Education qualification levels and school careers of unilateral versus bilateral hearing aid users.
OBJECTIVE
Analyse the difference in school careers and secondary school qualification levels between unilateral hearing aid users and bilateral hearing aid users.


METHODS
Retrospective questionnaire study.


METHODS
Postal-based questionnaire.


METHODS
Names of adults known to have been fitted with unilateral or bilateral hearing aids during childhood were retrieved. This resulted in 292 names. Participants were selected using the following criteria: availability of the medical record, presence of bilateral hearing loss, completed secondary school education, normal IQ and a minimum aided word-recognition score of 70% at 10 years of age. The questionnaire was sent to 50 potential participants of whom 40 responded, resulting in two groups comprising 19 unilateral and 21 bilateral hearing aid users.


METHODS
A questionnaire was developed to obtain data on secondary school levels and aspects of the school careers, such as type of schools attended (mainstream versus special), repeating a school year and additional assistance (speech and language therapy, personal frequency modulation systems).


METHODS
Comparison of the benefit of bilateral hearing aid fitting versus unilateral hearing aid fitting on secondary school qualification level, type of school the children attended, class failure and additional assistance used.


RESULTS
The group of bilaterally fitted hearing aid users eventually completed secondary school at a superior level than the unilaterally fitted users. 33% of binaural hearing aid users achieved qualifications giving access to a bachelors degree compared with 21% of unilateral users. There were no differences between those fitted with unilateral and bilateral hearing aids in the type of schools attended, repeating a school year and additional assistance.


CONCLUSIONS
The bilateral hearing aid users obtained superior secondary school qualifications than the unilateral users but their school careers were comparable.
Beijen
J
J
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Radboud University Medical Centre Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. j.beijen@kno.umcn.nl
Mylanus
E A M
EA
Snik
A F M
AF
D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D001309:Auditory Threshold; D002648:Child; D003131:Combined Modality Therapy / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D004519:Education, Special / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D004522:Educational Status; D005260:Female; D006306:Health Surveys; D006310:Hearing Aids; D006312:Hearing Loss, Bilateral / Q000453:epidemiology / Q000534:rehabilitation*; D006801:Humans; D007805:Language Development Disorders / Q000453:epidemiology / Q000534:rehabilitation; D007808:Language Therapy / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D008282:Mainstreaming, Education / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D008297:Male; D009426:Netherlands; D012050:Rehabilitation, Vocational / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D013070:Speech Therapy / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires