The use of religion in death penalty sentencing trials.
Both prosecutors and defense attorneys have presented religious appeals and testimony about a defendant's religious activities in order to influence capital jurors' sentencing. Courts that have objected to this use of religion fear that religion will improperly influence jurors' decisions and interfere with their ability to weigh aggravators and mitigators. This study investigated the effects of both prosecution and defense appeals. Prosecution appeals did not affect verdict decisions; however, use of religion by the defense affected both verdicts and the weighing of aggravators and mitigators. These results could be due to differences in perceived sincerity and remorse that are conveyed in the various appeals.
Miller
Monica K
MK
Department of Criminal Justice, University of Nevada, Reno, Mailstop 214, Reno, NV 89557, USA. mkmiller@unr.edu
Bornstein
Brian H
BH
D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D000704:Analysis of Variance; D001290:Attitude; D001633:Bible; D002203:Capital Punishment; D002835:Christianity / Q000523:psychology; D003657:Decision Making; D004644:Emotions; D005260:Female; D007722:Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice; D006801:Humans; D033222:Judicial Role; D035846:Law Enforcement; D033241:Lawyers / Q000523:psychology*; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D015146:Midwestern United States; D010565:Persuasive Communication; D011582:Psychological Theory; D011678:Punishment / Q000523:psychology; D012069:Religion and Psychology