Genetic Testing for Huntington's Disease: How Is the Decision Taken?
Research on genetic decision-making normally constructs the decision as an opportunity for choice. However, minimal research investigates how these decisions are taken and whether those who live with genetic risk perceive the test as an opportunity for choice. Employing semistructured interviews with at-risk persons, this study explored decisions about genetic testing for Huntington's disease (HD)--a fatal genetic disorder. A primary aim was to understand how test decisions were perceived. Qualitative data analysis revealed four decision pathways: (1) no decision to be made, (2) constrained decisions, (3) reevaluating the decision, and (4) indicators of HD. Contrary to the rational, "information-processor" approach to decision making, some test decisions were immediate and automatic. These stories challenged the conventional construction of a genetic-test decision as an opportunity for choice. Participant narratives suggested that this construction may be inadequate, at least for some people who live with genetic risk. Test decisions were sometimes constrained by perceived responsibility to other family members, notably offspring. For others at risk, the test decision was a dynamic process of critical thought and evaluation. Finally, behaviors that could be symptoms of HD were the catalyst for testing.
Etchegary
Holly
H
School of Psychology, Faculty of Social Sciences, GAP-Sante Research Group, National Institute of Population Health, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. hetchega@uottawa.ca
D000328:Adult; D003657:Decision Making; D005260:Female; D005820:Genetic Testing / Q000523:psychology; D006801:Humans; D006816:Huntington Disease / Q000523:psychology; D007406:Interview, Psychological; D008297:Male; D012307:Risk Factors