What's good for the goose may not be as good for the gander: the benefits of self-monitoring for men and women in task groups and dyadic conflicts.
The authors posit that women can rely on self-monitoring to overcome negative gender stereotypes in certain performance contexts. In a study of mixed-sex task groups, the authors found that female group members who were high self-monitors were considered more influential and more valuable contributors than women who were low self-monitors. Men benefited relatively less from self-monitoring behavior. In an experimental study of dyadic negotiations, the authors found that women who were high self-monitors performed better than women who were low self-monitors, particularly when they were negotiating over a fixed pool of resources, whereas men did not benefit as much from self-monitoring. Further analyses suggest that high self-monitoring women altered their behavior in these negotiations--when their partner behaved assertively, they increased their level of assertiveness, whereas men and low self-monitoring women did not alter their behavior.
Columbia Business School, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027, USA. ff144@columbia.edu
Francis J
FJ
Flynn
Daniel R
DR
Ames
D001290:Attitude; D003220:Conflict, Psychological; D005260:Female; D006126:Group Processes; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D017008:Negotiating; D020377:Self Efficacy; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires