In vitro radiographic determination of distances from working length files to root ends comparing Kodak RVG 6000, Schick CDR, and Kodak insight film.
Previous studies suggest that digital and film-based radiography are similar for endodontic measurements. This study compared the accuracy and acceptability of measured distances from the tips of size #10 and #15 files to molar root apices in cadaver jaw sections using the newly developed Kodak RVG 6000, and the Schick CDR digital systems to digitized Kodak film. Standardized images were taken of files placed 0.5 to 1.5 mm short of true radiographic lengths. Images were imported into Adobe PhotoShop 7.0, thereby blinding observers who measured distances from files to root apices and assessed images for clarity (acceptability). Repeated measures ANOVA and Tukey-Kramer post hoc tests demonstrated that Kodak RVG 6000 images with enhanced contrast produced significantly less measurement error than unenhanced contrast Schick CDR images (p < 0.05) and significantly higher acceptability ratings than all other systems (all p < 0.002). Among these conditions, the newly developed Kodak RVG 6000 system provided the best overall images.
Radel
Robert T
RT
Naval Postgraduate Dental School, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Goodell
Gary G
GG
McClanahan
Scott B
SB
Cohen
Mark E
ME
D000704:Analysis of Variance; D006801:Humans; D011856:Radiographic Image Enhancement / Q000295:instrumentation*; D012390:Root Canal Therapy / Q000295:instrumentation; D016037:Single-Blind Method; D019227:Tooth Apex / Q000033:anatomy & histology; D014092:Tooth Root / Q000033:anatomy & histology / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging*