Performance comparison of six independent components analysis algorithms for fetal signal extraction from real fMCG data.
In this study we compare the performance of six independent components analysis (ICA) algorithms on 16 real fetal magnetocardiographic (fMCG) datasets for the application of extracting the fetal cardiac signal. We also compare the extraction results for real data with the results previously obtained for synthetic data. The six ICA algorithms are FastICA, CubICA, JADE, Infomax, MRMI-SIG and TDSEP. The results obtained using real fMCG data indicate that the FastICA method consistently outperforms the others in regard to separation quality and that the performance of an ICA method that uses temporal information suffers in the presence of noise. These two results confirm the previous results obtained using synthetic fMCG data. There were also two notable differences between the studies based on real and synthetic data. The differences are that all six ICA algorithms are independent of gestational age and sensor dimensionality for synthetic data, but depend on gestational age and sensor dimensionality for real data. It is possible to explain these differences by assuming that the number of point sources needed to completely explain the data is larger than the dimensionality used in the ICA extraction.
Hild
Kenneth E
KE
Department of Radiology, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94122, USA. k.hild@ieee.org
Alleva
Giovanna
G
Nagarajan
Srikantan
S
Comani
Silvia
S
D000465:Algorithms; D003627:Data Interpretation, Statistical; D004562:Electrocardiography / Q000379:methods*; D005260:Female; D005323:Fetal Monitoring / Q000379:methods*; D005865:Gestational Age; D006801:Humans; D015233:Models, Statistical; D008962:Models, Theoretical; D010363:Pattern Recognition, Automated / Q000379:methods*; D011247:Pregnancy; D025341:Principal Component Analysis; D012984:Software; D013997:Time Factors