Perceiving the moral dimension of practice: insights from Murdoch, Vetlesen, and Aristotle.
This paper situates the moral domain of practice within the context of a particular description of nursing practice - one that sees human interaction at the heart of that practice. Such a description fits not only with professional rhetoric but also with literature from patients and recent empirical work exploring the nature of nursing practice. Martha Levine in her 1977 description of ethics, within the context of nursing practice, indicated that what was important from an ethical perspective was how we interact with each other, with patients and colleagues, on a daily basis. What enables such interaction to display moral sensitivity, insight into patient need, and a focus on the good for the patient? Of relevance when answering this question is the empirical evidence indicating that professional socialization, as a nurse or a doctor, may dull the individual's moral sense. If this is the case, cognizance needs to be taken of such evidence when identifying theoretical approaches from mainstream ethics that may provide insight and value for nurse education. It is suggested that such insight and value can be gained from a consideration of the work of Aristotle, Murdoch, and Vetlesen.
Scott
P Anne
PA
School of Nursing, Dublin City University, Dublin, Ireland. anne.scott@dcu.ie
D004645:Empathy; D028663:Ethical Theory / Q000266:history; D004993:Ethics, Nursing / Q000266:history*; D049673:History, 20th Century; D049674:History, 21st Century; D049690:History, Ancient; D006808:Humanism / Q000266:history; D006801:Humans; D007400:Interprofessional Relations / Q000941:ethics*; D035863:Moral Development; D009014:Morals; D009742:Nursing Theory; D010344:Patient Advocacy / Q000941:ethics / Q000266:history; D010687:Philosophy, Nursing / Q000266:history*; D012951:Socialization