Comparison of capacitive versus resistive joint contact stress sensors.
Cartilage contact stress elevations might be associated with pain or other symptoms after malunited, incongruous intraarticular fractures. Studies identifying fractures with patterns of elevated contact stresses would help to ensure more appropriate choices of treatment. However, appropriate instrumentation for such studies is crucial. We tested two such systems, one capacitive and one resistive, under identical loading conditions presumed to occur in the ankle. We used a materials testing machine and customized-loading fixtures to measure force detection error, contact area error, repeatability, homogeneity, creep, and one-axis and two-axis bending artifacts. The loading regimen caused pressures up to 2.5 MPa. An error in force detection between -3% and +5% was observed with the capacitive sensor whereas an error between -12% and +20% was observed with the resistive sensor. Repeatability and homogeneity were greater for the capacitive sensor. Errors in contact area measurement were less than 2% for the resistive sensor and less than 6% for the capacitive sensor. The resistive sensor could not conform to spherical surfaces without crinkling. Creep artifact was observed with both sensors. We concluded that the capacitive sensor had superior performance even though its thickness and high compliance may be disadvantageous in intraarticular measurements. The resistive sensor is required for use where higher pressures are expected despite its inferior accuracy.
Martinelli
L
L
Motion Analysis Laboratory, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster, Germany.
Hurschler
C
C
Rosenbaum
D
D