title: Physician colorectal cancer screening recommendations: an examination based on informed decision making.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  The purpose of this research was to examine the content of physicians' colorectal cancer screening recommendations. More specifically, using the framework of informed decision making synthesized by Braddock and colleagues, we conducted a qualitative study of the content of recommendations to describe how physicians are currently presenting this information to patients.
  
  
  METHODS
  We conducted semi-structured interviews with 65 primary care physicians. We analyzed responses to a question designed to elicit how the physicians typically communicate their recommendation.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Almost all of the physicians (98.5%) addressed the "nature of decision" element. A majority of physicians discussed "uncertainties associated with the decision" (67.7%). Fewer physicians covered "the patient's role in decision making" (33.8%), "risks and benefits" (16.9%), "alternatives" (10.8%), "assessment of patient understanding" (6.2%), or "exploration of patient's preferences" (1.5%).
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  We propose that the content of the colorectal screening recommendation is a critical determinant to whether a patient undergoes screening. Our examination of physician recommendations yielded mixed results, and the deficiencies identified opportunities for improvement.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  We suggest primary care physicians clarify that screening is meant for those who are asymptotic, present tangible and intangible benefits and risks, as well as make a primary recommendation, and, if needed, a "compromise" recommendation, in order to increase screening utilization.
authors.affiliation: Martin School of Public Policy and Administration, University of Kentucky, KY, USA. sbwack0@uky.edu
authors.forename: Sarah B
authors.initials: SB
authors.lastname: Wackerbarth
authors.forename: Yelena N
authors.initials: YN
authors.lastname: Tarasenko
authors.forename: Jennifer M
authors.initials: JM
authors.lastname: Joyce
authors.forename: Steven A
authors.initials: SA
authors.lastname: Haist
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D001291:Attitude of Health Personnel; D001294:Attitude to Health; D015179:Colorectal Neoplasms / Q000175:diagnosis*; D003142:Communication; D003657:Decision Making; D005260:Female; D007722:Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice; D006287:Health Planning Guidelines; D006801:Humans; D007258:Informed Consent; D007629:Kentucky; D008297:Male; D008403:Mass Screening / Q000379:methods / Q000592:standards; D008875:Middle Aged; D010353:Patient Education as Topic / Q000458:organization & administration*; D010358:Patient Participation / Q000379:methods / Q000523:psychology; D018579:Patient Selection; D010817:Physician-Patient Relations; D010821:Physicians, Family / Q000458:organization & administration / Q000523:psychology*; D017410:Practice Guidelines as Topic; D018570:Risk Assessment; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires; D035501:Uncertainty