title: Does motor lateralization have implications for stroke rehabilitation?
abstract: Recent findings on motor lateralization have revealed consistent differences in the control strategies of the dominant and nondominant hemisphere/limb systems that could have implications for hemiplegic stroke patients. Studies in stroke patients have demonstrated deficiencies in the ipsilesional arm that reflect these distinctions; patients with right-hemisphere damage tend to show deficits in positional accuracy, and patients with left-hemisphere damage show deficits in trajectory control. Such deficits have been shown to impede functional performance; yet patients with severe dominant-side hemiplegia must often use the nondominant arm as the primary manipulator for activities of daily living. Nevertheless, the nondominant arm may not spontaneously become efficient as a dominant manipulator, as indicated by the persistence of deficits in chronic stroke patients. More research is necessary to determine whether motor therapy can facilitate a more effective transition of this arm from a nondominant to a dominant controller.
authors.affiliation: Department of Kinesiology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA. rls45@psu.edu
authors.forename: Robert L
authors.initials: RL
authors.lastname: Sainburg
authors.forename: Susan V
authors.initials: SV
authors.lastname: Duff
mesh_terms: D007839:Functional Laterality / Q000502:physiology; D006801:Humans; D009069:Movement Disorders / Q000209:etiology / Q000503:physiopathology / Q000534:rehabilitation*; D020521:Stroke / Q000150:complications / Q000503:physiopathology*; D000071939:Stroke Rehabilitation