How does zinc oxide-eugenol compare to ferric sulphate as a pulpotomy material?
This study compared the clinical and radiographic responses after 3 months to a sterile compression technique with zinc oxide-eugenol or 15.5% ferric sulphate in 145 pulpotomised primary teeth in 30 children. In both groups of teeth the success rate was 100%. These short-term results suggest that either technique may be used.
Chien
M M
MM
Department of Restorative Dentistry, University of the Witwatersrand.
Setzer
S
S
Cleaton-Jones
P
P
D002648:Child; D002675:Child, Preschool; D003785:Dental Pulp Capping / Q000379:methods*; D003793:Dental Restoration, Permanent / Q000379:methods; D005260:Female; D005290:Ferric Compounds / Q000627:therapeutic use*; D005500:Follow-Up Studies; D006489:Hemostatic Techniques; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008334:Mandible; D008437:Maxilla; D008963:Molar / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging / Q000601:surgery; D011672:Pulpotomy / Q000379:methods*; D011859:Radiography; D014094:Tooth, Deciduous; D016896:Treatment Outcome; D015035:Zinc Oxide-Eugenol Cement / Q000627:therapeutic use*
D005290:Ferric Compounds; D015035:Zinc Oxide-Eugenol Cement; C024823:ferric sulfate