title: Evaluating rehabilitation using cost-consequences analysis: an example in Parkinson's disease.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  To use cost-consequences analysis to evaluate rehabilitation, and to discuss some practical limitations.
  
  
  METHODS
  Case study of a cost-consequences analysis.
  
  
  METHODS
  Day hospital.
  
  
  METHODS
  People with Parkinson's disease without major cognitive loss, and their carers.
  
  
  METHODS
  A programme of multidisciplinary rehabilitation, delivered for one day per week over six weeks, and including 2 h of individual therapy (physical, occupational, speech and language, specialist nurse) and group activities on each occasion.
  
  
  METHODS
  
  
  
  RESULTS
  direct and overhead costs of treatment; participant travel.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  patient outcomes (mobility, speech and language, disability, psychological well-being, health-related quality of life); carer outcomes (psychological well-being, health-related quality of life, strain); social service utilization; satisfaction.
  
  
  RESULTS
  In this example the main costs were facility's overheads and hospital-provided transport. The consequences of the intervention were improved immediate outcomes for patients that diminished over four months, discovery of unmet social services need, high satisfaction. No benefits for carers were observed.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  A cost-consequences analysis provides a clear descriptive summary for decision-makers that is easier to interpret than cost-effectiveness, cost-utility and cost-benefit analysis. It is a useful technique in rehabilitation research where multiple outcomes and several perspectives (health service, patient, carer) are relevant. However limitations remain: it is difficult to capture all consequences because of data deficiencies and long-term effects; evaluations of individual interventions are partial and do not guarantee economic rationality; local studies may not be generalizable; fixed protocols impede the evaluation of alternative service configurations.
authors.affiliation: Department of Economics, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK. h.gage@surrey.ac.uk
authors.forename: Heather
authors.initials: H
authors.lastname: Gage
authors.forename: Julie
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Kaye
authors.forename: Charles
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Owen
authors.forename: Patrick
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Trend
authors.forename: Derrick
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Wade
mesh_terms: D000368:Aged; D017281:Cost of Illness; D003362:Cost-Benefit Analysis; D003631:Day Care, Medical / Q000191:economics*; D004739:England; D005260:Female; D017048:Health Care Costs; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D019982:Organizational Case Studies; D017063:Outcome Assessment, Health Care; D010300:Parkinson Disease / Q000191:economics* / Q000534:rehabilitation*; D011788:Quality of Life; D012046:Rehabilitation / Q000191:economics