Australia needs an office of academic integrity.
Institutions investigating allegations of research misconduct are vulnerable to claims that their processes are inadequate or that they have an institutional conflict of interest. The Office of Research Integrity in the United States sets down standards for and reviews the adequacy of investigations of research misconduct by institutions; recognises that internal politics and the involvement of non-experts can lead to honest mistakes being regarded as serious misconduct; requires complainants and investigators to act "in good faith"; and reduces damaging publicity when complaints are misconceived or false. Australia needs an office of academic integrity to ensure that all complaints are thoroughly investigated; the investigative procedures meet international standards; fair processes are provided for complainants and respondents; and institutions are protected from claims of "cover-up" and institutional conflict of interest.
Hall
Bruce M
BM
Australian Technology Park, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia. b.hall@unsw.edu.au
D001315:Australia; D002961:Civil Rights / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence; D016265:Conflict of Interest; D008192:Deception; D032984:Ethics, Research; D006077:Government Agencies / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence / Q000458:organization & administration; D006801:Humans; D011050:Policy Making; D015871:Scientific Misconduct / Q000941:ethics / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence; D014481:United States; D018172:United States Office of Research Integrity