Impacts of a participatory approach to developing national level sustainable development indicators in Finland.
The paper explores the role of a participatory approach in the outcome of the Finnish sustainable development indicator (SDI) exercise in 1998-2002. The process is analysed through three main objectives: to achieve stronger democracy, better quality of the end product and a more effective process. The analysis is further structured by a set of criteria needed for successful participation and differentiation of types of participants. The criteria comprise three main aspects: fairness, competence and social learning. In addition to the normally mentioned stakeholders (e.g. citizens and interest groups) participants also include experts and civil servants. Using the set of criteria above the participatory approach of the Finnish SDI process is then evaluated, and in the light of this evaluation the paper also discusses the specifications needed as evaluation criteria for national level policy programme processes like developing the SDIs. The results are based on documentation of the indicator task force meetings, written comments and a study of the putative end-users conducted after the publication of the indicators. The results show that the intense and broad participation of experts and civil servants increased the competence of the outcome and led to greater efficiency in working methods. However, this led to technocratic participation, absence of democratic participation and absence of social learning. Thus the ultimate goal of SDIs to contribute to achieving sustainability was not reached.
Rosenström
Ulla
U
Finnish Environment Institute, Research Programme for Environmental Policy, P.O. Box 140, FIN-00251 Helsinki, Finland. ulla.rosenstrom@ymparisto.fi
Kyllönen
Simo
S
D003247:Conservation of Natural Resources / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D003299:Cooperative Behavior; D004777:Environment; D035082:Federal Government; D005387:Finland; D011050:Policy Making; D011057:Politics