A cost-effectiveness analysis of radon protection methods in domestic properties: a comparative case study in Brixworth, Northamptonshire, UK.
Building regulations in the UK have since 1992 required that radon-proof membranes be installed in new domestic properties to protect residents against the adverse effects of radon. This study compares the cost-effectiveness of the current regulatory regime with an alternative that would entail new properties being tested for radon after construction, and being remediated if necessary. The alternative regime is found to be more cost-effective for a sample of properties in Brixworth, Northamptonshire, UK. For this regime, the central estimate of cost per quality-adjusted life-year gained, the measure of cost-effectiveness used, is 2869 pounds compared to 6182 pounds for installing membranes, results suggesting a case for re-examining the current regulations on radon protection in new properties. Pilot studies will, however, be needed to consider how different means of protecting residents of new properties against radon might operate in practice and to provide improved evidence on their relative cost-effectiveness.
Coskeran
Thomas
T
School of Accounting, Finance and Economics, Liverpool John Moores University, John Foster Building, 98 Mount Pleasant, Liverpool L3 5UZ, UK. t.coskeran@ljmu.ac.uk <t.coskeran@ljmu.ac.uk>
Denman
Antony
A
Phillips
Paul
P
Tornberg
Roger
R
D000398:Air Pollution, Radioactive / Q000191:economics* / Q000517:prevention & control; D003362:Cost-Benefit Analysis; D004739:England; D004781:Environmental Exposure / Q000191:economics* / Q000517:prevention & control; D033161:Government Regulation; D006798:Housing / Q000191:economics* / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D011788:Quality of Life; D011886:Radon / Q000009:adverse effects*
D011886:Radon