A model for critical review of literature - with vaginismus as an example.
In this article we present a behavioral model for the critical review of the literature within a certain research field, using vaginismus as an example. We searched the literature for the title word "vaginismus" and analyzed to what extent the articles dealt with the following seven categories: prevention, etiology, maintaining factors, consequences, object of intervention, method of intervention, and method of evaluation. In each category we scrutinized the content of the articles for biological, psychological, social, relational, and gender aspects. Quality requirements of etiological and treatment studies were then added and the results presented in a "quality-adjusted" model. There were 102 articles during 1985-2001, of which 22 were included in the review. Most of the articles deal with supposed predisposing factors of etiology and different aspects of intervention. Only a few articles discuss precipitating factors, maintaining factors, or consequences of the problem. No article had a gender analysis. Only 11 of the articles fulfilled some of the proposed quality criteria. We found the behavioral model with quality requirements useful for classifying and evaluating the literature of vaginismus. The model may also be used as a guide to design methodologically good studies.
Wijma
Barbro
B
Division of Gender and Medicine, Department of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, Linköping University, S-58185 Linköping, Sweden. barbro.wijma@lio.se
Engman
Maria
M
Wijma
Klaas
K
D019317:Evidence-Based Medicine; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D015201:Meta-Analysis as Topic; D008962:Models, Theoretical; D012107:Research Design; D012196:Review Literature as Topic; D052065:Vaginismus / Q000145:classification / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000628:therapy*