Intensive case management: a critical re-appraisal of the scientific evidence for effectiveness.
Intensive Case Management (ICM) is widely claimed to be an evidence-based and cost effective program for people with high levels of disability as a result of mental illness. However, the findings of recent randomized controlled trials comparing ICM with 'usual services' suggest that both clinical and cost effectiveness of ICM may be weakening. Possible reasons for this, including fidelity of implementation, researcher allegiance effects and changes in the wider service environment within which ICM is provided, are considered. The implications for service delivery and research are discussed.
King
Robert
R
School of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Herston, QLD, Australia. r.king1@uq.edu.au
D000208:Acute Disease; D019090:Case Management; D003362:Cost-Benefit Analysis; D003422:Critical Care; D019317:Evidence-Based Medicine; D006801:Humans; D001523:Mental Disorders / Q000628:therapy*; D015201:Meta-Analysis as Topic; D011793:Queensland