title: Economic analysis of treatments reducing coronary heart disease mortality in England and Wales, 2000-2010.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Coronary heart disease (CHD) in the UK affects approximately 3 million people, with >100,000 deaths annually. Mortality rates have halved since the 1980s, but annual NHS treatment costs for CHD exceed 2 billion pounds.
  
  
  OBJECTIVE
  To examine the cost-effectiveness of specific CHD treatments in England and Wales.
  
  
  METHODS
  The IMPACT CHD model was used to calculate the number of life-years gained (LYG) from specific cardiological interventions from 2000 to 2010. Cost-effectiveness ratios (costs per LYG) were generated for each specific intervention, stratified by age and sex. The robustness of the results was tested using sensitivity analyses.
  
  
  RESULTS
  In 2000, medical and surgical treatments together prevented or postponed approximately 25,888 deaths in CHD patients aged 25-84 years, thus generating approximately 194,929 extra life-years between 2000 and 2010 (range 143,131-260,167). Aspirin and beta-blockers for secondary prevention following myocardial infarction or revascularisation, for angina and heart failure were highly cost-effective (< 1000 pounds per LYG). Other secondary prevention therapies, including cardiac rehabilitation, ACE inhibitors and statins, were reasonably cost-effective (1957 pounds, 3398 pounds and 4246 pounds per LYG, respectively), as were CABG surgery (3239 pounds-4601 pounds per LYG) and angioplasty (3845 pounds-5889 pounds per LYG). Primary angioplasty for myocardial infarction was intermediate (6054 pounds-12,057 pounds per LYG, according to age), and statins in primary prevention were much less cost-effective (27,828 pounds per LYG, reaching 69,373 pounds per LYG in men aged 35-44). Results were relatively consistent across a wide range of sensitivity analyses.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The cost-effectiveness ratios for standard CHD treatments varied by over 100-fold. Large amounts of NHS funding are being spent on relatively less cost-effective interventions, such as statins for primary prevention, angioplasty and CABG surgery. This merits debate.
authors: Department of Public Health, University of Liverpool, Whelan Building, Quadrangle, Liverpool L69 3GB, UK.
authors: D
authors: D
authors: Fidan
authors: B
authors: B
authors: Unal
authors: J
authors: J
authors: Critchley
authors: S
authors: S
authors: Capewell
mesh_terms: D000319:Adrenergic beta-Antagonists / Q000627:therapeutic use; D000328:Adult; D000806:Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors / Q000191:economics / Q000627:therapeutic use; D001241:Aspirin / Q000191:economics / Q000627:therapeutic use; D001026:Coronary Artery Bypass / Q000191:economics / Q000401:mortality; D003327:Coronary Disease / Q000191:economics* / Q000401:mortality / Q000628:therapy; D003362:Cost-Benefit Analysis; D004739:England / Q000453:epidemiology; D005260:Female; D005343:Fibrinolytic Agents / Q000627:therapeutic use; D006801:Humans; D019161:Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors / Q000191:economics / Q000627:therapeutic use*; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D009313:National Health Programs / Q000191:economics; D019057:Quality-Adjusted Life Years; D014852:Wales / Q000453:epidemiology
chemical_list: D000319:Adrenergic beta-Antagonists; D000806:Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; D005343:Fibrinolytic Agents; D019161:Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors; D001241:Aspirin