The Global Fund Secretariat's suspension of funding to Uganda: how could this have been avoided?
In August 2005, the Global Fund to fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria (the Global Fund) Secretariat suspended its five grants to Uganda following a PricewaterhouseCoopers audit report that exposed gross mismanagement in the Project Management Unit. How could this have been avoided? How can other countries avoid a similar pitfall? We argue that if a legitimate and fair decision-making process were used, the suspension of funding to Uganda could have been avoided, and that this lesson should be applied to other countries. The "accountability for reasonableness" framework of relevance, publicity, revisions and enforcement would help in implementing legitimate and fair decision-making processes, which would improve effectiveness, accountability and transparency in the implementation of Global Fund programmes, preventing future suspension of funding to any Global Fund projects.
Kapiriri
Lydia
L
Joint Centre for Bioethics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. lydia.kapiriri@utoronto.ca
Martin
Douglas K
DK
D003140:Communicable Disease Control / Q000191:economics*; D017598:Efficiency, Organizational; D005381:Financing, Organized / Q000458:organization & administration*; D006801:Humans; D016134:Organizational Policy; D014454:Uganda