Tobacco industry use of judicial seminars to influence rulings in products liability litigation.
OBJECTIVE
This paper examines the tobacco industry's efforts to influence litigation by sponsoring judicial seminars.


METHODS
Thousands of internal tobacco documents were examined, including memos, reports, presentations, and newsletters. Connections to outside organisations were corroborated by examining tobacco industry financial records, budgets, and letters pledging funds. Facts about outside organisations were triangulated through examining their websites and publicly-filed financial records, and verifying facts through their representatives' statements in newspaper and law review articles.


RESULTS
There are direct financial ties between the tobacco industry and groups that organise judicial seminars in an effort to influence jurisprudence, and judges who attend these seminars may be breaching judicial ethics either by not inquiring about the source of funding or by ignoring funding by potential litigants.


CONCLUSIONS
The tobacco industry's attempts to clandestinely influence judges' decisions in cases to which they are a party endangers the integrity of the judiciary.
Friedman
L C
LC
Tobacco Control Resource Center, Northeastern School of Law, Boston, MA 02115, USA. lissy@tplp.org
D032781:Codes of Ethics; D003226:Congresses as Topic / Q000191:economics / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence; D003479:Curriculum; D004781:Environmental Exposure / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence; D005381:Financing, Organized / Q000379:methods; D006076:Government; D016365:Liability, Legal; D009938:Organizations; D011287:Prejudice; D019460:Tobacco Industry / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D014481:United States