On No-KR tests in motor learning, retention and transfer.
In this paper we examine the role of no-knowledge of results (KR) tests in motor learning, retention and transfer. A distinction is drawn between studies of KR and studies of other issues in motor learning that use a No-KR test. Arguments are presented against the currently received position that a No-KR test is an essential protocol to examine motor learning, although a No-KR test is most relevant in the few contexts where the outcome information is not naturally available. Perspectives are provided on the limited though proper role of No-KR tests in motor learning, retention and transfer and these are illustrated through experimental examples. It is proposed that the current restrictive interpretation of KR as only augmented outcome information is narrowing not only the context of KR research but also the study of motor learning in general.
Russell
Daniel M
DM
The Pennsylvania State University - Berks, Division of Science, P.O. Box 7009, Tulpehocken Road, Reading, PA 19610, United States. dmr18@psu.edu
Newell
Karl M
KM
D003214:Conditioning, Classical; D006801:Humans; D007721:Knowledge of Results, Psychological; D007858:Learning / Q000502:physiology*; D008568:Memory / Q000502:physiology*; D009043:Motor Activity / Q000502:physiology*