Sometimes area counts more than number.
Using an interference paradigm, we show across three experiments that adults' order judgments of numbers, sizes, or combined area of dots in pairs of arrays occur spontaneously and automatically, but at different speeds and levels of accuracy. Experiment 1 used circles whose sizes varied between but not within arrays. Variation in circle size interfered with judgments of which array had more circles. Experiment 2 used displays in which circle size varied within and between arrays. Between-array differences in the amount of "circle stuff" (area occupied by circles) interfered with judgments of number. Experiment 3 examined whether variation in number also interferes with judgments of area. Interference between discrete and continuous stimulus dimensions occurred in both directions, although it was stronger from the continuous to the discrete than vice versa. These results bear on interpretations of studies with infants and preschoolers wherein subjects respond on the basis of continuous quantity rather than discrete quantity. In light of our results with adults, these findings do not license the conclusion that young children cannot represent discrete quantity. Absent data on attentional hierarchies and speed of processing, it is premature to conclude that infant and child quantity processes are fundamentally different from that of adults.
Hurewitz
Felicia
F
Deptartment of Linguistics, University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19716, USA. fel@udel.edu
Gelman
Rochel
R
Schnitzer
Brian
B
D000328:Adult; D001288:Attention / Q000502:physiology*; D004192:Discrimination, Psychological; D006801:Humans; D007600:Judgment / Q000502:physiology*; D008433:Mathematics; D010364:Pattern Recognition, Visual / Q000502:physiology*; D010775:Photic Stimulation