title: The nature of forensic science opinion--a possible framework to guide thinking and practice in investigations and in court proceedings.
abstract: The questions that are asked of forensic scientists during the course of a criminal investigation, and during subsequent court proceedings, are of varied form. This paper attempts to place these questions into broad generic types and explores the difference in the inferential process that a scientist may employ when forming opinions that help answer these questions. From this model, a working definition of different roles and attributes for forensic scientists is described which may offer greater clarity for both practitioners and users of forensic science.
authors.affiliation: Advance Forensic Science, Dundee, UK. enquiries@advanceforensicscience.com
authors.forename: G
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Jackson
authors.forename: S
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Jones
authors.forename: G
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Booth
authors.forename: C
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Champod
authors.forename: I W
authors.initials: IW
authors.lastname: Evett
mesh_terms: D005104:Expert Testimony; D044707:Forensic Sciences / Q000379:methods*; D006801:Humans; D007360:Intelligence; D007603:Jurisprudence; D024382:Professional Role