Commentary: the climate for physician adherence to psychiatric advance directives.
Factors that may be significant in rationalizing physician overrides of psychiatric advance directives (PADs) are not only features of individual clinical scenarios, but also are artifacts of the faltering mental health system being navigated by both provider and patient. This system, frequently viewed as hostile to consumer choice and increasingly focused on reacting to recurrent crises, is not predisposed to accepting proactive, person-centered measures such as PADs. In fact, PADs may hold great promise in improving clinical outcomes and even reducing system costs. But to realize the full potentials of PADs requires that providers understand their roles in challenging or perpetuating problems in the larger mental health system.
Bernstein
Robert
R
Bazelon Center for Mental Health Law, Washington, DC 20005, USA. robertb@bazelon.org
D016223:Advance Directives / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence* / Q000523:psychology; D006801:Humans; D010358:Patient Participation; D010817:Physician-Patient Relations; D014481:United States