Biomechanical characterization and clinical implications of artificially induced crouch walking: Differences between pure iliopsoas, pure hamstrings and combination of iliopsoas and hamstrings contractures.
The purpose of this study was to characterize biomechanically three different crouch walking patterns, artificially induced in eight neurologically intact subjects and to compare them to selected cases of pathological crouch walking. The subjects were equipped with a lightweight mechanical exoskeleton with artificial muscles that acted in parallel with hamstrings and iliopsoas muscles. They walked at a speed of approximately 1m/s along the walkway under four experimental conditions: normal walking (NW), hamstrings contracture emulation (HAM), iliopsoas contracture emulation (IPS) and emulation of both hamstrings and iliopsoas contractures (IPSHAM). Reflective markers and force platform data were collected and ankle, knee and hip-joint angles, moments and powers were calculated. HAM and IPSHAM shifted ankle-angle rotation profiles into dorsiflexion during midstance compared to IPS and NW where ankle-angle trajectories were similar. HAM, IPS and IPSHAM shifted the knee angle of rotation profiles into flexion during stance, compared to NW. IPS and IPSHAM shifted hip angle of rotation profiles toward pronounced flexion while HAM shifted hip angle of rotation profile toward extension, compared to NW. HAM and IPSHAM significantly increased ankle moment during midstance, compared to IPS and NW where ankle moment profiles were similar. All experimental conditions exhibited similar behavior in the knee-moment profiles during midstance while IPS and IPSHAM knee-moment profiles exhibited significantly higher knee-extension moment during terminal stance and pre-swing. In the hip joint all experimental conditions exhibited similar shape of hip moment profiles throughout the gait cycle. HAM and IPS kinematic and kinetic patterns were qualitatively compared to two selected clinical cases, showing considerable similarity. This implies that distinct differences in kinematics and kinetics between HAM, IPS and IPSHAM may be clinically relevant in helping determine the relative contribution of hamstrings and iliopsoas muscles contractures to particular crouch walking.
Matjacić
Zlatko
Z
Institute for Rehabilitation, Linhartova 51, SI-1000, Ljubljana, Slovenia. zlatko.matjacic@mail.ir-rs.si
Olensek
Andrej
A
D000328:Adult; D001696:Biomechanical Phenomena; D005684:Gait / Q000502:physiology*; D006801:Humans; D007700:Kinetics; D008297:Male; D016658:Psoas Muscles / Q000502:physiology*; D013710:Tendons / Q000502:physiology*; D016138:Walking / Q000502:physiology*