title: Mending metacognitive illusions: a comparison of mnemonic-based and theory-based procedures.
abstract: Previous research indicated that learners experience an illusion of competence during learning (termed foresight bias) because judgments of learning (JOLs) are made in the presence of information that will be absent at test. The authors examined the following 2 procedures for alleviating foresight bias: enhancing learners' sensitivity to mnemonic cues pertaining to ease of retrieval and inducing learners to resort to theory-based judgments as a basis for JOLs. Both procedures proved effective in mending metacognitive illusions-as reflected in JOLs and self-regulation of study time-but only theory-based debiasing yielded transfer to new items. The results support the notion that improved metacognition is 1 key to optimizing transfer but also that educating subjective experience does not guarantee generalization to new situations.
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel. akoriat@research.haifa.ac.il
authors.forename: Asher
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Koriat
authors.forename: Robert A
authors.initials: RA
authors.lastname: Bjork
mesh_terms: D000704:Analysis of Variance; D003071:Cognition / Q000502:physiology*; D036262:Empirical Research; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007088:Illusions / Q000502:physiology*; D007600:Judgment / Q000502:physiology*; D008297:Male; D008568:Memory / Q000502:physiology*; D010153:Paired-Associate Learning; D010827:Physiology; D011214:Practice, Psychological; D011930:Reaction Time / Q000502:physiology; D013997:Time Factors