title: Can false memories spontaneously recover?
abstract: Can false memories that were suppressed at one time spontaneously recover at a later time? Fuzzy trace theory and activation-monitoring theory predict that false memories in the Deese, Roediger, and McDermott (DRM) procedure become substantially reduced as list learning progresses because participants employ a memory-editing process. It follows that if the editing process is rendered less effective, false memories should spontaneously recover. We found that after DRM lists were well learned and false recognition to critical words was substantially reduced by multiple study-test trials, those false memories spontaneously recovered when participants were either rushed or delayed on a retest. We attributed the reduction in false recognition over trials to a memory-editing process that suppresses false recognition as participants gradually learn which words were in the lists and which words, though similar, were not. Rushing or delaying the participants on a retest made it more difficult for them to edit their memory, and false memories spontaneously returned.
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, Wesleyan University, Middletown, CT 06549-0408, USA. jseamon@wesleyan.edu
authors.forename: John G
authors.initials: JG
authors.lastname: Seamon
authors.forename: Jeffrey R
authors.initials: JR
authors.lastname: Berko
authors.forename: Brooke
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: Sahlin
authors.forename: Yi-Lo
authors.initials: YL
authors.lastname: Yu
authors.forename: Jennifer M
authors.initials: JM
authors.lastname: Colker
authors.forename: David H
authors.initials: DH
authors.lastname: Gottfried
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D003463:Cues; D006801:Humans; D007858:Learning; D008568:Memory; D011939:Mental Recall; D008960:Models, Psychological; D011581:Psychological Tests; D021641:Recognition, Psychology; D012153:Retention, Psychology; D013997:Time Factors