Clinical and basic science teachers' opinions about the required depth of biomedical knowledge for medical students.
The aim of the present study was to investigate whether basic scientists and physicians agree on the required depth of biomedical knowledge of medical students at graduation. A selection of basic science and clinical teachers rated the relevance of biomedical topics for students at graduation, illustrated by 80 example items. The items were derived from ten organ systems and designed at four levels: clinical, organ, cellular and molecular. Respondents were asked to identify for each item to what extent recently graduated medical students should have knowledge about it. In addition, they were asked to indicate whether the content of the item should be included in the medical curriculum. Analysis showed that basic scientists and physicians do not diverge at the clinical level. At the organ, cellular and molecular levels however, basic scientists judge that medical students should have more active knowledge. As expected, basic scientists also indicate that more deep level content should be included. Explanations for this phenomenon will be discussed.
Koens
Franciska
F
UMC Utrecht, The Netherlands. f.koens@vumc.nl
Custers
Eugène J F M
EJ
ten Cate
Olle T J
OT
D000704:Analysis of Variance; D002982:Clinical Clerkship / Q000458:organization & administration / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D003479:Curriculum / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D004504:Education, Medical, Undergraduate / Q000458:organization & administration* / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D006801:Humans; D009426:Netherlands; D011159:Population Surveillance; D012586:Science / Q000193:education; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires; D013663:Teaching / Q000379:methods* / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*