title: Interrater reliability in clinical psychology oral examinations: a preliminary study.
abstract: High interrater reliability was noted among academics evaluating students on a Master's level clinical psychology oral examination. There was greater concordance among more experienced academics, examiners from the same university department, and those in the same professional specialty.
authors.affiliation: University of Zululand.
authors.forename: Stephen D
authors.initials: SD
authors.lastname: Edwards
authors.forename: Anthony L
authors.initials: AL
authors.lastname: Pillay
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D003406:Credentialing; D004500:Education, Graduate / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007397:Internship, Nonmedical; D008004:Licensure; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D015588:Observer Variation; D011361:Professional Competence / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D011586:Psychology, Clinical / Q000193:education*; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D013019:South Africa