Rating methodological quality: toward improved assessment and investigation.
Assessing methodological quality is considered essential in deciding what investigations to include in research syntheses and in detecting potential sources of bias in meta-analytic results. Quality assessment is also useful in characterizing the strengths and limitations of the research in an area of study. Although numerous instruments to measure research quality have been developed, they have lacked empirically-supported components. In addition, different summary quality scales have yielded different findings when they were used to weight treatment effect estimates for the same body of research. Suggestions for developing improved quality instruments include: distinguishing distinct domains of quality, such as internal validity, external validity, the completeness of the study report, and adherence to ethical practices; focusing on individual aspects, rather than domains of quality; and focusing on empirically-verified criteria. Other ways to facilitate the constructive use of quality assessment are to improve and standardize the reporting of research investigations, so that the quality of studies can be more equitably and thoroughly compared, and to identify optimal methods for incorporating study quality ratings into meta-analyses.
Department of Psychology, State University of New York at Stony Brook, Stony Brook, NY 11794-2500, USA. amoyer@notes.cc.sunysb.edu
Anne
A
Moyer
John W
JW
Finney
D015982:Bias; D002986:Clinical Trials as Topic / Q000592:standards*; D036262:Empirical Research; D020452:Journalism / Q000592:standards; D015201:Meta-Analysis as Topic; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D012107:Research Design / Q000592:standards*