Do drug treatment facilities increase clients' exposure to potential neighborhood-level triggers for relapse? A small-area assessment of a large, public treatment system.
Research on drug treatment facility locations has focused narrowly on the issue of geographic proximity to clients. We argue that neighborhood conditions should also enter into the facility location decision and illustrate a formal assessment of neighborhood conditions at facilities in a large, metropolitan area, taking into account conditions clients already face at home. We discuss choice and construction of small-area measures relevant to the drug treatment context, including drug activity, disadvantage, and violence as well as statistical comparisons of clients' home and treatment locations with respect to these measures. Analysis of 22,707 clients discharged from 494 community-based outpatient and residential treatment facilities that received public funds during 1998-2000 in Los Angeles County revealed no significant mean differences between home and treatment neighborhoods. However, up to 20% of clients are exposed to markedly higher levels of disadvantage, violence, or drug activity where they attend treatment than where they live, suggesting that it is not uncommon for treatment locations to increase clients' exposure to potential environmental triggers for relapse. Whereas on average both home and treatment locations exhibit higher levels of these measures than the household locations of the general population, substantial variability in public treatment clients' home neighborhoods calls into question the notion that they hail exclusively from poor, high drug activity areas. Shortcomings of measures available for neighborhood assessment of treatment locations and implications of the findings for other areas of treatment research are also discussed.
Jacobson
Jerry O
JO
UCLA Integrated Substance Abuse Programs, 1640 S. Sepulveda Blvd, Suite 200, Los Angeles, CA, 90025, USA. jerryjacobson@gmail.com
D002391:Catchment Area, Health; D019548:Crime Victims; D006801:Humans; D015141:Los Angeles / Q000453:epidemiology; D011204:Poverty Areas; D011635:Public Health Administration; D012111:Residence Characteristics / Q000145:classification*; D018570:Risk Assessment; D012307:Risk Factors; D055502:Secondary Prevention; D017062:Small-Area Analysis; D012931:Social Environment; D012959:Socioeconomic Factors; D016320:Substance Abuse Treatment Centers / Q000706:statistics & numerical data / Q000600:supply & distribution*; D019966:Substance-Related Disorders / Q000453:epidemiology / Q000628:therapy*; D019037:Urban Health Services / Q000706:statistics & numerical data / Q000600:supply & distribution; D014754:Violence; D035862:Vulnerable Populations