title: [Quality control in rehabilitation of patients with visual impairment: evaluation of use and benefits of optic and electronic devices].
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Not only medical care and prescription of magnifying devices, but also social and professional rehabilitation are part of a complete interdisciplinary low vision service. This study provides quantitative data about the success of rehabilitation and the quality of the Low Vision Department's work.
  
  
  METHODS
  A sample of 105 visually disabled patients, who had already been provided with magnifying aids and other rehabilitation measures by the Low Vision Department, answered a questionnaire about quality control during a follow-up visit. The survey was carried out between May and October 2004. Patients were asked to rate the different rehabilitation measures and to comment on how frequently they used the different magnifying devices. Furthermore, they were asked to judge to what degree they coped with different life situations when using or not using the low vision aids.
  
  
  RESULTS
  The most frequently used aids were magnifiers (61%), glasses for near vision (34%), closed circuit television (20%), and monocular telescopes (20%). Of the 105 patients, 85 (81%) reported on frequent use of the devices, with just 3 patients (3%) reporting that they hardly ever used the aids. Only 2% of the patients could read newspaper text without the use of magnifying aids, while 51% were able to do this using the aids; 46% of the patients reported that they had profited from the social and professional rehabilitation measures.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Independently from the causal ophthalmologic diagnosis, patients were found to have benefited greatly from the rehabilitation measures provided by the Low Vision Department, enabling them to take part in more activities and participate more fully in social life, thereby greatly improving their quality of life. Frequent use of the low vision aids by the patient was ensured when offered alongside continued professional support.
authors.affiliation: Augenklinik der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Ambulanz für vergrössernde Sehhilfen/Sehbehindertenambulanz, Mathildenstrasse 8, 80336 München. Stephan.Froehlich@med.uni-muenchen.de
authors.forename: S J
authors.initials: SJ
authors.lastname: Fröhlich
authors.forename: C A
authors.initials: CA
authors.lastname: Lackerbauer
mesh_terms: D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D001766:Blindness / Q000175:diagnosis / Q000209:etiology / Q000523:psychology / Q000534:rehabilitation*; D005139:Eyeglasses / Q000592:standards*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D009216:Myopia / Q000175:diagnosis / Q000209:etiology / Q000523:psychology / Q000534:rehabilitation; D017060:Patient Satisfaction; D011786:Quality Control; D011788:Quality of Life / Q000523:psychology; D011932:Reading; D012050:Rehabilitation, Vocational; D012682:Sensory Aids / Q000592:standards*; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires; D015354:Vision, Low / Q000175:diagnosis / Q000209:etiology / Q000523:psychology / Q000534:rehabilitation*