title: The effect of two different types of cement restrictors on the femoral cement mantle.
abstract: Cement restriction and pressurisation are helpful technical points in achieving a good cement mantle in cemented hip replacement. In this prospective study, we compared 39 cases where a Hardinge polyethylene restrictor was used and 33 cases where a bone block restrictor was used during Charnley hip replacement. The preoperative radiographs were templated, calibrated holders for the cement restrictors were used intraoperatively, keeping the distal cement height within 2-3 cm from the tip of the femoral prosthesis. Postoperative radiographs were analysed. The Harris Hip scoring system was used for clinical assessment of results. The preoperative target of having a distal cement height of 2-3 cm was achieved in only 60.6% of the bone block group and 30.6% of the Hardinge group. The difference between the two groups is statistically significant (p = 0.001). Distal migration of the restrictors more than 3 cm from the tip of the femoral prosthesis was associated with a non-homogenous cement mantle in zones 3, 4 and 5 without affecting zones 1, 2, 6 and 7. The cement mantle was adequate when the distal cement mantle remained within 2-3 cm of the tip of the femoral prosthesis.
authors.affiliation: Airedale General Hospital, West Yorkshire, United Kingdom. shevanfaraj@hotmail.com
authors.forename: Adnan A
authors.initials: AA
authors.lastname: Faraj
authors.forename: Kumariah
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Rajasekar
mesh_terms: D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D019644:Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip / Q000295:instrumentation / Q000379:methods*; D002484:Cementation / Q000295:instrumentation* / Q000379:methods; D006801:Humans; D008875:Middle Aged; D011312:Pressure; D011446:Prospective Studies