Investigation of patient, tumour and treatment variables affecting residual motion for respiratory-gated radiotherapy.
Respiratory gating can reduce the apparent respiratory motion during imaging and treatment; however, residual motion within the gating window remains. Respiratory training can improve respiratory reproducibility and, therefore, the efficacy of respiratory-gated radiotherapy. This study was conducted to determine whether residual motion during respiratory gating is affected by patient, tumour or treatment characteristics. The specific aims of this study were to: (1) identify significant characteristics affecting residual motion, (2) investigate time trends of residual motion over a period of days (inter-session) and (3) investigate time trends of residual motion within the same day (intra-session). Twenty-four lung cancer patients were enrolled in an Institutional Review Board (IRB)-approved protocol. For approximately five sessions, 331 four-minute, respiratory motion traces were acquired with free breathing, audio instructions and audio-visual biofeedback for each patient. The residual motion was quantified by the standard deviation of the displacement within the gating window. The generalized linear model was used to obtain coefficients for each variable within the model and to evaluate the clinical and statistical significance. The statistical significance was determined by a p-value<0.05, while effect sizes of 0.1 cm (one standard deviation) were considered clinically significant. This data analysis was applied to patient, tumour and treatment variables. Inter- and intra-session variations were also investigated. The only variable that was significant for both inhale- and exhale-based gating was disease type. In addition, visual-training displacement, breathing type and Karnofsky performance status (KPS) values were significant for inhale-based gating, and dose-per-fraction was significant for exhale-based gating. Temporal respiratory variations within and between sessions were observed for individual patients. However inter- and intra-session analyses did not show significant time trends on average for any of the variables considered. The lack of significant time trends within and between sessions indicates that on average (1) there is no significant learning period for breathing training, (2) the patients did not experience training-related fatigue and (3) the margin component to account for residual motion during gated radiotherapy appears to remain constant throughout the treatment.
George
R
R
Department of Radiation Oncology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA. Rgoerge@mcvh-vcu.edu
Ramakrishnan
V
V
Siebers
J V
JV
Chung
T D
TD
Keall
P J
PJ
D003198:Computer Simulation; D008175:Lung Neoplasms / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging* / Q000503:physiopathology / Q000532:radiotherapy; D008954:Models, Biological; D009068:Movement; D011856:Radiographic Image Enhancement / Q000379:methods*; D011857:Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted / Q000379:methods*; D011880:Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted / Q000379:methods*; D020266:Radiotherapy, Conformal / Q000379:methods; D015656:Respiratory Mechanics; D014057:Tomography, X-Ray Computed / Q000379:methods*