Assessing decisional capacity for clinical research or treatment: a review of instruments.
OBJECTIVE
The need to evaluate decisional capacity among patients in treatment settings as well as subjects in clinical research settings has increasingly gained attention. Decisional capacity is generally conceptualized to include not only an understanding of disclosed information but also an appreciation of its significance, the ability to use the information in reasoning, and the ability to express a clear choice. The authors critically reviewed existing measures of decisional capacity for research and treatment.


METHODS
Electronic medical and legal databases were searched for articles published from 1980 to 2004 describing structured assessments of adults' capacity to consent to clinical treatment or research protocols. The authors identified 23 decisional capacity assessment instruments and evaluated each in terms of format, content, administration features, and psychometric properties.


RESULTS
Six instruments focused solely on understanding of disclosed information, and 11 tested for understanding, appreciation, reasoning, and expression of a choice. The instruments varied substantially in format, degree of standardization of disclosures, flexibility of item content, and scoring procedures. Reliability and validity also varied widely. All instruments have limitations, ranging from lack of supporting psychometric data to lack of generalizability across contexts.


CONCLUSIONS
Of the instruments reviewed, the MacArthur Competence Assessment Tools for Clinical Research and for Treatment have the most empirical support, although other instruments may be equally or better suited to certain situations. Contextual factors are important but understudied. Capacity assessment tools should undergo further empirically based development and refinement as well as testing with a variety of populations.
Dunn
Laura B
LB
Department of Psychiatry, 0603-V, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093-0603, USA. ldunn@ucsd.edu
Nowrangi
Milap A
MA
Palmer
Barton W
BW
Jeste
Dilip V
DV
Saks
Elyn R
ER
D000328:Adult; D002985:Clinical Protocols / Q000592:standards*; D003657:Decision Making; D006801:Humans; D007258:Informed Consent / Q000523:psychology* / Q000592:standards; D016743:Mental Competency / Q000145:classification / Q000523:psychology*; D001523:Mental Disorders / Q000145:classification / Q000523:psychology; D008875:Middle Aged; D010361:Patients / Q000145:classification / Q000523:psychology; D011569:Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; D011594:Psychometrics; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D035842:Research Subjects / Q000145:classification / Q000523:psychology*