Assessment of reproducibility and accuracy in templating hybrid total hip arthroplasty using digital radiographs.
In 20 patients undergoing hybrid total hip arthroplasty, the reproducibility and accuracy of templating using digital radiographs were assessed. Digital images were manipulated using either a ten-pence coin as a marker to scale for magnification, or two digital-line methods using computer software. On-screen images were templated with standard acetate templates and compared with templating performed on hard-copy digital prints. The digital-line methods were the least reliable and accuracy of sizing compared with the inserted prostheses varied between -1.6% and +10.2%. The hard-copy radiographs showed better reproducibility than the ten-pence coin method, but were less accurate with 3.7% undersizing. The ten-pence coin method was the most accurate, with no significant differences for offset or acetabulum, and undersizing of only 0.9%. On-screen templating of digital radiographs with standard acetate templates is accurate and reproducible if a radiopaque marker such as a ten-pence coin is included when the original radiograph is taken.
Oddy
M J
MJ
Department of Orthopaedics, The Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital NHS Trust, Colney Lane, Norwich, Norfolk NR4 7UZ, UK. Mjoddy9@aol.com
Jones
M J
MJ
Pendegrass
C J
CJ
Pilling
J R
JR
Wimhurst
J A
JA
D000077:Acetabulum / Q000601:surgery; D019644:Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip / Q000379:methods*; D005269:Femur / Q000601:surgery; D006621:Hip Joint / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging* / Q000601:surgery; D006622:Hip Prosthesis; D006801:Humans; D015588:Observer Variation; D010388:Pelvis / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging; D017755:Prosthesis Fitting; D011857:Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted / Q000379:methods; D015203:Reproducibility of Results