Determining the rotational alignment of the tibial component at total knee replacement: a comparison of two techniques.
We prospectively assessed the benefits of using either a range-of-movement technique or an anatomical landmark method to determine the rotational alignment of the tibial component during total knee replacement. We analysed the cut proximal tibia intraoperatively, determining anteroposterior axes by the range-of-movement technique and comparing them with the anatomical anteroposterior axis. We found that the range-of-movement technique tended to leave the tibial component more internally rotated than when anatomical landmarks were used. In addition, it gave widely variable results (mean 7.5 degrees ; 2 degrees to 17 degrees ), determined to some extent by which posterior reference point was used. Because of the wide variability and the possibilities for error, we consider that it is inappropriate to use the range-of-movement technique as the sole method of determining alignment of the tibial component during total knee replacement.
Ikeuchi
M
M
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kochi Medical School, Kochi University, Kohasu, Oko-cho, Nankoku, Japan. ikeuchim@med.kochi-u.ac.jp
Yamanaka
N
N
Okanoue
Y
Y
Ueta
E
E
Tani
T
T
D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D019645:Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee / Q000379:methods*; D005260:Female; D005500:Follow-Up Studies; D006801:Humans; D007430:Intraoperative Care / Q000379:methods; D007719:Knee Joint / Q000503:physiopathology*; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D016119:Posterior Cruciate Ligament / Q000473:pathology / Q000503:physiopathology; D011446:Prospective Studies; D016059:Range of Motion, Articular; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D012399:Rotation; D013977:Tibia / Q000473:pathology / Q000503:physiopathology*