title: Patching for corneal abrasion.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Recent audits show that corneal abrasion is a common presenting eye complaint. Eye patches are often recommended for treating corneal abrasions despite the lack of evidence for their use. This systematic review was conducted to determine the effects of the eye patch when used to treat corneal abrasions.
  
  
  OBJECTIVE
  The objective of this review was to test the hypothesis that patching an eye following a corneal abrasion improves healing or provides pain relief.
  
  
  METHODS
  We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (which contains the Cochrane Eyes and Vision Group Trials Register) on The Cochrane Library (2005, Issue 2), MEDLINE (1966 to April 2005), EMBASE (1980 to April 2005), LILACS (13 April 2005), NRR (2005, Issue 2) and SIGLE (December 2004). There were no language or date restrictions in the searches. We also searched the reference lists of included studies, unpublished 'grey' literature and conference proceedings and contacted pharmaceutical companies for details of unpublished trials.
  
  
  METHODS
  We included randomised and quasi-randomised controlled trials that compared patching the eye with no patching to treat simple corneal abrasions.
  
  
  METHODS
  Two authors independently assessed trial quality and extracted data. We contacted investigators for further information regarding quality of trials. The primary outcome was healing of the corneal epithelium and secondary outcomes were related to pain.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Eleven trials, which randomised a total of 1014 participants, were included in the review. Meta-analysis of seven studies with dichotomous healing outcomes favoured no patching on the first day of healing (risk ratio (RR) 0.89, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 0.79 to 0.99). For days two and three there was no significant difference between the two groups. Of the nine trials that measured pain scores two favoured no patching and none favoured patching. Complication rates were low and no differences were noted in these between the two groups. No-patch groups generally received more adjuvant treatment with antibiotics and/or cycloplegics than the patch group which is an important confounding factor.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Treating simple corneal abrasions with a patch does not improve healing rates on the first day post-injury and does not reduce pain. In addition, use of patches results in a loss of binocular vision. Therefore it is recommended that patches should not be used for simple corneal abrasions. Further research should focus on large (greater than 10 mm(2)) abrasions.
authors.affiliation: Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, 32 Gisborne St, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia, 3002. angus.turner@gmail.com
authors.forename: A
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Turner
authors.forename: M
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Rabiu
mesh_terms: D065306:Corneal Injuries; D005129:Eye Foreign Bodies / Q000150:complications; D006801:Humans; D009779:Occlusive Dressings; D016032:Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic