Improving efficiency of uncertainty analysis in complex integrated assessment models: the case of the RAINS emission module.
Ever since the Regional Acidification Information and Simulation Model (RAINS) has been constructed, the treatment of uncertainty has remained an issue of major interest. In a recent review of the model performed for the Clean Air for Europe (CAFE) programme of the European Commission, a more systematic and structured uncertainty analysis has been recommended. This paper aims at contributing to the scientific debate how this can be achieved. Because of its complex structure on the one hand and limited research resources (time, computational capacities) on the other hand a full-blown uncertainty analysis in RAINS is hardly feasible. Therefore, all types of uncertainty require more efficient ways for uncertainty analysis. With respect to parameter uncertainty, we propose to focus research efforts for uncertainty analysis on key parameters. Among different approaches to select key parameters that have been discussed in the literature screening methods seem to be particularly appropriate for complex, deterministic Integrated Assessment models such as RAINS. Surprisingly, in Integrated Assessment modelling for air pollution problems of screening design have not been taken up so far. As a case study we consider the emission module of RAINS. We show that its structure allows for a straightforward and effective screening procedure.
Gabbert
Silke
S
Department of Environmental Sciences, Environmental Systems Analysis Group, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands. silke.gabbert@wur.nl
D000397:Air Pollution / Q000032:analysis*; D004784:Environmental Monitoring / Q000379:methods; D008962:Models, Theoretical; D015203:Reproducibility of Results