The neurobiology of addiction: implications for voluntary control of behavior.
There continues to be a debate on whether addiction is best understood as a brain disease or a moral condition. This debate, which may influence both the stigma attached to addiction and access to treatment, is often motivated by the question of whether and to what extent we can justly hold addicted individuals responsible for their actions. In fact, there is substantial evidence for a disease model, but the disease model per se does not resolve the question of voluntary control. Recent research at the intersection of neuroscience and psychology suggests that addicted individuals have substantial impairments in cognitive control of behavior, but this "loss of control" is not complete or simple. Possible mechanisms and implications are briefly reviewed.
Hyman
Steven E
SE
Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA. seh@harvard.edu
D016739:Behavior, Addictive / Q000378:metabolism / Q000503:physiopathology* / Q000523:psychology; D001921:Brain / Q000378:metabolism*; D001927:Brain Diseases / Q000378:metabolism / Q000523:psychology; D002755:Choice Behavior; D003192:Compulsive Behavior; D003463:Cues; D004298:Dopamine / Q000378:metabolism*; D004328:Drive; D004644:Emotions; D006040:Goals; D006801:Humans; D007389:Internal-External Control; D007600:Judgment; D009446:Neurobiology; D009484:Neuropsychology; D026684:Personal Autonomy; D017397:Prefrontal Cortex / Q000378:metabolism; D012008:Recurrence; D012201:Reward; D012941:Social Responsibility; D012944:Social Support; D019966:Substance-Related Disorders / Q000378:metabolism / Q000503:physiopathology* / Q000523:psychology; D017557:Ventral Tegmental Area / Q000378:metabolism; D014836:Volition
D004298:Dopamine