Sequential tapping interferes selectively with multiple-object tracking: do finger-tapping and tracking share a common resource?
Multiple-object tracking involves simultaneously monitoring positions of a number of target items as they move among distractors. Young adults are capable of tracking only 3-5 items at once. In this study we investigated the origin of this limitation by looking for secondary tasks that interfere with tracking. We compared tracking performance (baseline condition), with performance when participants tapped three fingers in a specific order while tracking (sequential tapping) or articulated three syllables in a specific order while tracking (sequential articulation). The articulation task was used to ensure that the interference produced by sequential tapping was more than would be expected by the executive demands of carrying out any two "attention-demanding" tasks at once. Even though sequential tapping does not require vision or memorizing the positions of external items, it produced significantly more interference than did sequential articulation, as might be expected if tracking and sequential tapping shared a common (limited) resource.
Trick
Lana M
LM
Department of Psychology, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada. ltrick@uoguelph.ca
Guindon
Jeannine
J
Vallis
Lori A
LA
D000328:Adult; D003071:Cognition / Q000502:physiology; D005260:Female; D005385:Fingers / Q000502:physiology*; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D009068:Movement / Q000502:physiology*; D013028:Space Perception; D014796:Visual Perception