title: Impact of medical students' descriptive evaluations on long-term course development.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  In medical education, feedback from students is helpful in course evaluation. However, the impact of medical students' feedback on long-term course development is seldom reported. In this project we studied the correspondence between medical students' descriptive evaluations and key features of course development over five years.
  
  
  METHODS
  Qualitative content analysis was used. The context was consultation skills courses in the middle of the Göteborg undergraduate curriculum during five years. An analysis of 158 students' descriptive evaluations was brought together with an analysis of key features of course development; learning objectives, course records, protocols from teachers' evaluations and field notes. Credibility of data was tested by two colleagues and by presenting themes at seminars and conferences. Authors' experiences of evaluating the course over many years were also used.
  
  
  RESULTS
  A corresponding pattern was found in students' descriptive evaluations and key features of course development, indicating the impact of students' open-ended feed-back. Support to facilitators and a curriculum reform also contributed. Students' descriptive feedback was both initiating and validating longitudinal course implementation. During five years, students' descriptive evaluations and teachers' course records were crucial sources in a learner-centred knowledge-building process of course development.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Students' descriptive evaluations and course records can be seen as important instruments in developing both courses and students' learning. Continuity and endurance in the evaluation process must be emphasized for achieving relevant and useful results.
authors.affiliation: Department of Primary Health Care, The Sahlgrenska Academy, Göteborg University, Sweden. mats.wahlqvist@allmed.gu.se
authors.forename: Mats
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Wahlqvist
authors.forename: Annika
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Skott
authors.forename: Cecilia
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Björkelund
authors.forename: Gösta
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Dahlgren
authors.forename: Kirsti
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Lonka
authors.forename: Bengt
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: Mattsson
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D001291:Attitude of Health Personnel; D002983:Clinical Competence; D003479:Curriculum / Q000639:trends*; D004504:Education, Medical, Undergraduate / Q000639:trends*; D005180:Faculty, Medical; D005246:Feedback; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007858:Learning; D008297:Male; D008487:Medical History Taking / Q000592:standards; D010808:Physical Examination / Q000592:standards; D011320:Primary Health Care / Q000592:standards*; D015397:Program Evaluation / Q000379:methods*; D013337:Students, Medical / Q000523:psychology*; D013548:Sweden; D013997:Time Factors