Appropriate evaluation of HIV prevention interventions: from experiment to full-scale implementation.
BACKGROUND
Preventing HIV infection is still an essential goal in tackling the HIV/AIDS pandemic. Remarkably little is known about how best to reduce HIV incidence because most trials focus on the reduction of risk behaviours and assume an effect on HIV incidence.


OBJECTIVE
To discuss the evidence for the effectiveness of HIV prevention strategies, exploring the different types of evidence available: individual and community randomised controlled trials, and observational studies.


RESULTS
Although providing a gold standard for evidence, trials have been limited in their scope and are difficult to interpret and generalize. There have been examples of national level successes in preventing HIV which have been detected in surveillance data and understood through behavioural and modelling studies. These have the advantage of being to scale and indicating effectiveness rather than efficacy.


CONCLUSIONS
Although randomised trials are important because of their scientific rigor, it is also important that evidence from observational epidemiology is not overlooked. Only if good quality, consistent data are available can the history of the HIV epidemic be appropriately analysed.
Hallett
Timothy B
TB
Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Imperial College London, St Mary's Campus, Norfolk Place, London W2 1PG, UK. timothy.hallett@imperial.ac.uk
White
Peter J
PJ
Garnett
Geoff P
GP
D015658:HIV Infections / Q000517:prevention & control*; D006801:Humans; D015397:Program Evaluation; D016032:Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; D012107:Research Design / Q000592:standards; D012309:Risk-Taking; D012725:Sexual Behavior