"Belsenitis": liberating Belsen, its hospitals, UNRRA, and selection for re-emigration, 1945-1948.
The liberation of the concentration camp at Bergen-Belsen has remained controversial with opinion divided over whether the British military and subsequently the British zonal administration responded adequately to the plight of survivors. This paper reconsiders the evidence on health conditions at Bergen-Belsen. At first the British underestimated the incidence of typhus and the delay in taking effective measures caused the death rate to remain high. In the longer-term, measures for psychotic, old, and infirm DPs were inadequate as criteria that favored the fit and able-bodied were applied when selecting migrants.
Weindling
Paul
P
Department of History, Oxford Brookes University.
D003209:Concentration Camps / Q000266:history*; D004641:Emigration and Immigration / Q000266:history*; D005440:Fluid Therapy / Q000266:history; D005858:Germany; D049673:History, 20th Century; D006761:Hospitals / Q000941:ethics / Q000266:history; D006801:Humans; D007585:Jews / Q000266:history; D011329:Prisoners / Q000266:history*; D011618:Psychotic Disorders / Q000266:history / Q000628:therapy; D011640:Public Policy; D014438:Typhus, Epidemic Louse-Borne / Q000266:history* / Q000401:mortality / Q000628:therapy; D006113:United Kingdom