title: Serial processing is consistent with the time course of linguistic information extraction from consecutive words during eye fixations in reading: a response to Inhoff, Eiter, and Radach (2005).
abstract: A. W. Inhoff, B. M. Eiter, and R. Radach reported the results of 2 experiments that they claimed were problematic for serial attention models of eye movements in reading (such as the E-Z Reader model). In this reply, the authors demonstrate via argumentation and simulations that their data pose no serious problem for the E-Z Reader model or serial attention models in general.
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA 01003, USA. pollatsek@psych.umass.edu
authors.forename: Alexander
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Pollatsek
authors.forename: Erik D
authors.initials: ED
authors.lastname: Reichle
authors.forename: Keith
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Rayner
mesh_terms: D001288:Attention; D005403:Fixation, Ocular; D006801:Humans; D008606:Mental Processes; D008960:Models, Psychological; D011578:Psycholinguistics; D011932:Reading; D012438:Saccades