Comparison of pressurized fluid extraction, Soxhlet extraction and sonication for the determination of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in urban air and diesel exhaust particulate matter.
In order to characterize and compare the chemical composition of diesel particulate matter and ambient air samples collected on filters, different extraction procedures were tested and their extraction efficiencies and recoveries determined. This study is an evaluation of extraction methods using the standard 16 EPA PAHs with HPLC fluorescence analysis. Including LC analysis also GC and MS methods for the determination of PAHs can be used. Soxhlet extraction was compared with ultrasonic agitation and pressurized fluid extraction (PFE) using three solvents to extract PAHs from diesel exhaust and urban air particulates. The selected PAH compounds of soluble organic fractions were analyzed by HPLC with a multiple wavelength shift fluorescence detector. The EPA standard mixture of 16 PAH compounds was used as a standard to identify and quantify diesel exhaust-derived PAHs. The most effective extraction method of those tested was pressurized fluid extraction using dichloromethane as a solvent.
Rynö
M
M
Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, Helsinki, Finland.
Rantanen
L
L
Papaioannou
E
E
Konstandopoulos
A G
AG
Koskentalo
T
T
Savela
K
K
D000393:Air Pollutants / Q000032:analysis*; D002851:Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid; D011083:Polycyclic Compounds / Q000032:analysis*; D011312:Pressure; D012015:Reference Standards; D001335:Vehicle Emissions / Q000032:analysis*
D000393:Air Pollutants; D011083:Polycyclic Compounds; D001335:Vehicle Emissions