title: Shoulder arthroplasty: the socket perspective.
abstract: Although much attention has been directed to the development of the humeral components used in shoulder arthroplasty, the major unsolved challenge lies on the glenoid side of the articulation. This challenge arises from difficulties resisting eccentric loading and providing adequate implant-bone fixation. Current glenoid component designs use polyethylene and polymethyl methacrylate and are prone to loosening, plastic deformation, particulate debris, and third-body wear. Metal-backed components present further challenges, and results have generally been disappointing. There is interest in biologic resurfacing procedures, including the interposition of fascia, capsule, or meniscal allograft and nonprosthetic glenoid arthroplasty, or what has become known as the "ream-and-run" procedure. Despite encouraging results, important questions remain unanswered about these procedures. However, each may warrant further exploration with a goal of providing an effective and durable approach to glenoid arthritis that avoids the risks associated with polymethyl methacrylate and polyethylene.
authors: Department of Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA. matsen@u.washington.edu
authors: Frederick A
authors: FA
authors: Matsen
authors: Ryan T
authors: RT
authors: Bicknell
authors: Steven B
authors: SB
authors: Lippitt
mesh_terms: D001178:Arthroplasty; D019643:Arthroplasty, Replacement / Q000009:adverse effects* / Q000379:methods; D001672:Biocompatible Materials; D006801:Humans; D007595:Joint Prosthesis; D012785:Shoulder Joint / Q000601:surgery*
chemical_list: D001672:Biocompatible Materials