title: Treatment of carotid artery disease: stenting or surgery.
abstract: Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is the only form of cerebral revascularization for which Level 1 evidence of effectiveness has been reported. Recent studies demonstrate the feasibility of carotid artery stenting (CAS) as an alternative to CEA. Its popularity is due to the perceived advantages of a less invasive treatment for carotid occlusive disease. Two randomized trials have reported no difference in the composite stroke, death, and myocardial infarction rate between CAS and CEA. However, these trials were not powered to identify superiority between the two procedures. A trial sponsored by the National Institutes of Health is currently underway to make that determination. The lead-in phase of this trial noted low complication rates with CAS. These results have encouraged the US Food and Drug Administration to approve the use of CAS in patients with neurologic symptoms (ie, ipsilateral stroke, transient ischemic attacks, and amaurosis fugax) in association with severe medical co-morbidities. Patients with carotid restenosis after previous CEA, anatomically inaccessible lesions above C2, and radiation-induced stenoses may also benefit from preferential treatment with CAS. The National Institutes of Health have now expanded the Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy Versus Stenting Trial (CREST) to include asymptomatic patients, and resulting data will help to clarify the role of CAS in this subset as well.
authors.affiliation: Division of Vascular Surgery, UMDNJ New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ 07103, USA. lalbk@umdnj.edu
authors.forename: Brajesh K
authors.initials: BK
authors.lastname: Lal
authors.forename: Robert W
authors.initials: RW
authors.lastname: Hobson
mesh_terms: D002340:Carotid Artery Diseases / Q000628:therapy*; D006801:Humans; D009493:Neurosurgery / Q000379:methods*; D015607:Stents