A correction for primary blast injury criteria.
BACKGROUND
We review the accepted primary blast injury criteria. We point out a significant systematic error in the criteria due to the use of low-quality pulse duration data in the original criteria.


METHODS
We recalculate the injury criteria using state-of-the-art blast data.


RESULTS
We give the corrected injury criteria in the form of pressure-duration curves, pressure-impulse curves and charge weight-range curves.


CONCLUSIONS
We discuss the practical implications of a naive use of the accepted criteria in the various forms. In general, the criteria based on pulse duration are seen to be over conservative, while the criteria based on impulse are seen to be too liberal.
Gruss
Eyal
E
Israeli Ministry of Defense, Israel. eyalgruss@gmail.com
D055592:Biophysical Phenomena; D001703:Biophysics; D001753:Blast Injuries / Q000145:classification* / Q000503:physiopathology*; D003661:Decision Support Techniques; D006801:Humans; D008168:Lung / Q000503:physiopathology; D008954:Models, Biological; D011312:Pressure / Q000009:adverse effects; D015203:Reproducibility of Results