Veterinary students' views on animal patients and human clients, using Q-methodology.
Veterinarians serve two masters: animal patients and human clients. Both animal patients and human clients have legitimate interests, and conflicting moral claims may flow from these interests. Earlier research concludes that veterinary students are very much aware of the complex and often paradoxical relationship they have and will have with animals. In this article the views of veterinary students about their anticipated relationship with animal patients and human clients are studied. The main part of the article describes discourses of first-year and fourth-year students about their (future) relationship with animals and their caretakers, for which Q-methodology is used. At the end of the article, the discourses are related to the students' gender and their workplace preferences.
de Graaf
Gjalt
G
Department of Public Administration and Organization Science, Faculty of Social Sciences, De Boelelaan, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. g.de.graaf@fsw.vu.nl
D000827:Animal Welfare; D000818:Animals; D001290:Attitude; D005260:Female; D001841:Human-Animal Bond; D006801:Humans; D007398:Interpersonal Relations; D008297:Male; D020399:Practice Management / Q000592:standards*; D011361:Professional Competence; D012941:Social Responsibility; D013334:Students / Q000523:psychology*; D018634:Veterinarians / Q000523:psychology*