title: Direct comparison of feature tracking and autocorrelation for velocity estimation.
abstract: Feature tracking is an algorithm for estimating tissue motion and blood flow using pulse-echo ultrasound. It was proposed as a computationally simpler alternative to other techniques such as autocorrelation and time-domain cross correlation. The advantage of feature tracking is that it selectively extracts easily identifiable parts of the speckle signal (e.g., the local maxima), reducing the amount of information being processed. Studies on feature tracking to date have used stationary, speckle-generating targets to simulate blood flow. Also, feature tracking has not been compared with accepted commercial methods. This study directly compares feature tracking performance with the complex autocorrelation method, which is the most common color flow algorithm. Experiments were performed with both a rotating string phantom and a commercial flow phantom surrounded by tissue-mimicking material, using 2.25 MHz and 3.5 MHz transducers, under more realistic signal-to-clutter (-15 to -35 dB) and signal-to-noise ratios (SNR) (15 dB to 3 dB) than previous translating-phantom tests. The feature tracking approach is shown to produce mean estimates comparable to autocorrelation (R2 = 0.9954 and 0.9960 for 6-sample and 12-sample autocorrelation, respectively, and R2 = 0.9998 for both 6-sample and 12-sample feature tracking) for velocities ranging from 10 to 100 cm/s. The variance of feature-tracking estimates is shown to compare favorably to the complex autocorrelation approach using the same number of ensemble flow samples (19 to 28% lower standard deviation for 3.5 MHz, 36 to 55% lower standard deviation for 2.25 MHz). However, linear regression of the feature locations does not produce an appreciable improvement in estimation variance. Discussion of the need for further research, particularly in the areas of feature detection and feature correspondence, is given.
authors: Department of Biological Systems Engineering, University of Nebraska-Lincoln 68583-0726, USA. gbashford2@unl.edu
authors: Gregory R
authors: GR
authors: Bashford
authors: Derek J
authors: DJ
authors: Robinson
mesh_terms: D000465:Algorithms; D001185:Artificial Intelligence; D001783:Blood Flow Velocity / Q000502:physiology*; D003198:Computer Simulation; D007089:Image Enhancement / Q000379:methods; D007090:Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted / Q000379:methods*; D008954:Models, Biological; D009068:Movement / Q000502:physiology*; D010363:Pattern Recognition, Automated / Q000379:methods*; D012044:Regression Analysis; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D012212:Rheology / Q000379:methods*; D012680:Sensitivity and Specificity; D013223:Statistics as Topic; D014463:Ultrasonography / Q000379:methods*