The costs and benefits of undoing egocentric responsibility assessments in groups.
Individuals working in groups often egocentrically believe they have contributed more of the total work than is logically possible. Actively considering others' contributions effectively reduces these egocentric assessments, but this research suggests that undoing egocentric biases in groups may have some unexpected costs. Four experiments demonstrate that members who contributed much to the group outcome are actually less satisfied and less interested in future collaborations after considering others' contributions compared with those who contributed little. This was especially true in cooperative groups. Egocentric biases in responsibility allocation can create conflict, but this research suggests that undoing these biases can have some unfortunate consequences. Some members who look beyond their own perspective may not like what they see.
Caruso
Eugene
E
Department of Psychology, Harvard University, USA. ecaruso@fas.harvard.edu
Epley
Nicholas
N
Bazerman
Max H
MH
D000533:Altruism; D001319:Authorship; D003163:Competitive Behavior / Q000941:ethics / Q000502:physiology; D003220:Conflict, Psychological; D003299:Cooperative Behavior; D003657:Decision Making / Q000941:ethics / Q000502:physiology*; D004532:Ego; D004989:Ethics; D006126:Group Processes; D006801:Humans; D007398:Interpersonal Relations; D007600:Judgment / Q000941:ethics / Q000502:physiology; D008373:Manuscripts as Topic; D010379:Peer Group; D010465:Perception / Q000941:ethics / Q000502:physiology; D010549:Personal Satisfaction; D011287:Prejudice; D012919:Social Behavior; D013334:Students / Q000523:psychology; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires