Temperature profiles and heat dissipation in capillary electrophoresis.
While temperature control is usually employed in capillary electrophoresis (CE) to aid heat dissipation and provide acceptable precision, internal electrolyte temperatures are almost never measured. In principle, this limits the accuracy, repeatability, and method robustness. This work presents a fundamental study that combines the development of new equations characterizing temperature profiles in CE with a new method of temperature determination. New equations were derived from first principles relating the mean, axial, and inner wall electrolyte temperatures (T(Mean), T(Axis), T(Wall)). T(Mean) was shown to occur at a distance 1/ radical3 times the internal radius of the capillary from the center of the capillary and to be a weighted average of (2/3)T(Axis) and (1/3)T(Wall). Conductance (G) and electroosmotic mobility (mu(EOF)) can be used to determine T(Mean) and T(Wall), respectively. Extrapolation of curves of mu(EOF) versus power per unit length (P/L) at different temperatures was used to calibrate the variation of mu(EOF) with temperature (T), free from Joule heating effects. mu(EOF) increased at 2.22%/ degrees C. The experimentally determined temperatures using mu(EOF) agreed to within 0.2 degrees C with those determined using G. The accuracy of G measurements was confirmed independently by measuring the electrical conductivity (kappa) of the bulk electrolyte over a range of temperatures and by calculating the variation of G with T from the Debye-Hückel-Onsager equation. T(Mean) was found to be up to 20 degrees C higher than the external temperature under typical conditions using active air-cooling and a 74.0-microm-internal diameter (di) fused-silica capillary. A combination of experimentally determined and calculated temperatures enables a complete temperature profile for a fused-silica capillary to be drawn and the thickness of the stationary air layer to be determined. As an example, at P/L = 1.00 Wm(-1), the determined radial temperature difference across the electrolyte was 0.14 degrees C; the temperature difference across the fused-silica wall was 0.17 degrees C, across the poly(imide) coating was 0.13 degrees C, and across the stationary air layer was 2.33 degrees C.
Evenhuis
Christopher J
CJ
Australian Centre for Research on Separation Science (ACROSS), School of Chemistry, University of Tasmania, Private Bag 75, Hobart 7001, Tasmania, Australia.
Guijt
Rosanne M
RM
Macka
Miroslav
M
Marriott
Philip J
PJ
Haddad
Paul R
PR