title: Reliability of a novel classification system for thoracolumbar injuries: the Thoracolumbar Injury Severity Score.
abstract: METHODS
  Prospective study of 5 spine surgeons rating 71 clinical cases of thoracolumbar spinal injuries using the Thoracolumbar Injury Severity Score (TLISS) and then re-rating the cases in a different order 1 month later.
  
  
  OBJECTIVE
  To determine the reliability of the TLISS system.
  
  
  BACKGROUND
  The TLISS is a recently introduced classification system for thoracolumbar spinal column injures designed to simplify injury classification and facilitate treatment decision making. Before being widely adopted, the reliability of the TLISS must be studied.
  
  
  METHODS
  A total of 71 cases of thoracolumbar spinal trauma were distributed on CD-ROM to 5 attending spine surgeons, including clinical/radiographic data, details of the TLISS, and a scoring sheet in which cases would be scored using the system. The surgeons were later assigned the task with the cases reordered. Intraobserver and interobserver reliability was calculated for TLISS components, total score, and surgeon's treatment decision using the Cohen unweighted kappa coefficients and Spearman rank-order correlation.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Interrater reliability assessed by generalized kappa coefficients was 0.33 +/- 0.03 for injury mechanism, 0.91 +/- 0.02 for neurologic status, 0.35 +/- 0.03 for posterior ligamentous complex status, 0.29 +/- 0.02 for TLISS total, and 0.52 +/- 0.03 for treatment recommendation. Respective results using the Spearman correlation were 0.35 +/- 0.04, 0.94 +/- 0.01, 0.48 +/- 0.04, 0.65 +/- 0.03, and 0.51 +/- 0.04. Surgeons agreed with the TLISS recommendation 96.4% of the time. Intrarater kappa coefficients were 0.57 +/- 0.04 for injury mechanism, 0.93 +/- 0.02 for neurologic status, 0.48 +/- 0.04 for posterior ligamentous complex status, 0.46 +/- 0.03 for TLISS total, and 0.62 +/- 0.04 for treatment recommendation. Respective results using the Spearman correlation were 0.70 +/- 0.04, 0.95 +/- 0.02, 0.59 +/- 0.05, 0.77 +/- 0.04, and 0.59 +/- 0.05.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The TLISS has good reliability and compares favorably to other contemporary thoracolumbar fracture classification systems.
authors: Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA. alexvaccaro3@aol.com
authors: Alexander R
authors: AR
authors: Vaccaro
authors: Eli M
authors: EM
authors: Baron
authors: James
authors: J
authors: Sanfilippo
authors: Sidney
authors: S
authors: Jacoby
authors: Jacob
authors: J
authors: Steuve
authors: Eric
authors: E
authors: Grossman
authors: Matthew
authors: M
authors: DiPaola
authors: Paul
authors: P
authors: Ranier
authors: Luke
authors: L
authors: Austin
authors: Ray
authors: R
authors: Ropiak
authors: Michael
authors: M
authors: Ciminello
authors: Chuka
authors: C
authors: Okafor
authors: Matthew
authors: M
authors: Eichenbaum
authors: Venkat
authors: V
authors: Rapuri
authors: Eric
authors: E
authors: Smith
authors: Fabio
authors: F
authors: Orozco
authors: Peter
authors: P
authors: Ugolini
authors: Mark
authors: M
authors: Fletcher
authors: Jonathan
authors: J
authors: Minnich
authors: Gregory
authors: G
authors: Goldberg
authors: Jared
authors: J
authors: Wilsey
authors: Joon Y
authors: JY
authors: Lee
authors: Moe R
authors: MR
authors: Lim
authors: Anthony
authors: A
authors: Burns
authors: Ralph
authors: R
authors: Marino
authors: Christian
authors: C
authors: DiPaola
authors: Laura
authors: L
authors: Zeiller
authors: Steven C
authors: SC
authors: Zeiler
authors: James
authors: J
authors: Harrop
authors: D Greg
authors: DG
authors: Anderson
authors: Todd J
authors: TJ
authors: Albert
authors: Alan S
authors: AS
authors: Hilibrand