[Economic aspects of telemedicine].
The aim of health technology assessments is to study the incremental impact of health interventions within a complex care system characterised by a multitude of individual behaviours and institutions. Most frameworks available for telemedicine evaluation simply examine financial costs relative to face-to-face consultations. Current data collection systems are poorly suited to rigorous analyses of new networks in everyday situations. Randomised trials are designed to remove sources of interference that could mask a causal relationship between a new organization and a set of results. Their methodology, which introduces the term ceteris paribus into the principles of good practice, is poorly suited to analyzing individual behaviours. Observational studies attempt to describe actual treatment situations as accurately as possible. By definition, however, they assume that the natural course of events is not deviated by interventions. The absence of an experimental plan increases the likelihood of bias and makes it more difficult to test for causal relationships. These approaches are poorly suited to testing for incremental effectiveness. Quasi-experimental studies and a staged approach would be more suited to a comprehensive assessment of telemedicine initiatives. In this way its impact on effectiveness, integration of care, quality of life and social costs may be identified in normal conditions of use.
Launois
Robert
R
Réseau d'Evaluation en Economie de la Santé, REES France, Paris.
D003362:Cost-Benefit Analysis; D006801:Humans; D017216:Telemedicine / Q000191:economics* / Q000379:methods