title: Surgery of the peripheral nerves.
abstract: RESULTS
  In contrast to the CNS, peripheral nerves have the ability to regenerate. This ability has been utilized for a long time in the therapy of injuries of peripheral nerves. The aim of the present research was to assess the achievements in reconstructive surgery including nerve grafting and peripheral nerve suture repair in our clinic.
  
  
  METHODS
  During the 16-year period from 1986 to 2001 we surgically treated 116 patients with peripheral nerve lesions. The cases of lesions of the brachial plexus, partial peripheral nerve lesions and postoperative revision, as well as the attempts of reconstruction of cervical nerves and neurolysis are not included in this work. We analysed the results of surgery in our patients who where subjected to treatment of peripheral nerves in the arms (95 patients) and legs (21 patients). In 53 patients reconstructive surgery was performed by suture repair of peripheral nerve, which included treatment of 65 nerves, 10 patients were treated by suture repair of 2 nerves and repair of 3 nerves in one patient. In 42 patients we reconstructed 45 peripheral nerves of the hand by autograft. The total number of 42 patients compromised 37 males and five females. The average age was 36 years. Double nerve reconstruction (ulnar and median) was accomplished in three patients. In the remaining 21 patients (14 males and seven females) we performed 21 reconstruction operations of 24 injured nerves in the lower extremities, of which 8 operations of 9 nerves involved suture repair of peripheral nerves and 13 operations of 15 nerves were performed using a nerve graft. Their average age was 39.7 years. The average period between primary treatment and operation was 6.7 months. In five cases the interval exceeded 12 months. Operations were performed by microtechnique. All patients were subject to several postoperational tests aimed at the estimation of the degree of recovery in sensory and motor adaptation. The evaluation was performed according the Seddon classification (1975). Motor recovery was evaluated according to a five-point scale and the degree of sensory recovery according to a four-point scale. Recovery of grade M4 and S3 (or higher) was considered an excellent or very good result and grades M3 and S2 were considered a good result. Results corresponding to grades M0-M2 and S0-S1 were considered to be insufficient.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The results of reconstruction operations of peripheral nerves injuries were dependent on the patient's age, the period between the injury and operation, the length of the autograft, the location of the injury, the type of injured nerve and the character of the injury (Fig. 2, Tab. 7, Ref: 15).
authors.affiliation: Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, Comenius University, Bratislava, Slovakia. bll@fmed-uniba.sk
authors.forename: V
authors.initials: V
authors.lastname: Matejcik
authors.forename: G
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Penzesova
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D005121:Extremities / Q000294:innervation*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D019635:Neurosurgical Procedures; D059348:Peripheral Nerve Injuries; D010525:Peripheral Nerves / Q000601:surgery*; D020127:Recovery of Function