title: Global similarity and local divergence in human and mouse gene co-expression networks.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  A genome-wide comparative analysis of human and mouse gene expression patterns was performed in order to evaluate the evolutionary divergence of mammalian gene expression. Tissue-specific expression profiles were analyzed for 9,105 human-mouse orthologous gene pairs across 28 tissues. Expression profiles were resolved into species-specific coexpression networks, and the topological properties of the networks were compared between species.
  
  
  RESULTS
  At the global level, the topological properties of the human and mouse gene coexpression networks are, essentially, identical. For instance, both networks have topologies with small-world and scale-free properties as well as closely similar average node degrees, clustering coefficients, and path lengths. However, the human and mouse coexpression networks are highly divergent at the local level: only a small fraction (<10%) of coexpressed gene pair relationships are conserved between the two species. A series of controls for experimental and biological variance show that most of this divergence does not result from experimental noise. We further show that, while the expression divergence between species is genuinely rapid, expression does not evolve free from selective (functional) constraint. Indeed, the coexpression networks analyzed here are demonstrably functionally coherent as indicated by the functional similarity of coexpressed gene pairs, and this pattern is most pronounced in the conserved human-mouse intersection network. Numerous dense network clusters show evidence of dedicated functions, such as spermatogenesis and immune response, that are clearly consistent with the coherence of the expression patterns of their constituent gene members.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The dissonance between global versus local network divergence suggests that the interspecies similarity of the global network properties is of limited biological significance, at best, and that the biologically relevant aspects of the architectures of gene coexpression are specific and particular, rather than universal. Nevertheless, there is substantial evolutionary conservation of the local network structure which is compatible with the notion that gene coexpression networks are subject to purifying selection.
authors.affiliation: Basic Research Unit, Helsinki Institute for Information Technology, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland. tsaparas@cs.helsinki.fi
authors.forename: Panayiotis
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Tsaparas
authors.forename: Leonardo
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Mariño-Ramírez
authors.forename: Olivier
authors.initials: O
authors.lastname: Bodenreider
authors.forename: Eugene V
authors.initials: EV
authors.lastname: Koonin
authors.forename: I King
authors.initials: IK
authors.lastname: Jordan
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D019143:Evolution, Molecular; D015870:Gene Expression; D053263:Gene Regulatory Networks / Q000235:genetics*; D016678:Genome; D006801:Humans; D051379:Mice; D008957:Models, Genetic; D005810:Multigene Family