The association between psychological distance and construal level: evidence from an implicit association test.
According to construal level theory (N. Liberman, Y. Trope, & E. Stephan, in press; Y. Trope & N. Liberman, 2003), people use a more abstract, high construal level when judging, perceiving, and predicting more psychologically distal targets, and they judge more abstract targets as being more psychologically distal. The present research demonstrated that associations between more distance and higher level of construal also exist on a pure conceptual level. Eight experiments used the Implicit Association Test (IAT; A. G. Greenwald, D. E. McGhee, & J. L. K. Schwartz, 1998) to demonstrate an association between words related to construal level (low vs. high) and words related to four dimensions of distance (proximal vs. distal): temporal distance, spatial distance, social distance, and hypotheticality. In addition to demonstrating an association between level of construal and psychological distance, these findings also corroborate the assumption that all 4 dimensions of psychological distance are related to level of construal in a similar way and support the notion that they all are forms of psychological distance.
Bar-Anan
Yoav
Y
Department of Psychology, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel. baranan@virginia.edu
Liberman
Nira
N
Trope
Yaacov
Y
D003210:Concept Formation; D004215:Distance Perception; D005260:Female; D007839:Functional Laterality; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D010153:Paired-Associate Learning; D012929:Psychological Distance; D011597:Psychomotor Performance; D011930:Reaction Time; D012660:Semantics; D013998:Time Perception