title: Discordance between subjective perimetric visual fields and objective multifocal visual evoked potential-determined visual fields in patients with hemianopsia.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  To investigate the concordance between subjectively and objectively acquired visual fields in patients with subjectively determined hemianopsia.
  
  
  METHODS
  Retrospective observational study.
  
  
  METHODS
  Ten patients, six men and four women, ranging in age from 28 to 68 years, were studied. Goldmann or Humphrey perimeters were used to obtain the subjectively determined visual fields for up to 25 degrees of eccentricity, and the VERIS Scientific System (Electro-Diagnostic Imaging, San Francisco, California, USA) was used to record multifocal visual evoked potential [VEPs] (mfVEPs) to obtain the objective visual fields. Each of the 60 black-and-white segments of the checkerboard stimulus was alternated according to a binary m sequence. The first slices of the second-order kernels were extracted and analyzed.
  
  
  RESULTS
  In five cases, the visual field loci where the mfVEPs were within normal limits corresponded to the scotomatous areas obtained by conventional perimetry. In these discordant cases, the lesions (e.g., arteriovenous malformation) were located in the occipital lobe. Two of these cases had a complete recovery of the subjective visual field. The lesions of the concordant cases were located outside the occipital lobe (e.g., pituitary adenoma). In these cases, no visual field improvement was seen. The temporal crescent syndrome was ruled out in patients with posterior lesions by computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  In some patients with occipital lesions, the subjective and objective visual field results are discordant, and some of them will show a recovery of the visual field deficits.
authors.affiliation: Department of Ophthalmology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
authors.forename: Ken
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Watanabe
authors.forename: Kei
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Shinoda
authors.forename: Itaru
authors.initials: I
authors.lastname: Kimura
authors.forename: Yukihiko
authors.initials: Y
authors.lastname: Mashima
authors.forename: Yoshihisa
authors.initials: Y
authors.lastname: Oguchi
authors.forename: Hisao
authors.initials: H
authors.lastname: Ohde
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D001927:Brain Diseases / Q000175:diagnosis; D005074:Evoked Potentials, Visual; D005260:Female; D006423:Hemianopsia / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000209:etiology; D006801:Humans; D008279:Magnetic Resonance Imaging; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D009778:Occipital Lobe / Q000473:pathology; D012189:Retrospective Studies; D012607:Scotoma / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000209:etiology; D014057:Tomography, X-Ray Computed; D014793:Visual Cortex / Q000473:pathology; D058609:Visual Field Tests / Q000379:methods*; D014794:Visual Fields