The place for colectomy and ileorectal anastomosis: a valid surgical option for ulcerative colitis?
BACKGROUND
Conflicting views regarding the use of ileorectal anastomosis (IRA) in ulcerative colitis (UC) exist and this controversy prompted us to review our experience, especially against the background of the current tendency to choose the ileal pouch-anal procedure (IPAA).


METHODS
Thirty-two consecutive patients with IRA were studied. Complications, failure rate, reasons for failure and functional results were assessed. The median follow-up time was 3.5 years.


RESULTS
The overall complication rate was 28%. The rectum was excised in 4 patients, indicating a failure rate of 12%. The mean daily evacuation frequency was 5.6. Despite urgency occurring in one-third of the patients, continence function was well preserved.


CONCLUSIONS
Employed on a selective basis, IRA is a safe procedure with low mortality and morbidity and good prospects for success in many patients with UC. The patients must be prepared to submit to life-long rectoscopy surveillance.
Börjesson
L
L
Colorectal Unit, Department of Surgery Sahlgrenska University Hospital/Ostra, Göteborg, Sweden. lars.g.borjesson@vgregion.se
Lundstam
U
U
Oresland
T
T
Brevinge
H
H
Hultén
L
L
D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D000714:Anastomosis, Surgical; D003082:Colectomy; D003093:Colitis, Ulcerative / Q000601:surgery*; D039021:Colonic Pouches; D013505:Digestive System Surgical Procedures; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007082:Ileum / Q000601:surgery*; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D020127:Recovery of Function; D012007:Rectum / Q000601:surgery*; D016896:Treatment Outcome