Further tests of the Scalar Expectancy Theory (SET) and the Learning-to-Time (LeT) model in a temporal bisection task.
To contrast two models of timing, Scalar Expectancy Theory (SET) and Learning to Time (LeT), pigeons were exposed to a double temporal bisection procedure. On half of the trials, they learned to choose a red key after a 1s signal and a green key after a 4s signal; on the other half of the trials, they learned to choose a blue key after a 4-s signal and a yellow key after a 16-s signal. This was Phase A of an ABA design. On Phase B, the pigeons were divided into two groups and exposed to a new bisection task in which the signals ranged from 1 to 16s and the choice keys were blue and green. One group was reinforced for choosing blue after 1-s signals and green after 16-s signals and the other group was reinforced for the opposite mapping (green after 1-s signals and blue after 16-s signals). Whereas SET predicted no differences between the groups, LeT predicted that the former group would learn the new discrimination faster than the latter group. The results were consistent with LeT. Finally, the pigeons returned to Phase A. Only LeT made specific predictions regarding the reacquisition of the four temporal discriminations. These predictions were only partly consistent with the results.
Machado
Armando
A
University of Minho, Portugal. armandom@iep.uminho.pt
Arantes
Joana
J
D000465:Algorithms; D000818:Animals; D001522:Behavior, Animal; D002755:Choice Behavior; D010856:Columbidae; D003214:Conditioning, Classical; D004193:Discrimination Learning; D005794:Generalization, Response; D008960:Models, Psychological; D011582:Psychological Theory; D011594:Psychometrics; D012016:Reference Values; D012718:Set, Psychology; D013998:Time Perception