title: Efficacy of pantoprazole 20 mg daily compared with esomeprazole 20 mg daily in the maintenance of healed gastroesophageal reflux disease: a randomized, double-blind comparative trial - the EMANCIPATE study.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  To compare the efficacy and tolerability of pantoprazole 20 mg once daily with that of esomeprazole 20 mg once daily for 6 months as maintenance therapy in patients with previously healed gastroesophageal reflux disease.
  
  
  METHODS
  In an initial open-label acute phase, outpatients with endoscopically confirmed gastroesophageal reflux disease (Los Angeles grades A-D) received pantoprazole 40 mg once daily for 4 or 8 weeks. Those healed (defined as the absence of esophagitis, and 'no' or 'mild' heartburn and acid regurgitation) were randomized in the double-blind manner for maintenance therapy with pantoprazole 20 mg once daily or esomeprazole 20 mg once daily for 6 months.
  
  
  RESULTS
  In the acute healing phase, 1452 patients were recruited to receive pantoprazole 40 mg once daily. Healing success was 91% (intent-to-treat analysis). A total of 1303 patients entered the maintenance phase of the study. Pantoprazole 20 mg once daily and esomeprazole 20 mg once daily were equally effective at maintaining patients in remission; 84 and 85% of pantoprazole and esomeprazole recipients remained in combined endoscopic and symptomatic remission at 6 months (intent-to-treat analysis). The confidence interval of the difference was (-5.7; +infinity), showing that pantoprazole is as effective as esomeprazole with a noninferiority margin of 5.8%. Combined endoscopic and symptomatic remission was independent of Helicobacter pylori status. Both treatments were well tolerated and safe.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Treatment with pantoprazole 20 mg once daily or esomeprazole 20 mg once daily provides similarly effective and well-tolerated maintenance of previously healed gastroesophageal reflux disease irrespective of baseline H. pylori status.
authors.affiliation: Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. klgoh56@tm.net.my
authors.forename: Khean-Lee
authors.initials: KL
authors.lastname: Goh
authors.forename: Robert
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Benamouzig
authors.forename: Peter
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Sander
authors.forename: Thomas
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Schwan
mesh_terms: D053799:2-Pyridinylmethylsulfinylbenzimidazoles / Q000009:adverse effects / Q000627:therapeutic use*; D000328:Adult; D000897:Anti-Ulcer Agents / Q000009:adverse effects / Q000627:therapeutic use*; D004311:Double-Blind Method; D004334:Drug Administration Schedule; D064098:Esomeprazole / Q000009:adverse effects / Q000627:therapeutic use*; D005260:Female; D005764:Gastroesophageal Reflux / Q000188:drug therapy / Q000382:microbiology / Q000517:prevention & control*; D016481:Helicobacter Infections / Q000150:complications; D016480:Helicobacter pylori; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D000077402:Pantoprazole; D012074:Remission Induction; D055502:Secondary Prevention; D016896:Treatment Outcome
chemical_list: D053799:2-Pyridinylmethylsulfinylbenzimidazoles; D000897:Anti-Ulcer Agents; D000077402:Pantoprazole; D064098:Esomeprazole