Comparative performance of an adaptive directional microphone system and a multichannel noise reduction system.
The amplification outcomes of two hearing aid prescriptions, NAL-NL1 and Digital Perception Processing (DPP), of nine moderate to moderately severe hearing-impaired adults were compared in the same digital hearing instrument. NAL-NL1 aims at optimizing speech intelligibility while amplifying the speech signal to a normal overall loudness level (Dillon, 1999). DPP focuses on restoring loudness based on normal and impaired cochlear excitation models (Launer and Moore, 2003). In this comparison, DPP resulted in better sentence recognition performance than the NAL-NL1 algorithm in the signal-front/noise-side condition, and the two prescriptions gave similar performance in the signal-front/noise-front condition. Subjective evaluations by the participants using the Abbreviated Profile for Hearing Aid Benefit and sound quality comparisons did not give conclusive results between the two prescriptions. With each hearing aid prescription, the ability of the hearing aid circuitry to reduce the effects of noise was evaluated by a sentence-in-noise test in three conditions: (1) adaptive directional microphone (DAZ), (2) multichannel noise reduction system (FNC), and (3) a combination of FNC and DAZ (FNC + DAZ). In the signal-front/noise-side condition, DAZ and FNC + DAZ gave better performance than FNC in nearly all participants, whereas in the signal-front and noise-front evaluation, the conditions revealed no significant differences.
Yuen
Kevin C P
KC
Institute of Human Communicative Research, Division of Otorhinolaryngology, Department of Surgery, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, China. kevinyuen@surgery.cuhk.edu.hk
Kam
Anna C S
AC
Lau
Polly S H
PS
D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D004867:Equipment Design; D006310:Hearing Aids; D006319:Hearing Loss, Sensorineural / Q000534:rehabilitation*; D006801:Humans; D008875:Middle Aged; D009622:Noise; D017711:Nonlinear Dynamics; D012044:Regression Analysis