Hemispheric processing of inferences: the effects of textual constraint and working memory capacity.
In this study, we investigated hemispheric differences in the generation of bridging and predictive inferences. Participants read texts that provided either strong or weak causal constraints for a particular bridging (Experiment 1) or predictive (Experiment 2) inference and performed a lexical decision task to inference-related targets presented to the left or the right hemisphere. Facilitation for strongly constrained bridging and predictive inferences was found in both hemispheres. In contrast, facilitation for weakly constrained inferences was stronger in the right than in the left hemisphere for both bridging and predictive inferences, although for the latter there was some facilitation in the left hemisphere as well. We also considered whether these effects differ as a function of the working memory capacity of the reader. High working memory capacity readers showed greater facilitation for strongly constrained inferences than for weakly constrained inferences in both hemispheres, whereas low working memory capacity readers showed this same pattern in the left hemisphere but showed equal facilitation for strongly and weakly constrained inferences in the right hemisphere. These results suggest that hemispheric processing, textual constraint, and working memory capacity interact to affect how readers generate causal inferences.
Virtue
Sandra
S
Department of Psychology, DePaul University, Chicago, Illinois 60614, USA. svirtue@depaul.edu
van den Broek
Paul
P
Linderholm
Tracy
T
D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D001245:Association Learning; D032882:Comprehension; D003210:Concept Formation; D003657:Decision Making; D004292:Dominance, Cerebral; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D011939:Mental Recall; D011578:Psycholinguistics; D011930:Reaction Time; D011932:Reading; D012660:Semantics