'Hypotheses, everywhere only hypotheses!': on some contexts of Dilthey's critique of explanatory psychology.
In 1894, Wilhelm Dilthey published an article in which he formulated a critique of what he called 'explanatory psychology', contrasting it with his own conception of 'descriptive psychology'. Dilthey's descriptive psychology, in turn, was to provide the basis for Dilthey's specific philosophy of the human sciences (Geisteswissenschaften). In this paper, I contextualize Dilthey's critique of explanatory psychology. I show that while this critique comes across as very broad and sweeping, he in fact had specific opponents in mind, namely, scholars who, like him, attempted to theorize about the relationship between the individual and society, between psychology and the other human sciences. Dilthey's critique of explanatory psychology is the flipside of his critique of sociology, which he had already formulated. He challenged both because he felt that they gave the wrong kind of answer to the task of overcoming metaphysics within the human sciences. In particular, I identify the founders of Völkerpsychologie, Moritz Lazarus and Heymann Steinthal, and (more importantly) their student, Georg Simmel, as Dilthey's targets. I provide textual and historical evidence for this thesis.
Feest
Uljana
U
Technische Universität Berlin, Institut für Philosophie, Wissenschaftstheorie, Wissenschafts-und Technikgeschichte, Ernst-Reuter-Platz 7, 10587 Berlin, Germany. uljana.feest@tu-berlin.de <uljana.feest@tu-berlin.de>
D005858:Germany; D049672:History, 19th Century; D049673:History, 20th Century; D006801:Humans; D010684:Philosophy / Q000266:history*; D011584:Psychology / Q000266:history*