Theorizing waste in abortion and fetal ovarian tissue use.
This article explores the theoretical implications of the concept of waste as it specifically relates to arguments in favour of fetal ovarian tissue use as a source of donor eggs. The author begins by discussing medico-scientific constructions of women's reproductive bodies as wasteful. The article explores the works of Drucilla Cornell on bodily borders, Julia Kristeva on abjection, and Mary Douglas on pollution to develop a nuanced understanding of the relations between waste, women's reproductivity, and abortion in North American mainstream and medico-scientific cultures. This layered reading of waste and abortion deconstructs a significant assumption of arguments in favour of fetal ovarian tissue use as ethical--that such tissue is just "waste." The author suggests that theorizing waste this way may contribute to ethical analyses of uses of other reproductive materials (that is, embryos) that are supported, in part, by an assumption that those materials would otherwise be "wasted."
Arris
Rachel
R
D037881:Aborted Fetus; D000028:Abortion, Induced / Q000523:psychology*; D000022:Abortion, Spontaneous; D003469:Culture; D004777:Environment; D005260:Female; D016332:Fetal Tissue Transplantation; D018594:Human Body; D006801:Humans; D008506:Medical Waste; D018587:Oocyte Donation; D011247:Pregnancy; D012098:Reproduction; D012649:Self Concept; D014930:Women / Q000523:psychology*
D008506:Medical Waste