans; D007596:Joints / Q000473:pathology*; D008137:Longitudinal Studies; D008279:Magnetic Resonance Imaging / Q000379:methods* / Q000639:trends; D010003:Osteoarthritis / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging*