Accuracies of beta-lactam susceptibility test results for Pseudomonas aeruginosa with four automated systems (BD Phoenix, MicroScan WalkAway, Vitek, and Vitek 2).
Contemporary clinical isolates and challenge strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa were tested by four automated susceptibility testing systems (BD Phoenix, MicroScan WalkAway, Vitek, and Vitek 2; two laboratories with each) against six broad-spectrum beta-lactams, and the results were compared to reference broth microdilution (BMD) and to consensus results from three validated methods (BMD, Etest [AB Biodisk, Solna, Sweden], and disk diffusion). Unacceptable levels of error (minor, major, and very major) were detected, some with systematic biases toward false susceptibility (piperacillin-tazobactam and imipenem) and others toward false resistance (aztreonam, cefepime, and ceftazidime). We encourage corrective action by the system manufacturers to address test biases, and we suggest that clinical laboratories using automated systems should consider accurate alternative methods for routine use.
Juretschko
Stefan
S
Arkansas Children's Hospital, 800 Marshall Street, Little Rock, AR 72202, USA. JuretschkoSM@archildrens.org
Labombardi
Vincent J
VJ
Lerner
Stephen A
SA
Schreckenberger
Paul C
PC
D000900:Anti-Bacterial Agents / Q000494:pharmacology*; D024881:Drug Resistance, Bacterial; D005188:False Negative Reactions; D005189:False Positive Reactions; D008826:Microbial Sensitivity Tests / Q000592:standards*; D011237:Predictive Value of Tests; D011550:Pseudomonas aeruginosa / Q000187:drug effects*; D047090:beta-Lactams / Q000494:pharmacology*
D000900:Anti-Bacterial Agents; D047090:beta-Lactams