Social brains, simple minds: does social complexity really require cognitive complexity?
The social brain hypothesis is a well-accepted and well-supported evolutionary theory of enlarged brain size in the non-human primates. Nevertheless, it tends to emphasize an anthropocentric view of social life and cognition. This often leads to confusion between ultimate and proximate mechanisms, and an over-reliance on a Cartesian, narratively structured view of the mind and social life, which in turn lead to views of social complexity that are congenial to our views of ourselves, rather than necessarily representative of primate social worlds. In this paper, we argue for greater attention to embodied and distributed theories of cognition, which get us away from current fixations on 'theory of mind' and other high-level anthropocentric constructions, and allow for the generation of testable hypotheses that combine neurobiology, psychology and behaviour in a mutually reinforcing manner.
Barrett
Louise
L
Department of Psychology, Darwin Building, University of Central Lancashire, Preston PR1 2HE, UK. louise.barrett@uleth.ca
Henzi
Peter
P
Rendall
Drew
D
D000818:Animals; D003071:Cognition; D007360:Intelligence / Q000502:physiology*; D008954:Models, Biological; D011323:Primates / Q000502:physiology*; D012919:Social Behavior; D012931:Social Environment