title: International survey of peritoneal dialysis training programs.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  To survey nurses around the world about current practices for peritoneal dialysis (PD) home training programs.
  
  
  METHODS
  Random sampling of nurses to complete a written survey from the International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis Nursing Liaison Committee.
  
  
  METHODS
  United States, Canada, South America (Brazil, Columbia), The Netherlands, Hong Kong.
  
  
  METHODS
  Surveys and responses were sent by fax whenever possible, or by regular mail, or hand carried, or conducted by telephone. Results were stratified by geographic areas as well as by cumulative responses and were expressed as medians with ranges. Kruskal-Wallis was used to evaluate differences in responses. Associations between variables were tested with Pearson correlation. Univariate regression analysis was used to evaluate the impact of variables on peritonitis rates. Variables with p < 0.10 were included in a multivariate analysis.
  
  
  RESULTS
  A total of 317 nurses responded: 88 in the United States, 46 in Canada, 58 in South America, 58 in Hong Kong, and 67 in The Netherlands. This represented 37% of all surveys distributed. Respondents had a median of 12 years' experience in nephrology (range 1-35 years), but only 31% had a formal background in adult education. Nearly half received their guidance to patient training from a nurse colleague, 11% were guided by a corporate colleague, and 8% were simply self-taught. Clinics responding had a median of 30 PD patients (range 1-400) and reported they trained a median of 8 patients per year (range 0-86). Reported peritonitis rates were a median 0.46 per year or 1 episode every 26 months. Peritonitis rates, however, were not known by 53% of respondents. Total training time per patient had a very wide range of hours, from 6 to 96. There was no correlation between training time and peritonitis rates among the study respondents (p = 0.38), nor with any other variables.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  There is wide variation in practices for PD patient training programs within countries and around the world. Training time did not appear to be related to peritonitis rates. Randomized trials of training practices are needed to determine which approaches produce the best outcomes for patients.
authors.affiliation: University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213, USA.
authors.forename: Judith
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Bernardini
authors.forename: Valerie
authors.initials: V
authors.lastname: Price
authors.forename: Ana
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Figueiredo
authors.forename: Aase
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Riemann
authors.forename: Dora
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Leung
mesh_terms: D006437:Hemodialysis, Home / Q000193:education*; D006801:Humans; D038622:Internationality; D009729:Nursing; D010353:Patient Education as Topic; D010530:Peritoneal Dialysis; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires