Assessment of myocardial viability using delayed enhancement magnetic resonance imaging at 3.0 Tesla.
OBJECTIVE
Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at 3.0 T has recently become available and potentially provides a significant improvement of tissue contrast in T1-weighted imaging techniques relying on Gd-based contrast enhancement. Imaging at high-field strength may be especially advantageous for methods relying on strong T1-weighting and imaging after contrast material administration. The aim of this study was to compare cardiac delayed enhancement (DE) MRI at 3.0 T and 1.5 T with respect to image quality, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) between infarcted and normal myocardium.


METHODS
Forty consecutive patients with history of myocardial infarction were examined at 3.0 T (n = 20) or at 1.5 T (n = 20). Myocardial function was assessed using cine steady-state-free-precession (SSFP) sequences (TR 3.1 milliseconds, TE 1.6 milliseconds, flip angle 70 degrees , and a matrix of 168 x 256 at 1.5 T and TR 3.4 milliseconds, TE 1.7 milliseconds, flip angle 50 degrees and a matrix of 168 x 256 at 3.0 T), acquired in long- and short-axes views. DE images were obtained 15 minutes after the administration of 0.15 mmol of Gd-DTPA/kg body weight using a segmented inversion recovery prepared gradient echo sequence at 1.5 T (TR 9.6 milliseconds, TE 4.4 milliseconds, flip angle 25 degrees , matrix 160 x 256, bandwidth 140 Hertz/pixel) and at 3.0 T (TR 9.8 milliseconds, TE 4.3 milliseconds, flip angle 30 degrees , matrix 150 x 256, bandwidth 140 Hertz/pixel). For image analysis, standardized SNR and CNR measurements were performed in infarcted and remote myocardial regions. Two independent observers rated image quality on a 4-point scale (0 = poor image quality, 1 = sufficient image quality, 2 = good image quality, 3 = excellent image quality).


RESULTS
High diagnostic image quality was obtained in all patients. Rating of mean image quality was 2.2 +/- 0.8 at 1.5 T and 2.5 +/- 0.6 at 3.0 T (P = 0.012) for observer 1 and 2.2 +/- 0.7 at 1.5 T and 2.6 +/- 0.6 at 3.0 T (P = 0.003) for observer 2, respectively. Interobserver agreement was good (kappa = 0.68 at 1.5 T and 0.78 at 3.0 T). SNR measurements yielded a mean SNR of 37.8 +/- 13.9/22.9 +/- 6.0 in infarcted myocardium (P < 0.001) and 5.6 +/- 2.2/5.9 +/- 2.4 in normal myocardium (P = 0.45) at 3.0 T/1.5 T, respectively. CNR measurements revealed mean values of 32.4 +/- 13.0/16.7 +/- 5.4 (P< 0.001) at 3.0 T/1.5 T, respectively.


CONCLUSIONS
Delayed enhancement MRI at 3.0 T is feasible and provides superior image quality compared with 1.5 T. Furthermore, using identical contrast doses, increased SNR and CNR values were recorded at 3.0 T.
Klumpp
Bernhard
B
Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Eberhard-Karls-University Tuebingen, Hoppe-Seyler-Strasse 3, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany. bernhard.klumpp@med.uni-tuebingen.de
Fenchel
Michael
M
Hoevelborn
Tobias
T
Helber
Uwe
U
Scheule
Albertus
A
Claussen
Claus
C
Miller
Stephan
S
D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D003287:Contrast Media; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007089:Image Enhancement; D008279:Magnetic Resonance Imaging / Q000295:instrumentation / Q000379:methods*; D008280:Magnetics; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D009203:Myocardial Infarction / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000473:pathology; D012016:Reference Values; D012680:Sensitivity and Specificity; D018487:Ventricular Dysfunction, Left / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000473:pathology
D003287:Contrast Media