Comparative performance assessment of the conformational model generators omega and catalyst: a large-scale survey on the retrieval of protein-bound ligand conformations.
In continuation of our studies to evaluate the ability of various conformer generators to produce bioactive conformations, we present the extension of our work on the analysis of Catalyst's conformational subsampling algorithm in a comparative evaluation with OpenEye's currently updated tool Omega 2.0. Our study is based on an enhanced test set of 778 drug molecules and pharmacologically relevant compounds extracted from the Protein Data Bank (PDB). We elaborated protocols for two common conformer generation use cases and applied them to both programs: (i) high-throughput settings for processing large databases and (ii) high-quality settings for binding site exploration or lead structure refinement. While Catalyst is faster in the first case, Omega 2.0 better reproduces the bound ligand conformations from the PDB in less time for the latter case.
Kirchmair
Johannes
J
Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Institute of Pharmacy and Center for Molecular Biosciences (CMBI), University of Innsbruck, Innrain 52, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria.
Wolber
Gerhard
G
Laggner
Christian
C
Langer
Thierry
T
D002384:Catalysis; D008024:Ligands; D011487:Protein Conformation; D011506:Proteins / Q000737:chemistry / Q000378:metabolism*
D008024:Ligands; D011506:Proteins