The perceived structural shape of thin (wire-like) objects is different from that of silhouettes.
Observers are faster at judging the position of convex vertices compared to concave vertices. This is believed to be due to an explicit representation of position for visual parts. The best evidence comes from comparing the same contours perceived as either figures or holes, because this is a pure figure ground reversal (Bertamini and Croucher, 2003 Cognition 87 33 - 54; Bertamini and Mosca, 2004 Perception 33 35-48). Specifically, an interaction is present between type of object (object or hole) and shape. One assumption is that the contour of a silhouette is perceived as the rim of a solid object. It follows that a different pattern should be found for thin (wire-like) objects compared to silhouettes. We confirm this difference in three experiments. We argue that this is due to the perceived parts when contours can be interpreted as self-occlusion rims.
Bertamini
Marco
M
School of Psychology, Eleanor Rathbone Building, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 7ZA, UK. M.Bertamini@liverpool.ac.uk
Farrant
Tracy
T
D000704:Analysis of Variance; D004192:Discrimination, Psychological; D005556:Form Perception / Q000502:physiology*; D006801:Humans; D010775:Photic Stimulation; D011601:Psychophysics; D015348:Vision, Binocular