title: [PET/DT can cause clinicians extra concern . A case report illustrates the dilemma of judging additional findings].
authors.affiliation: Institutionen för medicinska vetenskaper, nukleär medicin, Uppsala universitet, Uppsala ImanetAB
authors.forename: Jens
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Sörensen
authors.forename: Silvia
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Johansson
mesh_terms: D000368:Aged; D003110:Colonic Neoplasms / Q000175:diagnosis; D015897:Comorbidity; D003657:Decision Making / Q000941:ethics; D003704:Dementia / Q000175:diagnosis; D005500:Follow-Up Studies; D006331:Heart Diseases / Q000175:diagnosis; D006801:Humans; D007822:Laryngeal Neoplasms / Q000175:diagnosis*; D008207:Lymphatic Metastasis / Q000175:diagnosis; D008297:Male; D009378:Neoplasms, Multiple Primary / Q000150:complications / Q000175:diagnosis*; D010353:Patient Education as Topic; D049268:Positron-Emission Tomography; D011471:Prostatic Neoplasms / Q000175:diagnosis*; D012680:Sensitivity and Specificity; D013117:Spinal Cord Compression / Q000175:diagnosis; D014057:Tomography, X-Ray Computed; D014342:Truth Disclosure / Q000941:ethics; D051598:Whole Body Imaging