Discrimination of artificial categories structured by family resemblances: a comparative study in people (Homo sapiens) and pigeons (Columba livia).
Adult humans (Homo sapiens) and pigeons (Columba livia) were trained to discriminate artificial categories that the authors created by mimicking 2 properties of natural categories. One was a family resemblance relationship: The highly variable exemplars, including those that did not have features in common, were structured by a similarity network with the features correlating to one another in each category. The other was a polymorphous rule: No single feature was essential for distinguishing the categories, and all the features overlapped between the categories. Pigeons learned the categories with ease and then showed a prototype effect in accord with the degrees of family resemblance for novel stimuli. Some evidence was also observed for interactive effects of learning of individual exemplars and feature frequencies. Humans had difficulty in learning the categories. The participants who learned the categories generally responded to novel stimuli in an all-or-none fashion on the basis of their acquired classification decision rules. The processes that underlie the classification performances of the 2 species are discussed.
Makino
Hiroshi
H
Graduate School of Science and Technology, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan.
Jitsumori
Masako
M
D000328:Adult; D000818:Animals; D001070:Appetitive Behavior; D001245:Association Learning; D003118:Color Perception; D010856:Columbidae; D003210:Concept Formation; D003657:Decision Making; D004193:Discrimination Learning; D005795:Generalization, Stimulus; D006801:Humans; D009949:Orientation; D010364:Pattern Recognition, Visual; D011340:Problem Solving; D011597:Psychomotor Performance; D013045:Species Specificity