title: Framing divorce reform: media, morality, and the politics of family.
abstract: No-fault statutes changed divorce from an adversarial system pitting victims against victimizers, with the state acting as enforcer of marital norms, to a private decision between unhappily married but legally blameless partners. Divorce reform following no-fault primarily focused on making divorce more fair for the parties involved. Over the last several decades, divorce reform has transitioned from making divorce better to making marriage healthier. The good divorce has slipped from policy attention, elevating the potential for restigmatization of divorced couples and their children. We trace the trajectory of media framing of divorce reform discourse in three general circulation newspapers from the start of the no-fault revolution, noting how media framing parallels and naturalizes the transition in divorce reform policy. We conclude by observing the prevalence of divorce and the related need for therapists to be cognizant of this naturalization process, thereby keeping the good divorce as a goal for those who desire to end their marriages.
authors: Department of Sociology, Tulane University, New Orleans, LA 70118, USA. madams2@tulane.edu
authors: Michele
authors: M
authors: Adams
authors: Scott
authors: S
authors: Coltrane
mesh_terms: D004243:Divorce / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence* / Q000706:statistics & numerical data / Q000639:trends; D005190:Family; D006801:Humans; D008393:Marriage / Q000523:psychology; D008402:Mass Media; D009014:Morals; D011057:Politics; D012922:Social Change; D014481:United States / Q000453:epidemiology