Obligations, internalization, and excuse making: integrating the triangle model and self-determination theory.
Schlenker's triangle model (Schlenker, Britt, Pennington, Murphy, & Doherty, 1994, Schlenker, Pontari, & Christopher, 2001) identifies three excuses people use to avoid taking responsibility after failure: that one had no control in the situation, that the obligation was unclear, and that it was not really one's obligation. Three retrospective studies tested the presumed negative association between excuse making and responsibility taking. The studies also examined the effects of self-determination theory's concept of motivational internalization (Deci & Ryan, 2000) upon these variables. A complex but replicable pattern emerged, such that responsibility taking and motivational internalization correlated with adaptive outcomes such as future commitment and positive expectancy and excuse making did not. Of particular interest, perceiving that the person levying the obligation internalized motivation predicted responsibility taking, in all three studies. Implications for the triangle model, as well as for theories of maturity and personality development, are considered.
Sheldon
Kennon M
KM
Department of Psychological Sciences, University of Missouri-Columbia 65211, USA. SheldonK@Missouri.edu
Schachtman
Todd R
TR
D000328:Adult; D003674:Defense Mechanisms; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007389:Internal-External Control; D007398:Interpersonal Relations; D008297:Male; D008960:Models, Psychological; D026684:Personal Autonomy; D012189:Retrospective Studies; D012649:Self Concept; D013334:Students / Q000523:psychology; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires