title: [Patient acceptance of magnetic resonance colonography: a prospective inquiry for comparison to conventional colonoscopy].
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  Precondition for establishment of magnetic resonance colonography (MRCG) as a diagnostic tool in secondary prevention of colorectal cancer is not only high diagnostic accuracy but also a good acceptance amongst patients. The aim of this study was to compare post-examination appraisal of patients for MRCG to that of bowel preparation and conventional colonoscopy.
  
  
  METHODS
  88 patients (24 women, 64 men, mean age 67 +- 17,3 years) were interviewed by a standardized questionnaire regarding pain/discomfort (scale from 1 to 10), overall assessment of difficulties and preference for future tests. After bowel cleansing, MRCG and conventional colonoscopy were performed on the same day. Bowel cleansing consisted of drinking about 5 liters of a polyethylene glycol-electrolyte solution. For MRCG the colon was filled with ca. 2000 ml of tap water. Imaging was performed with a 1.5T MR scanner in the prone position.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Most unpleasant for the patients was the preceding bowel preparation (70%), followed by colonoscopy (14%) and MRCG (8%). The preferred method was MRCG (58%) followed by colonoscopy (20,5%). The most unpleasant symptoms named by patients were the amount of oral electrolyte solution that had to be drunk (34%), abdominal pressure (25%), nausea (24%) because of bowel preparation, body positioning (25%) and rectal tube (13%) during MRCG, abdominal pressure (19%) and pain (18%) during colonoscopy.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Patients' acceptance of MRCG indicates that it has a potential role as an additional diagnostic tool in secondary prevention of colorectal cancer.
authors.affiliation: Medizinische Klinik C, Klinikum der Stadt Ludwigshafen gGmbH, Brenserstrasse 79, 67063 Ludwigshafen am Rhein. medcluhartmann@t-online.de
authors.forename: D
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Hartmann
authors.forename: B
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: Bassler
authors.forename: B
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: Pfeifer
authors.forename: A
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Eickhoff
authors.forename: U
authors.initials: U
authors.lastname: Weickert
authors.forename: J F
authors.initials: JF
authors.lastname: Riemann
authors.forename: G
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Layer
mesh_terms: D000368:Aged; D003113:Colonoscopy / Q000523:psychology*; D015179:Colorectal Neoplasms / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000473:pathology / Q000517:prevention & control; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008279:Magnetic Resonance Imaging / Q000379:methods* / Q000523:psychology*; D008297:Male; D010147:Pain Measurement; D010342:Patient Acceptance of Health Care; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires