Learning curve analysis of a patient lift-assist device.
One of the challenges facing ergonomists in the implementation of an ergonomic solution is addressing the concerns related to their impact on productivity. The focus of the current study was to (1) apply standard learning curve analysis to the learning that takes place as an individual works with a patient handling device and (2) compare the effects of two different training protocols on measures of learning. Eighteen subjects completed 11 replications of a patient transfer task after participating in either an "interactive" training protocol or "see-one-do-one" training protocol. The results show that the learning rate for this task was 83% with no difference as a function of training protocol. The results do indicate that the effect of Training Method was significant (p<0.05) for time to complete the first patient lift task (370s for the interactive training vs. 475s for see-one-do-one training). The results of the analysis of the survey data supported the objective results in that the only measure that was responsive to training type (p<0.05) was related to comfort level in performing the patient lift task for the first time. The results emphasize the importance in considering learning when introducing an intervention in the workplace, and showed that in this instance, training type had an immediate impact on productivity, but that this effect diminished over time.
Reid
Stephanie A
SA
Department of Industrial Engineering, The Ergonomics Laboratory, Box 7906, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-7906, USA.
Mirka
Gary A
GA
D000328:Adult; D006804:Ergonomics; D006801:Humans; D007858:Learning; D017770:Lifting; D009140:Musculoskeletal Diseases / Q000517:prevention & control; D009657:North Carolina; D016272:Occupational Health; D012656:Self-Help Devices; D013663:Teaching