title: Pressure phosphene tonometry versus Goldmann applanation tonometry for measuring intraocular pressure before and after LASIK.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  To compare pressure phosphene tonometry with Goldmann applanation tonometry for measuring intraocular pressure (IOP) before and after LASIK.
  
  
  METHODS
  Forty-three (18 men and 25 women) consecutive healthy patients underwent complete pre- and postoperative LASIK ophthalmologic assessments including manifest and cycloplegic refraction, keratometry, and central corneal thickness. Three repetitive sets of pressure phosphene tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry measurements were performed the day before and 3 months following uneventful LASIK.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Mean preoperative spherical equivalent refraction was -4.70 +/- 2.50 diopters (D) (range: -1.50 to -12.90 D) and mean preoperative keratometry was 43.95 +/- 1.08 D. After LASIK, spherical equivalent refraction was +0.23 +/- 0.11 D and mean keratometry was 39.46 +/- 2.28 D. Preoperative pressure phosphene tonometry (12.16 +/- 1.58 mmHg) and Goldmann applanation tonometry (12.01 +/- 1.55 mmHg) IOP measurements were similar. Postoperative IOP was 10.30 +/- 1.16 mmHg with Goldmann applanation tonometry and 12.20 +/- 1.62 mmHg with pressure phosphene tonometry. The postoperative IOP difference between Goldmann applanation tonometry and pressure phosphene tonometry was 0.15 +/- 1.12 mmHg (P = .41). The mean change in pachymetry after LASIK was 68.73 +/- 73 microm. The change in Goldmann applanation between preoperative and postoperative LASIK values was 1.71 +/- 1.43 mmHg (P < .0001), a change that was strongly correlated with changes in corneal thickness (R = 0.75, P < .0001) and keratometry (R = 0.72, P < .0001). No such correlations were found with pressure phosphene tonometry.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Goldmann applanation tonometry-measured IOP decrease after LASIK is strongly correlated with a decrease in central corneal thickness and changes in keratometry, whereas pressure phosphene tonometry-measured IOP is independent of corneal thickness. Pressure phosphene tonometry appears to be a more reliable method for recording tonometry in these patients.
authors: Department of Ophthalmology, Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Israel. gabi1961@netvision.net.il
authors: Gabi
authors: G
authors: Shemesh
authors: Oran
authors: O
authors: Man
authors: Adi
authors: A
authors: Michaeli
authors: David
authors: D
authors: Varssano
authors: Moshe
authors: M
authors: Lazar
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007429:Intraocular Pressure; D020731:Keratomileusis, Laser In Situ; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D010719:Phosphenes; D011184:Postoperative Period; D011300:Preoperative Care; D014065:Tonometry, Ocular / Q000379:methods*