Transanal endoscopic microsurgery: where are we now?
OBJECTIVE
This review of literature aimed to assess the role and establish the current status of transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) in the management of benign and malignant rectal lesions.


METHODS
A review of the literature was undertaken through the Medline database and by cross-referencing previous publications, thus identifying 54 relevant publications on TEM in the management of rectal lesions. Aggregated results of various parameters were calculated but statistical comparisons deemed unsuitable due to heterogeneity of data.


RESULTS
The TEM procedure is associated with good functional results, morbidity of 4% and zero procedure-related mortality. The local recurrence rates after TEM excision is 4.5% (range 0-14) for benign rectal lesions, 6% (0-13) for T(1) cancers, 14% (range 0-50) for T(2) cancers and 20% (range 14-67%) for T(3) cancers. Local recurrences after TEM can be surgically salvaged with good disease free survival rates.


CONCLUSIONS
The TEM procedure clearly offers the benefits of good exposure of the operative field allowing extremely precise dissection and access to high rectal lesions unresectable by other methods. For pTis and low risk pT(1) lesions, the oncological results are comparable to the more traditional formal resection. The routine use of TEM for high-risk pT(1) and higher stage lesions is not an oncologically sound choice at the present moment.
Maslekar
Sushil
S
Academic Surgical Unit, University of Hull and Castle Hill Hospital, Hull, UK.
Beral
Daniel L
DL
White
Tim J
TJ
Pillinger
Steve H
SH
Monson
John R T
JR