title: Changes in morphology and key cytokine gene expression after intradermal injection of louse (Bovicola ovis) antigen in sheep with naturally occurring atopic dermatitis.
abstract: Groups of louse-infested and louse-naïve lambs (n=6 or 7) were used in two experiments to determine the sequential tissue response (macroscopical, microscopical and key cytokine mRNA) to intradermal injection of crude louse (Bovicola ovis) antigen over a period of 72 or 96 h. Histamine diphosphate and phosphate-buffered saline/glycerol (antigen vehicle control) solutions were also injected intradermally in each lamb for comparison. In both experiments, louse-infested lambs showed immediate and late-phase responses (LPRs) to louse antigen that differed significantly from the responses in the louse-naïve lambs. In experiment 1, biopsy samples taken at 7, 24, 48 and 96 h after injections showed more extensive dermal inflammation and leucocyte infiltration in response to louse antigen in louse-infested than in louse-naïve lambs. Eosinophils were significantly more numerous in the dermis of louse-infested lambs after all treatments and increased substantially in these lambs after antigen injection. Additionally, the louse-infested lambs differed from the naïve lambs in showing significantly higher mononuclear leucocyte and basophil infiltration and significantly lower neutrophil infiltration after antigen injection. In experiment 2, biopsy samples taken 4, 24, 48 and 72 h after injections showed trends in eosinophil infiltration of the dermis similar to those observed in experiment 1. Peak IL-4 mRNA expression was detected 4 h after antigen injection in the louse-infested lambs and remained significantly elevated at 24 h as compared with the results in the louse-naïve lambs. No significant difference in IFN-gamma mRNA expression between the louse-infested and the louse-naïve lambs was observed. These results indicated that louse-infested lambs show a cutaneous LPR analogous to that observed in atopic human beings and dogs. However, some differences were observed, including the longer duration of the LPR, the profuse eosinophil infiltration, and an absence of increased IFN-gamma mRNA expression.
authors.affiliation: Wallaceville Animal Research Centre, AgResearch Ltd, P.O. Box 40063, Upper Hutt, New Zealand. alex.pfeffer@agresearch.co.nz
authors.forename: A
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Pfeffer
authors.forename: J A
authors.initials: JA
authors.lastname: Wilson
authors.forename: A
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Pernthaner
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D049873:Cardiidae / Q000276:immunology; D016207:Cytokines / Q000378:metabolism*; D003876:Dermatitis, Atopic / Q000276:immunology / Q000662:veterinary*; D007271:Injections, Intradermal / Q000379:methods; D007371:Interferon-gamma / Q000378:metabolism; D015847:Interleukin-4 / Q000378:metabolism; D007428:Intradermal Tests / Q000379:methods / Q000662:veterinary*; D007962:Leukocytes / Q000276:immunology; D020556:Neutrophil Infiltration; D008003:Phthiraptera / Q000276:immunology*; D012333:RNA, Messenger / Q000378:metabolism; D012756:Sheep; D012757:Sheep Diseases / Q000276:immunology* / Q000378:metabolism; D012867:Skin / Q000276:immunology
chemical_list: D016207:Cytokines; D012333:RNA, Messenger; D015847:Interleukin-4; D007371:Interferon-gamma