Associative and causal reasoning accounts of causal induction: symmetries and asymmetries in predictive and diagnostic inferences.
Associative and causal reasoning accounts are probably the two most influential types of accounts of causal reasoning processes. Only causal reasoning accounts predict certain asymmetries between predictive (i.e., reasoning from causes to effects) and diagnostic (i.e., reasoning from effects to causes) inferences regarding cue-interaction phenomena (e.g., the overshadowing effect). In the experiments reported here, we attempted to delimit the conditions under which these asymmetries occur. The results show that unless participants perceived the relevance of causal information to solving the task, predictive and diagnostic inferences were symmetrical. Specifically, Experiments 1A and 1B showed that implicitly stressing the relevance of causal information by having participants review the instructions favored the presence of asymmetries between predictive and diagnostic situations. In addition, Experiment 2 showed that explicitly stressing the relevance of causal information by stating the importance of the causal role of events after the instructions were given also favored the asymmetry.
López
Francisco J
FJ
Departamento de Psicología Básica, Universidad de Málaga, Málaga, Spain. frjlopez@uma.es
Cobos
Pedro L
PL
Caño
Antonio
A
D000328:Adult; D001245:Association Learning; D015984:Causality; D003118:Color Perception; D003210:Concept Formation; D003463:Cues; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D011340:Problem Solving