Effect of primary posterior continuous curvilinear capsulorhexis on clinical performance of ACR6D SE single-piece hydrophilic acrylic intraocular lenses.
OBJECTIVE
To evaluate the effects of a primary posterior continuous curvilinear capsulorhexis (PCCC) on the clinical performance of a single-piece hydrophilic acrylic intraocular lens (IOL) with haptic angulation.


METHODS
Department of Ophthalmology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.


METHODS
A prospective study of 52 patients with bilateral age-related cataract was conducted. Patients had standard cataract surgery with implantation of the same IOL in both eyes. Randomly, a PCCC was created in 1 eye and the posterior capsule was left intact in the fellow eye. Assessed parameters were visual axis opacification (VAO) in eyes with a PCCC or regeneratory posterior capsule opacification (PCO) in eyes without PCCC (scale 0 to 10) in the central (3.0 mm eccentricity), intermediate (3.0 to 4.5 mm eccentricity), and peripheral (>4.5 mm eccentricity [capsulorhexis edge]) areas; neodymium:YAG (Nd:YAG) laser capsulotomy or laser polishing of ongrowing lens epithelium; anterior capsule opacification (ACO); best corrected visual acuity (BCVA); and contrast sensitivity.


RESULTS
Thirty patients completed the 2(1/2)-year follow-up. Visual axis opacification was significantly lower in the central region in the PCCC group (mean 0.5 +/- 0.7 [SD]) than PCO in the central region of the non-PCCC group (mean 1.1 +/- 1.1) (P = .02). Forty percent in the non-PCCC group had an Nd:YAG laser capsulotomy during the follow-up period; none in the PCCC group had laser polishing. There were no significant differences in ACO, SE, BCVA, or contrast sensitivity. There was no additional gain in BCVA or contrast sensitivity in eyes with a PCCC compared with eyes without a PCCC when VAO and PCO were low.


CONCLUSIONS
A PCCC significantly reduced PCO formation within the central 3.0 mm eccentricity as well as the need for Nd:YAG laser capsulotomy in eyes with a single-piece hydrophilic acrylic IOL with angulated haptics.
Vock
Lorenz
L
Department of Ophthalmology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Menapace
Rupert
R
Stifter
Eva
E
Bühl
Wolf
W
Georgopoulos
Michael
M
D000180:Acrylic Resins; D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D019923:Capsulorhexis / Q000379:methods*; D002386:Cataract / Q000517:prevention & control; D015350:Contrast Sensitivity / Q000502:physiology; D005260:Female; D005500:Follow-Up Studies; D006801:Humans; D007903:Lens Capsule, Crystalline / Q000473:pathology; D019654:Lens Implantation, Intraocular; D007910:Lenses, Intraocular; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D011183:Postoperative Complications / Q000517:prevention & control; D011446:Prospective Studies; D019591:Pseudophakia / Q000503:physiopathology; D014792:Visual Acuity / Q000502:physiology
D000180:Acrylic Resins