title: Chemotherapy for metastatic carcinoma of the esophagus and gastro-esophageal junction.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  More than 50% of patients with esophageal cancer have metastatic disease at presentation. The use of chemotherapy for this patient group is increasing with the intention of local and distant tumor control, improving quality of life and prolongation of survival.
  
  
  OBJECTIVE
  To assess the effectiveness of a) chemotherapy versus best supportive care or b) different chemotherapy regimes against each other, in metastatic esophageal carcinoma.
  
  
  METHODS
  Searches were conducted on the Cochrane Central register of Controlled Trials--CENTRAL (which includes the Cochrane Upper Gastrointestinal and Pancreatic Diseases Group Trials Register) on The Cochrane Library (Issue 1 2004) MEDLINE (1966 to February 2004), EMBASE (1980 to February 2004) and Cancerlit. Reference lists from trials selected by electronic searching were handsearched to identify further relevant trials. Published abstracts from conference proceedings from the United European Gastroenterology Week (published in Gut) and Digestive Disease Week (published in Gastroenterology) were handsearched. The search was updated in February 2005 and February 2006. Members of the Cochrane UGPD Group, and experts in the field were contacted and asked to provide details of outstanding clinical trials and any relevant unpublished materials
  
  
  METHODS
  Randomized controlled trials comparing chemotherapy versus best supportive care, or different chemotherapy regimes against each other in patients with metastatic carcinoma of the esophagus or gastro-esophageal junction.
  
  
  METHODS
  Two authors (MYVH/EJK) extracted data and assessed trial quality. Study authors were contacted to obtain subgroup results of patients with metastatic esophageal carcinoma.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Only two RCTs with a total of 42 participants compared chemotherapy with best supportive care for metastatic esophageal cancer. No survival benefit was shown for chemotherapy treatment in these RCTs. Five RCTs with a total of 1242 participants compared different chemotherapy regimes. Due to variation in patient population and chemotherapy regimes, it was not possible to perform a formal pooled analysis. There was no consistent benefit of any specific chemotherapy regimen.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  There is a need for well designed, adequately powered, phase III trials comparing chemotherapy versus best supportive care for patients with metastatic esophageal cancer. Chemotherapy agents with promising response rates and tolerable toxicity are cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), paclitaxel and antracyclins. Future trials comparing palliative treatment modalities should assess quality of life with validated quality of life measures.
authors.affiliation: Erasmus MC, Dept. of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, University Medical Center, PO Box 2040, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
authors.forename: M Y V
authors.initials: MY
authors.lastname: Homs
authors.forename: A
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: v d Gaast
authors.forename: P D
authors.initials: PD
authors.lastname: Siersema
authors.forename: E W
authors.initials: EW
authors.lastname: Steyerberg
authors.forename: E J
authors.initials: EJ
authors.lastname: Kuipers
mesh_terms: D000971:Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols / Q000627:therapeutic use*; D004938:Esophageal Neoplasms / Q000188:drug therapy*; D004943:Esophagogastric Junction; D006801:Humans; D016032:Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic