title: Laparoscopic vertical banded gastroplasty. A multicenter prospective study of 200 procedures.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  The commonest surgical procedure for management of morbid obesity in Europe is laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB), even though laparoscopic vertical banded gastroplasty (LVBG) is still considered to be a gold standard restrictive option in bariatric surgery. A multicenter prospective study was designed to to assess the efficacy of LVBG in terms of weight loss and complication rates for obese patients who have indications for a restrictive procedure.
  
  
  METHODS
  Two-hundred morbidly obese patients (84.5% female) with a mean age of 41 years and mean body mass index (BMI) of 43.2 kg/m(2) underwent LVBG as described by MacLean. Five trocars were placed in standard positions as per laparoscopic upper gastrointestinal surgery. A vertical gastric pouch (30 ml) was created with circular (21 or 25mm) and endolinear stapling techniques, enabling definitive separation of the two parts of the stomach. The gastric outlet was calibrated with either a polypropylene mesh (5.5 cm in length and 1cm in width) or a nonadjustable silicone band. The median follow-up period was 30 months (range, 1-72 months).
  
  
  RESULTS
  One case had to be converted to open surgery (gastric perforation) and there was one death secondary to peritonitis of unknown etiology. The morbidity rate was 24%, comprising the following complications: gastric outlet stenosis (8%); staple line leak (2.5%); food trapping (1.5%); peritonitis (1%); thrombophlebitis (1.5%); pulmonary embolism (0.5%); and gastroesophageal reflux (9%). The excess weight loss achieved was 56.7% (1 year), 68.3% (2 years), and 65.1% (3 years).
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Laparoscopic vertical banded gastroplasty is an effective procedure for the surgical management of morbid obesity, especially for patients who present hyperphagia but are unable to manage the constraints of adjustable gastric banding. Laparoscopic vertical banded gastroplasty is safe, as demonstrated by an acceptable complication rate, of which gastric outlet stenosis, staple line leakage, and gastroesophageal reflux predominate.
authors.affiliation: Department of Digestive Surgery Pr Fabre, Hopital Saint Eloi, University Hospital of Montpellier, Montpellier, France. d.nocca@wanadoo.fr
authors.forename: D
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Nocca
authors.forename: R
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Aggarwal
authors.forename: P
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Blanc
authors.forename: B
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: Gallix
authors.forename: G L
authors.initials: GL
authors.lastname: Di Mauro
authors.forename: B
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: Millat
authors.forename: C
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Seguin des De Hons
authors.forename: E
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Deneve
authors.forename: J G
authors.initials: JG
authors.lastname: Rodier
authors.forename: G
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Tincani
authors.forename: M A
authors.initials: MA
authors.lastname: Pierredon
authors.forename: J M
authors.initials: JM
authors.lastname: Fabre
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D005260:Female; D015391:Gastroplasty / Q000009:adverse effects; D006801:Humans; D010535:Laparoscopy; D008297:Male; D009767:Obesity, Morbid / Q000601:surgery; D011183:Postoperative Complications; D011446:Prospective Studies; D016896:Treatment Outcome; D015431:Weight Loss