title: [Perineal prostatectomy].
abstract: There is a lack of prospective randomised trials comparing the efficacy of the different techniques for treating localised prostate cancer. Consequently, selecting one rather than the other appears very difficult. Even radical prostatectomy is controversial regarding its best approach--perineal, retropubic or laparoscopic. The perineal route was the first to be undertaken, and it was dropped out due to the need of performing obturator lymphadenectomy by a separate approach. Widespread use of prostate-specific antigen as a screening method has enabled to diagnose prostate cancer at its early stages, when the potential for lymphatic dissemination is low, which enables to obviate Lymphadenectomy in most patients. This was a promoting circumstance to use the perineal route in radical prostatectomies. In this article we discuss the perineal radical prostatectomy surgical technique, its indications, and its advantages and disadvantages as compared to other approaches.
authors.affiliation: Service d'urologie, Fundació Puigvert, C/ Cartagena 340-350, 08225 Barcelone, Espagne. hvillavicencio@fundacio_puigvert.es
authors.forename: H
authors.initials: H
authors.lastname: Villavicencio
authors.forename: J
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Segarra
mesh_terms: D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D010502:Perineum; D011468:Prostatectomy / Q000009:adverse effects / Q000379:methods*; D011471:Prostatic Neoplasms / Q000601:surgery*