Post-mortem forensic neuroimaging: correlation of MSCT and MRI findings with autopsy results.
Multislice-computed tomography (MSCT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are increasingly used for forensic purposes. Based on broad experience in clinical neuroimaging, post-mortem MSCT and MRI were performed in 57 forensic cases with the goal to evaluate the radiological methods concerning their usability for forensic head and brain examination. An experienced clinical radiologist evaluated the imaging data. The results were compared to the autopsy findings that served as the gold standard with regard to common forensic neurotrauma findings such as skull fractures, soft tissue lesions of the scalp, various forms of intracranial hemorrhage or signs of increased brain pressure. The sensitivity of the imaging methods ranged from 100% (e.g., heat-induced alterations, intracranial gas) to zero (e.g., mediobasal impression marks as a sign of increased brain pressure, plaques jaunes). The agreement between MRI and CT was 69%. The radiological methods prevalently failed in the detection of lesions smaller than 3mm of size, whereas they were generally satisfactory concerning the evaluation of intracranial hemorrhage. Due to its advanced 2D and 3D post-processing possibilities, CT in particular possessed certain advantages in comparison with autopsy with regard to forensic reconstruction. MRI showed forensically relevant findings not seen during autopsy in several cases. The partly limited sensitivity of imaging that was observed in this retrospective study was based on several factors: besides general technical limitations it became apparent that clinical radiologists require a sound basic forensic background in order to detect specific signs. Focused teaching sessions will be essential to improve the outcome in future examinations. On the other hand, the autopsy protocols should be further standardized to allow an exact comparison of imaging and autopsy data. In consideration of these facts, MRI and CT have the power to play an important role in future forensic neuropathological examination.
Yen
Kathrin
K
Institute of Forensic Medicine, University of Bern, 3012 Bern, Switzerland. kathrin.yen@meduni-graz.at
Lövblad
Karl-Olof
KO
Scheurer
Eva
E
Ozdoba
Christoph
C
Thali
Michael J
MJ
Aghayev
Emin
E
Jackowski
Christian
C
Anon
Javier
J
Frickey
Nathalie
N
Zwygart
Karin
K
Weis
Joachim
J
Dirnhofer
Richard
R
D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D001344:Autopsy; D001921:Brain / Q000473:pathology*; D001927:Brain Diseases / Q000175:diagnosis; D002574:Cervical Vertebrae / Q000293:injuries; D002648:Child; D002675:Child, Preschool; D006259:Craniocerebral Trauma / Q000175:diagnosis; D005260:Female; D049429:Forensic Pathology; D006801:Humans; D021621:Imaging, Three-Dimensional; D007223:Infant; D008279:Magnetic Resonance Imaging; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D012189:Retrospective Studies; D012680:Sensitivity and Specificity; D012867:Skin / Q000293:injuries / Q000473:pathology; D012886:Skull / Q000473:pathology*; D016103:Spinal Fractures / Q000175:diagnosis; D013703:Temporal Muscle / Q000293:injuries / Q000473:pathology; D014057:Tomography, X-Ray Computed / Q000379:methods*