title: Laser versus intense pulsed light: Competing technologies in dermatology.
abstract: Lasers have been competing with non-laser intense pulsed light (IPL) sources in the cosmetic arena over the past 10 years. Initially IPLs were somewhat cumbersome and accepted by a minority of "serious" practitioners. Recently, however, the popularity of full-face visible light skin rejuvenation, enhanced engineering of IPLs, and favorable cost versus many lasers, have lead to a proliferation of IPL devices. No longer a stepchild in the rejuvenation market, IPLs may overtake lasers as the devices of choice among most physicians. We review the pros and cons of lasers and IPLs within the context of design, cost, and other practical concerns for a typical office-based practice.
authors.affiliation: Dermatology Department, 34520 Bob Wilson Dr., Suite 300, Naval Medical Center San Diego, San Diego, California 92134, USA. evross@nmcsd.med.navy.mil
authors.forename: E Victor
authors.initials: EV
authors.lastname: Ross
mesh_terms: D020811:Biomedical Technology / Q000639:trends; D003880:Dermatology; D004867:Equipment Design; D006801:Humans; D028022:Low-Level Light Therapy; D010789:Phototherapy; D018570:Risk Assessment