Effects of gutting and ungutting on microbiological, chemical, and sensory properties of aquacultured sea bream (Sparus aurata) and sea bass (Dicentrarchus labrax) stored in ice.
The effect of gutting and ungutting on microbiological, chemical, and sensory properties of aqua-cultured sea bream (Sparus aurata) and sea bass (Dicentrarchus labrax) stored in ice were studied. The total viable mesophilic and psychrophilic bacterial counts increased throughout the storage period of gutted and ungutted sea bream and sea bass. The mesophilic counts reached 8.19 log cfu/g for ungutted sea bream and 7.93 log cfu/g for ungutted sea bass after 14 days of storage. The mesophilic counts reached 8.89 log cfu/g for gutted sea bream and 8.16 log cfu/g for gutted sea bass after 14 days of storage. On day 14 of storage the psychrophilic counts of ungutted sea bream and sea bass were 8.24 log cfu/g and 8.03 log cfu/g, respectively, and for gutted sea bream and sea bass were 8.93 and 8.22, respectively. At the end of the storage period of 14 days, TVB-N, TBA, and TMA-N values of ungutted sea bass were determined as 50.13 +/- 0.25 mg/100 g, 2.66 +/- 0.06 mg malonaldehit/kg, 9.86 +/- 0.01 mg/100 g respectively. TVB-N, TBA, and TMA-N values of ungutted sea bream reached 55.90 +/- 0.36 mg/100g, 2.51 +/- 0.21 mg malonaldehit/kg, 9.79 +/- 0.01 mg/100 g on day 14 respectively. And also at the end of the storage period of 14 days, TVB-N, TBA, and TMA-N values of gutted sea bass were determined as 48.00 +/- 0.26 mg/100 g, 2.48 +/- 0.03 mg malonaldehit/kg, 8.71 +/- 0.06 mg/100 g respectively. TVB-N, TBA, and TMA-N values of gutted sea bream reached 49.66 +/- 0.77 mg/100g, 2.64 +/- 0.07 mg malonaldehit/kg, 8.97 +/- 0.01 mg/100 g on day 14 respectively. The result of this study indicates that the shelf-life of whole ungutted sea bass and sea bream stored in ice as determined by the overal acceptibility sensory scores, chemical quality, and microbiological results show us that the fish were spoilt on day 14. Each chemical, sensory, and microbiological result for sea bream showed us that there was a correlation and similarity and on day 14 it was spoilt.
Cakli
S
S
Ege University, Fisheries Faculty, Fish Processing Technology Department, 35100 Bornova-Izmir, Turkey. cakli@mail.ege.edu.tr
Kilinc
B
B
Cadun
A
A
Dincer
T
T
Tolasa
S
S
D000818:Animals; D017756:Aquaculture; D001492:Bass; D005511:Food Handling; D005516:Food Microbiology; D005519:Food Preservation / Q000379:methods; D007053:Ice; D008460:Meat / Q000592:standards; D021541:Sea Bream; D017747:Seafood / Q000032:analysis / Q000382:microbiology* / Q000592:standards*; D012677:Sensation; D013997:Time Factors
D007053:Ice