title: Assessing risk assessment: genetic testing and screening for complex disease.
abstract: This paper reports on the presentations from the second session of a 2-day workshop on genetic diversity and science communication, organized by the Institute of Genetics. The four talks in this session (by Sarah Cunningham-Burley, Gail Geller, Michael Hayden, and Theresa Marteau) focused on the topic of risk assessment in the context of genetic testing, screening and preventive medicine for complex disease. Each talk underscored the urgency and importance of evaluating when and for whom risk assessment may be useful. A recurrent theme was the need to attend closely to the diverse ways that risk is constructed, perceived and communicated in a variety of contexts and the significant implications of this for laypersons as well as experts. Although there was no consensus on when genetic risk assessment ceases (or might begin) to be useful, ensuing dialogue between presenters and participants reflected what is perhaps a new and critical engagement with how risk assessment itself is assessed. In response to this impetus, I use the word RISK as a heuristic to identify, extract and amplify four tendencies that appear to advance understandings of risk assessment towards a more explicitly reflexive, interpretive, and situated form of knowing.
authors.affiliation: The Maurice W Young Centre for Applied Ethics, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada. suecox@interchange.ubc.ca
authors.forename: S M
authors.initials: SM
authors.lastname: Cox
mesh_terms: D003142:Communication; D030342:Genetic Diseases, Inborn / Q000175:diagnosis / Q000235:genetics; D005820:Genetic Testing; D014644:Genetic Variation; D006801:Humans; D018570:Risk Assessment