An examination of covert observation and solution audit as tools to measure the success of hand hygiene interventions.
BACKGROUND
Many studies have examined hand hygiene (HH) frequency and adherence in response to various interventions. This study used 2 methods to determine HH frequency and adherence to see how well the outcomes correlated.


METHODS
HH frequency was measured over 4, 1-month periods (phases 1-4), using 2 methods: an audit of HH solution used during each phase adjusted for patient-days and covert observation of HH adherence. The number of x-ray technician contacts with patients (a known quantity) across the study period was retrospectively compared with the number of observations made of x-ray technicians' HH behavior to see what proportion of contacts were observed.


RESULTS
HH solution use doubled in phase 2 and was 65% and 55% higher than the baseline level in phases 3 and 4, respectively. Observed HH adherence fell from 51% to 37% in phase 2 and then rose to 58% in phases 3 and 4. Three percent of x-ray technicians' patient contacts were observed across the 4 phases.


CONCLUSIONS
Observation of HH may not adequately sample patient contacts to provide an accurate measure of HH adherence. Further studies are needed to confirm this finding.
van de Mortel
Thea
T
School of Nursing and Health Care Practices, Southern Cross University, Lismore, Australia. tvandemo@scu.edu.au
Murgo
Margherita
M
D001315:Australia; D003625:Data Collection / Q000379:methods; D019983:Guideline Adherence; D006235:Hand Disinfection / Q000379:methods*; D006801:Humans; D006920:Hygiene; D019370:Observation; D010564:Personnel, Hospital; D011872:Radiology Department, Hospital