title: Effect of substrate on progression and healing of skin erosions and epidermal papillomas of Atlantic halibut, Hippoglossus hippoglossus (L.).
abstract: Juvenile Atlantic halibut cultured on a smooth substrate often develop skin lesions on the blind (abocular) side, significantly reducing carcass value and causing economic losses. We discovered that fish not only developed skin erosions, but also extensive epidermal papillomas when held on a smooth substrate for 39 months. This is the first time that epidermal papillomas have been reported in Atlantic halibut. To determine whether substrate type affected the progression or healing of these lesions, fish with papillomas and skin erosions were moved to identical rearing units having either an irregular (sand, gravel or Netlon) substrate, or a smooth (gel-coated fibreglass) substrate. After 62 days, 42-50% of fish held on any of the three irregular substrates had a skin erosion area (SEA) that had either diminished or appeared to be completely healed via gross examination. In contrast, none of the fish held on the smooth substrate showed improvement and 75-100% had a more severe SEA. Changes in the papilloma area (PA) were less dramatic: none of the fish held on an irregular substrate had any clear change in PA, although there was a suggestion that the PA in some fish might becoming less severe. Similarly, none of the fish held on the smooth substrate had a change in PA, although there was a suggestion that the PA in some fish was becoming more severe. After 97 days, there was also a suggestion that specific growth rates were higher in fish held on an irregular substrate when compared with those held on the smooth substrate. Overall, these data further substantiate previous studies suggesting that an irregular substrate, including the commercially used Netlon, is best for rearing Atlantic halibut. While there was a clear relationship between substrate type and whether skin erosions or papillomas progressed or healed, the exact cause(s) of these two responses is uncertain. Future studies should focus on risk factors such as stress, burrowing behaviour and the microenvironment of the substrate.
authors.affiliation: Department of Fisheries and Natural Sciences, Bodø University College, Bodø, Norway. oddvar.ottesen@hibo.no
authors.forename: O H
authors.initials: OH
authors.lastname: Ottesen
authors.forename: E J
authors.initials: EJ
authors.lastname: Noga
authors.forename: W
authors.initials: W
authors.lastname: Sandaa
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D005393:Fish Diseases / Q000473:pathology*; D005398:Fisheries; D005432:Flounder / Q000254:growth & development / Q000502:physiology*; D019015:Geologic Sediments; D010212:Papilloma / Q000473:pathology / Q000662:veterinary*; D012867:Skin / Q000473:pathology; D012871:Skin Diseases / Q000473:pathology / Q000662:veterinary*; D014867:Water / Q000032:analysis
chemical_list: D014867:Water