title: The costs of REACH. REACH is largely welcomed, but the requirement to test existing chemicals for adverse effects is not good news for all.
authors.forename: Holger
authors.initials: H
authors.lastname: Breithaupt
mesh_terms: D032761:Animal Experimentation / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence; D000826:Animal Testing Alternatives / Q000191:economics / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence / Q000379:methods; D000818:Animals; D003365:Costs and Cost Analysis; D003902:Detergents / Q000009:adverse effects*; D004777:Environment; D004785:Environmental Pollutants / Q000009:adverse effects; D005062:European Union / Q000191:economics*; D005544:Forecasting; D006262:Health; D006801:Humans; D010573:Pesticide Residues / Q000009:adverse effects*; D018570:Risk Assessment / Q000191:economics* / Q000379:methods; D018675:Toxicity Tests / Q000191:economics
chemical_list: D003902:Detergents; D004785:Environmental Pollutants; D010573:Pesticide Residues