Boehler's angle and the critical angle of Gissane are of limited use in diagnosing calcaneus fractures in the ED.
OBJECTIVE
The aim of this study was to determine the use of Boehler's angle (BA) and the critical angle of Gissane (CAG) in diagnosing calcaneus fractures in the ED.


METHODS
The study was conducted as a randomized, blinded, case-control trial.


METHODS
One hundred thirty-three patients older than 15 years were included in the study. Sixty-five patients with computed tomography-verified calcaneus fractures (gold standard) and 68 ED patients with lateral foot or ankle x-rays without calcaneus fractures were included in the study.


METHODS
One second-year emergency medicine resident, 1 third-year emergency medicine resident, 2 board-certified emergency medicine attending physicians, and 1 board-certified radiologist prospectively reviewed all films using the Picture Archival and Communication System digital radiology system. Cases and controls were randomized and the participants were blinded to final radiographic diagnoses. Participants determined whether there was a fracture on each x-ray and measured BA and the CAG using the digital angle tool in the Picture Archival and Communication System.


RESULTS
Emergency physicians were 97.9% accurate in diagnosing calcaneus fractures (range, 97% to 99%). The mean kappa value for emergency physicians was 0.96 (range, 0.94-0.985). Receiver operating characteristic curves were constructed for BA and the CAG. When compared with the gold standard, the area under the curve for BA ranged from 0.82 to 0.88. The area under the curve for the CAG ranged from 0.45 to 0.67. BA had an interclass correlation coefficient of 0.84 (95% confidence interval, 0.79-0.87). The CAG interclass correlation was 0.52 (95% confidence interval, 0.43-0.60). One fracture was missed by the radiologist and all of the emergency physicians because it was only visible on computed tomography.


CONCLUSIONS
BA is somewhat helpful and the CAG is not useful in diagnosing calcaneus fractures in the ED. Interrater reliability for BA is excellent, but for the CAG, it is poor. Emergency physicians were 97.9% accurate in making the diagnosis by reviewing the plain films without "assistance" of the angle measurements.
Knight
Jason R
JR
Department of Emergency Medicine, Maricopa Medical Center, Phoenix, AZ 85008, USA. jasonknight@cox.net
Gross
Eric A
EA
Bradley
Gail H
GH
Bay
Curt
C
LoVecchio
Frank
F
D019540:Area Under Curve; D002111:Calcaneus / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging / Q000293:injuries* / Q000473:pathology*; D016022:Case-Control Studies; D002983:Clinical Competence; D004635:Emergency Medicine; D004636:Emergency Service, Hospital; D050723:Fractures, Bone / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging* / Q000473:pathology; D006801:Humans; D007396:Internship and Residency; D015588:Observer Variation; D012372:ROC Curve; D011871:Radiology; D012680:Sensitivity and Specificity; D016037:Single-Blind Method; D013337:Students, Medical; D014057:Tomography, X-Ray Computed