Lymphoblastoid cell lines differing in p53 status show clear differences in basal gene expression with minor changes after irradiation.
OBJECTIVE
The genetic profile as determined by microarray is considered to be an ideal marker of the individual radiosensitivity. However, it is still an open question, whether this profile has to be determined prior to or only after irradiation, since the expression of some genes is affected by irradiation. These changes are induced mainly due to a p53-dependent transactivation.


METHODS
In this study gene expression profiles were measured for 3 lymphoblastoid cell lines differing in p53 status (p53 wt: TK6; p53null: TK6E6, p53mut: WTK1) measured either prior to or 3h after exposure to 2Gy. The gene expression profile was determined using the Affymetrix Human HG U133A GeneChip and for selective genes, variation in gene expression was validated by qRT-PCR. In addition, different assays were used to characterize the radioresponse of these three strains.


RESULTS
The three strains were found to be different in all aspects of radiosensitivity studied. Cells with p53wt showed more apoptosis, slightly stronger arrest in G1, but less lethal aberrations and a lower viability when compared to cells with mutated p53, whereas cells absent in p53 are characterized by an intermediate response. The gene expression profile measured prior to irradiation already revealed huge differences. Significance analysis of microarrays (SAM) identified 141 genes that changed expression twofold or more with a false discovery rate (FDR) of 5.4%. When compared to p53null cell line with p53wt showed a twofold difference in up- or down-regulation in 28 genes. A much higher variation was even found when p53mut cells were compared with p53null cells with a twofold difference in even 123 genes. The respective genes were found to be involved mainly in apoptosis, cell cycle regulation, metabolisms and signalling but with only one gene relevant for DNA repair. Radiation was found to affect this profile solely for cells with p53wt with a twofold significant up-regulation in only five genes. For selective genes (BCL2, CASP1, CCND2, DDB2, XPC, RAD51C, SESN1, FUCA1, CDKN1A, MDM2, XPC) array data were confirmed by qRT-PCR.


CONCLUSIONS
The result, that the gene expression profile of lymphoblastoid cells differing in p53 status already displayed clear differences when measured prior to irradiation with only few changes after irradiation, which are solely seen for p53wt cells, suggests, that the differences in radiosensitivity observed for these cells are primarily determined by the variation in expression profile present already prior to irradiation.
Zschenker
Oliver
O
Laboratory of Radiobiology and Experimental Radiooncology, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Borgmann
Kerstin
K
Streichert
Thomas
T
Meier
Ingo
I
Wrona
Agnieszka
A
Dikomey
Ekkehard
E
D002460:Cell Line; D015870:Gene Expression / Q000528:radiation effects; D020869:Gene Expression Profiling; D016158:Genes, p53 / Q000528:radiation effects; D006801:Humans; D008214:Lymphocytes / Q000378:metabolism / Q000502:physiology* / Q000528:radiation effects*; D020411:Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis; D016133:Polymerase Chain Reaction / Q000379:methods; D011836:Radiation Tolerance / Q000235:genetics; D016159:Tumor Suppressor Protein p53 / Q000096:biosynthesis / Q000235:genetics*
C495901:TP53 protein, human; D016159:Tumor Suppressor Protein p53