title: How well is peripheral neuropathy investigated? An audit from a regional neurophysiology department.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Peripheral neuropathy (PN) is common and increases with age.
  
  
  OBJECTIVE
  To assess how patients with confirmed peripheral neuropathy on nerve conduction studies (NCS) were investigated and to determine whether there was any difference in investigation based on patient age or referral source.
  
  
  METHODS
  Retrospective audit.
  
  
  METHODS
  All EMG/NCS reports from a one-year period were analysed. The computer laboratory system was used to determine which blood tests had been performed on those patients with confirmed peripheral neuropathy on NCS.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Over 50% of patients referred from within the hospital did not have a basic blood screen to search for the aetiology. There was no significant difference in investigation practise based on patient age or referral source.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Our results highlight the lack of systematic investigation in a university teaching hospital. As a result of this audit, a protocol has been prepared and is distributed with NCS/EMG reports.
authors.affiliation: Dept of Neurology, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin. smurph1@hotmail.com
authors.forename: S
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Murphy
authors.forename: B
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: McNamara
mesh_terms: D000367:Age Factors; D003943:Diagnostic Techniques, Neurological / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D005260:Female; D006784:Hospitals, Teaching; D006801:Humans; D007494:Ireland / Q000453:epidemiology; D008297:Male; D008485:Medical Audit; D008875:Middle Aged; D009482:Neurophysiology; D010523:Peripheral Nervous System Diseases / Q000175:diagnosis*; D012017:Referral and Consultation; D012189:Retrospective Studies; D013997:Time Factors