Effects of alternative communication on the communicative effectiveness of an individual with a progressive language disorder.
This study was designed to investigate the effects of two different modes of communication on the communicative output of an individual who is no longer able to communicate verbally, presenting with a primary progressive aphasia and apraxia of speech. The two treatment approaches included training the patient with a text-to-speech alternative communication device and with American sign language. An alternating treatment design was used to compare two communicative approaches (an alternative communication device and American sign language) on the subject's communicative effectiveness. Communicative effectiveness was measured in terms of number of words, correct information units and percentage correct information units, using a protocol that was adapted to quantify the output generated by the alternative communication device and American sign language. Increases across all three measures resulted for both the alternative communication device and American sign language. The clinical implications are explored, and the results add to existing studies regarding treatment possibilities using alternative communication for individuals who present with a progressive speech and language disorder, without concomitant cognitive deficits.
Pattee
Cynthia
C
Department of Speech Pathology and Audiology, School of Medicine, University of Nevada, Reno, Nevada 89557, USA.
Von Berg
Shelley
S
Ghezzi
Patrick
P
D018888:Aphasia, Primary Progressive / Q000534:rehabilitation*; D003143:Communication Devices for People with Disabilities; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008875:Middle Aged; D015397:Program Evaluation; D012813:Sign Language