title: Overall quality of outcomes framework scores lower in practices in deprived areas.
abstract: There has been much debate as to whether quality points allocated through the new general medical services contract are more difficult to achieve for practices in deprived and rural areas. We used multiple regression to assess the relationships between deprivation, rurality and the number of overall quality points achieved by each practice. Multiple deprivation was significantly inversely related to quality points achieved. Practices in villages and towns gained 2% more quality points than urban areas and hamlets.
authors.affiliation: School of Geography, University of Southampton. j.a.wright@soton.ac.uk
authors.forename: Jim
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Wright
authors.forename: David
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Martin
authors.forename: Samantha
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Cockings
authors.forename: Clare
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Polack
mesh_terms: D005194:Family Practice / Q000592:standards*; D006801:Humans; D011204:Poverty Areas; D011787:Quality of Health Care / Q000592:standards*; D012111:Residence Characteristics; D019035:Rural Health Services / Q000592:standards; D012959:Socioeconomic Factors; D019037:Urban Health Services / Q000592:standards