Timing, remembering, and discrimination.
Four pigeons were first trained in a timing procedure. In one condition, each trial began with the presentation of an X on the center key, followed by a delay (short or long), after which two side keys were lit. If the delay was short, pecks to the red side key were reinforced. If the delay was long, pecks to the green side key were reinforced. In a second condition, the opposite contingencies applied following presentation of a square on the center key. Choice responses were then tested at 10 time intervals ranging from short to long (1 to 4 s and 4 to 7 s in different conditions). The two timing conditions were combined to create a remembering condition in which correct responding depended upon discrimination of both the sample stimulus (X or square) and the delay interval (short or long). Choices varied systematically across delay in timing conditions, but in remembering conditions, accurate choice at the training delays did not initially generalize to intermediate delays. However, with prolonged training in the remembering task, the response pattern began to resemble that of the timing conditions. Generalization gradients were asymmetrical, in accordance with Weber's Law, in that greater generalization occurred with longer delays than with shorter delays.
Sargisson
Rebecca J
RJ
Department of Psychology, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand. rebeccas@psy.otago.ac.nz
White
K Geoffrey
KG
D000818:Animals; D001070:Appetitive Behavior; D001245:Association Learning; D003118:Color Perception; D010856:Columbidae; D004193:Discrimination Learning; D005795:Generalization, Stimulus; D008570:Memory, Short-Term; D011939:Mental Recall; D013561:Symbolism; D013998:Time Perception