title: Antibiotic cements in articular prostheses: current orthopaedic concepts.
abstract: The possibilities and limits of antibiotic cements (ACs) have been assessed by many researchers. ACs are now approved by many drug agencies, including the US Food and Drug Administration (approval in 2003), with widespread use in prophylaxis and curative treatments. Laboratory experiments have achieved satisfactory antibiotic delivery without impairing the mechanical properties of ACs. Implantation in large animals (e.g. sheep) showed an antibiotic concentration in the bone cortex four times the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) 6 months after implantation. Human pharmacokinetics during total hip replacement (THR) show antibiotic concentrations 20 times the MIC in drainage fluids. No toxic concentrations have been detected in blood or urine, and no allergies, toxic effects, mechanical failures or selection of resistant microorganisms have been observed. Antibioprophylaxis has been assessed in prospective studies in over 1600 cases. In data from the Scandinavian arthroplasty registers, with an exhaustive follow-up of more than 240000 THRs, infection rate was reduced by ca. 50% (0.9% compared with 1.9%). In prostheses with severe infection, use of AC increases the infection control rate from 86% to 93% when using two-stage prosthetic exchanges. In moderate infection, a similar infection control rate (86%) was achieved either by two-stage exchange without local antibiotic or by one-stage exchange with AC; however, one-stage exchange achieved better functional results at lower cost and with reduced pain and hospital stay. Therefore, AC prophylaxis is widely used in countries with prostheses registers (Northern Europe), and use of ACs as treatment for infected prostheses is often considered as the gold standard in the EU and North America. However, AC is only an adjuvant treatment, and excision of infected and devascularized tissues as well as systemic antibiotic treatment managed by a multidisciplinary team remain the main factors of infection control.
authors.affiliation: Federation of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Hospital Sud, 35203 Rennes, France; Bone Biomaterials Laboratory, University of Rennes 1, Rennes, France. frantz.langlais@chu-rennes.fr
authors.forename: F
authors.initials: F
authors.lastname: Langlais
authors.forename: N
authors.initials: N
authors.lastname: Belot
authors.forename: M
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Ropars
authors.forename: H
authors.initials: H
authors.lastname: Thomazeau
authors.forename: J C
authors.initials: JC
authors.lastname: Lambotte
authors.forename: G
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Cathelineau
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D000900:Anti-Bacterial Agents / Q000494:pharmacology / Q000627:therapeutic use*; D019072:Antibiotic Prophylaxis; D019644:Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip / Q000009:adverse effects; D001843:Bone Cements / Q000494:pharmacology / Q000627:therapeutic use*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D017053:Infection Control; D016459:Prosthesis-Related Infections / Q000517:prevention & control*; D012756:Sheep; D014640:Vancomycin / Q000008:administration & dosage / Q000493:pharmacokinetics
chemical_list: D000900:Anti-Bacterial Agents; D001843:Bone Cements; D014640:Vancomycin