Cost-effectiveness of cotrimoxazole prophylaxis among persons with HIV in Uganda.
BACKGROUND
Daily prophylaxis with trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (cotrimoxazole) by persons with HIV reduces morbidity and mortality and is recommended by Joint United Nations Program on HIV/AIDS and World Health Organization (WHO), but there are limited published cost-effectiveness data for this intervention. We assessed the cost-effectiveness of cotrimoxazole prophylaxis for persons living with HIV in rural Uganda.


METHODS
We modeled the cost-effectiveness of daily cotrimoxazole prophylaxis based on clinical results and operational data from a prospective cohort study of home-based care delivery to adults and children with HIV in rural Uganda who were older than the age of 5 years. Main outcome measures were net program cost and disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs) gained. We examined the provision of cotrimoxazole prophylaxis for (A) all HIV-infected individuals regardless of immunologic or clinical criteria; (B) those with WHO stage 2 or more advanced disease; (C) those with CD4 cell counts <500 cells/microL; and (D) those meeting criteria B or C, the current WHO recommendation. We calculated the costs and effectiveness of these 4 screening algorithms compared with no cotrimoxazole prophylaxis and calculated incremental cost-effectiveness ratios. We performed univariate and multivariate sensitivity analyses.


RESULTS
Cotrimoxazole prophylaxis for all HIV-infected individuals (algorithm A) produced 7.3 life-years and 7.55 DALYs per 100 persons over 1 year compared with no prophylaxis. Using this screening algorithm, the intervention saved $2.50 per person-year. The program costs and the DALYs gained by algorithms A, B, and D were more favorable than those for algorithm C. Among algorithms A, B, and D, strategies using screening algorithms for WHO stage or CD4 cell counts were more costly and marginally less effective than providing cotrimoxazole prophylaxis to all HIV-infected individuals.


CONCLUSIONS
Daily cotrimoxazole prophylaxis for HIV-infected individuals is highly cost-effective in rural Uganda. The use of screening algorithms to identify individuals with advanced HIV disease may result in higher program costs and less favorable cost-effectiveness.
Pitter
Christian
C
Elizabeth Glaser Pediatric AIDS Foundation, 1140 Connecticut Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20036, USA. cpitter@pedaids.org
Kahn
James G
JG
Marseille
Elliot
E
Lule
John R
JR
McFarland
Deborah A
DA
Ekwaru
John Paul
JP
Bunnell
Rebecca
R
Coutinho
Alex
A
Mermin
Jonathan
J
D017088:AIDS-Related Opportunistic Infections / Q000517:prevention & control*; D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D000465:Algorithms; D000890:Anti-Infective Agents / Q000627:therapeutic use*; D018890:Chemoprevention / Q000191:economics; D002648:Child; D003362:Cost-Benefit Analysis; D006801:Humans; D012424:Rural Population; D015662:Trimethoprim, Sulfamethoxazole Drug Combination / Q000627:therapeutic use*; D014454:Uganda
D000890:Anti-Infective Agents; D015662:Trimethoprim, Sulfamethoxazole Drug Combination