title: Alternatives to randomized controlled trials in telemedicine.
abstract: Research designs other than true experiments may be useful in the evaluation of telemedicine. Potential methods include those that do not rely on randomization and tight control of the intervention, and analysis of existing administrative and clinical databases. Quasi-experimental designs may also be useful, especially when conducted in association with careful statistical methods that allow the investigator to control for certain differences between groups. Databases, such as those maintained by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, contain information on both outcomes and claims, as well as disease/procedure registries and electronic health records. This may provide a potential tool for understanding the effects of telemedicine on access to care in conjunction with costs and quality. These different approaches have advantages and disadvantages, but may be useful in telemedicine, where the conduct of randomized controlled trials is generally very expensive and frequently not feasible.
authors.affiliation: Division of Health Care Policy and Research, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado at Denver and Health Sciences Center, Denver, Colorado 80011-5704, USA. jim.grigsby@uchsc.edu
authors.forename: Jim
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Grigsby
authors.forename: Rachael E
authors.initials: RE
authors.lastname: Bennett
mesh_terms: D006302:Health Services Research; D016032:Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic / Q000191:economics / Q000592:standards*; D012107:Research Design / Q000592:standards / Q000639:trends; D017216:Telemedicine / Q000191:economics / Q000379:methods*; D014481:United States