title: Immediate effects of spinal manipulation on thermal pain sensitivity: an experimental study.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  The underlying causes of spinal manipulation hypoalgesia are largely unknown. The beneficial clinical effects were originally theorized to be due to biomechanical changes, but recent research has suggested spinal manipulation may have a direct neurophysiological effect on pain perception through dorsal horn inhibition. This study added to this literature by investigating whether spinal manipulation hypoalgesia was: a) local to anatomical areas innervated by the lumbar spine; b) correlated with psychological variables; c) greater than hypoalgesia from physical activity; and d) different for A-delta and C-fiber mediated pain perception.
  
  
  METHODS
  Asymptomatic subjects (n = 60) completed baseline psychological questionnaires and underwent thermal quantitative sensory testing for A-delta and C-fiber mediated pain perception. Subjects were then randomized to ride a stationary bicycle, perform lumbar extension exercise, or receive spinal manipulation. Quantitative sensory testing was repeated 5 minutes after the intervention period. Data were analyzed with repeated measures ANOVA and post-hoc testing was performed with Bonferroni correction, as appropriate.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Subjects in the three intervention groups did not differ on baseline characteristics. Hypoalgesia from spinal manipulation was observed in lumbar innervated areas, but not control (cervical innervated) areas. Hypoalgesic response was not strongly correlated with psychological variables. Spinal manipulation hypoalgesia for A-delta fiber mediated pain perception did not differ from stationary bicycle and lumbar extension (p > 0.05). Spinal manipulation hypoalgesia for C-fiber mediated pain perception was greater than stationary bicycle riding (p = 0.040), but not for lumbar extension (p = 0.105).
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Local dorsal horn mediated inhibition of C-fiber input is a potential hypoalgesic mechanism of spinal manipulation for asymptomatic subjects, but further study is required to replicate this finding in subjects with low back pain.
authors.affiliation: Department of Physical Therapy, Brooks Center for Rehabilitation Studies, PO Box 100154, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32610-0154, USA. sgeorge@phhp.ufl.edu
authors.forename: Steven Z
authors.initials: SZ
authors.lastname: George
authors.forename: Mark D
authors.initials: MD
authors.lastname: Bishop
authors.forename: Joel E
authors.initials: JE
authors.lastname: Bialosky
authors.forename: Giorgio
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Zeppieri
authors.forename: Michael E
authors.initials: ME
authors.lastname: Robinson
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D006358:Hot Temperature; D006801:Humans; D006987:Hypesthesia / Q000209:etiology* / Q000503:physiopathology*; D008161:Lumbosacral Region; D020393:Manipulation, Spinal; D036421:Nerve Fibers, Unmyelinated; D009433:Neural Inhibition; D010146:Pain / Q000503:physiopathology*; D010147:Pain Measurement; D012016:Reference Values; D013116:Spinal Cord / Q000503:physiopathology