A new input device: comparison to three commercially available mouses.
This study was conducted to simultaneously compare the postural demands and performance of a new human-centred computer input device to three devices currently on the market. It was hypothesized that the new device would perform as well as the commercial devices while requiring less postural strain. A total of 24 experienced computer users performed a series of modified Steering and Fitts' Law Tests while their postural behaviour was captured using an opto-electric system. Analysis of the postural data revealed strong similarities between the new device and the commercially available devices, including some similarities that are not suggested in the literature. Analysis of the performance data reveals no significant difference between the new device and most commercial devices and suggests further examination of the difference between familiarity and mastery. This study has shown that it is possible to use the new device in a relaxed posture and yet achieve the same accuracy as commercial devices at no more postural risk than when the traditional mouse is used at a customized, ergonomic workstation.
Brown
J N A
JN
Faculty of Kinesiology, University of New Brunswick, 2 Peter Kelly Dr., Fredericton, NB E3C 1M6, Canada.
Albert
W J
WJ
Croll
J
J
D000328:Adult; D016287:Computer Peripherals; D006804:Ergonomics; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D011187:Posture; D014584:User-Computer Interface