title: The soft constraints hypothesis: a rational analysis approach to resource allocation for interactive behavior.
abstract: Soft constraints hypothesis (SCH) is a rational analysis approach that holds that the mixture of perceptual-motor and cognitive resources allocated for interactive behavior is adjusted based on temporal cost-benefit tradeoffs. Alternative approaches maintain that cognitive resources are in some sense protected or conserved in that greater amounts of perceptual-motor effort will be expended to conserve lesser amounts of cognitive effort. One alternative, the minimum memory hypothesis (MMH), holds that people favor strategies that minimize the use of memory. SCH is compared with MMH across 3 experiments and with predictions of an Ideal Performer Model that uses ACT-R's memory system in a reinforcement learning approach that maximizes expected utility by minimizing time. Model and data support the SCH view of resource allocation; at the under 1000-ms level of analysis, mixtures of cognitive and perceptual-motor resources are adjusted based on their cost-benefit tradeoffs for interactive behavior.
authors.affiliation: Cognitive Science Department, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Carnegie Building, 110 8th Street, Troy, NY 12180, USA. grayw@rpi.edu
authors.forename: Wayne D
authors.initials: WD
authors.lastname: Gray
authors.forename: Chris R
authors.initials: CR
authors.lastname: Sims
authors.forename: Wai-Tat
authors.initials: WT
authors.lastname: Fu
authors.forename: Michael J
authors.initials: MJ
authors.lastname: Schoelles
mesh_terms: D003071:Cognition; D006801:Humans; D007398:Interpersonal Relations; D008960:Models, Psychological; D011582:Psychological Theory; D012054:Reinforcement, Psychology; D012919:Social Behavior