Packaging health services when resources are limited: the example of a cervical cancer screening visit.
BACKGROUND
Increasing evidence supporting the value of screening women for cervical cancer once in their lifetime, coupled with mounting interest in scaling up successful screening demonstration projects, present challenges to public health decision makers seeking to take full advantage of the single-visit opportunity to provide additional services. We present an analytic framework for packaging multiple interventions during a single point of contact, explicitly taking into account a budget and scarce human resources, constraints acknowledged as significant obstacles for provision of health services in poor countries.


RESULTS
We developed a binary integer programming (IP) model capable of identifying an optimal package of health services to be provided during a single visit for a particular target population. Inputs to the IP model are derived using state-transition models, which compute lifetime costs and health benefits associated with each intervention. In a simplified example of a single lifetime cervical cancer screening visit, we identified packages of interventions among six diseases that maximized disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) averted subject to budget and human resource constraints in four resource-poor regions. Data were obtained from regional reports and surveys from the World Health Organization, international databases, the published literature, and expert opinion. With only a budget constraint, interventions for depression and iron deficiency anemia were packaged with cervical cancer screening, while the more costly breast cancer and cardiovascular disease interventions were not. Including personnel constraints resulted in shifting of interventions included in the package, not only across diseases but also between low- and high-intensity intervention options within diseases.


CONCLUSIONS
The results of our example suggest several key themes: Packaging other interventions during a one-time visit has the potential to increase health gains; the shortage of personnel represents a real-world constraint that can impact the optimal package of services; and the shortage of different types of personnel may influence the contents of the package of services. Our methods provide a general framework to enhance a decision maker's ability to simultaneously consider costs, benefits, and important nonmonetary constraints. We encourage analysts working on real-world problems to shift from considering costs and benefits of interventions for a single disease to exploring what synergies might be achievable by thinking across disease burdens.
Kim
Jane J
JJ
Department of Health Policy and Management, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America. jkim@hsph.harvard.edu
Salomon
Joshua A
JA
Weinstein
Milton C
MC
Goldie
Sue J
SJ
D003695:Delivery of Health Care / Q000379:methods*; D003906:Developing Countries; D005260:Female; D017048:Health Care Costs; D006295:Health Resources / Q000600:supply & distribution*; D006280:Health Workforce; D006801:Humans; D008403:Mass Screening; D009819:Office Visits; D002583:Uterine Cervical Neoplasms / Q000517:prevention & control*