The social control of behavior control: behavior modification, Individual Rights, and research ethics in America, 1971-1979.
In 1971, the U.S. Senate Subcommittee on Constitutional Rights began a three-year study to investigate the federal funding of all research involving behavior modification. During this period, operant programs of behavior change, particularly those implemented in closed institutions, were subjected to specific scrutiny. In this article, I outline a number of scientific and social factors that led to this investigation and discuss the study itself. I show how behavioral scientists, both individually and through their professional organizations, responded to this public scrutiny by (1) self-consciously altering their terminology and techniques; (2) considering the need to more effectively police their professional turf; and (3) confronting issues of ethics and values in their work. Finally, I link this episode to the formation of the National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research, whose recommendations resulted in changes to the ethical regulation of federally funded human subjects research that persist to the present day.
Rutherford
Alexandra
A
York University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
D032763:Behavior Control / Q000266:history*; D001521:Behavior Therapy / Q000266:history*; D032984:Ethics, Research / Q000266:history*; D049673:History, 20th Century; D006806:Human Rights / Q000266:history*; D006801:Humans; D012926:Social Control, Formal; D014481:United States