Issues in the use of adaptive clinical trial designs.
Sequential sampling plans are often used in the monitoring of clinical trials in order to address the ethical and efficiency issues inherent in human testing of a new treatment or preventive agent for disease. Group sequential stopping rules are perhaps the most commonly used approaches, but in recent years, a number of authors have proposed adaptive methods of choosing a stopping rule. In general, such adaptive approaches come at a price of inefficiency (almost always) and clouding of the scientific question (sometimes). In this paper, I review the degree of adaptation possible within the largely prespecified group sequential stopping rules, and discuss the operating characteristics that can be characterized fully prior to collection of the data. I then discuss the greater flexibility possible when using several of the adaptive approaches receiving the greatest attention in the statistical literature and conclude with a discussion of the scientific and statistical issues raised by their use.
Emerson
Scott S
SS
Department of Biostatistics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 9815, USA. semerson@u.washington.edu
D002986:Clinical Trials as Topic / Q000379:methods*; D006801:Humans; D012107:Research Design; D018401:Sample Size