Equipoise and the duty of care in clinical research: a philosophical response to our critics.
Franklin G. Miller and colleagues have stimulated renewed interest in research ethics through their work criticizing clinical equipoise. Over three years and some twenty articles, they have also worked to articulate a positive alternative view on norms governing the conduct of clinical research. Shared presuppositions underlie the positive and critical dimensions of Miller and colleagues' work. However, recognizing that constructive contributions to the field ought to enjoy priority, we presently scrutinize the constructive dimension of their work. We argue that it is wanting in several respects.
Miller
Paul B
PB
University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Weijer
Charles
C
D002986:Clinical Trials as Topic / Q000941:ethics*; D032984:Ethics, Research; D006801:Humans; D012107:Research Design