Not quite human: infrahumanization in response to collective responsibility for intergroup killing.
The present research examines how awareness of violence perpetrated against an out-group by one's in-group can intensify the infrahumanization of the out-group, as measured by a reduced tendency to accord uniquely human emotions to out-groups. Across 3 experiments that used different in-groups (humans, British, White Americans) and out-groups (aliens, Australian Aborigines, and Native Americans), when participants were made aware of the in-group's mass killing of the out-group, they infrahumanized the victims more. The perception of collective responsibility, not just the knowledge that the out-group members had died in great numbers, was shown to be necessary for this effect. Infrahumanization also occurred concurrently with increased collective guilt but was unrelated to it. It is proposed that infrahumanization may be a strategy for people to reestablish psychological equanimity when confronted with a self-threatening situation and that such a strategy may occur concomitantly with other strategies, such as providing reparations to the out-group.
Castano
Emanuele
E
Department of Psychology, New School for Social Research, New York, NY 10003, USA. castanoe@newschool.edu
Giner-Sorolla
Roger
R
D003220:Conflict, Psychological; D032981:Dehumanization; D004644:Emotions; D004739:England; D006126:Group Processes; D006167:Guilt; D006708:Homicide / Q000523:psychology*; D006801:Humans; D007198:Indians, North American; D008960:Models, Psychological; D012933:Social Identification; D012941:Social Responsibility; D014481:United States; D044465:White People