title: Is there an ideal animal model for SARS?
abstract: The outbreak of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) in 2003 was controlled by public health measures at a time when specific interventions such as antiviral drugs, vaccines and immunotherapy were not available. Since then, several animal models have been developed for the study of SARS and, although no model replicates the human disease in all aspects, the use of animal models for SARS has led to the establishment of several important principles for vaccine and immunotherapy. Consistency and reproducibility of findings in a given model must be demonstrated to establish the superiority of one model over others. Here, we suggest aspects of an ideal animal model for studies of SARS pathogenesis and vaccine development and present our assessment of the strengths and limitations of the current animal models for SARS.
authors.affiliation: Laboratory of Infectious Diseases, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, 50 South Drive, MSC 8007, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA. ksubbarao@niaid.nih.gov
authors.forename: Kanta
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Subbarao
authors.forename: Anjeanette
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Roberts
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D002520:Cercopithecidae; D006224:Cricetinae; D004195:Disease Models, Animal; D005289:Ferrets; D006801:Humans; D051379:Mice; D051078:Platyrrhini; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D045473:Severe acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus / Q000302:isolation & purification; D045169:Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome / Q000517:prevention & control*