Evaluating interprofessional education: the tautological need for interdisciplinary approaches.
This paper explores some issues associated with evaluating interprofessional education (IPE) programs. It proposes options that harness the synergy made possible through interdisciplinary and multi-method approaches. Both qualitative and quantitative research approaches are suggested. It is argued that traditional, control group experimental designs may not be adequate, appropriate or reasonable as the sole means of evaluating interprofessional education. The example of the four-year Rural IPE (RIPE) project, from southeastern Australia, is provided to suggest ways to identify indicators and implement features of successful IPE programs. It offers an interdisciplinary approach to measuring the effectiveness of IP programs. A particular focus is the use of self-assessment to both monitor and promote structured reflective learning and practice. Sample triangulatory data are presented from a range of evaluation methods collected from the RIPE project. The results suggest evidence of some significant educational gains as a result of this intervention. The data, the methods and the analyses may be useful for others interested in implementing or strengthening interprofessional education. The paper suggests a judicious, customized and balanced blend of methods and methodologies may offer more useful ways forward than relying on single method controlled studies which are, in any case, rarely feasible.
Stone
Nick
N
Rural Interprofessional Education Project, School of Rural Health University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia. n.stone@unimelb.edu.au
D004501:Education, Medical; D006801:Humans; D007400:Interprofessional Relations; D013337:Students, Medical / Q000523:psychology; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires; D014739:Victoria