Specification and misspecification of theoretical foundations and logic models for health communication campaigns.
While increasingly widespread use of behavior change theory is an advance for communication campaigns and their evaluation, such theories provide a necessary but not sufficient condition for theory-based communication interventions. Such interventions and their evaluations need to incorporate theoretical thinking about plausible mechanisms of message effect on health-related attitudes and behavior. Otherwise, strategic errors in message design and dissemination, and misspecified campaign logic models, insensitive to campaign effects, are likely to result. Implications of the elaboration likelihood model, attitude accessibility, attitude to the ad theory, exemplification, and framing are explored, and implications for campaign strategy and evaluation designs are briefly discussed. Initial propositions are advanced regarding a theory of campaign affect generalization derived from attitude to ad theory, and regarding a theory of reframing targeted health behaviors in those difficult contexts in which intended audiences are resistant to the advocated behavior or message.
Slater
Michael D
MD
School of Communication, The Ohio State University, Columbus, 43210, USA. slater.59@osu.edu
D000293:Adolescent; D000294:Adolescent Behavior / Q000523:psychology; D000329:Advertising; D003142:Communication; D015438:Health Behavior; D006266:Health Education / Q000458:organization & administration*; D006801:Humans; D008128:Logic; D008402:Mass Media; D008962:Models, Theoretical; D014481:United States