Comparison of two manipulation methods to produce in vitro fertilized, biopsied and vitrified bovine embryos.
The objective of this study was to compare the overall efficiency, measured by in vitro embryonic survival, and practical value of bovine in vitro embryo production, biopsy, vitrification, and direct transfer technology using 2 different manipulation methods for biopsy. Slaughterhouse-derived oocytes were matured in vitro, fertilized (Day 0) with frozen-thawed, Percoll-separated spermatozoa and cultured on a granulosa cell monolayer. In Experiment 1, one or two blastomeres were expelled from Day 4 embryos by mechanical force through a hole made by partial zona dissection. Using a darning needle hole system for individual culture of biopsied embryos from Day 4 to Day 7.5, the blastocyst per oocyte rate was 50%, and 76% of the blastocysts survived subsequent vitrification and direct in-straw rehydration. Attempts to increase the cell number of the biopsies by further in vitro culture were unsuccessful. In Experiment 2, Day 7 and Day 8 embryos were manually biopsied before or after vitrification. When biopsy was performed before vitrification, 98% of the embryos survived manipulation, and 86% of these re-expanded after vitrification and in-straw dilution. Biopsy after vitrification was less efficient, since only 69% of the embryos survived both processes. The cumulative efficiency of embryo production, Day 7.5 biopsy and vitrification--in-straw direct rehydration was lower (P < 0.001) than that of Day 4 biopsy and Day 7.5 vitrification (29 vs 38%, respectively). However, a Day 7.5 biopsy may have the more practical application since the size of the biopsy is larger and the process is not as time-consuming as the long-term individual culture of the biopsied embryos.
Vajta
G
G
Embryo Technology Center, Danish Institute of Animal Science DK-8830 Tjele, Denmark.
Holm
P
P
Greve
T
T
Callesen
H
H