Opportunities and obstacles to collecting wildlife disease data for public health purposes: results of a pilot study on Vancouver Island, British Columbia.
Existing sources of wildlife morbidity and mortality data were evaluated and 3 pilot active surveillance projects were undertaken to compare and contrast methods for collecting wildlife disease data on Vancouver Island for public health purposes. Few organizations could collect samples for diagnostic evaluation, fewer still maintained records, and none regularly characterized or reported wildlife disease for public health purposes. Wildlife rehabilitation centers encountered the greatest variety of wildlife from the largest geographic area and frequently received submissions from other organizations. Obstacles to participation included the following: permit restrictions; financial disincentives; staff safety; no mandate to collect relevant data; and lack of contact between wildlife and public health agencies. Despite these obstacles, modest investments in personnel allowed novel pathogens of public health concern to be tracked. Targeted surveillance for known pathogens in specific host species, rather than general surveys for unspecified pathogens, was judged to be a more effective and efficient way to provide useful public health data.
Stitt
Tyler
T
Western College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, 52 Campus Drive, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan S7N 5B7.
Mountifield
Julie
J
Stephen
Craig
C
D000820:Animal Diseases / Q000175:diagnosis / Q000453:epidemiology*; D000818:Animals; D000835:Animals, Wild; D001955:British Columbia; D003625:Data Collection / Q000379:methods*; D010865:Pilot Projects; D011159:Population Surveillance; D011634:Public Health; D011996:Records / Q000662:veterinary; D018571:Sentinel Surveillance / Q000662:veterinary