title: Aerosolized ceftazidime prophylaxis against ventilator-associated pneumonia in high-risk trauma patients: results of a double-blind randomized study.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is a frequent complication during recovery of severely traumatized patients. The primary objective of this study was to determine if prophylactic administration of aerosolized ceftazidime reduced the incidence of VAP in high-risk injured patients without altering the incidence of other infectious complications.
  
  
  METHODS
  This was a single-institution double-blind, randomized trial that compared a seven-day course of aerosolized ceftazidime with placebo. Intubated high-risk patients admitted to the trauma intensive care unit at a large regional trauma center between February 2003 and September 2005 were eligible for enrollment. The main outcome evaluated was the incidence of VAP at two weeks and 30 days. The incidences of multi-drug-resistant infections and other infectious complications were secondary outcomes.
  
  
  RESULTS
  A total of 105 patients were randomized, resulting in 52 patients in the placebo arm and 53 patients in the ceftazidime arm. There was no statistical difference between the groups with regard to demographic data, injury severity, calculated risk of VAP, or the number of doses received. In the intention-to-treat analysis, the incidence of VAP at two weeks was 24/52 (46%) in the placebo group and 21/53 (40%) in the ceftazidime group. The number of patients with VAP at 30 days was 26/52 (50%) in the placebo group and 26/53 (49%) in the ceftazidime group. There was no statistical difference in the development of multi-drug-resistant VAP or other infectious complications in the two groups.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The use of aerosolized ceftazidime did not reduce the rate of VAP in high-risk patients admitted after traumatic injury, but neither did it increase the incidence of other infectious complications. Routine use of prophylactic aerosolized ceftazidime to prevent VAP in trauma patients cannot be recommended.
authors: Department of Surgery, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN, USA. jclaridge@metrohealth.org
authors: Jeffrey A
authors: JA
authors: Claridge
authors: Norma M
authors: NM
authors: Edwards
authors: Joseph
authors: J
authors: Swanson
authors: Timothy C
authors: TC
authors: Fabian
authors: Jordan A
authors: JA
authors: Weinberg
authors: Christopher
authors: C
authors: Wood
authors: Martin A
authors: MA
authors: Croce
mesh_terms: D000280:Administration, Inhalation; D000328:Adult; D000900:Anti-Bacterial Agents / Q000008:administration & dosage* / Q000009:adverse effects / Q000627:therapeutic use; D019072:Antibiotic Prophylaxis / Q000379:methods*; D001419:Bacteria / Q000187:drug effects; D001424:Bacterial Infections / Q000453:epidemiology / Q000382:microbiology; D002442:Ceftazidime / Q000008:administration & dosage* / Q000009:adverse effects / Q000627:therapeutic use; D004311:Double-Blind Method; D024901:Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D015994:Incidence; D008297:Male; D010919:Placebos; D053717:Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated / Q000517:prevention & control*; D016896:Treatment Outcome; D014947:Wounds and Injuries / Q000150:complications
chemical_list: D000900:Anti-Bacterial Agents; D010919:Placebos; D002442:Ceftazidime