title: Smokers and non-smokers talk about regulatory options in tobacco control.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  Community members are occasionally polled about tobacco control policies, but are rarely given opportunities to elaborate on their views. We examined laypeople's conversations to understand how 11 regulatory options were supported or opposed in interactions.
  
  
  METHODS
  Qualitative design; purposive quota sampling; data collection via focus groups.
  
  
  METHODS
  Three locations in Sydney, Australia.
  
  
  METHODS
  63 smokers and 75 non-smokers, men and women, from three age groups (18-24, 35-44, 55-64 years), recruited primarily via telephone.
  
  
  METHODS
  Semi-structured question route; data managed in NVivo; responses compared between groups.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Laypeople rejected some regulatory proposals and certain arguments about taxation and the cost of cessation treatments. Protecting children and hypothecating tobacco excise for health education and care were highly acceptable. Plain packaging, banning retail displays and youth smoking prevention received qualified support. Bans on political donations from tobacco corporations were popular in principle but considered logistically fraught. Smokers asked for better cessation assistance and were curious about cigarette ingredients. Justice was an important evaluative principle. Support was often conditional and unresolved arguments frequent. We present both sides of these conflicts and the ways in which policies were legitimised or de-legitimised in conversation.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Simple measures of agreement used in polls may obscure the complexity of community responses to tobacco policy. Support was frequently present but contested; some arguments that seem self-evident to advocates were not so to participants. The detailed understanding of laypeople's responses provided through qualitative methods may help frame proposals and arguments to meet concerns about justice, effectiveness and feasibility.
authors.affiliation: Centre for Values, Ethics and the Law in Medicine, Central Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Sydney, NSW, Australia 2006. carters@med.usyd.edu.au
authors.forename: Stacy M
authors.initials: SM
authors.lastname: Carter
authors.forename: Simon
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Chapman
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D001290:Attitude; D001315:Australia; D003625:Data Collection; D006801:Humans; D008875:Middle Aged; D012907:Smoking / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence* / Q000523:psychology*; D016540:Smoking Cessation; D000074606:Smoking Prevention; D012923:Social Class; D019460:Tobacco Industry