title: A comparison of the perceived effects on Scottish general dental practitioners of peer review and other continuing professional development.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  To produce evidence to inform future provision of continuing professional development (CPD).
  
  
  METHODS
  A postal questionnaire survey of 268 dentists who had participated in the pilot peer review scheme in Scotland.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Courses, both Section 63 and privately run, were both seen as highly effective in changing both knowledge and practising behaviour. Most of the free form comments invited were positive about the effects and acceptability of peer review as a mode of CPD. Courses and reading journals were felt to be better at changing knowledge while all the other modes (vide intra) were felt to be better at changing practice, except computer assisted learning (CAL).
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Peer review in Scotland is perceived as an acceptable and effective CPD mode for changing knowledge and practice. It is not felt to be superior to the established classical modes of courses and reading of journals.
authors.affiliation: Edinburgh Postgraduate Dental Institute, Lauriston Building, Lauriston Place, Edinburgh, EH3 9YW. yannmaidment@blueyonder.co.uk
authors.forename: Y
authors.initials: Y
authors.lastname: Maidment
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000367:Age Factors; D001291:Attitude of Health Personnel; D002983:Clinical Competence; D003194:Computer-Assisted Instruction; D003226:Congresses as Topic; D019230:Dental Audit; D003815:Dentists / Q000523:psychology*; D004498:Education, Dental, Continuing; D005260:Female; D005792:General Practice, Dental; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D018024:Peer Review, Health Care; D010506:Periodicals as Topic; D010865:Pilot Projects; D019239:Practice Patterns, Dentists'; D012606:Scotland; D012737:Sex Factors