Benefits of interhemispheric collaboration can be eliminated by mixing stimulus formats that involve different cortical access routes.
Previous studies indicate that the benefits of dividing an information processing load across both cerebral hemispheres outweigh the costs of interhemispheric transfer as tasks become more difficult or cognitively complex. This is demonstrated as better performance when two stimuli to be compared are presented one to each visual field and hemisphere than when both stimuli are presented to the same single hemisphere (an across-hemisphere advantage). Two experiments indicate that this finding does not generalize to complex tasks that require matching numeric quantities represented by two very different visual formats whose processing involves somewhat different cortical areas: digits and dice-like dot patterns. In fact, mixing these stimulus formats consistently produces a within-hemisphere advantage. We propose that, when two simultaneously presented stimuli are presented in sufficiently different visual formats, identification of the two stimuli may take place in parallel, via different cortical access routes and with little or no interference, even when they are presented to the same cerebral hemisphere.
Patel
Urvi J
UJ
Department of Psychology, SGM 501, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089-1061, USA. upatel@usc.edu
Hellige
Joseph B
JB
D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D002540:Cerebral Cortex / Q000502:physiology*; D003344:Cortical Synchronization; D004193:Discrimination Learning / Q000502:physiology*; D004292:Dominance, Cerebral / Q000502:physiology*; D005260:Female; D005364:Field Dependence-Independence; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D010775:Photic Stimulation / Q000379:methods; D011930:Reaction Time / Q000502:physiology; D012016:Reference Values; D014794:Visual Fields / Q000502:physiology*; D014795:Visual Pathways / Q000502:physiology*