title: Assessment monitoring of laboratory critical values: a College of American Pathologists Q-Tracks study of 180 institutions.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Critical laboratory value reporting is a highly visible and essential key activity for clinical laboratories.
  
  
  OBJECTIVE
  To measure critical laboratory value reporting in multiple institutions over time and to examine the practice patterns and demographic factors associated with sustained improvement in critical value reporting.
  
  
  METHODS
  A longitudinal cohort study of 180 clinical laboratories that provided quarterly critical values reporting data for 2 to 16 quarters was conducted using a uniform definition of successful caregiver notification. Mixed linear model analysis of the 2001 through 2004 dataset was performed.
  
  
  RESULTS
  A decrease in total and inpatient rates of undocumented critical values per 1000 results was associated with (1) the American Association of Blood Banks inspection within the past 2 years (P = .01, for both total and inpatient rates); (2) unit secretary/clerical staff not authorized to accept inpatient critical value notification (P = .004 [total] and .001 [inpatient]); and (3) the mandatory practice of requiring notification of health care providers when handling inpatients known to have results repeatedly in the critical range (P = .01, for both total and inpatient rates). Continued participation in the Q-Tracks monitoring program was associated with significant and progressive improvement in total, inpatient, and outpatient critical value reporting (P = .02, .01, and .003, respectively).
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Critical value reporting improved as the duration of participation in the Q-Tracks monitoring program increased. Improved total and inpatient critical value reporting was associated with factors that may be markers for institutions with priorities of quality management and enhanced communication with responsible caregivers.
authors.affiliation: Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, 90095-1732, USA. ewagar@mednet.ucla.edu
authors.forename: Elizabeth A
authors.initials: EA
authors.lastname: Wagar
authors.forename: Ana K
authors.initials: AK
authors.lastname: Stankovic
authors.forename: David S
authors.initials: DS
authors.lastname: Wilkinson
authors.forename: Molly
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Walsh
authors.forename: Rhona J
authors.initials: RJ
authors.lastname: Souers
mesh_terms: D019985:Benchmarking; D001771:Blood Banks; D019411:Clinical Laboratory Techniques / Q000592:standards* / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D015331:Cohort Studies; D016638:Critical Illness; D006282:Health Personnel; D018578:Hospital-Physician Relations; D006801:Humans; D007753:Laboratories / Q000592:standards* / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D016014:Linear Models; D008137:Longitudinal Studies; D019221:Mandatory Reporting; D008505:Medical Staff, Hospital; D010338:Pathology, Clinical; D010818:Practice Patterns, Physicians' / Q000592:standards* / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D011785:Quality Assurance, Health Care / Q000379:methods*