title: Postoperative pain intensity assessment: a comparison of four scales in Chinese adults.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  To determine the psychometric properties and applicability of four pain scales in Chinese postoperative adults.
  
  
  METHODS
  A prospective clinical study.
  
  
  METHODS
  A university-affiliated hospital.
  
  
  METHODS
  In total, 173 Chinese patients (age range 18-78 years) undergoing scheduled surgery.
  
  
  METHODS
  Recalled pain and anticipated postoperative pain intensity were rated preoperatively with a visual analog scale (VAS), a numeric rating scale (NRS), a verbal descriptor scale (VDS), and the Faces Pain Scale Revised (FPS-R). From the day of surgery to the sixth postoperative day, patients were interviewed for the scores of current operative pain intensity and the worst, least, and average pain on that day. On the sixth postoperative day, retrospective ratings over the 7 days were also obtained and tool preferences were investigated.
  
  
  METHODS
  Scale reliability was evaluated using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). Scale validity was assessed by correlations between scales, analysis of variance with repeated measures, and the sensitivity of the scales to interventions. Chi-square tests were used to investigate if error rate and preference rate were related to gender, age, and educational level.
  
  
  RESULTS
  All four pain intensity scales had good reliability and validity when used with Chinese adults. The ICCs of the four scales across current, worst, least, and average pain on each postoperative day were consistently high (0.673-0.825), and all scales at each rating were strongly correlated (r = 0.71-0.99). Analysis of variance with repeated measures revealed significant decreases in scores associated with postoperative days, and all four scales were sensitive in evaluating analgesic efficacy. Both the VDS and the FPS-R had low error rates. Nearly half of the participants (48.1%) preferred the FPS-R, followed by the NRS (24.4%), the VDS (23.1%), and the VAS (4.4%); however, no significant differences were noted in terms of gender, age, and educational level.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  These findings demonstrate that although all four scales can be options for Chinese adults to report pain intensity, the FPS-R appears to be the best one. Providing tool options to address individual needs or preferences is suggested.
authors: Department of Nursing, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
authors: Li
authors: L
authors: Li
authors: Xueqin
authors: X
authors: Liu
authors: Keela
authors: K
authors: Herr
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D000367:Age Factors; D000368:Aged; D000700:Analgesics / Q000627:therapeutic use; D002681:China; D003625:Data Collection; D003627:Data Interpretation, Statistical; D004493:Education; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D011939:Mental Recall; D008875:Middle Aged; D010147:Pain Measurement / Q000187:drug effects / Q000379:methods* / Q000523:psychology; D010149:Postoperative Pain / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000188:drug therapy / Q000453:epidemiology; D011594:Psychometrics; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D012737:Sex Factors; D012959:Socioeconomic Factors
chemical_list: D000700:Analgesics