title: Effect of manganese source on manganese absorption by the intestine of broilers.
abstract: Two experiments were conducted to investigate the effect of Mn source on Mn absorption by the intestine of broilers. In Experiment 1, the effect of Mn source, including MnSO(4), 2 Mn-amino acid chelates (Mn-Gly and Mn-Met) synthesized in our laboratory, 3 Mn-amino acid complexes with different complex strengths (Mn-Met E, Mn-AA A, and Mn-AA B), and 2 mixtures of MnSO(4) with Gly or Met, on Mn absorption was assessed with ligated loops of different small intestinal segments of broilers. In Experiment 2, the absorption of Mn from MnSO(4), Mn-AA A, and Mn-AA B was compared with intact broilers fed ad libitum. The criterion used for comparison was the Mn content of hepatic portal vein plasma. The absorption of Mn was higher (P < 0.0002) by ligated ileal loops than by duodenal and jejunal ones. Met supplementation increased (P < 0.03) the absorption of Mn as MnSO(4). The absorption of Mn as Mn-AA A and Mn-AA B with moderate and strong complex strengths, respectively, were higher (P < 0.05) than those of Mn as MnSO(4) and Mn-Met E with weak complex strength. On d 7 and 9 of Experiment 2, the Mn content of portal vein plasma was higher (P < 0.03) for Mn-AA B with strong complex strength than for MnSO(4). On d 9, Mn content in plasma was higher (P < 0.01) for Mn-AA B with strong complex strength than for Mn-AA A with a moderate one. The results from this study confirm that the ileum was the main site of Mn absorption for broilers, and Met was more effective in facilitating Mn absorption than Gly as a ligand. Organic Mn was more efficiently absorbed than inorganic Mn (MnSO(4)); the absorption of organic Mn with moderate and strong complex strengths was greater than that of the organic Mn, which was weak, and the absorption of organic Mn with strong complex strength was greater than that of the organic Mn with a moderate strength.
authors.affiliation: Mineral Nutrition Research Division, Institute of Animal Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100094, China.
authors.forename: F
authors.initials: F
authors.lastname: Ji
authors.forename: X G
authors.initials: XG
authors.lastname: Luo
authors.forename: L
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Lu
authors.forename: B
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: Liu
authors.forename: S X
authors.initials: SX
authors.lastname: Yu
mesh_terms: D000704:Analysis of Variance; D000821:Animal Feed; D000818:Animals; D001682:Biological Availability; D002614:Chelating Agents / Q000378:metabolism; D002645:Chickens / Q000378:metabolism*; D005998:Glycine / Q000378:metabolism; D007408:Intestinal Absorption / Q000187:drug effects*; D007421:Intestine, Small / Q000378:metabolism*; D008297:Male; D008345:Manganese / Q000737:chemistry / Q000493:pharmacokinetics*; D017895:Manganese Compounds; D008715:Methionine / Q000378:metabolism; D011169:Portal Vein / Q000378:metabolism; D011897:Random Allocation; D013431:Sulfates
chemical_list: D002614:Chelating Agents; D017895:Manganese Compounds; D013431:Sulfates; D008345:Manganese; D008715:Methionine; D005998:Glycine; C039798:manganese sulfate