title: Bioterrorism-related inhalational anthrax: can extrapolated adult guidelines be applied to a pediatric population?
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  Since the 2001 anthrax attacks, an extensive body of literature has evolved, but there has been a limited focus on the management of pediatric-specific issues. We looked at the symptom complexes of all pediatric patients presenting to the emergency department of our hospital during this period and examined whether their presentations would likely allow current guidelines to be used as potential screening criteria to identify children infected with anthrax.
  
  
  METHODS
  We retrospectively reviewed emergency department records of all adult and pediatric patients (up to the age of 21 years) at Inova Fairfax Hospital during this time, when a large, and at the time ill-defined, group in the Washington, DC, metropolitan area was at risk for pulmonary anthrax. Two cases of anthrax infection were identified at this hospital in exposed adult postal workers. Screening algorithms (described by Mayer et al. and Hupert et al.) were applied to adult and pediatric patients with the presence of fever (38 degrees C), tachycardia, or other symptoms compatible with pulmonary anthrax. Specifically, the usefulness of these guidelines as potential screening tools to identify possibly infected children was examined.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Of 767 pediatric patients seen in the emergency department during the study period, 312 met criteria for review (41%; 95% CI: 37-44%). Four adult patients (0.4%; 95% CI: 0.1-0.9%) had at least five clinical symptoms, fever, and tachycardia; two of them had inhalational anthrax. No pediatric patient presented with five or more clinical symptoms. Twelve children (3.9%; 95% CI: 2-6.6%) presented with four clinical symptoms; five of the 12 had neither fever nor tachycardia. Children, particularly infants and toddlers, presented with nonspecific symptom complexes primarily limited to fever, vomiting, cough, and trouble breathing.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Existing guidelines are likely to be unreliable as a screening tool for inhalational anthrax in children, largely because of the children's inability to adequately communicate a suggestive symptom complex.
authors: Department of Emergency Medicine, Inova Fairfax Hospital, Falls Church, Virginia 22042, USA. linsonplace@aol.com
authors: Rick C
authors: RC
authors: Place
authors: Dan
authors: D
authors: Hanfling
authors: John M
authors: JM
authors: Howell
authors: Thom A
authors: TA
authors: Mayer
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D000881:Anthrax / Q000175:diagnosis*; D023482:Bioterrorism; D002648:Child; D004636:Emergency Service, Hospital; D017408:Guidelines as Topic; D006801:Humans; D019570:Inhalation Exposure; D008485:Medical Audit; D010372:Pediatrics; D012189:Retrospective Studies; D014218:Triage / Q000592:standards; D014768:Virginia