title: No face-like processing for objects-of-expertise in three behavioural tasks.
abstract: In the debate between expertise and domain-specific explanations of "special" processing for faces, a common belief is that behavioural studies support the expertise hypothesis. The present article refutes this view, via a combination of new data and review. We tested dog experts with confirmed good individuation of exemplars of their breed-of-expertise. In all experiments, standard results were confirmed for faces. However, dog experts showed no face-like processing for dogs on three behavioural tasks (inversion; the composite paradigm; and sensitivity to contrast reversal). The lack of holistic/configural processing, indicated in the first two of these tests, is shown by review to be consistent rather than inconsistent with previous studies of objects-of-expertise.
authors.affiliation: School of Psychology, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 0200, Australia. Dr.R.Robbins@gmail.com
authors.forename: Rachel
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Robbins
authors.forename: Elinor
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: McKone
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D000818:Animals; D004285:Dogs; D005145:Face; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D011361:Professional Competence; D021641:Recognition, Psychology; D014796:Visual Perception