title: Radio(chemo)therapy plus resection versus radio(chemo)therapy alone for the treatment of stage III esophageal cancer.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  To compare radio(chemo)therapy with 41.4-50.4 Gy (moderate dose, MD-RCT) plus resection versus radio(chemo)therapy with 59.4-66.6 Gy (higher dose, HD-RCT) alone for outcome in stage III esophageal cancer, and to investigate potential prognostic factors including preradiotherapy (pre-RT) hemoglobin.
  
  
  METHODS
  148 patients with stage III esophageal cancer, treated with MD-RCT plus resection (n = 41) or HD-RCT alone (n = 107), were retrospectively evaluated for age, gender, performance status, tumor location, tumor length, stage, histology, grading, number of chemotherapy courses, pre-RT hemoglobin, resection, overall survival (OS), metastases-free survival (MFS), and locoregional control (LC).
  
  
  RESULTS
  On univariate analysis, MD-RCT plus resection resulted in better 2-year OS (57% vs. 25%; p = 0.049), 2-year MFS (71% vs. 39%; p = 0.041), and 2-year LC (76% vs. 39%; p = 0.003). On multivariate analysis, results maintained significance for LC (p = 0.021). According to multivariate analysis, pre-RT hemoglobin was associated with OS (p = 0.003), MFS (p = 0.043), and LC (p = 0.041), tumor length with OS (p = 0.002) and MFS (p = 0.017), and the number of chemotherapy courses with OS (p = 0.008). Complications were more frequent in the MD-RCT-plus-surgery group (p < 0.001). Acute (p = 0.47) and late toxicity (p = 0.86) were similar in both groups. In patients receiving surgery, R0 resection was superior to R1/2 resection for OS (p < 0.001), MFS (p = 0.030), and LC (p < 0.001). MD-RCT plus R0 resection was also superior to HD-RCT alone.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  MD-RCT plus resection resulted in better LC than HD-RCT alone. If R0 resection is possible, MD-RCT plus resection appears preferable, as it results in better outcome. If only R1/2 resection can be performed, HD-RCT alone appears preferable regarding outcome and the greater morbidity associated with resection.
authors.affiliation: Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Luebeck, Luebeck, Germany.
authors.forename: Dirk
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Rades
authors.forename: Rainer
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Schulte
authors.forename: Emre F
authors.initials: EF
authors.lastname: Yekebas
authors.forename: Nils
authors.initials: N
authors.lastname: Homann
authors.forename: Steven E
authors.initials: SE
authors.lastname: Schild
authors.forename: Juergen
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Dunst
mesh_terms: D000970:Antineoplastic Agents / Q000627:therapeutic use*; D003131:Combined Modality Therapy / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D018572:Disease-Free Survival; D004938:Esophageal Neoplasms / Q000401:mortality* / Q000473:pathology / Q000628:therapy*; D016629:Esophagectomy / Q000401:mortality*; D005260:Female; D005858:Germany / Q000453:epidemiology; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D009364:Neoplasm Recurrence, Local / Q000401:mortality* / Q000473:pathology / Q000517:prevention & control*; D009367:Neoplasm Staging; D015995:Prevalence; D020266:Radiotherapy, Conformal / Q000401:mortality*; D012189:Retrospective Studies; D016019:Survival Analysis; D015996:Survival Rate; D016896:Treatment Outcome
chemical_list: D000970:Antineoplastic Agents