title: Statistical tests with accurate size and power for balanced linear mixed models.
abstract: The convenience of linear mixed models for Gaussian data has led to their widespread use. Unfortunately, standard mixed model tests often have greatly inflated test size in small samples. Many applications with correlated outcomes in medical imaging and other fields have simple properties which do not require the generality of a mixed model. Alternately, stating the special cases as a general linear multivariate model allows analysing them with either the univariate or multivariate approach to repeated measures (UNIREP, MULTIREP). Even in small samples, an appropriate UNIREP or MULTIREP test always controls test size and has a good power approximation, in sharp contrast to mixed model tests. Hence, mixed model tests should never be used when one of the UNIREP tests (uncorrected, Huynh-Feldt, Geisser-Greenhouse, Box conservative) or MULTIREP tests (Wilks, Hotelling-Lawley, Roy's, Pillai-Bartlett) apply. Convenient methods give exact power for the uncorrected and Box conservative tests. Simulations demonstrate that new power approximations for all four UNIREP tests eliminate most inaccuracy in existing methods. In turn, free software implements the approximations to give a better choice of sample size. Two repeated measures power analyses illustrate the methods. The examples highlight the advantages of examining the entire response surface of power as a function of sample size, mean differences, and variability.
authors: Department of Epidemiology and Health Policy Research, Gainesville, FL 32610-0177, USA. Keith.Muller@Biostat.ufl.edu
authors: Keith E
authors: KE
authors: Muller
authors: Lloyd J
authors: LJ
authors: Edwards
authors: Sean L
authors: SL
authors: Simpson
authors: Douglas J
authors: DJ
authors: Taylor
mesh_terms: D003952:Diagnostic Imaging / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D016014:Linear Models; D016011:Normal Distribution; D014481:United States