title: Facilitated psychiatric advance directives: a randomized trial of an intervention to foster advance treatment planning among persons with severe mental illness.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  Studies show a high potential demand for psychiatric advance directives but low completion rates. The authors conducted a randomized study of a structured, manualized intervention to facilitate completion of psychiatric advance directives.
  
  
  METHODS
  A total of 469 patients with severe mental illness were randomly assigned to a facilitated psychiatric advance directive session or a control group that received written information about psychiatric advance directives and referral to resources in the public mental health system. Completion of an advance directive, its structure and content, and its short-term effects on working alliance and treatment satisfaction were recorded.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Sixty-one percent of participants in the facilitated session completed an advance directive or authorized a proxy decision maker, compared with only 3% of control group participants. Psychiatrists rated the advance directives as highly consistent with standards of community practice. Most participants used the advance directive to refuse some medications and to express preferences for admission to specific hospitals and not others, although none used an advance directive to refuse all treatment. At 1-month follow-up, participants in the facilitated session had a greater working alliance with their clinicians and were more likely than those in the control group to report receiving the mental health services they believed they needed.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The facilitation session is an effective method of helping patients complete psychiatric advance directives and ensuring that the documents contain useful information about patients' treatment preferences. Achieving the promise of psychiatric advance directives may require system-level policies to embed facilitation of these instruments in usual-care care settings.
authors.affiliation: Services Effectiveness Research Program, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA. jeffrey.swanson@duke.edu
authors.forename: Jeffrey W
authors.initials: JW
authors.lastname: Swanson
authors.forename: Marvin S
authors.initials: MS
authors.lastname: Swartz
authors.forename: Eric B
authors.initials: EB
authors.lastname: Elbogen
authors.forename: Richard A
authors.initials: RA
authors.lastname: Van Dorn
authors.forename: Joelle
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Ferron
authors.forename: H Ryan
authors.initials: HR
authors.lastname: Wagner
authors.forename: Barbara J
authors.initials: BJ
authors.lastname: McCauley
authors.forename: Mimi
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Kim
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D016223:Advance Directives / Q000523:psychology; D001291:Attitude of Health Personnel; D001294:Attitude to Health; D005260:Female; D005500:Follow-Up Studies; D005555:Forensic Psychiatry / Q000379:methods*; D007722:Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D001523:Mental Disorders / Q000175:diagnosis / Q000523:psychology* / Q000628:therapy*; D017063:Outcome Assessment, Health Care; D010347:Patient Care Planning / Q000458:organization & administration; D017060:Patient Satisfaction; D010817:Physician-Patient Relations; D019727:Proxy / Q000523:psychology; D011570:Psychiatry / Q000592:standards; D012720:Severity of Illness Index