Manual materials handling in mining: the effect of rod heights and foot positions when lifting "in-the-hole" drill rods.
There is a paucity of studies focusing on the lifting of rods or long awkward heavy objects. In-the-hole (ITH) drilling is a heavy repetitive mining task, which has been identified as having a relatively high incidence and severity rate of musculoskeletal injuries. The purpose of this study was to examine how the load experienced by ITH drill operators changed when lifting a vertical drilling rod (1.61m, 35kg) using two rod heights and four different foot positions. In addition, a symmetrical lift with a lifting index (LI) of 1.4 also served as a comparison to determine possible risk of low back injury. Eleven experienced ITH drill operators participated in the study. Each subject was required to lift a vertical drilling rod until the upper body was in an erect posture using four different foot positions (0 degrees =subject facing the rod, 45 degrees =subject oblique to the rod, 90 degrees =subject right side to the rod and freestyle). In addition, two rod height conditions were studied where the base of the vertical rod was supported either (1) at ground level (height of rod CG=0.83m) or (2) on a 20cm rack (height of rod CG=1.03m). Finally, each subject lifted a 21.5kg box in the sagittal plane, which corresponded to an LI of 1.4 in the NIOSH lifting equation. Reflective markers were placed on the subjects, and three video cameras and one force plate were used to record the forces and the motion of the subjects' segments. Two surface electrodes were applied on the right and the left erector spinae (ES) at the level of L3. Back loading was defined by the level of the peak moments, the mechanical work and erector spinae muscle activity (EMG). It was found that the vertical height of the rod had the most significant impact on back loading, while the effect of the initial foot positioning relative to the rod was limited by the technique adopted by the drillers. Moreover, it was found that some of the subjects used techniques less strenuous for the back than others. Finally, the asymmetrical lifting component was found to be the most negative aspect of lifting an ITH drill rod compared to a standard symmetrical lift (NIOSH).
Institut de recherche Robert Sauvé en santé et en sécurité du travail (IRSST), 505 Boul. De Maisonneuve Ouest, Montréal, Qué., Canada, H3A 3C2. plamondon.andre@irsst.qc.ca
André
A
Plamondon
Alain
A
Delisle
Karin
K
Trimble
Pierre
P
Desjardins
Trevor
T
Rickwood
D000062:Accidents, Occupational / Q000517:prevention & control*; D000328:Adult; D000704:Analysis of Variance; D019567:Back Injuries / Q000517:prevention & control*; D001696:Biomechanical Phenomena; D004576:Electromyography; D006804:Ergonomics; D005528:Foot / Q000502:physiology*; D006801:Humans; D017770:Lifting; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D008906:Mining