title: Correlation between fine-needle aspiration cytology and histopathology in the evaluation of cutaneous and subcutaneous masses from dogs and cats.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) is commonly used as a diagnostic procedure to evaluate superficial and deep masses in animals. However, few studies have addressed the accuracy of FNAC in the evaluation of cutaneous and subcutaneous masses in a clinical setting.
  
  
  OBJECTIVE
  The purpose of this study was to compare the accuracy of FNAC as compared with histopathology in the diagnosis of cutaneous and subcutaneous masses from dogs and cats.
  
  
  METHODS
  Cytologic and histopathologic specimens obtained between 1999 and 2003 from 292 palpable cutaneous and subcutaneous masses obtained from 242 dogs and 50 cats were retrospectively evaluated. Cytologic samples were obtained by FNA and histopathologic samples were collected by surgical biopsy or at necropsy. Concordance was determined and the accuracy of FNAC for the diagnosis of neoplasia was determined using histopathology as the gold standard.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Of 292 specimens, 49 (from 44 dogs and 5 cats) were excluded due to poor cellularity of the cytologic specimen (retrieval rate 83.2%, n = 243). A cytologic diagnosis of neoplasia was obtained in 176 cases (175 true positives and 1 false positive compared with histopathology). Sixty-seven cytology samples were classified as non-neoplastic (46 true negatives, 21 false negatives compared with histopathology). Overall, the cytologic diagnosis was in agreement with the histopathologic diagnosis in 90.9% (221/243) of cases. For diagnosing neoplasia, cytology had a sensitivity of 89.3%, a specificity of 97.9%, a positive predictive value of 99.4%, and a negative predictive value of 68.7%.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The results of this study confirmed FNAC as a reliable and useful diagnostic procedure for the evaluation of palpable cutaneous and subcutaneous lesions in small animal practice.
authors.affiliation: Department of Veterinary Pathology, University of Milan, Italy. ghisleni@ticino.com
authors.forename: G
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Ghisleni
authors.forename: P
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Roccabianca
authors.forename: R
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Ceruti
authors.forename: D
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Stefanello
authors.forename: W
authors.initials: W
authors.lastname: Bertazzolo
authors.forename: U
authors.initials: U
authors.lastname: Bonfanti
authors.forename: M
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Caniatti
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D044963:Biopsy, Fine-Needle / Q000662:veterinary*; D002371:Cat Diseases / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000473:pathology; D002415:Cats; D004283:Dog Diseases / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000473:pathology; D004285:Dogs; D005188:False Negative Reactions; D005189:False Positive Reactions; D009369:Neoplasms / Q000175:diagnosis / Q000473:pathology / Q000662:veterinary*; D011237:Predictive Value of Tests; D012189:Retrospective Studies; D012680:Sensitivity and Specificity; D012878:Skin Neoplasms / Q000175:diagnosis / Q000473:pathology / Q000662:veterinary*