title: An Escherichia coli phytase expressed in yeast effectively replaces inorganic phosphorus for finishing pigs and laying hens.
abstract: Two experiments determined the efficacy of an Escherichia coli phytase (ECP) added to P-deficient, corn-soybean meal diets fed to finishing pigs and second-cycle laying hens. Sixty finishing pigs (49 +/- 0.9 kg) were formed into blocks within sex based on weight and ancestry and allotted to a P-deficient diet unsupplemented or supplemented with 0.10% inorganic P (iP) from KH2PO4 or ECP at 250, 500, 1,000, or 10,000 phytase units (FTU)/kg. Individually fed pigs were allowed ad libitum access to the experimental diets until a BW of 120 +/- 3 kg was achieved, at which time the pigs were euthanized and the left fibula and fourth metatarsal were excised for determination of bone ash. Pigs were fed a 2-phase diet program for early- and late-finishing pigs; available P in the basal diets was set 0.10% below the requirement. Dietary supplementation of iP or ECP increased weight gain (P < 0.10) and G:F (P < 0.01); performance was not different (P > 0.13) among the phytase-supplemented groups. Fibula ash was greatest (P < 0.01) for pigs fed diets containing 10,000 FTU of ECP/kg. Two hundred forty second-cycle hens were allotted to a P-deficient diet or a P-deficient diet supplemented with 0.10% iP or ECP at 150, 300, or 10,000 FTU/kg for a 12-wk experiment. The basal diet was a corn-soybean meal diet with no added iP (17% CP, 3.8% Ca, 0.10% available P). Hens fed the P-deficient diet were removed from the experiment after 4 wk due to poor egg production. Supplementation of iP or ECP resulted in increased (P < 0.01) feed intake, egg weight, and egg production during the first 4 wk. During the entire 12-wk period, there were no differences (P > 0.28) between the iP- and ECP-supplemented groups in feed intake, egg weight, or egg production. These experiments reveal that ECP was as efficacious as supplemental iP and that supplementation of an excess dose of ECP was efficacious and without negative effects in finishing pigs and laying hens.
authors.affiliation: JBS United Inc., Sheridan, IN 46069, USA. nathan.augspurger@jbsunited.com
authors.forename: N R
authors.initials: NR
authors.lastname: Augspurger
authors.forename: D M
authors.initials: DM
authors.lastname: Webel
authors.forename: D H
authors.initials: DH
authors.lastname: Baker
mesh_terms: D010832:6-Phytase / Q000378:metabolism / Q000494:pharmacology*; D000818:Animals; D002113:Calcification, Physiologic / Q000502:physiology; D002645:Chickens / Q000378:metabolism*; D004032:Diet / Q000662:veterinary*; D019587:Dietary Supplements; D004305:Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; D004926:Escherichia coli / Q000201:enzymology*; D005260:Female; D015966:Gene Expression Regulation, Fungal; D008297:Male; D010758:Phosphorus / Q000378:metabolism*; D012441:Saccharomyces cerevisiae / Q000378:metabolism; D013552:Swine / Q000378:metabolism*
chemical_list: D010758:Phosphorus; D010832:6-Phytase