title: Responsiveness of isokinetic dynamometry parameters, pain and activity level scores to evaluate changes in patients with capsulitis of the shoulder.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  To determine the responsiveness to change of isokinetic dynamometry of the shoulder and to compare this responsiveness with outcome measures of pain and activity level.
  
  
  METHODS
  Responsiveness was evaluated as the change in outcome after intra-articular steroid injection in patients with capsulitis of the shoulder. Effect sizes of all outcome measures, quantified as standardized response means, were compared. Relationships between change scores of shoulder function and activities were assessed.
  
  
  METHODS
  Ten patients with unilateral capsulitis of the shoulder.
  
  
  METHODS
  Muscle strength and active range of motion were measured by isokinetic dynamometry. We then calculated involved/uninvolved ratios of the maximal peak torques of abduction, adduction, external and internal rotation, active range of motion of abduction and external rotation. In addition, pain was scored using the numeric rating scale (NRS-101) and activity level was scored using the Shoulder Disability Questionnaire.
  
  
  RESULTS
  The standardized response mean of all outcome parameters was equal to or greater than 0.8, except for active range of motion of abduction. No significant differences between the standardized response means were found. There is a significant correlation between the change scores of NRS-101 and Shoulder Disability Questionnaire. No significant correlations were found between the change scores of NRS-101 and Shoulder Disability Questionnaire on the one hand, and involved/ uninvolved ratios of peak torques and active range of motion on the other.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Responsiveness of all outcome measures is good. Parameters of isokinetic dynamometry may provide additional information as compared with the usual outcome measures of pain and functional level.
authors.affiliation: Erasmus MC-University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, PO Box 2040, 3000 CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands. j.vanmeeteren@erasmusmc.nl
authors.forename: J
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: van Meeteren
authors.forename: M E
authors.initials: ME
authors.lastname: Roebroeck
authors.forename: R W
authors.initials: RW
authors.lastname: Selles
authors.forename: H J
authors.initials: HJ
authors.lastname: Stam
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D000893:Anti-Inflammatory Agents / Q000627:therapeutic use; D002062:Bursitis / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000188:drug therapy / Q000534:rehabilitation; D004185:Disability Evaluation; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D053581:Muscle Strength Dynamometer; D010147:Pain Measurement; D016059:Range of Motion, Articular; D020069:Shoulder Pain / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000188:drug therapy / Q000534:rehabilitation; D016896:Treatment Outcome
chemical_list: D000893:Anti-Inflammatory Agents