Fixational eye movements are not an index of covert attention.
The debate about the nature of fixational eye movements has revived recently with the claim that microsaccades reflect the direction of attentional shifts. A number of studies have shown an association between the direction of attentional cues and the direction of microsaccades. We sought to determine whether microsaccades in attentional tasks are causally related to behavior. Is reaction time (RT) faster when microsaccades point toward the target than when they point in the opposite direction? We used a dual-Purkinje-image eyetracker to measure gaze position while 3 observers (2 of the authors, 1 naive observer) performed an attentional cuing task under three different response conditions: saccadic localization, manual localization, and manual detection. Critical trials were those on which microsaccades moved away from the cue. On these trials, RTs were slower when microsaccades were oriented toward the target than when they were oriented away from the target. We obtained similar results for direction of drift. Cues, not fixational eye movements, predicted behavior.
Horowitz
Todd S
TS
Visual Attention Laboratory, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 64 Sidney Street, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA. toddh@search.bwh.harvard.edu
Fine
Elisabeth M
EM
Fencsik
David E
DE
Yurgenson
Sergey
S
Wolfe
Jeremy M
JM
D000328:Adult; D001288:Attention; D003463:Cues; D005133:Eye Movements; D005260:Female; D005403:Fixation, Ocular; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male