An examination of learning processes during critical incident training: implications for the development of adaptable trainees.
Three experiments are reported that examined the process by which trainees learn decision-making skills during a critical incident training program. Formal theories of category learning were used to identify two processes that may be responsible for the acquisition of decision-making skills: rule learning and exemplar learning. Experiments 1 and 2 used the process dissociation procedure (L. L. Jacoby, 1998) to evaluate the contribution of these processes to performance. The results suggest that trainees used a mixture of rule and exemplar learning. Furthermore, these learning processes were influenced by different aspects of training structure and design. The goal of Experiment 3 was to develop training techniques that enable trainees to use a rule adaptively. Trainees were tested on cases that represented exceptions to the rule. Unexpectedly, the results suggest that providing general instruction regarding the kinds of conditions in which a decision rule does not apply caused them to fixate on the specific conditions mentioned and impaired their ability to identify other conditions in which the rule might not apply. The theoretical, methodological, and practical implications of the results are discussed.
Neal
Andrew
A
Key Centre for Human Factors, School of Psychology, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia. andrew@psy.uq.edu.au
Godley
Stuart T
ST
Kirkpatrick
Terry
T
Dewsnap
Graham
G
Joung
Wendy
W
Hesketh
Beryl
B
D000223:Adaptation, Psychological; D000328:Adult; D003419:Crisis Intervention / Q000379:methods*; D003657:Decision Making; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007858:Learning; D008297:Male; D013663:Teaching / Q000379:methods*