title: Examining the basis for illusory recollection: the role of remember/know instructions.
abstract: Curiously, studies using the remember/know paradigm to measure recollective experience show that people often vividly remember events that never occurred, a phenomenon referred to as illusory recollection. Two experiments tested the hypothesis that false remember responses in the converging associates, or Deese/Roediger-McDermott (DRM) paradigm, reflect accurate memory for the study episode, rather than false recollection of critical lures. To test this hypothesis, we used standard remember instructions that emphasized recollection of the study context by allowing participants to use memory of surrounding list items as evidence for recollection, or we used modified instructions that did not include memory for surrounding list items as a basis for recollection. Results showed that, as compared with the standard instruction condition, the modified instructions selectively reduced reports of false remember responses to critical lures, but did not affect remember responses to studied items. By contrast, remember responses to critical lures were unaffected by an instruction condition that excluded the use of voice information as evidence for remembering. These results suggest that remember responses to falsely recognized items are driven partly by retrieval of studied items, rather than illusory recollection of the critical lures themselves. They further point to the importance of instructions in influencing subjective reports.
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843-4235, USA. lgeraci@tamu.edu
authors.forename: Lisa
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Geraci
authors.forename: David P
authors.initials: DP
authors.lastname: McCabe
mesh_terms: D006801:Humans; D007088:Illusions; D011939:Mental Recall; D011930:Reaction Time; D013997:Time Factors