Basket design as a factor in retention and release of calculi in vitro.
OBJECTIVE
To compare stone retrieval and release from seven basket designs in vitro.


METHODS
We tested two tipped and one tipless NCompass models, three other tipless Nitinol designs (NCircle, Sur-Catch, and Dimension), and the Segura Hemisphere for their ability to retrieve and release single beads 8, 6, 5.6, and 5 mm diameter and multiple beads 3.6 mm diameter in both a ureteral and a caliceal model in three separate attempts.


RESULTS
In the ureteral model, all baskets were successful in retrieving all sizes of single beads. With multiple 3.6-mm beads, only the NCompass and Dimension designs were able to retrieve at least two of three beads in all attempts. With the exception of the Segura Hemisphere, all designs were successful in releasing all bead sizes. In the caliceal model, only the NCircle, Dimension, and tipless NCompass models were able to retrieve all bead sizes in 100% of the trials. The tipped NCompass and Hemisphere designs were unable to retrieve any beads in this model. The Sur-Catch basket was successful in the retrieval of large beads only. The Dimension articulating design was the only basket able to release all bead sizes in all attempts. The tipless NCompass basket did not release any of the beads once engaged.


CONCLUSIONS
Nitinol basket designs show excellent retrieval and release capabilities in the in-vitro ureteral model. The articulating Nitinol basket has the best stone-releasing capability of all baskets tested.
Zeltser
Ilia S
IS
Department of Urology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Bagley
Demetrius H
DH
D000497:Alloys; D004867:Equipment Design; D006801:Humans; D007669:Kidney Calculi / Q000628:therapy*; D007670:Kidney Calices; D008954:Models, Biological; D013525:Surgical Instruments; D014514:Ureteral Calculi / Q000628:therapy*
D000497:Alloys; C013616:nitinol