title: Last night I had the strangest dream: Varieties of rational thought processes in dream reports.
abstract: From the neurophysiological perspective, thinking in dreaming and the quality of dream thought have been considered hallucinatory, bizarre, illogical, improbable, or even impossible. This empirical phenomenological research concentrates on testing whether dream thought can be defined as rational in the sense of an intervening mental process between sensory perception and the creation of meaning, leading to a conclusion or to taking action. From 10 individual dream journals of male participants aged 22-59 years and female participants aged 25-49 years, we delimited four dreams per journal and randomly selected five thought units from each dream for scoring. The units provided a base for testing a hypothesis that the thought processes of dream construction are rational. The results support the hypothesis and demonstrate that eight fundamental rational thought processes can be applied to the dreaming process.
authors.affiliation: Harvard Medical School, 99 Summer Street, Suite 1600, Boston, MA 02110, USA.
authors.forename: Richard N
authors.initials: RN
authors.lastname: Wolman
authors.forename: Miloslava
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Kozmová
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000339:Affect; D001244:Association; D001364:Awareness; D003071:Cognition; D003469:Culture; D004325:Dreams; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D019545:Intuition; D008297:Male; D011939:Mental Recall; D008875:Middle Aged; D009043:Motor Activity; D010465:Perception; D013850:Thinking; D014851:Wakefulness