title: Fast-track cardiac anesthesia: efficacy and safety of remifentanil versus sufentanil.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  The purpose of this study was to compare the safety and efficacy of fast-track cardiac anesthesia with remifentanil (group R) versus sufentanil (group S).
  
  
  METHODS
  Prospective, single-blinded, randomized study.
  
  
  METHODS
  University hospital.
  
  
  METHODS
  One hundred twenty patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery and/or cardiac valve surgery.
  
  
  METHODS
  After routine standardized anesthesia induction, anesthesia was maintained with isoflurane (0.4-0.8 vol%) together with either remifentanil (group R) (1 microg/kg/min) or sufentanil (group S) (1 microg/kg for induction, 0.5 microg/kg for skin incision, and then 0.02 microg/kg/min). After surgery, which included cardiopulmonary bypass in all cases, postoperative sedation was achieved in both groups with propofol until the patient was deemed ready for extubation. Additionally, patients in group R received remifentanil, 0.25 microg/kg/min.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Recovery profile in group R patients was faster (p < 0.05), with a median time interval between end of surgery and eligibility for extubation of 295 minutes versus 375 minutes. Time from end of surgery to being eligible for discharge from intensive care unit was similar in both groups, with 22.9 hours in group R versus 26.3 hour in group S. Remifentanil provided a better protection against intraoperative stimuli at skin incision and maximal sternal spread (p < 0.05). The incidence of adverse events was comparable in both groups. Postoperative pain scores during the first hour of weaning were higher in group R (p < 0.05).
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Remifentanil for fast-track cardiac anesthesia provided safe and stable operating conditions and facilitated earlier tracheal extubation. However, postoperative pain management should be planned carefully.
authors.affiliation: Department of Anesthesiology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany.
authors.forename: Susanne
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Lison
authors.forename: Markus
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Schill
authors.forename: Peter
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Conzen
mesh_terms: D000758:Anesthesia / Q000379:methods*; D018686:Anesthetics, Intravenous / Q000009:adverse effects / Q000627:therapeutic use*; D006348:Cardiac Surgical Procedures / Q000379:methods*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007431:Intraoperative Complications / Q000517:prevention & control; D007442:Intubation, Intratracheal / Q000379:methods; D007902:Length of Stay / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D010147:Pain Measurement / Q000379:methods; D010149:Postoperative Pain / Q000188:drug therapy; D017060:Patient Satisfaction / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D010880:Piperidines / Q000009:adverse effects / Q000627:therapeutic use*; D011446:Prospective Studies; D000077208:Remifentanil; D016037:Single-Blind Method; D017409:Sufentanil / Q000009:adverse effects / Q000627:therapeutic use*; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires; D013997:Time Factors; D016896:Treatment Outcome
chemical_list: D018686:Anesthetics, Intravenous; D010880:Piperidines; D017409:Sufentanil; D000077208:Remifentanil