Feminist theory confronts US Supreme Court rhetoric: the case of abortion rights.
The research presented below analyses the rhetoric of abortion jurisprudence from the perspective of fundamental principles of feminist theory. While focused primarily on the American experience, it addresses and raises questions that are on the political agenda in a significant number of contemporary societies. The feminist principles identified, and against which judicial rhetoric is assessed, include: the importance of actual life experience over abstract principles, the significance of the distinction between the public and private realms and the understanding of society as a web of relationships. Demonstrated by the relevant data is that the decisions of the judiciary restrictive of reproductive choice are characterized by a distinctly non-feminist rhetoric.
Binion
G
G
Department of Political Science, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106, USA.
D000029:Abortion, Legal / Q000266:history / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D005260:Female; D019513:Feminism; D049673:History, 20th Century; D006801:Humans; D033242:Minors / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence; D010287:Parent-Child Relations; D033282:Parental Consent / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence; D035622:Parental Notification / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence; D010817:Physician-Patient Relations; D011247:Pregnancy; D037841:Pregnant People; D018907:Privacy; D011640:Public Policy; D035521:Supreme Court Decisions; D014481:United States