Species resilience in Pleistocene hominids that traveled far and ate widely: an analogy to the wolf-like canids.
Morphological and genetic analyses have yet to resolve the question of whether more than one species of Homo existed contemporaneously in the Pleistocene. In an effort to contribute a process-related perspective to hominid phylogenetic reconstruction, this paper uses an analogy to the northern wolf-like canids (the wolves and coyotes) to ask the question, How many Homo species should there be, given their likely behavioral profile(s)? In contrast to earlier comparisons to social carnivores which sought to illuminate specific aspects of hominid behavioral ecology, this paper explores behavioral constraints on the process of speciation itself. The analogy suggests that because Pleistocene Homo probably exhibited high habitat tolerance, they would not have had the opportunity to speciate, especially in Africa. In contrast to an earlier single-species hypothesis based on competitive exclusion between sympatric hominid species, this paper explores constraints on the process of speciation under conditions of temporary allopatry.
Arcadi
A Clark
AC
Department of Anthropology, 265 McGraw Hall, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853, USA. apc13@cornell.edu
D000222:Adaptation, Physiological; D000818:Animals; D001522:Behavior, Animal; D046028:Canidae / Q000502:physiology*; D004032:Diet; D017753:Ecosystem; D049810:Genetic Speciation; D015186:Hominidae / Q000502:physiology*; D008124:Locomotion; D010807:Physical Endurance; D012919:Social Behavior