Amodal completion with background determines depth from monocular gap stereopsis.
Grove, Gillam, and Ono [Grove, P. M., Gillam, B. J., & Ono, H. (2002). Content and context of monocular regions determine perceived depth in random dot, unpaired background and phantom stereograms. Vision Research, 42, 1859-1870] reported that perceived depth in monocular gap stereograms [Gillam, B. J., Blackburn, S., & Nakayama, K. (1999). Stereopsis based on monocular gaps: Metrical encoding of depth and slant without matching contours. Vision Research, 39, 493-502] was attenuated when the color/texture in the monocular gap did not match the background. It appears that continuation of the gap with the background constitutes an important component of the stimulus conditions that allow a monocular gap in an otherwise binocular surface to be responded to as a depth step. In this report we tested this view using the conventional monocular gap stimulus of two identical grey rectangles separated by a gap in one eye but abutting to form a solid grey rectangle in the other. We compared depth seen at the gap for this stimulus with stimuli that were identical except for two additional small black squares placed at the ends of the gap. If the squares were placed stereoscopically behind the rectangle/gap configuration (appearing on the background) they interfered with the perceived depth at the gap. However when they were placed in front of the configuration this attenuation disappeared. The gap and the background were able under these conditions to complete amodally.
Grove
Philip M
PM
School of Psychology, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia. p.grove@psy.uq.edu.au
Ben Sachtler
W L
WL
Gillam
Barbara J
BJ
D003118:Color Perception; D003463:Cues; D003867:Depth Perception; D006801:Humans; D010775:Photic Stimulation / Q000379:methods; D011601:Psychophysics; D015357:Vision Disparity; D015348:Vision, Binocular; D015349:Vision, Monocular