title: Comparing performance of Morbidity and Mortality Conference and National Surgical Quality Improvement Program for detection of complications after urologic surgery.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  The detection of postoperative complications is a necessary quality-of-care endeavor. Despite its historical role, the Morbidity and Mortality (M&M) Conference depends on voluntary reporting and may be an insufficient mechanism for comprehensive complication surveillance. In response to this concern, we compared the concordance between complications voluntarily reported at the M&M Conference and those identified prospectively by the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP).
  
  
  METHODS
  For a single calendar year (2004), we compiled a comprehensive list of complications that were either identified and voluntarily entered into our department's electronic M&M Conference database and/or identified prospectively (from an explicit sample of cases) by a trained research associate-based NSQIP protocol. For analytic purposes, we treated NSQIP as the reference standard for the detection of complications. We then determined the sensitivity of the M&M Conference for the identification of complications at a patient and event level. Logistic regression modeling was used to evaluate for an association between complication category (ie, organ system affected) and detection by the M&M Conference.
  
  
  RESULTS
  The NSQIP detected 347 complications in 176 patients. Using this reference standard, the patient-level and event-level sensitivity of the M&M Conference was 25% (44 of 176) and 14% (47 of 347), respectively. The sensitivity of the M&M Conference varied by NSQIP complication category (P = 0.08). Circulatory events were 11 times more likely to be reported at the M&M Conference than urinary complications (odds ratio 11.3, 95% confidence interval 2.4 to 53.7).
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Compared with the NSQIP, the M&M Conference has a low (but variable) sensitivity for the detection of postoperative complications. Therefore, despite its limitations, the NSQIP may provide a better foundation for urologic quality improvement endeavors.
authors.affiliation: Department of Urology, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, USA.
authors.forename: David C
authors.initials: DC
authors.lastname: Miller
authors.forename: Chris P
authors.initials: CP
authors.lastname: Filson
authors.forename: Lauren P
authors.initials: LP
authors.lastname: Wallner
authors.forename: James E
authors.initials: JE
authors.lastname: Montie
authors.forename: Darrell A
authors.initials: DA
authors.lastname: Campbell
authors.forename: John T
authors.initials: JT
authors.lastname: Wei
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D016208:Databases, Factual; D006801:Humans; D011446:Prospective Studies; D011787:Quality of Health Care; D013520:Urologic Surgical Procedures / Q000009:adverse effects* / Q000592:standards*