title: Contamination vs. harm-relevant outcome expectancies and covariation bias in spider phobia.
abstract: There is increasing evidence that spiders are not feared because of harmful outcome expectancies but because of disgust and contamination-relevant outcome expectancies. This study investigated the relative strength of contamination- and harm-relevant UCS expectancies and covariation bias in spider phobia. High (n=25) and low (n=24) spider fearful individuals saw a series of slides comprising spiders, pitbulls, maggots, and rabbits. Slides were randomly paired with either a harm-relevant outcome (electrical shock), a contamination-related outcome (drinking of a distasting fluid), or nothing. Spider fearful individuals displayed a contamination-relevant UCS expectancy bias associated with spiders, whereas controls displayed a harm-relevant expectancy bias. There was no evidence for a (differential) postexperimental covariation bias; thus the biased expectancies were not robust against refutation. The present findings add to the evidence that contamination ideation is critically involved in spider phobia.
authors.affiliation: Department of Developmental and Clinical Psychology, University of Groningen, Grote Kruisstraat 1/2, 9712 TS Groningen, The Netherlands. p.j.de.jong@rug.nl
authors.forename: Peter J
authors.initials: PJ
authors.lastname: de Jong
authors.forename: Madelon L
authors.initials: ML
authors.lastname: Peters
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D000339:Affect; D000818:Animals; D004597:Electroshock; D005239:Fear / Q000523:psychology*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D010698:Phobic Disorders / Q000523:psychology*; D011594:Psychometrics; D013112:Spiders