Proactive interference and cuing effects in short-term cued recall: does foil context matter?
Tehan and Humphreys's (1995, 1996) short-term cued recall paradigm showed that recall in short-term memory is cue driven. In critical trials, the participants studied two blocks of four words each and were required to forget the first block while remembering the second block. A foil in the first block (e.g., orange) was related to a target (e.g., carrot) in the second block. Proactive interference (PI) was evident when a retrieval cue was used that subsumed the foil and the target (e.g., type of juice), but not when a cue was used that subsumed only the target (e.g., type of vegetable). Four experiments were performed to examine the extent to which contextual organization in the foil block would enhance or diminish the foil's efficacy in creating PI. A novel condition was included in which the words in the foil block were studied in a phonologically related context but the target was cued semantically, and vice versa with a semantic context and phonological cue. There were no differences in recall accuracy between conditions with and without contextual organization, but reliable increases in foil intrusions were observed when contextual organization was present. Contextual organization enhanced the foil, rather than diminished it, but the strengthened foil generated PI only when the cue subsumed the foil and the target and had no effect when the cue subsumed only the target. The results are consistent with a cue-driven retrieval interpretation of short-term recall.
Goh
Winston D
WD
T Department of Psychology, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117570. psygohw@nus.edu.sg
Tan
Huiqin
H
D001288:Attention; D003463:Cues; D006801:Humans; D008570:Memory, Short-Term; D010153:Paired-Associate Learning; D010700:Phonetics; D012153:Retention, Psychology; D012660:Semantics; D012691:Serial Learning