The effect of attitude toward women on the relative individuation of women and men is mediated by perceived gender subgroups.
The present study investigated whether a differential number of perceived subgroups for men and women mediated the previous finding that men and women with more traditional attitudes concerning women's roles individuate men more than women, whereas individuals with less traditional attitudes better individuate women (Stewart, Vassar, Sanchez, & David, 2000). Participants were asked to recall traits of 2 male and 2 female targets described to them. Comparison of memory errors for male vs female targets indicated relative individuation of men and women. Participants also generated subgroups of men and women and indicated their familiarity with these groups. As predicted, relative number of subgroups but not differential familiarity mediated the relationship between attitudes and relative individuation of men and women. More complex representations of women are proposed to facilitate organization of information about new members of this group.
Stewart
Tracie L
TL
Department of Psychology, Georgia State University, P.O. Box 5010, Atlanta, GA 30302-5010, USA. stewart@gsu.edu
Harris
Kevin R
KR
van Knippenberg
Ad
A
Hermsen
Berlinda J
BJ
Joly
Janneke F
JF
Lippmann
Maarten W
MW
D000328:Adult; D001290:Attitude; D005260:Female; D005783:Gender Identity; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D012737:Sex Factors; D012938:Social Perception