title: 3.0 T versus 1.5 T pediatric brain imaging.
abstract: This article represents a review of the authors' experience with two 3.0 T Siemens Trio Whole Body MR imaging units, with a cumulative experience of 12 months total imaging time on these scanners, over 1000 cases. The authors were able to identify and review numerous patients who had diagnostic studies both on 1.5 T and 3.0 T.
authors.affiliation: Department of Radiology, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA. zimmerman@email.chop.edu
authors.forename: Robert A
authors.initials: RA
authors.lastname: Zimmerman
authors.forename: Larissa T
authors.initials: LT
authors.lastname: Bilaniuk
authors.forename: Avrum N
authors.initials: AN
authors.lastname: Pollock
authors.forename: Tamara
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Feygin
authors.forename: Deborah
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Zarnow
authors.forename: Erin Simon
authors.initials: ES
authors.lastname: Schwartz
authors.forename: Christine
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Harris
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D016477:Artifacts; D001921:Brain / Q000473:pathology*; D002648:Child; D002675:Child, Preschool; D005240:Feasibility Studies; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D021621:Imaging, Three-Dimensional; D018810:Magnetic Resonance Angiography / Q000379:methods*; D008279:Magnetic Resonance Imaging / Q000379:methods*; D008280:Magnetics; D008297:Male