Food safety--who is responsible?
Though scientists believe that issues of risk can be handled without appeal to values in general or ethics in particular, this is demonstrably false. The very notion of risk is enmeshed in a complex of social ethics. This is clearly true with regard to food safety. With this in mind, it is plausible to affirm that responsibility for food safety at a given point in the chain from producer to consumer rests with the person or entity under whose control the management of that risk most plausibly lies. This principle is illustrated with various examples and with clear cases of industry shouldering and avoiding responsibility. An additional ethical concern relevant to food safety arises from genetically modified foods. Given that the situation here is uncertain and risk unknown, it is hard to see who is responsible for managing such risks. It is arguable that this situation militates in favor of labeling, since consumers are in effect research subjects. The reasonable moral approach to risk we have outlined is jeopardized by the societal tendency towards "victimology" and abrogation of personal responsibility. In such a world, it is incumbent on industry to educate the public with regard to consumer minimization of food safety risks, the impossibility of zero-risk situations, and the economic costs to freedom of protectionism.
Rollin
Bernard E
BE
Department of Philosophy, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado 80523-1781, USA. Bernard.Rollin@colostate.edu
D000818:Animals; D003257:Consumer Product Safety; D005515:Food Labeling / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D030841:Food, Genetically Modified / Q000009:adverse effects; D006801:Humans; D007881:Legislation, Food; D018570:Risk Assessment; D012308:Risk Management