title: CRACK/project prevention: providing a social service or promoting social control?
abstract: This paper tests the arguments put forth by Morgan (2004) and several others that the CRACK/Project Prevention programme, which offers substance-abusing women a monetary incentive to choose long-term or permanent birth control, is racist and unethical. Findings from a sample of 521 participants in the programme show that the majority of women chose a birth control method that was not permanent, and race did not play a statistically significant role in explaining the birth control choices among the women. Rather, the participant's age and the number of pregnancies she had experienced were more influential. The findings suggest that the prior criticisms of the programme for targeting minority and inherently vulnerable, addicted women for sterilisation are unsupported. Women in this study appeared to follow the larger trends among women of all races and socioeconomic backgrounds in choosing permanent birth control: they were older and had more children.
authors.affiliation: University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL 60607, USA. chedgzse@uic.edu
authors.forename: C
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Smith-McKeever
authors.forename: C-M
authors.initials: CM
authors.lastname: Hsieh
authors.forename: R
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Harris
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D002755:Choice Behavior; D003267:Contraception; D003268:Contraception Behavior / Q000208:ethnology*; D005006:Ethnicity / Q000523:psychology*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008875:Middle Aged; D012947:Social Work; D012959:Socioeconomic Factors; D019966:Substance-Related Disorders / Q000523:psychology*