title: Emotions and attributions of legal responsibility and blame: a research review.
abstract: Research on the effects of emotions and moods on judgments of legal responsibility and blame is reviewed. Emotions and moods may influence decision makers in 3 ways: by affecting their information processing strategies, by inclining their judgments in the direction of the valence of the emotion or mood, and/or by providing informational cues to the proper decision. A model is proposed that incorporates these effects and further distinguishes among various affective influences in terms of whether the affect is provoked by a source integral or incidental to the judgment task, and whether it affects judgment directly (e.g., by providing an informational cue to judgment) or indirectly (e.g., by affecting construal of judgment target features, which in turn affects the judgment). Legal decision makers' abilities to correct for any affective influences they perceive to be undesirable and normative implications for legal theory and practice are briefly discussed.
authors.affiliation: Quinnipiac University, Hamden, Connecticut, USA. feigenson@quinnipiac.edu
authors.forename: Neal
authors.initials: N
authors.lastname: Feigenson
authors.forename: Jaihyun
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Park
mesh_terms: D000339:Affect; D003657:Decision Making; D004644:Emotions; D006801:Humans; D007600:Judgment; D016365:Liability, Legal; D008606:Mental Processes; D008960:Models, Psychological; D009014:Morals; D012938:Social Perception