title: Cross-cultural similarities and differences in North Americans' geographic location judgments.
abstract: We examined some potential causes of bias in geographic location estimates by comparing location estimates of North American cities made by Canadian, U.S., and Mexican university students. All three groups placed most Mexican cities near the equator, which implies that all three groups were influenced by shared beliefs about the locations of geographical regions relative to global reference points. However, the groups divided North America into different regions and differed in the relative accuracy of the estimates within them, which implies that there was an influence of culture-specific knowledge. The data support a category-based system of plausible reasoning, in which biases in judgments are multiply determined, and underscore the utility of the estimation paradigm as a tool in cross-cultural cognitive research.
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada. alinda@ualberta.ca
authors.forename: Alinda
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Friedman
authors.forename: Dennis D
authors.initials: DD
authors.lastname: Kerkman
authors.forename: Norman R
authors.initials: NR
authors.lastname: Brown
authors.forename: David
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Stea
authors.forename: Hector M
authors.initials: HM
authors.lastname: Cappello
mesh_terms: D001290:Attitude / Q000208:ethnology*; D002170:Canada; D003071:Cognition; D003431:Cross-Cultural Comparison; D006801:Humans; D007600:Judgment; D008800:Mexico; D013334:Students; D014481:United States