title: Total disk arthroplasty.
abstract: Spinal fusion remains the gold standard for surgical management of instability and mechanical low back or neck pain. However, even in carefully selected patients, successful clinical results can be difficult to achieve. Reasons for failure include pseudarthrosis and adjacent spine segment disease. The theoretic advantages of removing the painful disk while preserving motion have led to increasing interest in total disk arthroplasty. Although disk replacements have been implanted in Europe for decades, the procedure is relatively new in the United States. Recently, two artificial disks for symptomatic lumbar degenerative disk disease have been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration; several others are undergoing clinical trials. Short-term studies demonstrate similar clinical improvements for both disk replacements and fusion procedures at up to 2-year follow-up. Issues requiring further research include optimal design specifications, potential complications, and appropriate patient selection. Consequently, the long-term benefit of total disk arthroplasty over fusion for the treatment of axial low back or neck pain remains to be determined.
authors.affiliation: Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA.
authors.forename: Eric L
authors.initials: EL
authors.lastname: Lin
authors.forename: Jeffrey C
authors.initials: JC
authors.lastname: Wang
mesh_terms: D019643:Arthroplasty, Replacement / Q000379:methods*; D002574:Cervical Vertebrae / Q000601:surgery; D006801:Humans; D007403:Intervertebral Disc / Q000601:surgery; D008159:Lumbar Vertebrae / Q000601:surgery; D019736:Prostheses and Implants; D013122:Spinal Diseases / Q000175:diagnosis; D013123:Spinal Fusion; D013131:Spine / Q000601:surgery*