Genetic technologies and the regulation of reproductive decision-making in Australia.
This article provides a critical analysis of the current Australian regulatory landscape at the interface between genetics and reproductive decision-making. The authors argue that a comparative analysis with other countries and international law and a contextual examination of the way law regulates concepts such as disease and health, abnormality and normality is necessary before we can develop appropriate policy and legislative responses in this area. Specific genetic testing technologies are considered including prenatal genetic testing, preimplantation genetic diagnosis and inheritable genetic modification. An increasing number of members of the Australian community are using genetic testing technologies when they decide to have a baby. The authors argue that as concepts of disease and health vary among members of the community and the potential to test for traits other than illness increases, a new tension arises between an ethic of individual choice and a role for government in regulating reproductive decision-making.
Karpin
Isabel
I
Centre for Health Governance, Law and Ethics, Faculty of Law, University of Sydney, NSW 2000, Australia.
Bennett
Belinda
B
D000025:Abortion, Eugenic; D001315:Australia; D001709:Biotechnology / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D003657:Decision Making; D004992:Ethics, Medical; D005260:Female; D005820:Genetic Testing / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D033161:Government Regulation; D006801:Humans; D026684:Personal Autonomy; D016742:Preconception Care / Q000941:ethics / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D027724:Reproductive Techniques, Assisted / Q000941:ethics / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D012935:Social Justice