title: Selecting Treatment for Distal Ureteral Calculi: Shock Wave Lithotripsy versus Ureteroscopy.
abstract: Shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) and ureteroscopy (URS) are both effective treatments for removal of distal ureteral calculi, associated with high success rates and limited morbidity. The American Urological Association Ureteral Stones Clinical Guidelines Panel has found both to be acceptable treatment options for patients, based on the stone-free results, morbidity, and retreatment rates for each respective therapy. However, costs and patient satisfaction or preference were not addressed, and the report was based on data derived from older endoscopic and lithotripsy technology. Each of these treatment options has valid advantages and disadvantages. Both modalities are reasonable treatment options for the majority of patients with distal ureteral calculi. Whereas SWL is less invasive, the high, immediate success rate with minimal morbidity and decreased cost makes URS a very valid competitor. The results of treating patients with larger stones favor URS.
authors.forename: Ojas D
authors.initials: OD
authors.lastname: Shah
authors.forename: Brian R
authors.initials: BR
authors.lastname: Matlaga
authors.forename: Dean G
authors.initials: DG
authors.lastname: Assimos