title: Evaluating the potential for conservation development: biophysical, economic, and institutional perspectives.
abstract: The widespread conversion of rural land to low-density residential development poses an immediate threat to biodiversity and to the provision of ecosystem services. Given that development will continue and environmental stakes are high, analyzing alternative growth strategies is critical. Conservation development is one such strategy that has the potential to benefit ecosystems and diverse stakeholders including developers, homebuyers, governments, and society as a whole. Conservation development clusters homes on one part of a property to manage the most ecologically important land for the conservation of biodiversity and ecosystem services. We draw on lessons learned from landscape ecology, open-space development, and regional planning to weigh the biophysical, economic, and institutional evidence for and against conservation development. Conservation development offers many potential environmental and economic advantages: relatively high home values and appreciation rates, lower development costs, and social and ecological benefits to society including landscape connectivity, protection and active stewardship of important ecological assets, and the maintenance of ecosystem services. But this approach also has shortcomings: it may require enlightened institutional regulations and regional planning (and/or ecologically aware developers), it is not always more profitable than conventional development and thus may require subsidies or incentives, and additional research is required to fully understand its benefits and drawbacks. With more information on the effects of clustering, the development of flexible zoning laws, and effective regional planning, conservation development could be a viable strategy for sustaining biodiversity and ecosystem services in changing landscapes.
authors.affiliation: Biological Sciences, 371 Serra Mall, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA. liba@stanford.edu
authors.forename: Liba
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Pejchar
authors.forename: Peter M
authors.initials: PM
authors.lastname: Morgan
authors.forename: Margaret R
authors.initials: MR
authors.lastname: Caldwell
authors.forename: Carl
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Palmer
authors.forename: Gretchen C
authors.initials: GC
authors.lastname: Daily
mesh_terms: D044822:Biodiversity; D003247:Conservation of Natural Resources / Q000379:methods* / Q000639:trends; D004467:Economics / Q000639:trends*; D006798:Housing / Q000191:economics* / Q000592:standards; D010934:Planning Techniques