Ethics and the science of animal minds.
Ethicists have commonly appealed to science to bolster their arguments for elevating the moral status of nonhuman animals. I describe a framework within which I take many ethicists to be making such appeals. I focus on an apparent gap in this framework between those properties of animals that are part of the scientific consensus, and those to which ethicists typically appeal in their arguments. I will describe two different ways of diminishing the appearance of the gap, and argue that both of them present challenges to ethicists seeking a firm scientific basis for their claims about the moral status of animals. I argue that more clarity about the role of appeals to science by applied ethicists leads to questions about the effectiveness of such appeals, and that these questions might best be pursued empirically.
Allen
Colin
C
Department of History & Philosophy of Science, Indiana University, 1011 East Third Street, Bloomington, Indiana 47405, USA. colallen@indiana.edu
D017087:Animal Rights; D000827:Animal Welfare; D000818:Animals; D001522:Behavior, Animal; D026688:Bioethical Issues; D026689:Ethical Analysis; D028663:Ethical Theory; D005010:Ethology; D020452:Journalism; D008606:Mental Processes; D019370:Observation