Comparison of performance and patient satisfaction of two types of ERG electrodes.
BACKGROUND
An age-controlled comparison concerning patient satisfaction and electrical performance of microfibres (DTL) and rigid contact lens (Henkes) corneal ERG electrodes was carried out.


METHODS
36 test persons underwent complete ophthalmological examination and were equally distributed into 3 age groups. Electroretinograms were recorded according to ISCEV standards. Randomly, in one eye a Henkes electrode was used and in the other eye a DTL electrode. Amplitudes of a- and b-waves and implicit times were measured and compared for the two electrode types.


RESULTS
34 of 36 test persons preferred DTL electrodes. Electrical performance concerning b-wave amplitudes was comparable. Statistically significant differences were detected only for scotopic combined cone-rod stimulation in the age groups 20 - 40 and 41 - 60 years between the different electrodes. Other recordings did not show differences. A statistically significant reduction of signal amplitudes with age was detected for scotopic isolated rod signals and combined cone-rod signals. Significance level was p < 0.05. No conjunctival or corneal erosions were found after ERG recordings for either electrode.


CONCLUSIONS
Electrical performance is comparable between electrodes. For scotopic stimulations age was a significant influencing factor for signal amplitude and should be respected for normative values. DTL electrodes were preferred by the vast majority of patients. No adverse clinical effects were observed for either electrode. DTL electrodes should be preferred due to hygienic reasons (single use) and patient comfort.
Beeler
P
P
Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Barthelmes
D
D
Sutter
F K
FK
Helbig
H
H
Fleischhauer
J C
JC
D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D003261:Contact Lenses; D004566:Electrodes; D004596:Electroretinography / Q000295:instrumentation* / Q000379:methods*; D004867:Equipment Design; D019544:Equipment Failure Analysis; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D008904:Miniaturization; D017060:Patient Satisfaction; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D012680:Sensitivity and Specificity