title: Directional verbal probabilities: inconsistencies between preferential judgments and numerical meanings.
abstract: Verbal probability expressions (e.g., it is possible or doubtful) convey not only vague numerical meanings (i.e., probability) but also semantic functions, called directionality. We performed two experiments to examine whether preferential judgments are consistent with numerical meanings of verbal probabilities regardless of directionality. The results showed that because of the effects of directionality, perceived degrees of certainty for verbal probabilities differed between a binary choice and a numerical translation (Experiment 1), and decisions based on a verbal probability do not correspond to those based on a numerical translation for verbal probabilities (Experiment 2). These findings suggest that directionality of verbal probabilities is an independent feature from numerical meanings; hence numerical meanings of verbal probability alone remain insufficient to explain the effects of directionality on preferential judgments.
authors.affiliation: Graduate School of Decision Science and Technology Tokyo Institute of Technology, Tokyo, Japan. hito@ky.hum.titech.ac.jp
authors.forename: Hidehito
authors.initials: H
authors.lastname: Honda
authors.forename: Kimihiko
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Yamagishi
mesh_terms: D002755:Choice Behavior; D003657:Decision Making; D006801:Humans; D007600:Judgment; D008433:Mathematics; D011336:Probability; D014705:Verbal Behavior; D014825:Vocabulary