title: Quantitative genetics of age-related retinal degeneration: a second F1 intercross between the A/J and C57BL/6 strains.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  Previously, several quantitative trait loci (QTL) that influence age-related retinal degeneration (ageRD) were demonstrated in a cross between the C57BL/6J-c(2J) and BALB/cByJ strains (B x C). In this study, as a complementary approach to ongoing recombinant progeny testing for the purpose of identifying candidate quantitative trait genes (QTG), a second test cross using the A/J and the pigmented C57BL/6J strains (A x B) was carried out. The albino A/J strain was selected because it had the most amount of ageRD among several inbred strains tested, and the pigmented C57BL/6J strain was selected because along with its coisogenic counterpart C57BL/6J-c(2J) it had the least amount of ageRD. Thus, the effect of pigment on ageRD could be tested at the same time that the C57BL/6 genetic background was kept in common between the crosses from the two studies for the purpose of comparison.
  
  
  METHODS
  A non-reciprocal F1 intercross between the A/J and C57BL/6J strains produced 170 F2 progeny. At 8 months of age after being maintained in relatively dim light, F2 mice, control mice and mice of other strains were evaluated for retinal degeneration by measurement of the thickness of the outer nuclear layer of the retina. The F2 mice were genotyped with dinucleotide repeat markers spanning the genome. Correlation of genotype with phenotype was made with Map Manager QTX software.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Comparison of several strains of mice including the pigmented strains 129S1/SvImJ and C57BL/6J and the albino strains A/J, NZW/LacJ, BALB/cByJ and C57BL/6J-c(2J), showed significant differences in ageRD. The greatest difference was between the albino A/J strain and the pigmented C57BL/6J strain. However, there was no significant difference between the pigmented C57BL/6J and its albino coisogenic counterpart C57BL/6J-c(2J). Neither was there significant difference between the pigmented and albino F2 mice from the A x B cross. On the other hand, F2 males had a small but significantly lower amount of ageRD than females. Several QTL were identified in the A x B cross but surprisingly none of the 3 major QTL present in the original B x C cross (Chrs 6, 10, and 16) was present. There were minor QTL on proximal Chr 12 and proximal Chr 14 in common between the two crosses, and the proximal Chr 12 QTL was present in a previous light damage study involving the B and C strains. At least one sex-limited QTL was present on the X chromosome with a peak in a different location from that of a sex-limited QTL in the previous B x C study. In addition, the protective X allele was from the BALB/cByJ strain in the B x C cross and from C57BL/6J in the A x B cross. In both crosses, the C57BL/6J X-chromosome allele was recessive.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Significant differences were observed in ageRD among several inbred strains of mice maintained in relatively dim light. AgeRD was not influenced by pigment but was influenced by gender, albeit to a small degree. The presence of the same QTL in one light-induced and two ageRD studies suggests at least partial commonality in retinal degeneration pathways of different primary cause. However, the three main QTL present in the B x C cross were absent from the A x B cross. This suggests that the genetic determinants responsible for the greater sensitivity to ageRD of BALB/cByJ and A/J relative to C57BL/6J are not the same. This is supported by the presence of sex-limited X-chromosome QTL in the two crosses in which the C57BL/6J allele is protective relative to the A allele and sensitive relative to the C allele. The findings in the two studies of differing allelic relationships of QTG, and differing QTL aid the identification of candidate genes mapping to critical QTL. Identifying natural modifying genes that influence retinal degeneration resulting from any causal pathway, especially those QTG that are protective, will open avenues of study that may lead to broad based therapies for people suffering retinal degenerative diseases.
authors.affiliation: Department of Biology, Loyola Marymount University, Los Angeles, CA 90045-2659, USA. mdancige@lmu.edu
authors.forename: M
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Danciger
authors.forename: H
authors.initials: H
authors.lastname: Yang
authors.forename: R
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Ralston
authors.forename: Y
authors.initials: Y
authors.lastname: Liu
authors.forename: M T
authors.initials: MT
authors.lastname: Matthes
authors.forename: J
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Peirce
authors.forename: M M
authors.initials: MM
authors.lastname: Lavail
mesh_terms: D000375:Aging; D000483:Alleles; D000818:Animals; D002874:Chromosome Mapping; D003433:Crosses, Genetic; D005260:Female; D005808:Genes, Recessive; D020022:Genetic Predisposition to Disease; D006239:Haplotypes; D006799:Housing, Animal; D008029:Lighting; D008297:Male; D051379:Mice; D008810:Mice, Inbred C57BL / Q000235:genetics*; D008815:Mice, Inbred Strains / Q000235:genetics*; D040641:Quantitative Trait Loci / Q000235:genetics; D012162:Retinal Degeneration / Q000235:genetics*; D012737:Sex Factors; D014960:X Chromosome