title: Contingency and stimulus change in chained schedules of reinforcement.
abstract: Higher rates of pecking were maintained by pigeons in the middle component of three-component chained fixed-interval schedules than in that component of corresponding multiple schedules (two extinction components followed by a fixed-interval component). This rate difference did not occur in equivalent tandem and mixed schedules, in which a single stimulus was correlated with the three components. The higher rates in components of chained schedules demonstrate a reinforcing effect of the stimulus correlated with the next component; the acquired functions of this stimulus make the vocabulary of conditioned reinforcement appropriate. Problems in defining conditioned reinforcement arise not from difficulties in demonstrating reinforcing effects but from disagreements about which experimental operations allow such reinforcing effects to be called conditioned.
authors.forename: A C
authors.initials: AC
authors.lastname: Catania
authors.forename: R
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Yohalem
authors.forename: P J
authors.initials: PJ
authors.lastname: Silverman