Can artificially selected phenotypes influence a component of field fitness? Thermal selection and fly performance under thermal extremes.
Artificially selected lines are widely used to investigate the genetic basis of quantitative traits and make inferences about evolutionary trajectories. Yet, the relevance of selected traits to field fitness is rarely tested. Here, we assess the relevance of thermal stress resistance artificially selected in the laboratory to one component of field fitness by investigating the likelihood of adult Drosophila melanogaster reaching food bait under different temperatures. Lines resistant to heat reached the bait more often than controls under hot and cold conditions, but less often at intermediate temperatures, suggesting a fitness cost of increased heat resistance but not at temperature extremes. Cold-resistant lines were more common at baits than controls under cold as well as hot field conditions, and there was no cost at intermediate temperatures. One of the replicate heat-resistant lines was caught less often than the others under hot conditions. Direct and correlated patterns of responses in laboratory tests did not fully predict the low performance of the heat selected lines at intermediate temperatures, nor the high performance of the cold selected lines under hot conditions. Therefore, lines selected artificially not only behaved partly as expected based on laboratory assays but also evolved patterns only evident in the field releases.
Kristensen
Torsten Nygaard
TN
Center for Environmental Stress and Adaptation Research, Department of Genetics, The University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. torsten.kristensen@biology.au.dk
Loeschcke
Volker
V
Hoffmann
Ary A
AA
D000064:Acclimatization; D000222:Adaptation, Physiological; D000818:Animals; D003080:Cold Temperature; D004331:Drosophila melanogaster / Q000145:classification / Q000502:physiology*; D006358:Hot Temperature; D010641:Phenotype; D019655:Quantitative Trait, Heritable