title: Why the Groningen Protocol should be rejected.
authors.affiliation: Weill Medical College of Cornell University-New York Presbyterian Hospital, USA.
authors.forename: Frank A
authors.initials: FA
authors.lastname: Chervenak
authors.forename: Laurence B
authors.initials: LB
authors.lastname: McCullough
authors.forename: Birgit
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: Arabin
mesh_terms: D000025:Abortion, Eugenic / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence; D026686:Beneficence; D002985:Clinical Protocols / Q000592:standards; D017281:Cost of Illness; D026690:Ethics, Clinical; D005066:Euthanasia, Passive / Q000941:ethics* / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007231:Infant, Newborn; D008297:Male; D009426:Netherlands; D033282:Parental Consent; D026684:Personal Autonomy; D011247:Pregnancy; D011262:Pregnancy Trimester, Second; D011379:Prognosis; D011788:Quality of Life; D012017:Referral and Consultation; D016135:Spinal Dysraphism / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging; D013315:Stress, Psychological / Q000209:etiology; D016216:Ultrasonography, Prenatal; D028761:Withholding Treatment