[Evaluation of consequences of test use in validity theory].
There is little doubt about the importance of validity during the compilation and evaluation of tests. Nevertheless, intense debate has arisen with regard to incorporating the consequences of test use as a further source of evidence in the most recent edition of the AERA, APA, NCME Standards . After reviewing the historical antecedents of the issue and the main lines of approach of both defenders and critics, this paper sets out the arguments which may be used in answer to the question: 'At what point should the analysis of the consequences of test use become part of validation?' The response of the AERA, APA, NCME Standards has clear similarities with the perspective adopted towards the consideration of bias in tests as a problem of validity. Finally, the paper describes how consequence validation may be subject to tension arising from the evolution of notions of justice in test use.
Padilla
José Luis
JL
Facultad de Psicología, Universidad de Granada, Spain. jpadilla@ugr.es
Gómez
Juana
J
Hildago
María Dolores
MD
Muñiz
José
J
D015982:Bias; D015986:Confounding Factors, Epidemiologic; D017408:Guidelines as Topic; D006801:Humans; D008962:Models, Theoretical; D011581:Psychological Tests / Q000592:standards*; D011588:Psychology, Educational / Q000458:organization & administration / Q000592:standards*; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D012107:Research Design