[Study on the accuracy of three portable reflectometers to determine glycaemia levels: Reflolux II, Glucometer II and Glucoscot II].
OBJECTIVE
To evaluate the accuracy of three portable glucoreflectometers (Reflolux II, Glucometer II and Glucoscot II), comparing them with the laboratory (Hitachi 704, exokinase method) and checking their reliability when measurements were repeated.


METHODS
A validity and reliability study. Three methods were evaluated and another used as reference.


METHODS
The study was carried out at an urban Health Centre in Albacete.


METHODS
A sample composed of 102 types I and II diabetic patients included in an adult programme was used. The choice was made on the basis of a simple randomized sampling of the centre's records with no exclusion criteria.


RESULTS
The following correlations were obtained: Reflolux II = 0.94, Glucometer II = 0.85, Glucoscot II = 0.85. The difference of averages between machines and laboratory, using venous blood was: Reflolux II (2.5 +/- 2.9; t = -1.67: p > 0.01), Glucometer II (40.2 +/- 4.8; t = -16.42: p < 0.001), Glucoscot II (32.8 +/- 4.7: p < 0.001). Variation coefficients (n = 30): Reflolux II (8.1%); Glucometer II (8.5%); Glucoscot II (3.6%).


CONCLUSIONS
Reflolux II was shown to be a more accurate machine than the other two under study. It is therefore the most suitable for use in Primary Care.
Medrano Corredor
A
A
Centro de Salud no 2, Albacete.
García
J J
JJ
D001774:Blood Chemical Analysis / Q000295:instrumentation*; D001786:Blood Glucose / Q000032:analysis*; D003922:Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 / Q000097:blood*; D003924:Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 / Q000097:blood*; D004867:Equipment Design; D006801:Humans; D015203:Reproducibility of Results
D001786:Blood Glucose