Do relations between judgment and epistemological beliefs differentiate between mere acceptance and critical evaluation? Comment on Latifian & Bashash (2004).
In 2004 Latifian and Bashash presented Iranian students with questionnaires assessing (a) their epistemological beliefs regarding religion and science as sources of value and truth and (b) their acceptance of a scenario arguing for relative ethics. Acceptance was related to epistemological beliefs in a condition where the scenario was attributed to Freud but not in a condition where it was attributed to Tabatabaee, a highly authoritative theologian. This commentary questions the authors' explanation, particularly their assumption that the participants' reliance on epistemological beliefs would indicate a more critical attitude towards the scenario in the Freud condition than in the Tabatabaee condition.
Peeters
Guido
G
Laboratory of Experimental Social Psychology, Catholic University of Leuven, Belgium. guido.peeters@psy.kuleuven.be