Normative warrant in diagnostic criteria: the case of DSM-IV-TR personality disorders.
This article focuses on the kinds of evaluative judgments made when applying DSM-IV-TR diagnostic criteria within the diagnostic interview between clinician and patient. The authors name these kinds of value judgments in diagnosis "normative warrant" because they involve one or more justifications (warrants) for standard-bearing (normative) elements involved in applying diagnostic criteria to actual patients. Seven types of normative warrant judgments are described (Type 1, Semantic-Phenomenal Matching; Type 2, Solicitation Choice; Type 3, Sociocultural Context; Type 4, Performance-Context Matching; Type 5, Deviance Threshold; Type 6, Threshold Characterization; Type 7, Disvalue characterization) and the typology is illustrated by applying it to various DSM-IV-TR personality disorder criteria. A research and clinical understanding of normative warrant may well contribute to the refinement of criteria sets as well as the refinement of the clinical use of criteria sets.
Sadler
John Z
JZ
Department of Psychiatry, UT Southwestern, Dallas, TX 75390-9070, USA. John.Sadler@UTSouthwestern.edu
Fulford
Bill
B
D039721:Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders; D006801:Humans; D010552:Personality Assessment / Q000592:standards; D010554:Personality Disorders / Q000145:classification* / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000628:therapy; D011569:Psychiatric Status Rating Scales / Q000592:standards*; D011586:Psychology, Clinical / Q000592:standards; D011594:Psychometrics; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D009626:Terminology as Topic