Is adaptive co-management ethical?
'Good' governance and adaptive co-management hold broad appeal due to their positive connotations and 'noble ethical claims'. This paper poses a fundamental question: is adaptive co-management ethical? In pursuing an answer to this question, the concept of adaptive co-management is succinctly summarized and three ethical perspectives (deontology, teleology and existentialism) are explored. The case of adaptive co-management in Cambodia is described and subsequently considered through the lens of ethical triangulation. The case illuminates important ethical considerations and directs attention towards the need for meditative thinking which increases the value of tradition, ecology, and culture. Giving ethics a central position makes clear the potential for adaptive co-management to be an agent for governance, which is good, right and authentic as well as an arena to embrace uncertainty.
Fennell
David
D
Department of Tourism and Environment, Brock University, 500 Glenridge Avenue, St. Catharines, Ont., Canada L2S 3A1. dfennell@brocku.ca
Plummer
Ryan
R
Marschke
Melissa
M
D002160:Cambodia; D003247:Conservation of Natural Resources / Q000379:methods*; D003657:Decision Making; D017753:Ecosystem; D004989:Ethics; D006076:Government; D006802:Human Activities; D011640:Public Policy