title: Social comparison processes in autobiographies of adult cancer survivors.
abstract: Cancer survivors often compare their situations to other survivors' situations. However, types of social comparison processes used and resulting outcomes are not clearly delineated. This study explores usage and consequences of three social comparison styles (downward, upward and parallel) of adult cancer survivors in free narratives, using content analysis of 30 autobiographical books by survivors ranging in age from 30-70 (M = 54, SD = 10.04); 43 percent prostate cancer, 17 percent breast cancer and 40 percent other cancers. Overall, cancer survivors used more parallel comparisons than directional comparisons, followed by upward comparisons. Each type of comparison was associated with different kinds of positive and negative consequences.
authors.affiliation: National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
authors.forename: Keith M
authors.initials: KM
authors.lastname: Bellizzi
authors.forename: Thomas O
authors.initials: TO
authors.lastname: Blank
authors.forename: Claudia E
authors.initials: CE
authors.lastname: Oakes
mesh_terms: D000223:Adaptation, Psychological; D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D009369:Neoplasms / Q000523:psychology*; D018187:Personal Construct Theory; D011582:Psychological Theory; D012803:Sick Role; D012933:Social Identification; D017741:Survivors / Q000523:psychology*; D014956:Writing