title: Durability of flexible ureteroscopes: a randomized, prospective study.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  We performed a randomized, prospective, multi-institutional study evaluating the durability of commercially available flexible ureteroscopes.
  
  
  METHODS
  A total of 192 patients were randomized to the use of 7 less than 9Fr flexible ureteroscopes, including the Storz 11274AA and Flex-X, the ACMI DUR-8 and DUR-8 Elite, Wolf models 7330.170 and 7325.172, and the Olympus URF-P3. Information about total and lower pole use time, the number and method of ureteroscope insertion, and they type and duration of accessory instrumentation was recorded. Surgeons were asked to rate the visibility and maneuverability of the instrument on a scale of 0-poor to 10-excellent.
  
  
  RESULTS
  The indication for ureteroscopy was upper tract calculi in 87% of cases. Of ureteroscope insertions 97% were performed through an access sheath. The average of number of cases before repair ranged from 3.25 for the Wolf 7325 to 14.4 for the ACMI DUR-8 Elite. Average ureteroscope operative time was statistically longer for the DUR-8 Elite (494 minutes) than for the Flex-X (p = 0.047), and the Wolf 7325 and 7330 (p = 0.001 and 0.001, respectively). Duration of use before repair for the URF-P3 (373 minutes) was statistically longer than for the Wolf 7325 and 7330 (p = 0.016 and 0.017, respectively). Minutes of use with an instrument in the working channel were significantly more with the DUR-8 Elite and the URF-P3 than the Wolf 7330 (p = 0.017 and 0.008) and 7325 (p = 0.012 and 0.005, respectively). The ureteroscope that experienced the greatest average duration of lower pole use was the URF-P3, while the shortest was the Wolf 7325 (103 vs 20 minutes, p = 0.005). Average minutes of laser use before breakage was significantly longer for the DUR-8 Elite than for the Wolf 7325 (110 vs 21 minutes, p = 0.021) and 7330 (24 minutes, p = 0.025).
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Currently available less than 9Fr flexible ureteroscopes remain fragile instruments. The DUR-8 Elite and Olympus URF-P3 proved to be the most durable devices.
authors.affiliation: Department of Urology, Veterans Affairs Health Care System Minneapolis, and Department of Urology, University of Minnesota, 520 Delaware Street, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA. endourol@yahoo.com
authors.forename: Manoj
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Monga
authors.forename: Sara
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Best
authors.forename: Ramakrishna
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Venkatesh
authors.forename: Caroline
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Ames
authors.forename: Courtney
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Lee
authors.forename: Michael
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Kuskowski
authors.forename: Steven
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Schwartz
authors.forename: Richard
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Vanlangendock
authors.forename: Jason
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Skenazy
authors.forename: Jaime
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Landman
mesh_terms: D004867:Equipment Design; D004868:Equipment Failure; D006801:Humans; D020709:Ureteroscopes