Can I look at my list? An evaluation of a 'prompt sheet' within an oncology outpatient clinic.
OBJECTIVE
We introduced a patient 'prompt sheet' into our clinic between January 2004 and January 2005. The aim was to determine whether it would facilitate communication and help patients in obtaining their desired level of information about their illness, and assist with decision making. We conducted an audit survey to investigate the way follow-up takes place in our oncology clinic, to determine what works and what does not work in the clinic, and to examine how patients access the most useful information and to assess the utility of, and patient satisfaction with, a locally developed pilot prompt sheet.


METHODS
A single questionnaire was designed to elicit information on patients' information needs, overall satisfaction with the oncology clinic, and uptake and perceived usefulness of the prompt sheet. We carried out an audit survey in the form of a Likert-scale questionnaire (33 questions), followed immediately afterwards by a semi-structured interview. A specialist nurse asked a range of open questions about what was good and bad about the clinic and the prompt sheets.


RESULTS
Despite efforts to ensure that all patients received the prompt-sheet leaflets, only 254 out of 300 (85%) received them. Of these, 195 (65%) felt that they were 'very helpful', and 30 (10%) found them 'fairly helpful'. However, 15 (5%) had no strong feelings and only three found them either fairly or completely unhelpful. One-third of the patients were able to ask more questions about their disease as a result of the prompt sheet, although they felt the doctor was busy and did not want to take up too much of their time. Men with prostate cancer found the prompt sheet particularly helpful to ask questions.


CONCLUSIONS
This satisfaction audit suggests that our pilot prompt sheet is helpful to patients attending oncology outpatient appointments, particularly for men with prostate cancer. We aim to adapt the present prompt sheet on the basis of the replies obtained, and re-audit in the future.
Glynne-Jones
R
R
Barnet and Chase Farm NHS Trust, London, UK. rob.glynnejones@nhs.net
Ostler
P
P
Lumley-Graybow
S
S
Chait
I
I
Hughes
R
R
Grainger
J
J
Leverton
T J
TJ
D000223:Adaptation, Psychological; D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D000554:Ambulatory Care Facilities / Q000458:organization & administration*; D003142:Communication; D003657:Decision Making; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008495:Medical Oncology / Q000458:organization & administration*; D008875:Middle Aged; D009369:Neoplasms / Q000523:psychology / Q000628:therapy*; D010353:Patient Education as Topic / Q000379:methods*; D010358:Patient Participation / Q000379:methods*; D017060:Patient Satisfaction; D010817:Physician-Patient Relations; D010865:Pilot Projects; D011379:Prognosis; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires