title: Is enteral nutrition optimally used in hospitalized patients? A study of the practice of nutrition in a Swedish hospital.
abstract: Thirty patients with parenteral nutrition were studied in order to evaluate if they could be given enteral nutrition instead. Based upon absolute and relative contraindications for enteral nutrition, we calculated that 80% of the patients were possible candidates for enteral nutrition. Long-term use of parenteral nutrition may cause complications. Besides metabolic and other advantages when enteral nutrition is used, economical gains are also important. We have calculated an estimated annual net profit of US$ 357,000 in our hospital, if enteral instead of parenteral feeding is used in patients suitable for the former type of feeding. This implies that it is really cost-beneficial to consider enteral nutrition in hospitalized patients. Although parenteral nutrition will continue to have its place in the management of different occasions, increased use of enteral nutrition may result in improved patient outcomes and improved cost-effectiveness.
authors.affiliation: Department of Surgery, Karolinska Institutet at Danderyd Hospital, S-182 88 Danderyd, Sweden.
authors.forename: C
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Johansson
authors.forename: L
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Backman
authors.forename: J
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Jakobsson