title: Staff experiences of an early warning indicator for unstable patients in Australia.
abstract: The objective of this study is to explore nursing and medical staff's perceptions of a clinical marker referral tool implemented to assist in the early identification of unstable patients in the general surgical and medical ward environment. A descriptive, exploratory survey design was undertaken 6 months after the implementation of a clinical marker referral tool. The target population for the survey was all ward nursing, junior medical staff and intensive care unit (ICU) registrars in a metropolitan tertiary referral hospital in Australia. The survey consisted of open-ended and closed-ended questions, as well as statements asking participants to explore their perceptions, attitudes and perceived understanding of the clinical marker referral tool. The surveys were sent to all targeted staff in a personally addressed envelope via the internal mail system. Overall, nursing and medical staff (n = 178) responses were positive to the clinical marker project/tool, offering clear guidelines for staff to respond to the patient's clinical condition and contact the medical staff and the ICU liaison team as appropriate. Furthermore, comments were made in relation to the ICU liaison team acting as a 'support' and 'prompt back-up' for nursing staff when needed. However, ward medical staff had reservations with the clinical markers chosen and with ward nurses being able to contact the ICU registrar after hours. Additionally, the ICU registrars commented on an increase to their workload in having to review unstable patients after hours. These results suggest that the ward nurses required additional support and guidance in caring for the unstable patient in the ward which may improve patient outcomes. Further research investigating the less-favourable responses of the ward medical staff and ICU medical staff is warranted.
authors.affiliation: ICU Liaison Nurse Practitioner, Western Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. anna.green@wh.org.au
authors.forename: Anna
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Green
authors.forename: Allison
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Williams
authors.forename: William
authors.initials: W
authors.lastname: Allison
mesh_terms: D000208:Acute Disease / Q000451:nursing; D001291:Attitude of Health Personnel; D002983:Clinical Competence; D003422:Critical Care / Q000458:organization & administration*; D003663:Decision Trees; D004509:Education, Nursing, Continuing; D007722:Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice; D006301:Health Services Needs and Demand; D006757:Hospital Units; D006801:Humans; D007318:Inservice Training; D008505:Medical Staff, Hospital / Q000193:education / Q000523:psychology; D008991:Monitoring, Physiologic / Q000379:methods / Q000451:nursing; D024802:Nurse's Role; D009730:Nursing Assessment / Q000379:methods* / Q000592:standards; D015403:Nursing Evaluation Research; D015404:Nursing Methodology Research; D009741:Nursing Staff, Hospital / Q000193:education / Q000523:psychology*; D017410:Practice Guidelines as Topic / Q000592:standards*; D012017:Referral and Consultation / Q000592:standards*; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires; D013664:Teaching Materials / Q000592:standards; D014739:Victoria