title: Will "no blood" kill Jehovah Witnesses?
abstract: A 46-year-old Indonesian woman presented with signs and symptoms suggestive of an ovarian tumour and was advised to have surgery with exploratory laparotomy and removal of the mass. She agreed but refused blood transfusion any time in the course of her treatment or procedure, as she was a Jehovah Witness. As there was a high risk of intraoperative haemorrhage, steps were taken to reduce any consequent complications due to the surgery. The ethical conflict is between respecting patient autonomy and compromising standards of care, arising from the refusal of a standard therapy. The latest developments in the blood transfusion doctrine policy for the Jehovah Witnesses are also discussed in this case study.
authors.affiliation: Ministry of Health, 16 College Road, College of Medicine Building, Singapore 169854. raymond_chua@moh.gov.sg
authors.forename: R
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Chua
authors.forename: K F
authors.initials: KF
authors.lastname: Tham
mesh_terms: D016223:Advance Directives; D001803:Blood Transfusion / Q000941:ethics*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007258:Informed Consent; D033221:Jehovah's Witnesses; D008875:Middle Aged; D010051:Ovarian Neoplasms / Q000601:surgery*; D026684:Personal Autonomy; D016896:Treatment Outcome; D016312:Treatment Refusal / Q000941:ethics*