title: Continuous passive motion compared with intermittent mobilization after total knee arthroplasty. Elaboration of French clinical practice guidelines.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  To develop clinical practice guidelines concerning the use of continuous passive motion (CPM) compared with intermittent mobilization after total knee arthroplasty (TKA).
  
  
  METHODS
  We used the SOFMER (French Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Society) methodology, combining systematic literature review and collection of everyday clinical practice concerning postoperative rehabilitation techniques and external review by a multidisciplinary expert panel, to develop the guidelines.
  
  
  RESULTS
  The literature contains no evidence of the advantages of CPM over other techniques of mobilization, although CPM could be adjuvant therapy used to accelerate short-term recovery. However, in France, CPM remains widely used after TKA, both in orthopedic surgery units and in physical medicine and rehabilitation services.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Good methodological quality studies are needed to assess different CPM modalities and compare them to alternative intermittent mobilization techniques, particularly those with therapy starting from a flexed position.
authors.affiliation: Clinique Arago, 95, boulevard Arago, 75014 Paris, France.
authors.forename: J-M
authors.initials: JM
authors.lastname: Postel
authors.forename: P
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Thoumie
authors.forename: B
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: Missaoui
authors.forename: D
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Biau
authors.forename: P
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Ribinik
authors.forename: M
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Revel
authors.forename: F
authors.initials: F
authors.lastname: Rannou
mesh_terms: D019645:Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee / Q000534:rehabilitation*; D005602:France; D006801:Humans; D015915:Motion Therapy, Continuous Passive