title: Two regimens of vaginal misoprostol in second trimester termination of pregnancy: a prospective randomised trial.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  The search continues for a safe, effective, and cheap method for mid-trimester termination of pregnancy. Misoprostol is a strong contender in this respect. The dose schedule of misoprostol is still not fixed. The objective of our present study was to compare the efficacy and adverse events of 2 dose regimens of vaginal misoprostol for second trimester termination.
  
  
  METHODS
  A prospective, randomised, controlled trial was undertaken in 138 women at 14-20 weeks gestation, in a teaching hospital. Subjects were randomised to receive either regime A: 400 microg of intravaginal misoprostol every 3 h, or regime B: loading dose of 600 microg, followed by 200 microg every 3 h. The main outcome measure was the success rate at 48 h, total dose required, induction-abortion interval, and adverse events. Data was analysed by Student's t-test, Mann-Whitney U-test, the chi-squared test or Fisher's exact test, using Statistica 6.0 software.
  
  
  RESULTS
  There was no significant difference in the success rates at 24 and 48 h (Regime A: 97.18 and 98.59%; Regime B: 95.45 and 95.45%), and in mean induction-abortion interval (12.97 versus 12.13 h). However, mean misoprostol requirement was significantly higher for Regime A (1701.4 versus 1269.7 microg). The incidence of fever was significantly less in Regime B (32.4 versus 14.9%).
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Use of vaginal misoprostol for second trimester abortion had comparable efficacy with less drug requirement for the 600 microg loading dose followed by 200 microg 3-hourly regime compared to the 400 microg 3-hourly regime.
authors.affiliation: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, RG Kar Medical College and Hospital, Kolkata, India. drsubir69@yahoo.com
authors.forename: Subir Kumar
authors.initials: SK
authors.lastname: Bhattacharyya
authors.forename: Joydeb
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Mukherji
authors.forename: Gouri Sankar
authors.initials: GS
authors.lastname: Kamilya
authors.forename: Sailesh
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Ray
authors.forename: Avijit
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Hazra
mesh_terms: D000020:Abortifacient Agents, Nonsteroidal / Q000008:administration & dosage* / Q000009:adverse effects; D000028:Abortion, Induced / Q000379:methods*; D000282:Administration, Intravaginal; D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D016009:Chi-Square Distribution; D004305:Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; D004334:Drug Administration Schedule; D005260:Female; D005334:Fever / Q000453:epidemiology / Q000209:etiology; D006801:Humans; D016595:Misoprostol / Q000008:administration & dosage* / Q000009:adverse effects; D011247:Pregnancy; D011262:Pregnancy Trimester, Second; D011446:Prospective Studies; D012449:Safety; D018709:Statistics, Nonparametric; D013997:Time Factors; D016896:Treatment Outcome
chemical_list: D000020:Abortifacient Agents, Nonsteroidal; D016595:Misoprostol