Field studies in pesticide registration: questioning the answers.
The principal conclusion of a workshop in October 2005 at RIVM (Bilthoven, The Netherlands) on the assessment of field studies with pesticides for authorization is that the lack of a definition of acceptability of effects is recognized as a problem by all stakeholders: Industry, risk assessors, and regulators. Because of this lack of definition in the legislation, it is unclear what critical effect values should be assessed in field studies. Despite the extensive documentation on field study performance, the decision making is not based on justifiable scientific opinions or publicly shared values but on technical limitations of the test design instead. In the workshop, research was identified that should result in a scientific basis for value judgments applied in decision making.
Montforts
Mark H M M
MH
National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Antonie van Leeuwenhoeklaan 9, PO. Box 1, NL-3720BA, Bilthoven, The Netherlands. mark.montforts@rivm.nl
de Jong
Frank M W
FM
D000818:Animals; D003226:Congresses as Topic; D018556:Crops, Agricultural; D004785:Environmental Pollutants / Q000032:analysis / Q000633:toxicity; D005062:European Union; D033161:Government Regulation; D007391:International Cooperation; D010575:Pesticides / Q000009:adverse effects* / Q000032:analysis / Q000633:toxicity; D012106:Research / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence* / Q000592:standards; D012308:Risk Management / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence / Q000379:methods / Q000592:standards
D004785:Environmental Pollutants; D010575:Pesticides