title: Dear diary, is plastic better than paper? I can't remember: Comment on Green, Rafaeli, Bolger, Shrout, and Reis (2006).
abstract: In this commentary, the authors discuss the implications of A. S. Green, E. Rafaeli, N. Bolger, P. E. Shrout, and H. T. Reis's (2006) diary studies with respect to memory. Researchers must take 2 issues into account when determining whether paper-and-pencil or handheld electronic diaries gather more trustworthy data. The first issue is a matter of prospective memory, and the second is a matter of reconstructive memory. The authors review the research on these issues and conclude that regardless of the type of diary researchers use, several factors can conspire to produce prompt--but inaccurate--data.
authors.affiliation: School of Psychology, Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand.
authors.forename: Melanie K T
authors.initials: MK
authors.lastname: Takarangi
authors.forename: Maryanne
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Garry
authors.forename: Elizabeth F
authors.initials: EF
authors.lastname: Loftus
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D015982:Bias; D034201:Computers, Handheld / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D003627:Data Interpretation, Statistical; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008432:Mathematical Computing; D008499:Medical Records / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D010209:Paper; D010349:Patient Compliance / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D012647:Self-Assessment; D014956:Writing