title: Growth and yield of groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) as influenced by weed management practices and Rhizobium inoculation.
abstract: Groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) productivity in India is low, because of many problems beset in its cultivation. One of the serious problems are weeds. Groundnut yield losses due to weeds have been estimated as high as 24 to 70 percent. This has created a scope for using herbicides in groundnut crop. A field investigation was carried out during kharif (rainy) season of 2001-2002 on a sandy loam soil at College Agronomy Farm, B.A. College of Agriculture, Gujarat Agricultural University, Anand, India to study the effect of weed management practices and Rhizobium inoculation on growth and yield of groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Ten weed control treatments, comprising four treatments of sole application of fluchloralin, pendimethalin, butachlor and metolachlor, respectively each applied at 1.0 kg ha(-1); four treatments comprising of an application of the same herbicides at the same levels coupled with one hand weeding at 30 DAS; one weed-free treatment (hand weedings at 15, 30, 45 DAS); and one unweeded control. All 10 treatmets were combined with and without Rhizobium inoculation (i.e. a total of 20 treatment combinations) under a factorial randomized complete block design (FRBD) with four replications. Minimum weed dry matter accumulation (70 kg/ha) with higher weed control efficiency (90.70%) was recorded under an integrated method i.e. pendimethalin at 1.0 kg ha(-1) + hand weeding at 30 DAS, which also resulted in maximum pod yield (1773.50 kg ha(-1)). This treatment was comparable to fluchloralin applied at 1.0 kg ha(-1) combined with hand- weeding at 30 DAS. Weedy conditions in the unweeded control treatment reduced pod yield by 29.90-35.95% as compared to integrated method. Significantly higher pod yield was obtained with Rhizobium inoculation than the mean value of all treatments without inoculation. For most agronomical parameters examined, Rhizobium inoculation and weed control treatments were independent in their effect.
authors.affiliation: AICRP on Weed Control, B.A. College of Agriculture, Gujarat Agricultural University, Anand-388 110, Gujarat, India. amit_jhalaat@yahoo.co.in
authors.forename: A
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Jhala
authors.forename: P H
authors.initials: PH
authors.lastname: Rathod
authors.forename: K C
authors.initials: KC
authors.lastname: Patel
authors.forename: P
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Van Damme
mesh_terms: D010367:Arachis / Q000254:growth & development*; D004305:Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; D006540:Herbicides / Q000494:pharmacology*; D010571:Pest Control / Q000379:methods; D006109:Poaceae / Q000187:drug effects* / Q000254:growth & development; D011897:Random Allocation; D012231:Rhizobium / Q000502:physiology*
chemical_list: D006540:Herbicides