An audit of referral practice for patients with impacted palatal canines and the impact of referral guidelines.
OBJECTIVE
To assess referral practice for patients presenting with impacted palatal maxillary canines, and to develop and evaluate the effectiveness of referral guidelines.


METHODS
Prospective clinical audit.


METHODS
Southend and Basildon district general hospitals.


METHODS
The 'gold' standard was identified as regular dental attenders with unerupted palatal canines being referred by 12 years old, with a wait of no longer than 20 weeks from referral to assessment. Data were collected and compared to the defined standard. An algorithm outlining the correct management was developed and distributed to all local dentists. The cycle was repeated for a similar time period.


RESULTS
Ninety-eight per cent of patients were seen within 20 weeks during both cycles while the referrals increased from 85 to 109 patients. The percentage of patients referred by 12 years of age increased from 16.5% to 27% (p = 0.09). During the first cycle 82% of patients presented with retained deciduous maxillary canines. This was reduced to 76% during the second cycle (p = 0.29).


CONCLUSIONS
Referral practice was generally poor when compared to the recommended good practice. More patients were referred after distribution of the guidelines, but the percentage referred by the recommended age was not statistically significantly improved.
Hassan
T
T
Orthodontic Department, Southend Hospital, Prittlewell Chase, Westclif on Sea, Essex, SS0 0RY. tasnim1000@yahoo.co.uk
Nute
S J
SJ
D000293:Adolescent; D000465:Algorithms; D016009:Chi-Square Distribution; D002648:Child; D019230:Dental Audit; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D017410:Practice Guidelines as Topic; D011446:Prospective Studies; D012017:Referral and Consultation / Q000592:standards / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D013997:Time Factors; D014095:Tooth, Impacted / Q000628:therapy*