Accuracy of obstetric diagnoses and procedures in hospital discharge data.
OBJECTIVE
The objective of the study was to estimate the validity of obstetric procedures and diagnoses in California patient discharge data.


METHODS
We randomly sampled 1611 deliveries from 52 of 267 California hospitals that performed more than 678 eligible deliveries in 1992 to 1993. We compared hospital-reported procedures and diagnoses against our recoding of the same records.


RESULTS
Cesarean, forceps, and vacuum delivery were accurately reported, with sensitivities and positive predictive values exceeding 90%. Episiotomy was underreported (70% sensitivity). Cesarean indications were reported with at least 60% sensitivity, except uterine inertia, herpes, and long labor. Among comorbidities, sensitivity exceeded 60% for chorioamnionitis, diabetes, premature labor, preeclampsia, and intrauterine death. Sensitivity was poor (less than 60%) for anemia, asthma, thyroid disorders, mental disorders, drug abuse, genitourinary infections, obesity, fibroids, excessive fetal growth, hypertension, premature rupture, polyhydramnios, and postdates.


CONCLUSIONS
The validity of hospital-reported obstetric procedures and diagnoses varies, with moderate to high accuracy for some codes but poor accuracy for others.
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of California, Davis, School of Medicine, Sacramento, CA 95817, USA.
Shagufta
S
Yasmeen
Patrick S
PS
Romano
Michael E
ME
Schembri
Janet M
JM
Keyzer
William M
WM
Gilbert
D005260:Female; D006753:Hospital Records; D006801:Humans; D013513:Obstetric Surgical Procedures / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D010351:Patient Discharge; D011247:Pregnancy; D011248:Pregnancy Complications / Q000175:diagnosis*; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D012680:Sensitivity and Specificity