title: Comment on Kraft O. et al. Detection of sentinel lymph nodes in cervical cancer. A comparison of two protocols.
authors.affiliation: Department of Gynaecology, Medical University, Gdañsk, Poland. dwydra@amg.gda.pl
authors.forename: Dariusz
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Wydra
authors.forename: Grzegorz
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Romanowicz
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D001706:Biopsy; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007150:Immunohistochemistry; D008198:Lymph Nodes / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging* / Q000473:pathology*; D008207:Lymphatic Metastasis; D008875:Middle Aged; D011877:Radionuclide Imaging / Q000379:methods; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D012680:Sensitivity and Specificity; D021701:Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy / Q000379:methods*; D013668:Technetium Tc 99m Aggregated Albumin; D013997:Time Factors; D002583:Uterine Cervical Neoplasms / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging* / Q000473:pathology*
chemical_list: D013668:Technetium Tc 99m Aggregated Albumin