title: Howe v. MGH and Hudson v. Texas Children's Hospital: two approaches to resolving family-physician disputes in end-of-life care.
authors.affiliation: Boston College, Chestnut Hill, MA 2467, USA. john.paris@bc.edu
authors.forename: J J
authors.initials: JJ
authors.lastname: Paris
authors.forename: J A
authors.initials: JA
authors.lastname: Billinngs
authors.forename: B
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: Cummings
authors.forename: M P
authors.initials: MP
authors.lastname: Moreland
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D034462:Dissent and Disputes / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007223:Infant; D007231:Infant, Newborn; D008297:Male; D008404:Massachusetts; D012121:Respiration, Artificial; D013727:Terminal Care / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D013781:Texas; D028761:Withholding Treatment / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*