title: Survey of the use of quality indicators in academic radiology departments.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  Our purpose was to determine whether quality in academic radiology departments in the United States is systematically measured through indicators and evaluated by preset standards.
  
  
  METHODS
  We performed a cross-sectional study using a validated survey sent to Society of Chairmen of Academic Radiology Departments (SCARD) members and studied type, frequency of monitoring, and use of preset standards for evaluation of quality indicators. Statistical methods were descriptive summary statistics, chi-square test, analysis of variance, and Spearman's rank correlation test.
  
  
  RESULTS
  The response rate was 42% (55/132). Most responding hospitals were from the Northeast (20/55, 36.4%) and Midwest (18/55, 32.7%). About 58% (32/55) of the responding hospitals had more than 500 beds in operation; 50.9% (28/55) of the radiology departments performed 200,000-400,000 examinations per year. Among the 80% of departments (44/55) that monitored patient satisfaction, only 49.1% and 45.5% assessed referring physician and employee satisfaction, respectively. The most frequently monitored customer satisfaction indicator, patient satisfaction, was monitored quarterly or less frequently by 70.5% (31/44) of departments; about 45.5% (20/44) had preset standards for this indicator. MRI and CT were monitored for patient appointment access by 80% (44/55) and 72.7% (40/55) of departments, respectively; 59.1% (26/44) and 62.5% (25/40) of departments applied preset standards to these indicators, respectively. The reporting-time indicator monitored most frequently was report turnaround time (45/55, 81.8%). None of the differences in mean numbers and monitoring frequencies of the indicators and the use of preset standards to evaluate them by region and size of departments were significant (p >0.05).
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Use of quality management indicators, particularly customer satisfaction indicators, is not a fully standardized and established process for academic radiology departments in the United States.
authors.affiliation: Hospital Administration, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02120, USA.
authors.forename: Silvia
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Ondategui-Parra
authors.forename: Sukru M
authors.initials: SM
authors.lastname: Erturk
authors.forename: Pablo R
authors.initials: PR
authors.lastname: Ros
mesh_terms: D000046:Academic Medical Centers; D003430:Cross-Sectional Studies; D003625:Data Collection; D017060:Patient Satisfaction; D011785:Quality Assurance, Health Care; D019984:Quality Indicators, Health Care / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D011872:Radiology Department, Hospital / Q000592:standards*; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires; D014481:United States