Penal managerialism from within: implications for theory and research.
Unlike the bulk of penological scholarship dealing with managerialist reforms, this article calls for greater theoretical and research attention to the often pernicious impact of managerialism on criminal justice professionals. Much in an ideal-typical fashion, light is shed on: the reasons why contemporary penal bureaucracies endeavor systematically to strip criminal justice work of its inherently affective nature; the structural forces that ensure control over officials; the processes by which those forces come into effect; and the human consequences of submission to totalitarian bureaucratic milieus. It is suggested that the heavy preoccupation of present-day penality with the predictability and calculability of outcomes entails the atomization of professionals and the dehumanization of their work. This is achieved through a kaleidoscope of direct and indirect mechanisms that naturalize and/or legitimate acquiescence.
Cheliotis
Leonidas K
LK
Universities of Cambridge and Kent, United Kingdom. LC324@cam.ac.uk
D003416:Criminal Law / Q000458:organization & administration*; D032981:Dehumanization; D006608:Hierarchy, Social; D006801:Humans; D017063:Outcome Assessment, Health Care; D010934:Planning Techniques; D011057:Politics; D011330:Prisons / Q000458:organization & administration*; D012106:Research; D006113:United Kingdom