Importance of c-Type cytochromes for U(VI) reduction by Geobacter sulfurreducens.
BACKGROUND
In order to study the mechanism of U(VI) reduction, the effect of deleting c-type cytochrome genes on the capacity of Geobacter sulfurreducens to reduce U(VI) with acetate serving as the electron donor was investigated.


RESULTS
The ability of several c-type cytochrome deficient mutants to reduce U(VI) was lower than that of the wild type strain. Elimination of two confirmed outer membrane cytochromes and two putative outer membrane cytochromes significantly decreased (ca. 50-60%) the ability of G. sulfurreducens to reduce U(VI). Involvement in U(VI) reduction did not appear to be a general property of outer membrane cytochromes, as elimination of two other confirmed outer membrane cytochromes, OmcB and OmcC, had very little impact on U(VI) reduction. Among the periplasmic cytochromes, only MacA, proposed to transfer electrons from the inner membrane to the periplasm, appeared to play a significant role in U(VI) reduction. A subpopulation of both wild type and U(VI) reduction-impaired cells, 24-30%, accumulated amorphous uranium in the periplasm. Comparison of uranium-accumulating cells demonstrated a similar amount of periplasmic uranium accumulation in U(VI) reduction-impaired and wild type G. sulfurreducens. Assessment of the ability of the various suspensions to reduce Fe(III) revealed no correlation between the impact of cytochrome deletion on U(VI) reduction and reduction of Fe(III) hydroxide and chelated Fe(III).


CONCLUSIONS
This study indicates that c-type cytochromes are involved in U(VI) reduction by Geobacter sulfurreducens. The data provide new evidence for extracellular uranium reduction by G. sulfurreducens but do not rule out the possibility of periplasmic uranium reduction. Occurrence of U(VI) reduction at the cell surface is supported by the significant impact of elimination of outer membrane cytochromes on U(VI) reduction and the lack of correlation between periplasmic uranium accumulation and the capacity for uranium reduction. Periplasmic uranium accumulation may reflect the ability of uranium to penetrate the outer membrane rather than the occurrence of enzymatic U(VI) reduction. Elimination of cytochromes rarely had a similar impact on both Fe(III) and U(VI) reduction, suggesting that there are differences in the routes of electron transfer to U(VI) and Fe(III). Further studies are required to clarify the pathways leading to U(VI) reduction in G. sulfurreducens.
Shelobolina
Evgenya S
ES
Department of Microbiology, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA, USA. shelobolina@wisc.edu <shelobolina@wisc.edu>
Coppi
Maddalena V
MV
Korenevsky
Anton A
AA
DiDonato
Laurie N
LN
Sullivan
Sara A
SA
Konishi
Hiromi
H
Xu
Huifang
H
Leang
Ching
C
Butler
Jessica E
JE
Kim
Byoung-Chan
BC
Lovley
Derek R
DR
D001673:Biodegradation, Environmental; D003574:Cytochrome c Group / Q000235:genetics / Q000378:metabolism*; D005290:Ferric Compounds / Q000737:chemistry / Q000378:metabolism; D045302:Geobacter / Q000235:genetics / Q000378:metabolism* / Q000648:ultrastructure; D046529:Microscopy, Electron, Transmission; D009154:Mutation; D010084:Oxidation-Reduction; D019897:Periplasm / Q000378:metabolism / Q000648:ultrastructure; D014501:Uranium / Q000737:chemistry / Q000378:metabolism*
D003574:Cytochrome c Group; D005290:Ferric Compounds; D014501:Uranium