title: Discrepancy processes in prospective memory retrieval.
abstract: Discrepancy processes may be helpful in noticing prospective memory targets (McDaniel, Guynn, Einstein, & Breneiser, 2004). We manipulated the discrepancy of prospective memory targets from the processing coherence established by the ongoing task by preexposing nontarget items in the ongoing task either five times (high discrepancy) or two times (low discrepancy). Prospective memory performance was significantly better in the high-discrepancy group than in the low-discrepancy group. These results support a discrepancy view of prospective remembering.
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, Washington University, St. Louis, MO 63130-4899, USA. jebrenei@artsci.wustl.edu
authors.forename: Jennifer E
authors.initials: JE
authors.lastname: Breneiser
authors.forename: Mark A
authors.initials: MA
authors.lastname: McDaniel
mesh_terms: D001288:Attention; D001364:Awareness; D004193:Discrimination Learning; D006801:Humans; D008570:Memory, Short-Term; D011939:Mental Recall; D011597:Psychomotor Performance; D011932:Reading; D012660:Semantics; D012718:Set, Psychology; D014706:Verbal Learning