title: Interpersonal psychotherapy for depression? The need to define its ecological niche.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Interpersonal psychotherapy (IPT) has long been viewed as an efficacious treatment for depression, with a large number of published studies allowing its efficacy and utility to be considered closely.
  
  
  METHODS
  We review original studies and the one published meta-analysis of controlled efficacy trials, examining acute-phase and prophylactic studies, comparison studies with cognitive behaviour therapy, and studies evaluating its efficacy in combination with pharmacotherapy.
  
  
  RESULTS
  We highlight difficulties in evaluating any psychotherapy, particularly when tested as having universal application for varying depressive conditions, but do identify circumstances where IPT may have specific salience.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  As for other treatments, IPT is unlikely to be a universal therapy for depression. This review offers suggestions as to where its preferential utility may lie, and argues for modified research paradigms to assist definition of its therapeutic niche.
authors.affiliation: School of Psychiatry, University of New South Wales, Black Dog Institute, Australia. g.parker@unsw.edu.au
authors.forename: Gordon
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Parker
authors.forename: Isabella
authors.initials: I
authors.lastname: Parker
authors.forename: Heather
authors.initials: H
authors.lastname: Brotchie
authors.forename: Scott
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Stuart
mesh_terms: D000928:Antidepressive Agents / Q000627:therapeutic use; D003131:Combined Modality Therapy; D003863:Depression / Q000628:therapy*; D003866:Depressive Disorder / Q000150:complications / Q000628:therapy*; D006801:Humans; D010554:Personality Disorders / Q000150:complications / Q000628:therapy; D011613:Psychotherapy / Q000379:methods*
chemical_list: D000928:Antidepressive Agents