Hypermnesia and total retrieval time.
Recall performance sometimes improves over repeated recall attempts, a phenomenon dubbed hypermnesia. A critical theoretical issue is whether hypermnesia is due to repeated testing per se or increased retrieval time. The present experiments investigated by contrasting five testing conditions. All participants were presented with the same study list followed by either two shorter recall tests or a single longer test. In the multiple test conditions, the tests were either separated by a (filled) 7-minute interval (the multiple-split condition), or presented consecutively, with no break (the multiple-immediate condition). In the single test conditions, the test either began at the start of the recall session, after a (filled) 7-minute delay, or with a 7-minute interruption inserted in the middle. The multiple-split condition produced more reminiscence and hypermnesia than the multiple-immediate condition. More importantly, the multiple-split condition produced greater cumulative recall than any of the other conditions (which did not differ among themselves). That is, single and repeated recall tests of equal total duration are not functionally equivalent.
Mulligan
Neil W
NW
Department of Psychology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3270, USA. nmulligan@unc.edu
D000647:Amnesia / Q000523:psychology*; D003463:Cues; D006801:Humans; D011939:Mental Recall; D008960:Models, Psychological; D009275:Names; D011581:Psychological Tests; D011897:Random Allocation; D013067:Speech Perception; D013997:Time Factors; D014796:Visual Perception