Effects of response-stimulus interval manipulation and articulatory suppression on task switching.
We conducted three experiments using a list paradigm to examine how articulatory suppression and response-stimulus interval (RSI) manipulation affected task switching. Experiments 1 and 2 tested task-switching performance under a short and long RSI and three concurrent task conditions (control, articulatory suppression, and tapping) without external task cues. The results indicated that alternation had a greater effect under articulatory suppression than under the control and tapping conditions, and that articulatory suppression costs were unrelated to the RSI. In Experiment 3, an external task cue was provided with each stimulus, and the negative effect of articulatory suppression on alternation cost was eliminated. These results indicated that articulatory suppression effects did not differ between conditions of short and long RSI and that the availability of verbal representations of task information was independent of RSI length. This paper discussed the possible roles played by the phonological loop in task-switching paradigms.
Saeki
Erina
E
Division of Applied System Neuroscience, Advanced Medical Research Center, Nihon University Graduate School of Medical Science 31-1, Oyaguchi-kamicho, Itabashi-ku, Tokyo, 173-0032, Japan. saeki@med.nihon-u.ac.jp
Saito
Satoru
S
Kawaguchi
Jun
J
D000328:Adult; D003071:Cognition / Q000502:physiology*; D003463:Cues; D006801:Humans; D008960:Models, Psychological; D010775:Photic Stimulation; D011597:Psychomotor Performance; D011930:Reaction Time / Q000502:physiology*