title: Analysis of renal function in the immediate postoperative period after partial liver transplantation.
abstract: Although renal dysfunction is common after liver transplantation, postoperative renal function after split liver transplantation (SLT) has not been well studied. Renal function immediately after surgery was analyzed retrospectively in 16 patients that received a SLT (SLT group). The results were compared with corresponding data from 31 matched patients that received a full-size liver transplant (FSLT group) during the same period. Serum creatinine (SCr) was measured before surgery, and, after transplantation, daily during the first week and at days 14, 21, and 28. Renal dysfunction (RD) was defined as the requirement for renal replacement therapy (RRT) or a 100% increase in SCr if the basal value had been <1.0 mg/dL or a 50% increase in SCr if the basal value had been >1.0 mg/dL. SCr had to be at least 1.5 mg/dL for a diagnosis of RD to be considered. The classification of RD was: mild, SCr 1.5-2.4 mg/dL; moderate, SCr 2.5-4.0 mg/dL; or severe, SCr >4.0 mg/dL (the requirement for RRT). Both donor and recipient age and cold ischemia time were lower in the SLT group than in the FSLT group (P < 0.05). Length of surgery was longer in the SLT group (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences between groups with respect to Model for End-Stage Liver Disease scores, the need for transfusions, the length of admission to the intensive care unit (ICU), survival rate, individual severity index, or sepsis-related organ failure assessment scores at the time of diagnosing RD. Immunosuppression regimens were similar in both groups. RD developed in 82% of SLT patients, but in only 58% of FSLT patients (P = not significant [NS]). Among SLT patients, RD (23.0% mild, 15.5% moderate, and 61.5% severe) was more severe (P = 0.007) than in FSLT patients (63.1% mild, 15.8% moderate, and 24.1% severe). The requirement for RRT in the SLT group (43.7%) was significantly greater (P < 0.05) than that in the FSLT group (12.9%). This finding may be due to the different incidence of sepsis in the 2 groups (SLT 37.5% vs. FSLT 9.7%; P < 0.05). In conclusion, although the number of patients studied was small, our data suggest a higher incidence of RD and a greater requirement for RRT in patients that receive a split liver graft than in those that receive a full size liver graft.
authors.affiliation: Hospital Ramón y Cajal, Anaesthesia, Madrid, Spain. luisgump@hotmail.com
authors.forename: Luis
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Gajate
authors.forename: Ascensión
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Martín
authors.forename: Elena
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Elías
authors.forename: Maria T
authors.initials: MT
authors.lastname: Tenorio
authors.forename: Angélica
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: de Pablo
authors.forename: Cristina
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Carrasco
authors.forename: Adolfo
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Martínez
authors.forename: Angel
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Candela
authors.forename: Javier
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Zamora
authors.forename: Fernando
authors.initials: F
authors.lastname: Liaño
mesh_terms: D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007668:Kidney / Q000502:physiology*; D016031:Liver Transplantation; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D016896:Treatment Outcome