Alternative methods for intensity-modulated radiation therapy inverse planning and dose delivery.
A large number of IMRT systems are currently being marketed. Many of these systems appear to be unique, and manufacturers often emphasize design differences as they argue the merits of their particular approach. This paper focuses on highlighting the underlying feature that is intrinsically part of all IMRT systems. On the other hand, major differences often appear at the implementation stage for dose delivery. Such variations are evident because each manufacturer has a unique approach to balancing the issues of treatment time, leakage radiation reaching the patient's total body, aperture approximation of the ideal intensity maps, increasing the angles of approach for the treatment fields, integration of on-line imaging, selection of treatment distance, availability of different photon energies, and overall system complexity (i.e., cost). How these different issues are handled in the process of system design affects the relative advantages and disadvantages that appear in the final product. This paper takes the approach of dividing the various IMRT methods into categories that are divided roughly along the lines of the technique used during dose delivery to approximate the intensity patterns. Other features of each system are included under these sub-sections.
Galvin
James M
JM
Jefferson Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA. james.galvin@mail.tju.edu
D006801:Humans; D009369:Neoplasms / Q000532:radiotherapy*; D011829:Radiation Dosage; D011879:Radiotherapy Dosage; D050397:Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated / Q000379:methods*; D018570:Risk Assessment