Wear measurement of retrieved polyethylene ABG 1 cups by universal-type measuring microscope and X-ray methods.
BACKGROUND
Polyethylene wear is considered a most important part of periprosthetic osteolysis development. Thus, its measurement is central to contemporary orthopaedics.


OBJECTIVE
The aim of this paper was to compare the accuracy of three radiographic techniques for wear measurement. Secondly, the influence of the abduction angle of the cup on measurement accuracy was investigated.


METHODS
Wear was measured manually in 80 patients by a single observer according to the Livermore, Charnley, and Dorr description. A multi-component statistical analysis was used to test the hypothesis that the Livermore technique was superior. In vitro data obtained from a Universal-type measuring microscope served as a gold standard.


RESULTS
In vitro measurements showed an average linear wear of 0.363 mm per year (0.000-0.939, SD 0.241) with a corresponding volumetric wear rate of 161 mm3 per year (0-467, SD 118.2). The Livermore technique showed the least deviation from the optical reference standard and a superior position from the viewpoint of error analysis but the correlation coefficient was slightly less (r = 0.761) than for the Dorr and Charnley techniques (r = 0.795 and r = 0.778, respectively). In addition, the mean error of the Dorr method differed significantly from zero (p = 0.036). Overall, the Livermore technique was the most accurate method for polyethylene wear measurement regardless of the abduction angle of the cup.


CONCLUSIONS
The Livermore technique performed manually was more accurate than the Charnley and Dorr methods. Nevertheless, we consider the Dorr technique an adequate tool for day-to-day wear measurements, mainly due to its simplicity.
Gallo
Jiri
J
Department of Orthopaedics, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry and Teaching Hospital, Palacky University, Olomouc, Czech Republic. jiri.gallo@volny.cz
Havranek
Vitezslav
V
Cechova
Ivana
I
Zapletalova
Jana
J
D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D020878:Device Removal; D019544:Equipment Failure Analysis; D005260:Female; D006622:Hip Prosthesis; D006801:Humans; D066298:In Vitro Techniques; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D020959:Polyethylene; D011475:Prosthesis Failure
D020959:Polyethylene