The role of typography in differentiating look-alike/sound-alike drug names.
Until recently, when errors occurred in the course of caring for patients, blame was assigned to the healthcare professionals closest to the incident rather than examining the larger system and the actions that led up to the event. Now, the medical profession is embracing expertise and methodologies used in other fields to improve its own systems in relation to patient safety issues. This exploratory study, part of a Master's of Design thesis project, was a response to the problem of errors that occur due to confusion between look-alike/sound-alike drug names (medication names that have orthographic and/or phonetic similarities). The study attempts to provide a visual means to help differentiate problematic names using formal typographic and graphic cues. The FDA's Name Differentiation Project recommendations and other typographic alternatives were considered to address issues of attention and cognition. Eleven acute care nurses participated in testing that consisted of word-recognition tasks and questions intended to elicit opinions regarding the visual treatment of look-alike/sound-alike names in the context of a label prototype. Though limited in sample size, testing provided insight into the kinds of typographic differentiation that might be effective in a high-risk situation.
Gabriele
Sandra
S
Department of Design, Faculty of Fine Arts, York University, Toronto, ON. sandrag@yorku.ca
D002170:Canada; D003142:Communication; D004348:Drug Labeling; D006801:Humans; D008508:Medication Errors / Q000517:prevention & control*; D012106:Research; D017751:Safety Management / Q000458:organization & administration*; D013647:Task Performance and Analysis