title: Emotion and the law: a framework for inquiry.
abstract: This paper draws on research in social and cognitive psychology to show how theories of judgment and decision making that incorporate decision makers' affective responses apply to legal contexts. It takes 2 widely used models of decision making, the rational actor and lens models, and illustrates their utility for understanding legal judgments by using them to interpret research findings on juror decision making, people's obedience to the law (e.g., paying taxes), and eyewitness memory. The paper concludes with a discussion of the advantages of modifying existing approaches to information processing to include the influence of affect on how legal actors reach judgments about law and legal process.
authors.affiliation: University of Nebraska, Lincoln, Nebraska 68188, USA. rwiener2@unl.edu
authors.forename: Richard L
authors.initials: RL
authors.lastname: Wiener
authors.forename: Brian H
authors.initials: BH
authors.lastname: Bornstein
authors.forename: Amy
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Voss
mesh_terms: D003415:Crime / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence / Q000523:psychology*; D003657:Decision Making; D004644:Emotions; D006801:Humans; D007603:Jurisprudence; D008568:Memory; D008960:Models, Psychological; D012938:Social Perception; D014342:Truth Disclosure