title: Surgical service centralisation in Australia versus choice and quality of life for rural patients.
abstract: High patient volume for both hospitals and surgeons is an important determinant of operative mortality and outcome for complex and infrequently performed operations. The 13% of Australia's population who live in rural and remote areas often choose to have surgery close to home and support networks despite the potentially higher operative mortality and morbidity. Rural patients should be able to make an informed choice about having their surgery locally. Rural and metropolitan surgeons should discuss and reach mutual agreement on where each patient is best treated. A balance must be struck between quality of services that can be provided locally and geographic convenience.
authors.affiliation: Department of Clinical and Surgical Services (Surgery), Edinburgh University, Edinburgh, United Kingdom. grantstewart@rcsed.ac.uk
authors.forename: Grant D
authors.initials: GD
authors.lastname: Stewart
authors.forename: Gareth
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Long
authors.forename: Bruce R
authors.initials: BR
authors.lastname: Tulloh
mesh_terms: D001315:Australia; D002497:Centralized Hospital Services; D002755:Choice Behavior; D002998:Clonazepam; D006801:Humans; D017060:Patient Satisfaction; D011787:Quality of Health Care; D011788:Quality of Life; D019035:Rural Health Services; D013514:Surgical Procedures, Operative; D019037:Urban Health Services
chemical_list: D002998:Clonazepam