Cranial thickness in superior canal dehiscence syndrome: implications for canal resurfacing surgery.
OBJECTIVE
To use morphometric analyses of cranial thickness to investigate 2 cases of unanticipated calvarial bone resorption in superior canal dehiscence (SCD) resurfacing surgery.


METHODS
Retrospective morphometric analysis of high-resolution computed tomography (CT) temporal bone scans in normal and control subjects with accompanying case reports.


METHODS
Tertiary care referral center.


METHODS
Two patients with SCD and failed resurfacing because of bone resorption. Temporal bone CT scans from 30 sex-matched controls.


METHODS
Resurfacing of SCD via a middle fossa approach using a split thickness calvarial graft from the craniotomy site.


METHODS
Mean cross-sectional area of the middle fossa craniotomy bone flap and mean cranial thickness at 30 and 45 degrees above the middle fossa floor.


RESULTS
Two patients had delayed failure of SCD resurfacing surgery as manifested by return of symptoms. High-resolution CT scans in both, and intraoperative confirmation in one, confirmed resorption of the bone graft. Measurements of cross-sectional area of the middle fossa craniotomy on high-resolution CT scans demonstrated significantly reduced values in the two SCD patients as compared with normal controls (Mann-Whitney U test, p<0.05). Cranial thickness outside the squamous temporal bone was reduced but did not reach statistical significance.


CONCLUSIONS
Morphometric measurements of the calvarium have demonstrated that the squamous temporal bone is thinner in patients with SCD as compared with controls. Thus, the process leading to defects in the tegmen extends beyond the petrous pyramid. This suggests that there may be extratemporal factors leading to the development of a dehiscence. These findings also have implications for the surgical treatment of this disorder. Resurfacing methods may have a higher failure rate as the bone graft has reduced mass and maybe prone to resorption. Canal plugging methods may provide a more definitive means of addressing the dehiscent labyrinth than resurfacing.
Friedland
David R
DR
Division of Otology and Neuro-otologic Skull Base Surgery, Department of Otolaryngology and Communication Sciences, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53226, USA. dfriedla@mcw.edu
Michel
Michelle A
MA
D000328:Adult; D016022:Case-Control Studies; D004724:Endoscopy; D005072:Evoked Potentials, Auditory; D006801:Humans; D007759:Labyrinth Diseases / Q000601:surgery*; D008297:Male; D013506:Otologic Surgical Procedures; D010294:Parietal Bone / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging / Q000473:pathology; D012044:Regression Analysis; D012189:Retrospective Studies; D012665:Semicircular Canals / Q000473:pathology* / Q000601:surgery*; D013577:Syndrome; D013701:Temporal Bone / Q000002:abnormalities* / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging; D014057:Tomography, X-Ray Computed