Single- versus dual-process models of lexical decision performance: insights from response time distributional analysis.
This article evaluates 2 competing models that address the decision-making processes mediating word recognition and lexical decision performance: a hybrid 2-stage model of lexical decision performance and a random-walk model. In 2 experiments, nonword type and word frequency were manipulated across 2 contrasts (pseudohomophone-legal nonword and legal-illegal nonword). When nonwords became more wordlike (i.e., BRNTA vs. BRANT vs. BRANE), response latencies to nonwords were slowed and the word frequency effect increased. More important, distributional analyses revealed that the Nonword Type = Word Frequency interaction was modulated by different components of the response time distribution, depending on the specific nonword contrast. A single-process random-walk model was able to account for this particular set of findings more successfully than the hybrid 2-stage model.
Yap
Melvin J
MJ
Department of Psychology, Washington University, St. Louis, MO 63130, USA.
Balota
David A
DA
Cortese
Michael J
MJ
Watson
Jason M
JM
D000328:Adult; D003657:Decision Making / Q000502:physiology*; D006801:Humans; D008568:Memory; D008960:Models, Psychological; D016011:Normal Distribution; D010364:Pattern Recognition, Visual / Q000502:physiology*; D011578:Psycholinguistics; D011930:Reaction Time / Q000502:physiology*; D011932:Reading; D017603:Signal Detection, Psychological