title: Comparison of observational recordings in vivo, via mirror, and via television.
abstract: Simultaneous observational recordings were made in vivo, via an observation mirror, and via closed circuit television. Three of nine observers had extensive experience recording behavior in vivo; three had extensive experience recording behavior via mirror; and three had extensive experience recording via television. Observers recorded nine categories of disruptive behavior for children in a special class setting. Frequencies of behavior recorded in vivo, via mirror, and via television differed significantly for only one category, vocalization. There were no significant main effects or interactions involving the observers' previous experience. Occurrence reliability coefficients computed within and between media demonstrated the similarity of observer agreement in all three media. Data collection procedures using an observational mirror or closed circuit television appear to be reasonable alternatives to in vivo observation in circumstances similar to those in the present study.
authors.affiliation: State University of New York at Stony Brook.
authors.forename: R N
authors.initials: RN
authors.lastname: Kent
authors.forename: K D
authors.initials: KD
authors.lastname: O'leary
authors.forename: A
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Dietz
authors.forename: C
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Diament