title: Reasoning about complex probabilistic concepts in childhood.
abstract: The competencies of children, particularly their understanding of the more complex probabilistic concepts, have not been thoroughly investigated. In the present study participants were required to choose the more likely of two events, a single event, and a joint event (conjunctive or disjunctive). It was predicted that the operation of the representativeness heuristic would result in erroneous judgements when children compared an unlikely component event with a likely-unlikely conjunction (the conjunction fallacy) and when a likely component event was compared to a likely-unlikely disjunction. The results supported the first prediction with both older children aged between 9 and 10 years and younger children aged between 4 and 5 committing the conjunction fallacy. However, the second prediction was not confirmed. It is proposed that the basis of representativeness judgements may differ between the conjunctive and disjunctive cases with absolute frequency information possibly playing a differential role.
authors.affiliation: University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK. jfisk@uclan.ac.uk
authors.forename: John E
authors.initials: JE
authors.lastname: Fisk
authors.forename: Angela S
authors.initials: AS
authors.lastname: Bury
authors.forename: Rachel
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Holden
mesh_terms: D002648:Child; D002675:Child, Preschool; D003071:Cognition; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007600:Judgment; D008297:Male; D010988:Play and Playthings; D011340:Problem Solving