title: 3D imaging of the whole spine at 3T compared to 1.5T: initial experiences.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  To describe our first experiences with a recently introduced 3T system for T2-weighted isotropic 3D whole-spine imaging.
  
  
  METHODS
  Magnetic resonance imaging of the whole spine was performed by implementing an isotropic 3D fast spin-echo sequence with variable flip-angle refocusing pulses at 3T and 1.5T. Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) was compared on both systems in eight subjects.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Mean values for SNR were significantly higher at 3T (346+214) for 1.0 mm voxel size compared to 1.5T (202 +/- 41), but showed considerably higher variability at 3T. At 3T, measurements with 0.9 mm voxel size were possible with similar SNR as with 1.0 mm voxel size at 1.5T.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  High-resolution 3D imaging of the whole spine is feasible at 3T with an increased SNR compared to 1.5T. Signal gain at 3T can be used to further increase spatial resolution. Pronounced interpatient variability of SNR at 3T may be a result of inhomogeneous RF deposition due to dielectric effects.
authors.affiliation: Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Tübingen, Germany. Enno.Rodegerdts@uni-tuebingen.de
authors.forename: E A
authors.initials: EA
authors.lastname: Rodegerdts
authors.forename: A
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Boss
authors.forename: K
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Riemarzik
authors.forename: M
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Lichy
authors.forename: F
authors.initials: F
authors.lastname: Schick
authors.forename: C D
authors.initials: CD
authors.lastname: Claussen
authors.forename: H P
authors.initials: HP
authors.lastname: Schlemmer
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D006801:Humans; D021621:Imaging, Three-Dimensional; D008279:Magnetic Resonance Imaging / Q000379:methods*; D013124:Spinal Injuries / Q000175:diagnosis; D013131:Spine / Q000033:anatomy & histology*