title: Morphological changes in mouse embryos cryopreserved by different techniques.
abstract: Cryopreservation of mammalian embryos is an important tool for the application of reproductive biotechnologies. Subjective evaluation to determine embryo viability is often used. The determination of the best cryopreservation protocol depends on morphological and molecular analysis of cellular injuries. The main objective of this study was to compare two methods of cryopreservation by assessing morphological alterations of frozen embryos using light, fluorescence, and transmission electron microscope. Fresh (control), slow frozen, and vitrified mouse embryos were composed. To evaluate the viability of the embryos, the cell membrane integrity was assessed using Hoechst33342 and propidium iodide (H/PI) staining. Morphological analyses using hematoxylin and eosin (HE) staining were performed to test different techniques (in situ, paraffin, and historesin) by both light and fluorescence microscopy. Transmission electron microscope was used to detect ultrastructural alterations in Spurr- and Araldite-embedded samples. H/PI staining detected more membrane permeability in the vitrification (69.8%) than in the slow freezing (48.4%) or control (13.8%) groups (P < 0.001). Historesin-embedded samples showed to be more suitable for morphological analyses because cellular structures were better identified. Nuclear evaluation in historesin sections showed the induction of pycnosis in slow freezing and vitrification groups. Cytoplasm evaluation revealed a condensation and an increase in eosinophilic intensity (indicating apoptosis) in the slow freezing group, and weakly eosinophilic structures and degenerated cells (indicating oncosis) in the vitrification group (P < 0.05). Ultrastructural analyses confirmed HE morphological findings. It was concluded that both cryopreservation techniques resulted in oncosis and apoptosis injuries. However, vitrification caused more severe cellular alterations and reduced embryonic viability compared to slow freezing.
authors.affiliation: Department of Animal Reproduction, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil. manicout@usp.br
authors.forename: A R S
authors.initials: AR
authors.lastname: Coutinho
authors.forename: C M
authors.initials: CM
authors.lastname: Mendes
authors.forename: H V A
authors.initials: HV
authors.lastname: Caetano
authors.forename: A B
authors.initials: AB
authors.lastname: Nascimento
authors.forename: V P
authors.initials: VP
authors.lastname: Oliveira
authors.forename: F J
authors.initials: FJ
authors.lastname: Hernadez-Blazquez
authors.forename: I L
authors.initials: IL
authors.lastname: Sinhorini
authors.forename: J A
authors.initials: JA
authors.lastname: Visintin
authors.forename: M E O
authors.initials: ME
authors.lastname: Assumpção
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D015925:Cryopreservation; D004622:Embryo, Mammalian / Q000648:ultrastructure*; D005260:Female; D051379:Mice; D046529:Microscopy, Electron, Transmission; D008856:Microscopy, Fluorescence