title: The polity of academic medicine: a critical analysis of autocratic governance.
abstract: How should academic radiology departments be governed? This question has rarely been directly addressed in the radiology literature. The dominant model of administration in present-day academic departments differs from that typically seen in private group practices. Whereas private group practices tend to follow a democratic model whereby key decisions must be supported by a majority of the partners, in academic institutions, medical school deans and department chairs generally possess great latitude in strategic and operational decision making. This article considers arguments for and against "top-down" governance in academia. The rationale supporting this form of governance is weak, and the best evidence from the fields of management and organizational behavior suggests it may in fact be detrimental.
authors.affiliation: Department of Radiology, Indiana University, Indianapolis, Indiana 46202, USA. swilling@iupui.edu
authors.forename: Steven J
authors.initials: SJ
authors.lastname: Willing
authors.forename: Richard B
authors.initials: RB
authors.lastname: Gunderman
authors.forename: Philip L
authors.initials: PL
authors.lastname: Cochran
authors.forename: Todd
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Saxton
mesh_terms: D000046:Academic Medical Centers / Q000458:organization & administration*; D003657:Decision Making; D017598:Efficiency, Organizational; D006076:Government; D007857:Leadership; D017146:Models, Organizational; D014481:United States