title: Comparison of visual and quantitative analysis for characterization of insonated liver tumors after microbubble contrast injection.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  The objective of our study was to compare diagnostic performance of visual and quantitative analysis for the characterization of liver tumors insonated at low transmit power after microbubble contrast agent injection.
  
  
  METHODS
  This series comprised 166 liver tumors (1-5 cm in diameter) in 166 patients (99 men, 67 women; mean age +/- SD, 58 +/- 11 years) scanned at low transmit power (mechanical index: 0.1-0.14) after sulfur hexafluoride-filled microbubble injection. Digital cine clips recorded at the arterial phase (10-40 sec after contrast injection) and late phase (100-300 sec) were analyzed to characterize liver tumors as benign or malignant. Visual analysis was performed by three independent blinded reviewers who evaluated enhancement patterns at the arterial phase and subjective tumor conspicuity at the late phase. Quantitative analysis of videotape intensity (VI: gray-scale levels, 0-255) was performed to calculate objective tumor conspicuity at the late phase: (VI(tumor) - VI(liver)) / VI(liver).
  
  
  RESULTS
  Characteristic enhancement patterns were observed in malignant tumors (peripheral rimlike) and benign tumors (peripheral nodular or central and spoke-wheel-shaped). Malignant (n = 95) versus benign (n = 71) tumors differed for subjective (median value: -1 vs 1, respectively) and objective conspicuity at the late phase (-0.6 vs 0.15, respectively; p = 0.001, Mann-Whitney U test) due to persistent microbubble uptake in benign tumors. Diagnostic performance of visual (odds ratio: reviewer 1 = 4.28, reviewer 2 = 10.18, reviewer 3 = 9.56) and quantitative (odds ratio: 89.33) analyses differed significantly in the characterization of liver tumors (p = 0.01, chi-square test).
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Quantitative analysis revealed higher diagnostic performance than visual analysis to characterize liver tumors insonated at low transmit power after microbubble contrast agent injection.
authors.affiliation: Department of Radiology, University of Trieste, Cattinara Hospital, Strada di Fiume 447, Trieste 34149, Italy. equaia@yahoo.com
authors.forename: Emilio
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Quaia
authors.forename: Alessandro
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Palumbo
authors.forename: Stefania
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Rossi
authors.forename: Francesca
authors.initials: F
authors.lastname: Degobbis
authors.forename: Stefano
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Cernic
authors.forename: Giuseppe
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Tona
authors.forename: Maria
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Cova
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D003287:Contrast Media / Q000008:administration & dosage*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007267:Injections; D008113:Liver Neoplasms / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging*; D008297:Male; D045423:Microbubbles; D008875:Middle Aged; D014463:Ultrasonography
chemical_list: D003287:Contrast Media