title: Adaptive flexibility and maladaptive routines in selecting fast and frugal decision strategies.
abstract: Decision routines unburden the cognitive capacity of the decision maker. In changing environments, however, routines may become maladaptive. In 2 experiments with a hypothetical stock market game (n = 241), the authors tested whether decision routines tend to persist at the level of decision strategies rather than at the level of options in strategy selection. The payoff structure of the task was changed after 80 decision trials, rendering a new strategy optimal with respect to expected payoff. Whereas most participants detected the appropriate strategy at the beginning of the task, they tended to retain it even when it was no longer optimal. A hint about a possible change had only a small influence on this maladaptive routine; a monetary incentive had none. Switching to a similar but not identical task relaxed the routine, but not much.
authors.affiliation: Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods, Bonn, Germany. broeder@coll.mpg.de
authors.forename: Arndt
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Bröder
authors.forename: Stefanie
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Schiffer
mesh_terms: D000223:Adaptation, Psychological; D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D001290:Attitude; D001332:Automatism / Q000523:psychology*; D003210:Concept Formation; D003463:Cues; D003657:Decision Making; D005246:Feedback; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D009042:Motivation; D010364:Pattern Recognition, Visual; D011340:Problem Solving; D012931:Social Environment; D013239:Stereotyped Behavior