Universal access: but when? Treating the right patient at the right time: access to cardiac rehabilitation.
The Canadian Cardiovascular Society formed an Access to Care Working Group ('Working Group') in the spring of 2004. The mandate of the group was to use the best science and information to establish reasonable triage categories and safe wait times for access to common cardiovascular services and procedures. The present commentary presents the rationale for benchmarks for cardiac rehabilitation (CR) services. The Working Group's search for evidence included: a full literature review of the efficacy of CR, and the factors affecting access and referral to CR; a review of existing guidelines for access to CR; and a national survey of 14 CR programs across Canada undertaken in May 2005 to solicit information on referral to, and wait times for, CR. The Working Group also reviewed the results of The Ontario Cardiac Rehabilitation Pilot Project (2002) undertaken by the Cardiac Care Network of Ontario, which reported the average and median wait times for CR. Some international agencies have formulated their own guidelines relating to the optimal wait time for the onset of CR. However, due to the limited amount of supporting literature, these guidelines have generally been formed as consensus statements. The Canadian national survey showed that few programs had guidelines for individual programs. The Cardiac Care Network of Ontario pilot project reported that the average and median times from a cardiac event to the intake into CR were 99 and 70 days, respectively. The national survey of sampled CR programs also revealed quite remarkable differences across programs in terms of the length of time between first contact to first attendance and to commencement of exercise. Programs that required a stress test before program initiation had the longest wait for exercise initiation. Some patients need to be seen within a very short time frame to prevent a marked deterioration in their medical or psychological state. In some cases, early intervention and advocacy may reduce the risk of loss of employment. Or, there may be profound disturbances in the patient's family as a result of the cardiac event. For other patient groups, preferable wait times vary from one to 30 days, and acceptable wait times vary from seven to 60 days. All cardiovascular disease patients require core aspects of CR services. Patients who would derive benefit from formal CR programs should be provided the opportunity, given the proven efficacy and cost effectiveness of CR.
Dafoe
William
W
University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada. williamdafoe@cha.ab.ca
Arthur
Heather
H
Stokes
Helen
H
Morrin
Louise
L
Beaton
Louise
L
D019985:Benchmarking; D002170:Canada; D000072038:Cardiac Rehabilitation; D002309:Cardiology / Q000592:standards*; D002318:Cardiovascular Diseases / Q000517:prevention & control*; D006297:Health Services Accessibility / Q000592:standards*; D006801:Humans; D018579:Patient Selection; D010818:Practice Patterns, Physicians' / Q000592:standards*; D012449:Safety; D013995:Time; D014218:Triage / Q000592:standards; D014850:Waiting Lists