title: Immediate versus water-storage performance of Class V flowable composite restoratives.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  The aims of this investigation were to clarify the effects of 24h water-storage and finishing time on mechanical properties and marginal adaptation to a Class V cavity of eight modern flowable resin-composites.
  
  
  METHODS
  Eight flowable composites, plus two controls (one microfilled and one hybrid composite), were investigated with specimen sub-groups (n = 10) for each property measured. The principal series of experiments was conducted in model Class V cavities with interfacial polishing either immediately (3 min) after setting or after 24 h water-storage. After the finishing procedure, each tooth was sectioned in a buccolingual direction through the center of the restoration, and the presence or absence of marginal-gaps was measured (and then summed for each cavity) at 14 points (each 0.5 mm apart) along the cavity restoration interface (n = 10 per group; total points measured = 140). The shear bond-strengths to enamel and to dentin, and flexural strengths and moduli data were also measured at 3 min and after 24 h water-storage.
  
  
  RESULTS
  For all flowable composites, polished immediately after setting, 14-30 summed gaps were observed (controls: 64 and 42). For specimens polished after 24 h, a significantly (p < 0.05) reduced number of 8-17 summed gaps occurred for only 3 flowable composites; whereas for 5 flowable composites there were non-significantly-different (p > 0.05) numbers (11-17) of summed gaps (controls: 28 and 22). After 24h storage, shear bond-strengths to enamel and to dentin, flexural strengths and moduli increased highly significantly (p < 0.001) for all materials, except Silux Plus.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  A post-cure interval of 24 h resulted in enhanced mechanical and adhesive properties of flowable dental composites. In a minority of cases there was also a reduced incidence of marginal-gap formation. However the latter effect may be partly attributed to 24 h delayed polishing, even though such a delay is not usual clinical practice.
authors.affiliation: Department of Biomaterials, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama 700-8525, Japan. mirie@md.okayama-u.ac.jp
authors.forename: Masao
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Irie
authors.forename: Kenji
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Hatanaka
authors.forename: Kazuomi
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Suzuki
authors.forename: David C
authors.initials: DC
authors.lastname: Watts
mesh_terms: D001641:Bicuspid; D003188:Composite Resins; D001840:Dental Bonding; D003737:Dental Cavity Preparation; D018772:Dental Marginal Adaptation; D003775:Dental Polishing; D019232:Dental Restoration Failure; D003793:Dental Restoration, Permanent; D003799:Dental Stress Analysis; D004356:Drug Storage; D004548:Elasticity; D006801:Humans; D044367:Phase Transition; D018583:Pliability; D019279:Resin Cements; D033081:Shear Strength; D013997:Time Factors; D019237:Tooth Cervix; D014783:Viscosity; D014867:Water
chemical_list: D003188:Composite Resins; D019279:Resin Cements; C111840:flowable hybrid composite; D014867:Water