An argument for the use of Aristotelian method in bioethics.
The main claim of this paper is that the method outlined and used in Aristotle's Ethics is an appropriate and credible one to use in bioethics. Here "appropriate" means that the method is capable of establishing claims and developing concepts in bioethics and "credible" that the method has some plausibility, it is not open to obvious and immediate objection. It begins by suggesting why this claim matters and then gives a brief outline of Aristotle's method. The main argument is made in three stages. First, it is argued that Aristotelian method is credible because it compares favourably with alternatives. In this section it is shown that Aristotelian method is not vulnerable to criticisms that are made both of methods that give a primary place to moral theory (such as utilitarianism) and those that eschew moral theory (such as casuistry and social science approaches). As such, it compares favourably with these other approaches that are vulnerable to at least some of these criticisms. Second, the appropriateness of Aristotelian method is indicated through outlining how it would deal with a particular case. Finally, it is argued that the success of Aristotle's philosophy is suggestive of both the credibility and appropriateness of his method.
Allmark
Peter
P
Department of Acute and Critical Care Nursing, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, S5 7AU, UK. p.j.allmark@shef.ac.uk
D001675:Bioethics / Q000266:history; D028663:Ethical Theory / Q000266:history; D018645:Greek World; D049690:History, Ancient; D006801:Humans; D028722:Virtues