title: Validation of a blood-sampling method for the measurement of 99mTc-methylene diphosphonate skeletal plasma clearance.
abstract: Quantitative studies of bone using (99m)Tc-methylene diphosphonate (MDP) reflect bone remodeling. The simplest method of evaluating (99m)Tc-MDP kinetics involves taking multiple blood samples and measuring total clearance (K(total)) from the area under the plasma curve (AUC) and deriving bone clearance (K(bone)) by subtracting glomerular filtration rate (GFR) from K(total). However, the accuracy of the AUC method is uncertain because of assumptions that the terminal exponential is reached by 2 h and that the rate constant k(4), representing the backflow of tracer from bone to plasma, is negligibly small. The aim of this study was to validate the accuracy of the AUC method by comparing K(bone) values obtained by that method with those obtained by gamma-camera imaging.
  
  
  METHODS
  Seventy-one patients were injected with 600 MBq of (99m)Tc-MDP. For the first 22 patients, whole-body images were acquired at 15 min and at 1, 2, 3, and 4 h after injection, whereas the remaining 49 were imaged at 15 min and at 1 and 3 h. Two-minute static images of the thighs were acquired immediately before each whole-body scan. Multiple blood samples were taken between 5 min and 4 h, and free (99m)Tc-MDP was measured using ultrafiltration. Two gamma-camera methods were used to evaluate K(bone): the Patlak plot method and the Brenner method, which is based on measuring soft-tissue uptake in the thighs. The soft-tissue data were also used to measure k(4).
  
  
  RESULTS
  The soft-tissue data gave a k(4) value of 0.0003 min(-1) (95% confidence interval, 0-0.0008 min(-1)). The mean (+/-SD) (99m)Tc-MDP K(bone) was 56.0 +/- 32.4 mL x min(-1) with the AUC method, 49.5 +/- 32.1 mL x min(-1) with the Patlak method, and 42.8 +/- 32.0 mL x min(-1) with the Brenner method. Correcting the AUC values of K(total) by factors of 0.95 and 0.90 gave K(bone) values in agreement with the Patlak and Brenner methods, respectively.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Values of k(4) are too small to affect values of K(bone) measured using the AUC method. Correcting K(total) by factors in the range of 0.90-0.95 corrects for the error in the terminal exponential and brings K(bone) values measured using the AUC method into agreement with the gamma-camera results.
authors.affiliation: School of Medicine, King's College London, London, United Kingdom. amelia.moore@kcl.ac.uk
authors.forename: Amelia E B
authors.initials: AE
authors.lastname: Moore
authors.forename: Glen M
authors.initials: GM
authors.lastname: Blake
authors.forename: Ignac
authors.initials: I
authors.lastname: Fogelman
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D019540:Area Under Curve; D001800:Blood Specimen Collection; D016723:Bone Remodeling; D001842:Bone and Bones / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging / Q000378:metabolism*; D005260:Female; D005919:Glomerular Filtration Rate; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D010949:Plasma; D011877:Radionuclide Imaging; D019275:Radiopharmaceuticals / Q000097:blood* / Q000493:pharmacokinetics; D013669:Technetium Tc 99m Medronate / Q000097:blood* / Q000493:pharmacokinetics; D051598:Whole Body Imaging
chemical_list: D019275:Radiopharmaceuticals; D013669:Technetium Tc 99m Medronate