Triangulation of qualitative approaches: hermeneutical phenomenology and grounded theory.
OBJECTIVE
In this paper, suggestions are offered about the appropriate use of hermeneutic phenomenology and grounded theory in one study.


BACKGROUND
As an alternative to selecting only one qualitative research approach to illuminate a topic of interest about which little is known, two qualitative approaches could be used in a study. Fear of 'method slurring' may prevent this alternative being used. Occasionally, however, credible qualitative researchers have advocated using various research approaches in one study, for example using hermeneutical phenomenology and grounded theory in triangulation. However, if pursuing this direction, several advances in thinking about using qualitative research approaches should be considered.


CONCLUSIONS
An experience is presented of deciding to use grounded theory and hermeneutic phenomenology in one study. Cautions, practical considerations and alternative options are offered for using these approaches in one study, and the implications of some other possible ways to 'triangulate' qualitative approaches are discussed.


CONCLUSIONS
Different research approaches can be creatively and successfully used in one study if there has been adequate consideration of vital factors that determine if there is a good 'fit' of the approaches not only with the research problem and question, but also with each other, while also maintaining the integrity of each approach.
Annells
Merilyn
M
Professor of Community Nursing, La Trobe University, RDNS Helen Macpherson Smith Institute of Community Health, St Kilda, Victoria, Australia. m.annells@latrobe.edu.au
D003625:Data Collection; D006801:Humans; D015404:Nursing Methodology Research / Q000379:methods*; D010687:Philosophy, Nursing; D036301:Qualitative Research; D012107:Research Design