title: A comparison of open and laparoscopic cholecystectomy done by a surgeon in training.
abstract: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy has virtually replaced conventional open cholecystectomy as the gold standard for symptomatic cholelithiasis. The laparoscopic approach brings numerous advantages at the expense of higher complication rates, especially in training facilities. This comparative 18-month review examines the outcomes of 52 cholecystectomies performed by a single surgical resident at the University Hospital of the West Indies--a teaching hospital in Jamaica. The advantages of laparoscopic cholecystectomy have been demonstrated and it has been found to be safe and effective in this training facility.
authors.affiliation: Department of Surgery, Radiology, Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, The University of the West Indies, Kingston 7, Jamaica, West Indies.
authors.forename: S O
authors.initials: SO
authors.lastname: Cawich
authors.forename: D I G
authors.initials: DI
authors.lastname: Mitchell
authors.forename: M S
authors.initials: MS
authors.lastname: Newnham
authors.forename: M
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Arthurs
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D002763:Cholecystectomy; D017081:Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic / Q000009:adverse effects / Q000193:education; D002769:Cholelithiasis / Q000601:surgery; D005260:Female; D042882:Gallstones / Q000601:surgery; D006785:Hospitals, University; D006801:Humans; D007396:Internship and Residency; D007563:Jamaica; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D010195:Pancreatitis / Q000601:surgery; D012189:Retrospective Studies