Considerations in incorporating office-based ultrasound of the head and neck.
OBJECTIVE
The purpose of this study was to determine the cost considerations and strategies for incorporating ultrasound (US) in a head and neck practice.


METHODS
A retrospective chart review of office-based US procedures from 2001 to 2005 was completed at our academic medical center. Billing and coding for US and US guided fine needle aspiration (USFNA) were examined.


RESULTS
The appropriate CPT codes are 76536 for US and 76942 and 10022 for USFNA-related procedures. The USFNA codes should be used repeatedly for correct coding of biopsies from multiple sites. Cost (equipment) sharing between specialties is a potential strategy for office-based US incorporation.


CONCLUSIONS
Based on practice volume, specific CPT coding, and Medicare reimbursements, office-based US equipment and certification costs could be offset in 1 year.


CONCLUSIONS
Office-based US can be readily incorporated with significant benefits to patients. Billing and usage strategies were identified that would improve the economics of providing office-based US.
Akbar
Nadeem A
NA
Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery; University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas 72205, USA.
Bodenner
Donald L
DL
Kim
Lawrence T
LT
Suen
James Y
JY
Kokoska
Mimi S
MS
D044963:Biopsy, Fine-Needle / Q000191:economics; D039702:Current Procedural Terminology; D006257:Head / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging*; D006801:Humans; D007349:Insurance, Health, Reimbursement; D009333:Neck / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging*; D009819:Office Visits / Q000191:economics; D010036:Otolaryngology / Q000191:economics*; D011216:Practice Management, Medical / Q000191:economics*; D012189:Retrospective Studies; D014463:Ultrasonography / Q000191:economics