title: Shear bond strength of acetone-based one-bottle adhesive systems.
abstract: The aim of this study was to assess the shear bond strength of four acetone-based one-bottle adhesive systems to enamel and dentin, and compare to that of an ethanol-based system used as control. Fifty human molars were bisected mesiodistally and the buccal and lingual surfaces were embedded in acrylic resin using PVC cylinders. The buccal surfaces were ground to obtain flat dentin surfaces, while the lingual surfaces were ground to obtain flat enamel surfaces. All specimens were polished up to 600-grit sandpapers and randomly assigned to 5 groups (n=20; 10 dentin specimens and 10 enamel specimens), according to the adhesive system used: One-Step (Bisco); Gluma One Bond (Heraeus Kulzer); Solobond M (Voco); TenureQuik w/F (Den-Mat) and OptiBond Solo Plus (Kerr) (control). Each adhesive system was applied according to the manufacturers' instructions. The respective proprietary hybrid composite was applied in a gelatin capsule (d=4.3 mm) and light-cured for 40 s. The specimens were tested in shear strength with an Instron machine at a crosshead speed of 5 mm/min. Bond strengths means were analyzed statistically by one-way ANOVA and Duncan's post-hoc (p< or =0.05). Shear bond strength means (MPa) (+/-SD) to enamel and dentin were: Enamel: One-Step=11.3(+/-4.9); Gluma One Bond=16.3(+/-10.1); Solobond M=18.9(+/-4.5); TenureQuik w/F=18.7(+/-4.5) and OptiBond Solo Plus=16.4(+/-3.9); Dentin: One-Step=6.4(+/-2.8); Gluma One Bond=3.0(+/-3.4); Solobond M=10.6(+/-4.9); TenureQuik w/F=7.8(+/-3.9) and OptiBond Solo Plus=15.1(+/-8.9). In enamel, the adhesive systems had statistically similar bond strengths to each other (p>0.05). However, the ethanol-based system (OptiBond Solo Plus) showed significantly higher bond strength to dentin than the acetone-based systems (p< or =0.0001). In conclusion, the solvent type (acetone or ethanol) had no influence on enamel bond strength, but had great influence on dentin bonding, which should be taken into account when choosing the adhesive system.
authors.affiliation: Department of Operative Dentistry, University of Southern Santa Catarina, Tubarão, SC, Brazil. guilhermelopes@ccs.ufsc.br
authors.forename: Guilherme Carpena
authors.initials: GC
authors.lastname: Lopes
authors.forename: Paula C
authors.initials: PC
authors.lastname: Cardoso
authors.forename: Luiz Clovis Cardoso
authors.initials: LC
authors.lastname: Vieira
authors.forename: Luiz N
authors.initials: LN
authors.lastname: Baratieri
authors.forename: Karina
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Rampinelli
authors.forename: Gisele
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Costa
mesh_terms: D000096:Acetone / Q000737:chemistry; D000269:Adhesives / Q000737:chemistry*; D000704:Analysis of Variance; D003743:Dental Enamel / Q000737:chemistry; D003804:Dentin / Q000737:chemistry; D017220:Dentin-Bonding Agents / Q000737:chemistry*; D000431:Ethanol / Q000737:chemistry; D006801:Humans; D033081:Shear Strength
chemical_list: D000269:Adhesives; D017220:Dentin-Bonding Agents; D000096:Acetone; D000431:Ethanol