title: Asthma management: are GINA guidelines appropriate for daily clinical practice?
abstract: An international group of primary care asthma experts, as well as pulmonologists and allergists from Europe and the US, met to discuss asthma management focused on the primary care office. This paper summarizes their discussions. Accuracy of diagnosis and appropriateness of treatment is variable depending on the clinical circumstances and patient group. The value of classifying patients based on baseline or static asthma severity scores remains controversial, and asthma management decisions based on symptom control appear to have greater practical utility in a primary care setting. Furthermore, it must be recognized that patients, caregivers and physicians may have differing, and possibly conflicting, goals for therapy. There are many initiatives to improve the quality of asthma management, for example, primary care-focused guidelines being developed by the International Primary Care Respiratory Group, and several groups are working on asthma control scores. In addition, new therapies may improve the options available for increasing compliance and reducing side effects. In conclusion, asthma management should be patient-focused, with outcomes relevant to improving the quality of life for people with asthma.
authors.affiliation: Department of Research, Olmsted Medical Center, Rochester, MN, USA. yawnx002@umn.edu
authors.forename: Barbara P
authors.initials: BP
authors.lastname: Yawn
authors.forename: Thys
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: van der Molen
authors.forename: Marc
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Humbert