title: The effect of changing ventilator settings on indices of ventilation inhomogeneity in small ventilated lungs.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  In ventilated newborns the use of multiple breath washout (MBW) techniques for measuring both lung volume and ventilation inhomogeneity (VI) is hampered by the comparatively high dead space fraction. We studied how changes in ventilator settings affected VI indices in this particular population.
  
  
  METHODS
  Using a computer simulation of a uniformly ventilated volume the interaction between VI indices (lung clearance index (LCI), moment ratios (M1/M0, M2/M0, AMDN1, AMDN2) of the washout curve) and tidal volume (VT), dead space (VD) and functional residual capacity (FRC) were calculated. The theoretical results were compared with measurements in 15 ventilated piglets (age <12 h, median weight 1135 g) by increasing the peak inspiratory pressure (PIP). FRC and VI indices were measured by MBW using 0.8% heptafluoropropane as tracer gas.
  
  
  RESULTS
  The computer simulation showed that the sensitivity of most VI indices to changes in VD/VT and VT/FRC increase, in particular for VD/VT > 0.5. In piglets, the raised PIP caused a significant increase of VT from 15.4 +/- 9.5 to 21.9 +/- 14.7 (p = 0.003) and of the FRC from 31.6 +/- 14.7 mL to 35.0 +/- 15.9 mL (p = 0.006), whereas LCI (9.15 +/- 0.75 to 8.55 +/- 0.74, p = 0.019) and the moment ratios M1/M0, M2/M0 (p < 0.02) decreased significantly. No significant changes were seen in AMDN1 and AMDN2. The within-subject variability of the VI indices (coefficient of variation in brackets) was distinctly higher (LCI (9.8%), M1/M0 (6.6%), M2/M0 (14.6%), AMDN1 (9.1%), AMDN2 (16.3%)) compared to FRC measurements (5.6%). Computer simulations showed that significant changes in VI indices were exclusively caused by changes in VT and FRC and not by an improvement of the homogeneity of alveolar ventilation.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  In small ventilated lungs with a high dead space fraction, indices of VI may be misinterpreted if the changes in ventilator settings are not considered. Computer simulations can help to prevent this misinterpretation.
authors.affiliation: Clinic of Neonatology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany. gerd.schmalisch@charite.de
authors.forename: G
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Schmalisch
authors.forename: H
authors.initials: H
authors.lastname: Proquitté
authors.forename: C C
authors.initials: CC
authors.lastname: Roehr
authors.forename: R R
authors.initials: RR
authors.lastname: Wauer
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D000831:Animals, Newborn / Q000502:physiology*; D003198:Computer Simulation; D008168:Lung / Q000502:physiology*; D008962:Models, Theoretical; D012119:Respiration; D012121:Respiration, Artificial / Q000379:methods*; D012126:Respiratory Dead Space; D013552:Swine; D012122:Ventilators, Mechanical