title: Prognosis research: why is Dr. Lydgate still waiting?
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Understanding prognosis--the future risk of adverse outcomes among people with existing disease--plays third fiddle behind clinical research into therapeutic interventions and novel diagnostic technologies.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Diseases show marked variations in a wide range of prognostic outcomes, yet these variations have seldom been the subject of systematic and sustained epidemiologic and multidisciplinary research. This is important to prioritize hypotheses for testing in intervention studies in groups, and to refine tools for prognostication in individuals. Methodologic standards for the design, conduct, analysis and reporting of prognosis research are required. Training is needed for the clinicians, policymakers, and payers who use prognostic information.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Here, arguments detracting from the potential scope of prognosis research are rebutted and misconceptions addressed with the aim of stimulating debate on the evolving role of prognosis research.
authors.affiliation: Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London Medical School, 1-19 Torrington Place, London WC1E 6BT, UK. h.hemingway@ucl.ac.uk
authors.forename: Harry
authors.initials: H
authors.lastname: Hemingway
mesh_terms: D004194:Disease / Q000145:classification; D004501:Education, Medical / Q000379:methods; D016021:Epidemiologic Studies; D019317:Evidence-Based Medicine; D006801:Humans; D009042:Motivation; D011379:Prognosis; D016032:Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; D012106:Research / Q000639:trends*