A comparison of analysis of variance and correlation methods for investigating cognitive development with functional magnetic resonance imaging.
Statistical approaches used in functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to study cognitive development are varied and evolving. Two approaches have generally been used. These are between-group end-point analysis of variance (ANOVA) and age-related regression. Differences in these 2 approaches could produce different results when applied to a single data set. Event-related fMRI data from a group of typically developing participants (n = 95; age range = 7-35 years) performing controlled lexical processing tasks were analyzed using both methods. Results from the 2 approaches showed significant overlap, but also noteworthy differences. The results suggest that for regions showing age-related changes, correlation was relatively more sensitive to more linear changes whereas ANOVA was relatively more sensitive to less-linear changes. These findings suggest that full characterization of developmental dynamics will require converging methodologies.
Fair
Damien A
DA
Department of Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO 63110, USA
Brown
Timothy T
TT
Petersen
Steven E
SE
Schlaggar
Bradley L
BL
D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D000375:Aging / Q000502:physiology*; D000704:Analysis of Variance; D001921:Brain / Q000098:blood supply* / Q000254:growth & development / Q000502:physiology; D001931:Brain Mapping; D002648:Child; D003071:Cognition / Q000502:physiology*; D007839:Functional Laterality / Q000502:physiology; D006801:Humans; D007091:Image Processing, Computer-Assisted / Q000379:methods; D016014:Linear Models; D008279:Magnetic Resonance Imaging; D010100:Oxygen / Q000097:blood
D010100:Oxygen