title: Impact of specialty of admitting physician and type of hospital on care and outcome for myocardial infarction in England and Wales during 2004-5: observational study.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  To examine process of care and outcome for patients admitted with acute myocardial infarction to hospitals in England and Wales in relation to type of consultant care and type of hospital.
  
  
  METHODS
  Observational study of 88,782 patients admitted with myocardial infarction during 2004-5, using records from the national audit of myocardial infarction project (MINAP) database.
  
  
  METHODS
  Use of reperfusion treatment and secondary prevention drugs, use of angiography, and 90 day mortality of patients admitted under the care of cardiologists and non-cardiologists in hospitals with and without facilities for coronary intervention.
  
  
  RESULTS
  36% of patients were admitted under the care of a cardiologist and 20% to a hospital with coronary interventional facilities. Patients admitted under cardiologists had fewer comorbidities than other patients and were more likely to have reperfusion treatment (12,266/14,433 (85%) v 13,682/17,064 (80%)) and appropriate secondary prevention drugs. Overall, 27,431/79,374 (35%) of patients had angiography. Relatively more patients admitted to interventional hospitals (8167/14,661; 56%) than to other hospitals had angiography (19,264/64,713; 30%). The adjusted risk of death by 90 days for patients treated in interventional compared with non-interventional hospitals was 0.93 (95% confidence interval 0.82 to 1.06). The adjusted risk of death at 90 days for patients admitted under cardiologists compared with non-cardiologists was 0.86 (0.81 to 0.91).
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Patients cared for by cardiologists had less comorbidity than other patients. They were more likely to receive proved treatments and angiography, and they had a lower adjusted 90 day mortality. Large differences existed in the use of angiography between interventional and non-interventional hospitals. These findings show wide variations in the management and outcome of patients with myocardial infarction in England and Wales.
authors.affiliation: Northampton General Hospital, Northampton, NN1 5BD. John.birkhead@btinternet.com
authors.forename: John S
authors.initials: JS
authors.lastname: Birkhead
authors.forename: Clive
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Weston
authors.forename: Derek
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Lowe
mesh_terms: D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D002316:Cardiotonic Agents / Q000627:therapeutic use; D003253:Consultants; D017023:Coronary Angiography / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D004739:England / Q000453:epidemiology; D006760:Hospitalization / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D006761:Hospitals / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D006801:Humans; D008505:Medical Staff, Hospital / Q000592:standards*; D008511:Medicine / Q000592:standards* / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D008875:Middle Aged; D009203:Myocardial Infarction / Q000401:mortality / Q000628:therapy*; D015425:Myocardial Reperfusion / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D010043:Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care; D013038:Specialization; D016896:Treatment Outcome; D014852:Wales / Q000453:epidemiology
chemical_list: D002316:Cardiotonic Agents