RetCam imaging for retinopathy of prematurity screening.
OBJECTIVE
Indirect ophthalmoscopy is the gold standard for retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) screening. Screening for ROP with digital imaging has been proposed as a possible alternative. Our goal was to evaluate the longitudinal clinical outcomes of employing digital imaging to detect high-risk ROP.


METHODS
Serial RetCam imaging and indirect ophthalmoscopy were performed on 43 premature infants. A masked reader evaluated the images and made management recommendations that were compared with indirect ophthalmoscopy results. Successful screening was determined by correctly identifying progression to prethreshold or threshold disease with referral for indirect ophthalmoscopy. Unsuccessful screening was determined by failure to identify prethreshold or threshold disease, inaccurately detecting prethreshold or threshold disease, or inability to evaluate for ROP.


RESULTS
No cases of prethreshold or threshold disease were missed by the reader. The reader overestimated prethreshold or threshold disease in 5% of cases. Initial screening in 21% of cases could not be evaluated for ROP secondary to poor image quality. Digital photography had a sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 97.5% in detecting prethreshold and threshold ROP. Positive-predictive value of digital photography was 67% and negative-predictive value was 100%.


CONCLUSIONS
Screening and management of ROP using RetCam imaging did not fail to detect prethreshold or threshold disease when images could be obtained. Ophthalmologic examinations were needed in 20% of cases that did not reach threshold or prethreshold disease because of poor image quality or overestimation of ROP. RetCam screening may safely reduce the overall number of indirect ophthalmologic examinations required.
Wu
Carolyn
C
Department of Ophthalmology, Children's Hospital Boston, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02116, USA. carolyn.wu@childrens.harvard.edu
Petersen
Robert A
RA
VanderVeen
Deborah K
DK