Proportional ethical review and the identification of ethical issues.
Presently, there is a movement in the UK research governance framework towards what is referred to as proportional ethical review. Proportional ethical review is the notion that the level of ethical review and scrutiny given to a research project ought to reflect the level of ethical risk represented by that project. Relatively innocuous research should receive relatively minimal review and relatively risky research should receive intense scrutiny. Although conceptually attractive, the notion of proportional review depends on the possibility of effectively identifying the risks and ethical issues posed by an application with some process other than a full review by a properly constituted research ethics committee. In this paper, it is argued that this cannot be achieved and that the only appropriate means of identifying risks and ethical issues is consideration by a full committee. This implies that the suggested changes to the National Health Service research ethics system presently being consulted on should be strenuously resisted.
Hunter
D
D
School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Ulster, Cromore Road, Coleraine, Co. Londonderry BT52 1SA, UK. d.hunter3@ulster.ac.uk
D026688:Bioethical Issues; D026724:Ethical Review; D028663:Ethical Theory; D028744:Ethics Committees, Research; D007600:Judgment; D011361:Professional Competence; D018570:Risk Assessment / Q000941:ethics*; D013222:State Medicine; D035501:Uncertainty; D006113:United Kingdom