Discrepancies in interpretation of ED body computed tomographic scans by radiology residents.
OBJECTIVE
In academic institutions, radiology residents are often relied on for providing preliminary reports of imaging studies done in the ED. We examined the prevalence of discrepant interpretations of body computed tomographic (CT) scans in our institution.


METHODS
We conducted a retrospective study on a consecutive series of body CT scans at an urban ED. We compared the preliminary interpretation by radiology residents with the final interpretation by radiology attending physicians. An interpretation was characterized as having no discrepancy, minor discrepancy, or major discrepancy. A major discrepancy was defined as a discrepancy that resulted in a change in diagnosis, treatment, or disposition.


RESULTS
Two hundred three body CT scans were identified during the study period. Of these CT scans, 20 had major discrepancies (10%), 40 had minor discrepancies (20%), and 143 had no discrepancy (70%). Major discrepancies included missed appendicitis, normal appendix, missed bowel obstruction, and missed colon cancer. Computed tomographic scans with abnormal findings were more likely to contain major discrepancies (relative risk = 6.0; 95% confidence interval = 1.8-2.0).


CONCLUSIONS
Discrepancies between radiology residents and radiology attending physicians were common at our institution. Emergency department physicians should exercise caution when relying on residents' interpretation of body CT scans.
Tieng
Nelson
N
Department of Emergency Medicine, Jacobi Medical Center, Bronx, NY 10461, USA.
Grinberg
Diana
D
Li
Siu Fai
SF
D015746:Abdominal Pain / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging*; D003951:Diagnostic Errors / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D004636:Emergency Service, Hospital; D006801:Humans; D007396:Internship and Residency; D012189:Retrospective Studies; D014057:Tomography, X-Ray Computed; D014193:Trauma Centers