title: Patient satisfaction and health-related quality of life after treatment for colon cancer.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  Health-related quality of life has become an important outcome in cancer treatment. Detailed health-related quality of life measures were taken as part of a trial of follow-up of patients with colon cancer by general practitioners and surgeons. This study was designed as a longitudinal assessment of health-related quality of life after treatment for carcinoma of the colon and patient satisfaction with two different settings of follow-up (general practitioners vs. surgeons).
  
  
  METHODS
  A total of 338 patients were recruited into randomized (n = 203) and patient preference (n = 135) follow-up groups. Prospectively assessed physical and mental health-related quality of life measures and patient satisfaction are reported during two years.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Elderly and less educated patients prefer follow-up by general practitioners over surgeons. Overall, physical health-related quality of life is reduced early after treatment; however, this returns to normal levels at one year. Mental quality of life, anxiety, and depression are at or above population levels throughout the two-year follow-up period. There were no differences in physical or psychologic health-related quality of life measures between general practitioner and surgeon groups at any time during follow-up. Overall, more advanced Dukes stage is associated with a trend to improved mental health-related quality of life. Patients' ability to choose the setting of follow-up has no influence on health-related quality of life compared with random allocation to general practitioner or surgeon. Patients are equally highly satisfied with follow-up by general practitioner or surgeon.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  After recovery from treatment for colon cancer, health-related quality of life is similar to the general population. Good health-related quality of life outcomes and high patient satisfaction are as well provided by general practitioners in the community setting as by surgeon review.
authors.affiliation: Department of Surgery, Flinders Medical Centre, Bedford Park, South Australia. cgall@hobartcrs.com.au
authors.forename: Carey A
authors.initials: CA
authors.lastname: Gall
authors.forename: David
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Weller
authors.forename: Adrian
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Esterman
authors.forename: Louis
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Pilotto
authors.forename: Kelly
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: McGorm
authors.forename: Zoe
authors.initials: Z
authors.lastname: Hammett
authors.forename: David
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Wattchow
mesh_terms: D000367:Age Factors; D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D001007:Anxiety / Q000453:epidemiology; D001315:Australia / Q000453:epidemiology; D003110:Colonic Neoplasms / Q000473:pathology / Q000523:psychology*; D003107:Colorectal Surgery; D003266:Continuity of Patient Care; D003863:Depression / Q000453:epidemiology; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008137:Longitudinal Studies; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D017060:Patient Satisfaction; D010821:Physicians, Family; D011446:Prospective Studies; D011788:Quality of Life; D012737:Sex Factors