title: Objective criteria for successful transsphenoidal removal of suprasellar nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas. A prospective study.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Despite ample experience with transsphenoidal surgery, objective data on which suprasellar tumour expansion and growth pattern allows for radical adenoma resection are still sparse. Hence, we have performed a prospective study to establish the predictive value of tumour dimension and shape for the intra-operative descent of the diaphragma, the completeness of tumour resection and the outcome of patients harbouring pituitary adenomas with suprasellar extension.
  
  
  METHODS
  Included in the study were 105 patients with nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas and suprasellar extension who underwent primary transsphenoidal surgery between January 1998 and December 2005. The precise suprasellar extension, the degree of dumbbell-shape, the configuration of the adenomas and the depth of the pituitary fossa were evaluated. Completeness of resection was assessed by MRI at 3 months postoperatively.
  
  
  RESULTS
  The mean cranio-caudal diameter of the tumours was 28.0 mm (range 9.2-57.8 mm). On average, the suprasellar extension measured 11.9 mm (range 2.1-25.8 mm). Total removal of the suprasellar tumour was accomplished in 83% (87 of 105) of the patients. A second operation for residual adenoma was only indicated in 2 cases. The vertical intracranial extension was the strongest independent predictor of subtotal resection (p < 0.001). Irregular and multilobular configuration was a second highly-significant and independent predictor for incomplete resection (p < 0.003). In contrast, dumbbell-shape and shallow pituitary fossa were not independent predictive factors for incomplete tumour resection. The complication rate was very low. None of our patients suffered postoperative rhinorrhea, meningitis or visual deterioration.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  One-stage transsphenoidal surgery allows total or near-total resection of most suprasellar pituitary adenomas with low surgical morbidity. Quantitative assessment of tumour dimension and configuration contributes to establishing guidelines for the selection of the appropriate approach and prediction of surgical outcome.
authors.affiliation: Department of Neurosurgery, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany. honegger@med.uni-tuebingen.de
authors.forename: J
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Honegger
authors.forename: U
authors.initials: U
authors.lastname: Ernemann
authors.forename: T
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Psaras
authors.forename: B
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: Will
mesh_terms: D000236:Adenoma / Q000473:pathology* / Q000601:surgery*; D005240:Feasibility Studies; D005500:Follow-Up Studies; D006801:Humans; D007016:Hypophysectomy / Q000379:methods*; D008279:Magnetic Resonance Imaging; D010911:Pituitary Neoplasms / Q000473:pathology* / Q000601:surgery*; D011237:Predictive Value of Tests; D011446:Prospective Studies; D013100:Sphenoid Bone / Q000601:surgery*; D016896:Treatment Outcome