title: Impact on hypertension control of a patient-held guideline: a randomised controlled trial.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Hypertension is generally poorly controlled in primary care. One possible intervention for improving control is the harnessing of patient expertise through education and encouragement to challenge their care.
  
  
  OBJECTIVE
  To determine whether encouraging patients to manage their hypertension in an 'expert' manner, by providing them with information in a clear clinical guideline, coupled with an explicit exhortation to become involved in and to challenge their own care if appropriate, would improve their care.
  
  
  METHODS
  Single blind randomised controlled trial of detailed guideline versus standard information.
  
  
  METHODS
  Single urban general practice over 1 year.
  
  
  METHODS
  Patient-held guideline with written explicit exhortation to challenge care when appropriate. Two hundred and ninety-four of 536 eligible patients on the practice hypertension register were recruited, all of whom were randomised into one of two groups. Two hundred and thirty-six patients completed the study.
  
  
  RESULTS
  
  
  
  METHODS
  average systolic blood pressure.
  
  
  RESULTS
  proportion of patients with blood pressure < 150 mmHg systolic and < 90 mmHg diastolic, average cholesterol, proportion of patients prescribed statins and aspirin according to guideline, hospital anxiety and depression score. No clinically, or statistically significant differences were found between intervention and control with respect to all parameters or in anxiety and depression levels. Statin and aspirin use improved throughout the course of the study in both groups. Statin use showed a trend (P = 0.02) in favour of control.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  In this study there was no clinically significant perceived benefit to patients as a result of providing them with a hypertension guideline. Patient guidelines are currently planned for many chronic illnesses. It is important to determine the utility of such interventions before scarce resources are applied to them.
authors.affiliation: Community Health Sciences, University of Edinburgh. brian.mckinstry@ed.ac.uk
authors.forename: Brian
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: McKinstry
authors.forename: Janet
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Hanley
authors.forename: David
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Heaney
authors.forename: Lucy
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: McCloughan
authors.forename: Rob
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Elton
authors.forename: David J
authors.initials: DJ
authors.lastname: Webb
mesh_terms: D000368:Aged; D000959:Antihypertensive Agents / Q000008:administration & dosage*; D018660:Blood Pressure Monitoring, Ambulatory; D005194:Family Practice; D005260:Female; D019983:Guideline Adherence; D006801:Humans; D006973:Hypertension / Q000188:drug therapy* / Q000523:psychology; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D010349:Patient Compliance / Q000523:psychology; D010353:Patient Education as Topic; D010358:Patient Participation / Q000523:psychology; D010817:Physician-Patient Relations; D017410:Practice Guidelines as Topic; D016037:Single-Blind Method; D016896:Treatment Outcome
chemical_list: D000959:Antihypertensive Agents