title: Randomized double-blind comparison of sirolimus-eluting stent versus bare-metal stent implantation in diseased saphenous vein grafts: six-month angiographic, intravascular ultrasound, and clinical follow-up of the RRISC Trial.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  We sought to compare, in a randomized fashion, sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) versus bare-metal stents (BMS) in saphenous vein grafts (SVGs).
  
  
  BACKGROUND
  Sirolimus-eluting stents reduce restenosis and repeated revascularization in native coronary arteries compared with BMS. However, randomized data in SVG are absent.
  
  
  METHODS
  Patients with SVG lesions were randomized to SES or BMS. All were scheduled to undergo 6-month coronary angiography. The primary end point was 6-month angiographic in-stent late lumen loss. Secondary end points included binary angiographic restenosis, neointimal volume by intravascular ultrasound and major adverse clinical events (death, myocardial infarction, target lesion, and vessel revascularization).
  
  
  RESULTS
  A total of 75 patients with 96 lesions localized in 80 diseased SVGs were included: 38 patients received 60 SES for 47 lesions, whereas 37 patients received 54 BMS for 49 lesions. In-stent late loss was significantly reduced in SES (0.38 +/- 0.51 mm vs. 0.79 +/- 0.66 mm in BMS, p = 0.001). Binary in-stent and in-segment restenosis were reduced, 11.3% versus 30.6% (relative risk [RR] 0.37; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.15 to 0.97, p = 0.024) and 13.6% versus 32.6% (RR 0.42; 95% CI 0.18 to 0.97, p = 0.031), respectively. Median neointimal volume was 1 mm(3) (interquartile range 0 to 13) in SES versus 24 (interquartile range 8 to 34) in BMS (p < 0.001). Target lesion and vessel revascularization rates were significantly reduced, 5.3% versus 21.6% (RR 0.24; 95% CI 0.05 to 1.0, p = 0.047) and 5.3% versus 27% (RR 0.19; 95% CI 0.05 to 0.83, p = 0.012), respectively. Death and myocardial infarction rates were not different.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Sirolimus-eluting stents significantly reduce late loss in SVG as opposed to BMS. This is associated with a reduction in restenosis rate and repeated target lesion and vessel revascularization procedures. (The RRISC Study; http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct/show; NCT00263263).
authors.affiliation: Antwerp Cardiovascular Institute Middelheim, AZ Middelheim, Antwerp, Belgium. paul.vermeersch@zna.be
authors.forename: Paul
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Vermeersch
authors.forename: Pierfrancesco
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Agostoni
authors.forename: Stefan
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Verheye
authors.forename: Paul
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Van den Heuvel
authors.forename: Carl
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Convens
authors.forename: Nico
authors.initials: N
authors.lastname: Bruining
authors.forename: Frank
authors.initials: F
authors.lastname: Van den Branden
authors.forename: Glenn
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Van Langenhove
mesh_terms: D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D017023:Coronary Angiography; D001026:Coronary Artery Bypass / Q000009:adverse effects; D023903:Coronary Restenosis / Q000188:drug therapy / Q000209:etiology; D004311:Double-Blind Method; D016503:Drug Delivery Systems; D005260:Female; D005500:Follow-Up Studies; D006083:Graft Occlusion, Vascular / Q000188:drug therapy* / Q000209:etiology; D006801:Humans; D007166:Immunosuppressive Agents / Q000008:administration & dosage*; D008297:Male; D012501:Saphenous Vein / Q000637:transplantation*; D020123:Sirolimus / Q000008:administration & dosage*; D015607:Stents; D016896:Treatment Outcome; D018084:Ultrasonography, Interventional
chemical_list: D007166:Immunosuppressive Agents; D020123:Sirolimus