Comparison of two pressure ulcer preventive dressings for reducing shear force on the heel.
OBJECTIVE
We compared the shear forces exerted over the heel between a pressure ulcer preventive dressing and a thin-film dressing in a clinical setting. Interface pressures were measured as well.


METHODS
Quasi-experimental clinical trial.


METHODS
Participants were 30 elderly patients (5 men, 25 women; mean age, 86.4 +/- 8.0 years) hospitalized in a geriatrics hospital in Japan; all had a Braden score of less than 14 (mean, 10.1 +/- 1.1). Informed consent was obtained from all the patients.A shear force and pressure sensor including a strain gauge, and an oval airbag-type pressure sensor were used.


METHODS
The sensor was attached to one heel using double-sided tape; then the target dressing was applied over the sensor and on the opposite heel to avoid the influence of the opposite heel on the shear force measurement. Interface pressures were measured with the patient in a stationary supine position; shear force was then measured at 0.2-second intervals, while the sheet was manually pulled at a velocity of around 5 cm/second. Shear force was determined by averaging the stable shear force lasting for 10 measurement points.


RESULTS
The mean interface pressures with the PPD and the film dressings were 70.7 +/- 16.5 and 70.2 +/- 15.2 mmHg, respectively; this difference was not statistically significant. The shear force produced during the pulling of the sheet was 2.2 +/- 1.4 and 11.7 +/- 5.8 N, respectively (P < .001, Wilcoxon signed-rank test).


CONCLUSIONS
The results of this study suggest that a dressing with a low-friction external surface (such as the pressure ulcer preventive dressing) can significantly reduce shear force. However, results also suggest that external dressings do not significantly reduce interface pressures and cannot be used as a substitute for heel elevation in an immobile patient.
Nakagami
Gojiro
G
Department of Gerontological Nursing/Wound Care Nursing, Division of Health Sciences and Nursing, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Japan. gojiron-tky@umin.ac.jp
Sanada
Hiromi
H
Konya
Chizuko
C
Kitagawa
Atsuko
A
Tadaka
Etsuko
E
Tabata
Keiko
K
D047070:Bandages, Hydrocolloid / Q000592:standards*; D001510:Bed Rest; D002518:Ceramides; D015400:Clinical Nursing Research; D017276:Friction; D005853:Geriatrics; D006365:Heel; D006782:Hospitals, Special; D006801:Humans; D007564:Japan; D009730:Nursing Assessment; D015403:Nursing Evaluation Research; D010226:Parabens; D011137:Polystyrenes; D011140:Polyurethanes; D011310:Preservatives, Pharmaceutical; D011312:Pressure / Q000009:adverse effects; D003668:Pressure Ulcer / Q000209:etiology / Q000517:prevention & control*; D033081:Shear Strength; D018709:Statistics, Nonparametric; D014233:Tricarboxylic Acids; D014870:Water Loss, Insensible
D002518:Ceramides; D010226:Parabens; D011137:Polystyrenes; D011140:Polyurethanes; D011310:Preservatives, Pharmaceutical; D014233:Tricarboxylic Acids; C024075:styrofoam; C015358:methylparaben