title: Counterfactual thinking and posttraumatic stress reactions.
abstract: Preoccupation with alternative outcomes (counterfactual thinking) is a central component of the ruminations of trauma victims. The questions investigated were whether such thinking should be distinguished from general rumination and whether elements of counterfactual thinking might relate to the process of adjustment. A sample of assault victims was interviewed. They completed a battery of self-report scales and thought-listing procedures. Frequency of counterfactual thinking was closely associated with continuing levels of posttraumatic distress. However, high availability of counterfactuals (as indexed by verbal fluency) was related to potentially adaptive outcomes, such as the generation of behavioral plans. In addition, as expected, levels of different aspects of counterfactual thinking were moderated by metacognitive control strategies as a function of time since the trauma.
authors.affiliation: The Traumatic Stress Service, St. George's Hospital, London, UK. sharif.elleithy@swlstg-tr.nhs.uk
authors.forename: Sharif
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: El Leithy
authors.forename: Gary P
authors.initials: GP
authors.lastname: Brown
authors.forename: Ian
authors.initials: I
authors.lastname: Robbins
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D019260:Expressed Emotion; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008016:Life Change Events; D008297:Male; D013313:Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000453:epidemiology / Q000523:psychology*; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires; D013850:Thinking