title: [Emergency department overcrowding: a legitimate reason to refuse access to urgent care for non-urgent patients?].
abstract: Non-urgent cases represent 30-40% of all ED consults; they contribute to overcrowding of emergency departments (ED), which could be reduced if they were denied emergency care. However, no triage instrument has demonstrated a high enough degree of accuracy to safely rule out serious medical conditions: patients suffering from life-threatening emergencies have been inappropriately denied care. Insurance companies have instituted financial penalties to discourage the use of ED as a source of non-urgent care, but this practice mainly restricts access for the underprivileged. More recent data suggest that in fact most patients consult for appropriate urgent reasons, or have no alternate access to urgent care. The safe reduction of overcrowding requires a reform of the healthcare system based on patients' needs rather than access barriers.
authors.affiliation: Centre interdisciplinaire des urgences CHUV, 1011 Lausanne. olivier.hugli@chuv.ch
authors.forename: O W
authors.initials: OW
authors.lastname: Hugli
authors.forename: M
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Potin
authors.forename: N
authors.initials: N
authors.lastname: Schreyer
authors.forename: B
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: Yersin
mesh_terms: D003441:Crowding; D004636:Emergency Service, Hospital; D006297:Health Services Accessibility; D006801:Humans; D014218:Triage