title: [Effects of different catheter ablation strategies in treatment of typical atrial flutter complicated with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation].
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  To evaluate the clinical effects of different catheter ablation strategies in the treatment of typical atrial flutter complicated with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF). [CTIA, pulmonary vein segmental isolation (PVSI), CTIA + PVI] to the patients coexisted with typical atrial flutter and PAF.
  
  
  METHODS
  66 patients with typical atrial flutter complicated with PAF were divided into 3 groups: Group A (n = 30), undergoing cavotricuspid isthmus ablation, (CTIA), Group B (n = 17), undergoing pulmonary vein segmental isolation, (PVSI), and Group C (n = 19), undergoing CTIA + PVSI. Follow-up was conducted for 30.5 weeks +/- 10.4 weeks. The clinical curative effects, operation safety, and complication were evaluated.
  
  
  RESULTS
  The recurrence rate of typical atrial flutter within 12 weeks after operation of Groups A and C were 13.3% and 10.5% respectively, both significantly lower than that of Group B (52.9%, both P < 0.05) without no significant difference between Group A and Group C (P > 0.05). The recurrence rate of typical atrial flutter within 36 weeks after operation of the Groups A, B, and C were 10%, 11.8%, and 10.5% respectively, without significant differences among these 3 groups (all P > 0.05). The recurrence rates of PAF within 12 weeks and 30 weeks after operation of Groups B and C were 29.4% and 31.6%, and 23.5% and 26.3% respectively, all significantly lower than those of Group A (46.7% and 73.3% respectively, all P < 0.05) without significant o differences between Groups B and C.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  In patients with both typical atrial flutter and PAF, pure CTIA has a good effect on typical atrial flutter, whereas the PAF recurrence rate is higher; Pure PVSI has a good control of typical atrial flutter while curing PAF; PVSI + CTIA only reduces the early recurrence of typical atrial flutter, however, has no advantage in long-term follow up.
authors.affiliation: Department of Cardiology, No.1 Hospital, China Medical University, Shenyang 110001, China.
authors.forename: Bo
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: Yu
authors.forename: Yang
authors.initials: Y
authors.lastname: Li
authors.forename: Wei-hua
authors.initials: WH
authors.lastname: Zhao
authors.forename: Xue-feng
authors.initials: XF
authors.lastname: Pang
authors.forename: Wen
authors.initials: W
authors.lastname: Tian
authors.forename: Jian
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Hu
authors.forename: Guo-xian
authors.initials: GX
authors.lastname: Qi
authors.forename: Min
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Li
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D001281:Atrial Fibrillation / Q000150:complications / Q000628:therapy*; D001282:Atrial Flutter / Q000150:complications / Q000628:therapy*; D017115:Catheter Ablation / Q000379:methods*; D000075202:Contraindications; D005260:Female; D005500:Follow-Up Studies; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D012008:Recurrence; D016896:Treatment Outcome