Framing discrimination: effects of inclusion versus exclusion mind-sets on stereotypic judgments.
Three studies investigated how inclusion versus exclusion strategies differentially lead to stereotypic decisions. In inclusion strategies, suitable targets are selected from a list of candidates, whereas in exclusion strategies, unsuitable candidates are eliminated. Across 2 separate target domains (Study 1: male and female politicians; Studies 2 and 3: African American and European American basketball players), exclusion strategies, as compared with inclusion strategies, elicited higher levels of both sensitivity stereotyping (i.e., greater difficulty distinguishing among members of stereotyped groups) and criterion stereotyping (i.e., setting different decision thresholds for judging members of different groups; see M. R. Banaji & A. G. Greenwald, 1995). Thus, the strategy used during decision making can influence the final decision via 2 theoretically distinct stereotyping mechanisms.
Hugenberg
Kurt
K
Department of Psychology, Miami University, Oxford, OH 45056, USA. hugenbk@muohio.edu
Bodenhausen
Galen V
GV
McLain
Melissa
M
D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D001245:Association Learning; D002755:Choice Behavior; D003657:Decision Making; D005260:Female; D005793:Generalization, Psychological; D006801:Humans; D007600:Judgment; D008297:Male; D011287:Prejudice; D012718:Set, Psychology; D017603:Signal Detection, Psychological; D013240:Stereotyping