title: Mixing costs in task shifting reflect sequential processing stages in a multicomponent task.
abstract: We investigated the hypothesis that mixing costs intask shifting reflect th e sequential selection of task components (e.g., stimulus categories) during task execution. This proposition was supported by Hübner, Futterer, and Steinhauser (2001), who showed that the amount of mixing costsdepends on the number of mixed task components (e.g., stimulus level and judgment). However, their results could also be explained by a task set selection account, because task components and task sets were confounded. In Experiments 1 and 2, we compared conditions in which either the number of task sets varied and the number of mixed task components was constant or vice versa. Only the number of mixed task components was predictive for the mixing costs. In Experiment 3, we replicated the additivity of mixing costs from level a ndjudgment mixing. Our results suggest thatthe mixingcosts reflect a selection strategy in which interference is reduced in a stepwise manner.
authors.affiliation: Universität Konstanz, Fachbereich Psychologie, Konstanz, Germany. marco.steinhauser@uni-konstanz.de
authors.forename: Marco
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Steinhauser
authors.forename: Ronald
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Hübner
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D001288:Attention; D003220:Conflict, Psychological; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007600:Judgment; D008297:Male; D009949:Orientation; D010364:Pattern Recognition, Visual; D011340:Problem Solving; D011597:Psychomotor Performance; D011930:Reaction Time; D012691:Serial Learning; D012718:Set, Psychology