A real-life example of choosing an inherently safer process option.
While choosing an inherently safer alternative may seem straightforward, sometimes what seems to be the most obvious alternative may not provide the best risk reduction. The process designer must maintain a broad perspective to be able to recognize all potential hazards when evaluating design options. All aspects of operation such as start-up, shut-down, utility failure, as well as normal operation should be considered. Choosing the inherently safer option is best accomplished early in the option selection phase of a project; however, recycle back to the option selection phase may be needed if an option is not thoroughly evaluated early in the process. In this paper, a project to supply ammonia to a catalytic reactor will be reviewed. During the course of the project, an "inherently safer" alternative was selected and later discarded due to issues uncovered during the detail design phase. The final option chosen will be compared to (1) the original design and (2) the initial "inherently safer" alternative. The final option was inherently safer than both the original design and the initial "inherently safer" alternative even though the design team initially believed that it would not be.
Study
Karen
K
Risk Management Services Department, Rohm and Haas Company, 6519 State Highway 225, Deer Park, TX 77536, USA. KStudy@rohmhaas.com
D000641:Ammonia / Q000737:chemistry*; D019149:Bioreactors; D005160:Facility Design and Construction; D015386:Hazardous Substances / Q000302:isolation & purification / Q000633:toxicity*; D018570:Risk Assessment; D017751:Safety Management / Q000379:methods*
D015386:Hazardous Substances; D000641:Ammonia