California drug courts: outcomes, costs and promising practices: an overview of Phase II in a statewide study.
The rapid expansion of drug courts in California and the state's uncertain fiscal climate highlighted the need for definitive cost information on drug court programs. This study focused on creating a research design that can be utilized for statewide and national cost-assessment of drug courts by conducting in-depth case studies of the costs and benefits in nine adult drug courts in California. A Transactional Institutional Costs Analysis (TICA) approach was used, allowing researchers to calculate costs based on every individual's transactions within the drug court or the traditional criminal justice system. This methodology also allows the calculation of costs and benefits by agency (e.g., Public Defender's office, court, District Attorney). Results in the nine sites showed that the majority of agencies save money in processing an offender though drug court. Overall, for these nine study sites, participation in drug court saved the state over 9 million dollars in criminal justice and treatment costs due to lower recidivism in drug court participants. Based on the lessons learned in Phases I and II, Phase III of this study focuses on the creation of a web-based drug court cost self-evaluation tool (DC-CSET) that drug courts can use to determine their own costs and benefits.
Carey
Shannon M
SM
NPC Research, 4380 SW Macadam, Suite 530, Portland, OR 97239, USA. carey@npcresearch.com
Finigan
Michael
M
Crumpton
Dave
D
Waller
Mark
M
D002140:California; D015331:Cohort Studies; D003362:Cost-Benefit Analysis; D003365:Costs and Cost Analysis; D006801:Humans; D020407:Internet; D033222:Judicial Role; D015397:Program Evaluation / Q000191:economics; D012008:Recurrence; D015813:Substance Abuse Detection; D019966:Substance-Related Disorders / Q000191:economics* / Q000534:rehabilitation*; D016896:Treatment Outcome