Food from cloned animals is part of our brave old world.
When confronted by pressure from activists and Congress, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has not always adopted policies and made decisions about individual products that accord with the scientific evidence. An example was the unnecessarily and markedly prolonged review of the veterinary drug bovine somatotropin (bST), or bovine growth hormone, during the 1980s. The FDA now faces a similar situation surrounding the question of whether meat and milk from cloned animals and their offspring are safe for human consumption. Having made a preliminary decision in the affirmative - based on an exhaustive analysis of scientific articles, health records, blood samples and studies of the composition of meat and milk - the agency has been beleaguered by criticisms. It remains to be seen whether, ultimately, science will trump anti-technology, anti-consumer activism.
Miller
Henry I
HI
The Hoover Institution, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305-6010, USA. miller@hoover.stanford.edu
D019976:Cloning, Organism / Q000639:trends*; D003257:Consumer Product Safety; D005504:Food Analysis / Q000379:methods*; D005524:Food Technology / Q000639:trends*; D030841:Food, Genetically Modified; D018570:Risk Assessment / Q000379:methods*; D014481:United States; D014486:United States Food and Drug Administration / Q000639:trends*