A comparative study of conventional mammography film interpretations with soft copy readings of the same examinations.
An acceptable mammography film digitizer must provide high-quality images at a level of diagnostic accuracy comparable to reading conventional film examinations. The purpose of this study was to determine if there are significant differences between the interpretations of conventional film-screen mammography examinations and soft copy readings of the images produced by a mammography film digitizer. Eight radiologists interpreted 120 mammography examinations, half as original films and the other half as digital images on a soft copy work station. No radiologist read the same examination twice. The interpretations were recorded in accordance with the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System and included other variables such as perceived image quality and diagnostic difficulty and confidence. The results provide support for the hypothesis that there are no significant differences between the interpretations of conventional film-screen mammography examinations and soft copy examinations produced by a mammography film digitizer.
Gitlin
Joseph N
JN
The John Hopkins Medical Institutions in Baltimore, The John Hopkins School of Medicine, 600 North Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA. jgitlin@jhmi.edu
Narayan
Anand K
AK
Mitchell
Chad A
CA
Akmal
Ali M
AM
Eisner
David J
DJ
Peterson
Lindsy M
LM
Nie
Daisy
D
McClintock
Tyler R
TR
D001943:Breast Neoplasms / Q000175:diagnosis / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging*; D003626:Data Display; D003657:Decision Making; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008327:Mammography / Q000379:methods* / Q000592:standards; D015588:Observer Variation; D012372:ROC Curve; D011857:Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted; D014481:United States