Using performance-based assessments to evaluate parity between a campus and distance education pathway.
OBJECTIVE
To compare the performance of campus-based students with that of distance students during the first 2 years of a doctor of pharmacy program to evaluate parity between the pathways.


METHODS
Twelve cases were created for each year of the program along with performance criteria. The cases were converted into computer-based simulations for programmatic assessment at the end of the 2002-2003 and 2003-2004 school years. All first-professional year (P1) and second-professional year (P2) students participated in the assessments. Overall class means were calculated and used to compare student performances between campus and distance education pathways.


RESULTS
Overall scores for the 2003 P1 class were 56.4% for the campus-based students and 62.4% for the distance students, (p = 0.002); overall scores for the 2003 P2 class were 48.8% and 55.5%, respectively (p < 0.0001). The 2004 overall scores for P1 campus and distance students were 59.0% and 65.7%, respectively, (p = 0.001); and for 2004 P2 scores the results were 51.8% and 56.5%, respectively (p = 0.049).


CONCLUSIONS
Students receiving their pharmacy education via a distance pathway scored higher on performance-based assessments compared with students receiving their pharmacy education via the traditional campus-based pathway. This indicates that distance students are receiving at least an equivalent curricular experience in the P1 and P2 years compared to that received by campus-based students.
Lenz
Thomas L
TL
School of Pharmacy and Health Professions, Creighton University Medical Center, 2500 California Plaza, Omaha, NE 68178, USA. tlenz@creighton.edu
Monaghan
Michael S
MS
Wilson
Amy F
AF
Tilleman
Jennifer A
JA
Jones
Rhonda M
RM
Hayes
Mary M
MM
D020375:Education, Distance; D004512:Education, Pharmacy; D004521:Educational Measurement / Q000379:methods*; D005178:Faculty; D006801:Humans; D013663:Teaching / Q000379:methods