title: The use of urinary dipstick tests to exclude urinary tract infection: a systematic review of the literature.
abstract: Several systematic reviews have examined the use of dipstick tests to diagnose or rule in urinary tract infection (UTI). We examined the evidence relating to the use of urine leukocyte esterase and nitrite tests in adults to exclude or rule out UTI. A search of the literature from 1966 to 2003 revealed 30 studies as containing relevant and suitable information and 23 of these, which used a cut-off of 108 colony-forming units per liter, were combined in a meta-analysis. The leukocyte esterase or nitrite test combination, with one or the other test positive, was used in 14 studies, showed the highest sensitivity and the lowest negative likelihood ratio. While there was significant heterogeneity between the studies, 7 of 14 demonstrated significant decreases in pretest to posttest probability with a pooled posttest probability of 5% for the negative result. In certain circumstances, there is evidence for the use of urinalysis as a rule-out test for UTI.
authors.affiliation: ARC Consulting, Perth, Western Australia.
authors.forename: Andrew
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: St John
authors.forename: James C
authors.initials: JC
authors.lastname: Boyd
authors.forename: Andrew J
authors.initials: AJ
authors.lastname: Lowes
authors.forename: Christopher P
authors.initials: CP
authors.lastname: Price
mesh_terms: D002265:Carboxylic Ester Hydrolases / Q000652:urine*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D016017:Odds Ratio; D011336:Probability; D014552:Urinary Tract Infections / Q000175:diagnosis*; D014556:Urine / Q000382:microbiology*
chemical_list: C021443:leukocyte esterase; D002265:Carboxylic Ester Hydrolases