title: [REMEEX: A possible treatment option in selected cases of sphincter incompetence].
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  To evaluate the functional results and morbidity of adjustable tension suburethral tape (REMEEX) in the treatment of urinary incontinence due to severe sphincter incompetence (MUCP < 40 cm H2O) in patients presenting a contraindication to artificial sphincter operated between December 2001 and May 2004. Twelve patients (66.7%) had already undergone incontinence surgery. Ten patients (55.5%) had mixed urinary incontinence. The efficacy of the tape was considered to be good when incontinence resolved completely, partial when incontinence was decreased by > 50% and/or PVR > 100 ml. All other cases were considered to be failures. In April 2005, after a mean follow-up of 26.3 months, retrospective evaluation of the functional results was performed by means of a pad-test and a questionnaire comprising an MHU (urinary disability) score and a Ditrovie score. Complications after each intercurrent event were recorded.
  
  
  RESULTS
  The initial efficacy of the tape was considered to be good in 13 patients (72.2%) and partial in 4 patients (22.2%) with only one initial failure. Eight patients (44.4%) required secondary adjustment after a mean interval of 5.2 months, with a failure rate of 62.5%. In April 2005, 10 patients (55.5%) had a good result, 2 patients (11.1%) required self-catheterization (partial efficacy) and 6 patients (33.4%) were considered to be failures. In terms of morbidity, we observed 2 bladder injuries (11.1%), 6 superinfections of the device (33.3%), 2 (11.1%) of which required removal of the material. Fifteen patients (83.3%) answered the questionnaire: 6 patients (40%) had an MHU score greater than 3. The mean Ditrovie score was 2.1. 9 patients (60%) had a score less than 2 and 4 patients (26.6%) had a score greater than 3.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The results of this series, in patients in whom artificial sphincter was contraindicated, are satisfactory at the price of acceptable morbidity. Before defining the place of this device in the range of treatment options for sphincter incompetence, our results must be confirmed by a longer series.
authors.affiliation: Service d'Urologie, Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud, Lyon, France. jeanlouisscf@yahoo.fr
authors.forename: Jean-Louis
authors.initials: JL
authors.lastname: Campos-fernandes
authors.forename: Marc-Olivier
authors.initials: MO
authors.lastname: Timsit
authors.forename: Philippe
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Paparel
authors.forename: Marian
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Devonec
authors.forename: Béatrice
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: Leriche
authors.forename: Albert
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Leriche
authors.forename: Alain
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Ruffion
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D004867:Equipment Design; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008875:Middle Aged; D019736:Prostheses and Implants; D014549:Urinary Incontinence / Q000601:surgery*; D013520:Urologic Surgical Procedures / Q000379:methods