title: Evaluation of ureterointestinal anastomosis: Wallace vs Bricker.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  There are no published reports to our knowledge comparing the complication rates of the 2 most frequently used ureterointestinal anastomoses. We compared the Bricker method vs the Wallace method in terms of stricture rate.
  
  
  METHODS
  A retrospective review of the cystectomy database at our institution covering 1997 to 2003 was conducted. Patients were reviewed in terms of type of anastomosis, stricture formation, intervention, radiation therapy, type of diversion, operating room time, sex and age.
  
  
  RESULTS
  A total of 237 patients at our institution underwent cystectomy during the time evaluated. Of these patients, 33 had incomplete data, 2 were anephric and did not require diversion, and 4 patients underwent LeDuc anastomosis. These patients were excluded from analysis, leaving 198 patients, 86 (43%) undergoing Bricker and 112 (56%) undergoing Wallace. Bricker anastomoses were considered 2 anastomotic units while Wallace anastomoses were considered a single unit. Therefore, there were 162 (59%) total Bricker anastomoses compared to 112 (41%) Wallace anastomoses. There was no statistically significant difference between the 2 groups in terms of type of diversion, number of patients undergoing adjuvant or neoadjuvant radiation therapy, operating room time, and days of followup. There were 3 strictures (1.85%) in the Bricker group and 5 strictures (4.46%) in the Wallace group. There was no statistically significant difference between the stricture rate in these 2 groups (p = 0.21). Stricture rates for patients undergoing neoadjuvant or adjuvant radiation were not statistically significant from the patients with no adjuvant therapy.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Overall the stricture rate for ureterointestinal anastomosis was 2.92%. There was no difference in stricture rate between the 2 types of ureterointestinal anastomosis.
authors.affiliation: Department of Urology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas 66160, USA. aevangel@kumc.edu
authors.forename: Apostolos
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Evangelidis
authors.forename: Eugene K
authors.initials: EK
authors.lastname: Lee
authors.forename: Michael E
authors.initials: ME
authors.lastname: Karellas
authors.forename: J Brantley
authors.initials: JB
authors.lastname: Thrasher
authors.forename: Jeffrey M
authors.initials: JM
authors.lastname: Holzbeierlein
mesh_terms: D000368:Aged; D000714:Anastomosis, Surgical / Q000009:adverse effects / Q000379:methods; D003251:Constriction, Pathologic / Q000453:epidemiology / Q000209:etiology; D015653:Cystectomy; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007422:Intestines / Q000601:surgery*; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D012189:Retrospective Studies; D014513:Ureter / Q000601:surgery*; D013520:Urologic Surgical Procedures / Q000009:adverse effects / Q000379:methods