title: Decision making regarding Smith-Petersen vs. pedicle subtraction osteotomy vs. vertebral column resection for spinal deformity.
abstract: METHODS
  Author experience and literature review.
  
  
  OBJECTIVE
  To investigate and discuss decision-making on when to perform a Smith-Petersen osteotomy as opposed to a pedicle subtraction procedure and/or a vertebral column resection.
  
  
  BACKGROUND
  Articles have been published regarding Smith-Petersen osteotomies, pedicle subtraction procedures, and vertebral column resections. Expectations and complications have been reviewed. However, decision-making regarding which of the 3 procedures is most useful for a particular spinal deformity case is not clearly investigated.
  
  
  METHODS
  Discussed in this manuscript is the author's experience and the literature regarding the operative options for a fixed coronal or sagittal deformity.
  
  
  RESULTS
  There are roles for Smith-Petersen osteotomy, pedicle subtraction, and vertebral column resection. Each has specific applications and potential complications.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  As the magnitude of resection increases, the ability to correct deformity improves, but also the risk of complication increases. Therein, an understanding of potential applications and complications is helpful.
authors.affiliation: Washington University School of Medicine, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA. bridwellk@wudosis.wustl.edu
authors.forename: Keith H
authors.initials: KH
authors.lastname: Bridwell
mesh_terms: D000465:Algorithms; D003663:Decision Trees; D006801:Humans; D010027:Osteotomy / Q000295:instrumentation / Q000379:methods* / Q000592:standards*; D013121:Spinal Curvatures / Q000209:etiology / Q000503:physiopathology / Q000601:surgery*; D013131:Spine / Q000002:abnormalities / Q000033:anatomy & histology / Q000473:pathology / Q000601:surgery*