Outcomes of scholarly inquiry: an analysis of Master's of Nursing students' projects/theses.
This study examined the first scholarly projects/theses of 112 graduates of a newly formed Master of Nursing (MN) program. The purpose of the analysis was to determine whether MN graduates' scholarly projects/theses addressed the American Association Colleges of Nursing's (1996) Essentials of Master's Education for Advanced Practice Nursing, met program outcomes, and adhered to campus and program values. Other specific questions were formulated to ascertain the method of inquiry most used, the population group most examined, and the outcomes of the inquiry. The sample of 106 scholarly projects and six theses were categorized according to method of inquiry, population group, population type, and scholarly outcomes and then entered into a database software program. The findings showed the method of inquiry most used was literature review, followed by program critique, community assessment, and secondary analysis. The community was the most frequently examined population group, with patient, children, provider, minority, and elderly the most used population type. The most frequent scholarly outcomes were recommendations, study reports, educational materials, and program development. Findings supported the campus's and program's mission statement that values community partnership and diversity, improved health care outcomes, as well as an outcome objective of master's-level proficiencies in research competencies.
Dobratz
Marjorie C
MC
University of Washington, Tacoma, WA 98402, USA. mdobratz@u.washington.edu
Primomo
Janet
J
Bjorling
Elin
E
D004212:Academic Dissertations as Topic; D004511:Education, Nursing, Graduate; D004521:Educational Measurement; D006801:Humans; D015397:Program Evaluation; D014861:Washington