Recent findings in the use of reflectance oximetry: a critical review.
OBJECTIVE
Pulse oximetry is ubiquitous but detailed understanding of the technology is poor. This is illustrated by publications addressing knowledge of pulse oximetry and those warning against the use of transmission pulse oximeter sensors in a reflectance manner, unintended by the manufacturers, owing to the potential for iatrogenic problems. Reflectance oximetry sensors are distinct and their application rather specific. Users must adhere to the manufacturer's guidelines to be assured of approximating the claimed accuracy and other specifications. Moreover, a thorough understanding of the device's shortcomings will optimize performance and avoid misuse. Cautious skepticism is appropriate with use of any technology but particularly with indirect measures of vital signs.


RESULTS
The studies of reflectance sensors described here illustrate a diversity of successful applications and opportunities for further research. The genesis of applications for some sensors, for example fetal sensors, has proven helpful in other clinical settings where low mean arterial pressure and need for accurate monitoring of a SpO2 of less than 80% is poorly provided by transmittance sensors. Reflectance sensors are more prone to placement over contaminating sources (for example arteries and pigmentation), but their more sophisticated design can provide greater versatility than transillumination methods.


CONCLUSIONS
This invited review highlights recent developments and applications of reflectance oximetry with an emphasis on the potential clinical and research advantages.
Department of Anaesthesia & Intensive Care, Royal Brompton Hospital, London, UK. b.keogh@rbht.nhs.uk
Brian F
BF
Keogh
Robert J
RJ
Kopotic