Current attitudes and practices towards diathermy smoke.
BACKGROUND
The hazards of surgical smoke are well documented and electrosurgical units (ESUs) are an integral part of surgical practice. The aim of this study was to gauge the opinions of general surgical consultants, specialist registrars and senior theatre nurses in the Wessex Region towards the hazards of ESU smoke.


METHODS
A literature search was carried out using Ovid Medline. A questionnaire was sent to 169 consultants, SpRs and nurses in the 14 hospitals across the Wessex Region, exploring current practices, perceived hazards and whether adequate precautions were currently in use.


RESULTS
Only 3 of 98 surgeons used dedicated smoke extractors, despite the fact the majority (72%) felt that, currently, inadequate precautions were taken to protect staff and patients from surgical smoke. There was also uncertainty about the hazards amongst the respondents.


CONCLUSIONS
The use of smoke extraction equipment is very limited. Greater awareness of the hazards and available technology to extract fumes from the theatre environment might lead to greater uptake.
Spearman
John
J
Department of Surgery, Great Western Hospital, Swindon, Wiltshire, UK.
Tsavellas
George
G
Nichols
Paul
P
D001291:Attitude of Health Personnel; D003253:Consultants; D003972:Diathermy / Q000009:adverse effects*; D004739:England; D006801:Humans; D008505:Medical Staff, Hospital / Q000523:psychology / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D009741:Nursing Staff, Hospital / Q000523:psychology / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D016273:Occupational Exposure / Q000009:adverse effects*; D011364:Professional Practice / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D012307:Risk Factors; D012906:Smoke / Q000009:adverse effects*
D012906:Smoke