title: Mentor evaluation of a year-long mentorship program: a quality improvement initiative.
abstract: This paper presents 23 mentors' perceptions of their role in a year-long mentorship program during the period 1999- 2002. The majority of mentors were clinical specialists, had bachelor degrees and over five years clinical experience. The mentorship program was informed by the Deming Cycle of Plan, Do, Check and Act. This quality improvement framework was used to evaluate the mentorship program from the mentors' perspective. Information was gathered through surveys and focus group discussions. Responses were analysed to identify three themes of 'Enhancing student learning outcomes', 'Time and resources' and 'Personal and professional growth'. Mentors perceived their role as valuable in students' education and development. Despite concerns regarding adequate time and resources for an effective mentoring program, mentors acknowledged benefits to themselves in terms of personal and professional growth. Their vision and commitment to nursing was also evident in the perceived benefits of the program for the profession.
authors.affiliation: Research Centre for Clinical Practice Innovation, Griffth University, Brisbane, Australia.
authors.forename: Mary Ann
authors.initials: MA
authors.lastname: van Eps
authors.forename: Marie
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Cooke
authors.forename: Debra K
authors.initials: DK
authors.lastname: Creedy
authors.forename: Rachel
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Walker
mesh_terms: D001315:Australia; D004508:Education, Nursing, Baccalaureate / Q000379:methods*; D005181:Faculty, Nursing; D005260:Female; D017144:Focus Groups; D006801:Humans; D007397:Internship, Nonmedical / Q000379:methods*; D007588:Job Satisfaction; D008297:Male; D008611:Mentors; D024802:Nurse's Role; D015403:Nursing Evaluation Research / Q000379:methods; D011786:Quality Control; D012938:Social Perception