title: Accuracy of contacts calculated from 3D images of occlusal surfaces.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  Compare occlusal contacts calculated from 3D virtual models created from clinical records to contacts identified clinically using shimstock and transillumination.
  
  
  METHODS
  Upper and lower full arch alginate impressions and vinyl polysiloxane centric interocclusal records were made of 12 subjects. Stone casts made from the alginate impressions and the interocclusal records were optically scanned. Three-dimensional virtual models of the dental arches and interocclusal records were constructed using the Virtual Dental Patient Software. Contacts calculated from the virtual interocclusal records and from the aligned upper and lower virtual arch models were compared to those identified clinically using 0.01mm shimstock and transillumination of the interocclusal record. Virtual contacts and transillumination contacts were compared by anatomical region and by contacting tooth pairs to shimstock contacts. Because there is no accepted standard for identifying occlusal contacts, methods were compared in pairs with one labeled "standard" and the second labeled "test". Accuracy was defined as the number of contacts and non-contacts of the "test" that were in agreement with the "standard" divided by the total number of contacts and non-contacts of the "standard".
  
  
  RESULTS
  Accuracy of occlusal contacts calculated from virtual interocclusal records and aligned virtual casts compared to transillumination were: 0.87+/-0.05 and 0.84+/-0.06 by region and 0.95+/-0.07 and 0.95+/-0.05 by tooth, respectively. Comparisons with shimstock were: 0.85+/-0.15 (record), 0.84+/-0.14 (casts), and 81+/-17 (transillumination).
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The virtual record, aligned virtual arches, and transillumination methods of identifying contacts are equivalent, and show better agreement with each other than with the shimstock method.
authors.affiliation: Minnesota Dental Research Center for Biomaterials and Biomechanics, Department of Restorative Sciences, University of Minnesota School of Dentistry, USA. delon002@umn.edu
authors.forename: R
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: DeLong
authors.forename: S
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Knorr
authors.forename: G C
authors.initials: GC
authors.lastname: Anderson
authors.forename: J
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Hodges
authors.forename: M R
authors.initials: MR
authors.lastname: Pintado
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000464:Alginates / Q000737:chemistry; D016302:Centric Relation; D003430:Cross-Sectional Studies; D003724:Dental Arch / Q000033:anatomy & histology; D003760:Dental Impression Materials / Q000737:chemistry; D003761:Dental Impression Technique / Q000295:instrumentation; D003766:Dental Occlusion; D003792:Dental Records; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007091:Image Processing, Computer-Assisted / Q000379:methods*; D021621:Imaging, Three-Dimensional / Q000379:methods*; D007574:Jaw Relation Record / Q000295:instrumentation; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D003765:Models, Dental; D011145:Polyvinyls / Q000737:chemistry; D012833:Siloxanes / Q000737:chemistry; D013499:Surface Properties; D019228:Tooth Crown / Q000033:anatomy & histology*; D014172:Transillumination; D014584:User-Computer Interface
chemical_list: D000464:Alginates; D003760:Dental Impression Materials; D011145:Polyvinyls; D012833:Siloxanes; C034183:vinyl polysiloxane