title: Ethnobotany and ethnopharmacology--interdisciplinary links with the historical sciences.
abstract: In this paper we use three disparate examples to highlight the relevance of historical methods in the context of ethnobotany and ethnopharmacology. Unfortunately, in ethnopharmacology we have only very few examples where such historical depth is possible. On the other hand the first hand data available through ethnopharmacological research, may be of relevance for interpreting historical information. Three distinct methods were used successfully in the retrospective exploration of diachronic data. In order to gain an insight into historical developments in the use of plant species and evolution of pharmacopoeias we used a botanico-historical approach (Rosmarinus officinalis), one that combines linguistic and statistical methods (Popoluca/Mixe), and one that uses historical documentary evidence (Ch'orti). We hope that this methodological discussion encourages a wider use of such historical methods in ethnopharmacology and related areas of research.
authors.affiliation: Centre for Pharmacognosy and Phytotherapy, The School of Pharmacy, University of London, 29-39 Brunswick Sq., London WC1N 1AX, United Kingdom. phyto@pharmacy.ac.uk
authors.forename: Michael
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Heinrich
authors.forename: Johanna
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Kufer
authors.forename: Marco
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Leonti
authors.forename: Manuel
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Pardo-de-Santayana
mesh_terms: D019448:Ethnobotany / Q000266:history*; D020834:Ethnopharmacology / Q000266:history*; D049668:History, 15th Century; D049690:History, Ancient; D049691:History, Medieval; D033183:Interdisciplinary Communication; D028321:Plant Preparations / Q000266:history / Q000627:therapeutic use; D027542:Rosmarinus / Q000737:chemistry
chemical_list: D028321:Plant Preparations