title: Comparison and evaluation of methods for generating differentially expressed gene lists from microarray data.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Numerous feature selection methods have been applied to the identification of differentially expressed genes in microarray data. These include simple fold change, classical t-statistic and moderated t-statistics. Even though these methods return gene lists that are often dissimilar, few direct comparisons of these exist. We present an empirical study in which we compare some of the most commonly used feature selection methods. We apply these to 9 publicly available datasets, and compare, both the gene lists produced and how these perform in class prediction of test datasets.
  
  
  RESULTS
  In this study, we compared the efficiency of the feature selection methods; significance analysis of microarrays (SAM), analysis of variance (ANOVA), empirical bayes t-statistic, template matching, maxT, between group analysis (BGA), Area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, the Welch t-statistic, fold change, rank products, and sets of randomly selected genes. In each case these methods were applied to 9 different binary (two class) microarray datasets. Firstly we found little agreement in gene lists produced by the different methods. Only 8 to 21% of genes were in common across all 10 feature selection methods. Secondly, we evaluated the class prediction efficiency of each gene list in training and test cross-validation using four supervised classifiers.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  We report that the choice of feature selection method, the number of genes in the genelist, the number of cases (samples) and the noise in the dataset, substantially influence classification success. Recommendations are made for choice of feature selection. Area under a ROC curve performed well with datasets that had low levels of noise and large sample size. Rank products performs well when datasets had low numbers of samples or high levels of noise. The Empirical bayes t-statistic performed well across a range of sample sizes.
authors.affiliation: Bioinformatics, Conway Institute, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland. Ian.Jeffery@ucd.ie
authors.forename: Ian B
authors.initials: IB
authors.lastname: Jeffery
authors.forename: Desmond G
authors.initials: DG
authors.lastname: Higgins
authors.forename: Aedín C
authors.initials: AC
authors.lastname: Culhane
mesh_terms: D000465:Algorithms; D045744:Cell Line, Tumor; D019295:Computational Biology / Q000379:methods*; D003627:Data Interpretation, Statistical; D030541:Databases, Genetic; D020869:Gene Expression Profiling / Q000379:methods*; D015972:Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic; D006801:Humans; D015233:Models, Statistical; D020411:Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis; D010363:Pattern Recognition, Automated; D012372:ROC Curve; D018401:Sample Size