title: Failures to find suppression of episodic memories in the think/no-think paradigm.
abstract: Anderson and Green (2001) had subjects learn paired associates and then selectively suppress responses to some of them. They reported a decrease in final cued recall for responses that subjectshad been instructed not to think of and explained their data as resulting from cognitive suppression, a laboratory analog of repression. We report three experiments designed to replicate the suppression/repression results. After subjects learned a series of A-B word pairs (e.g., ordsea-roach), they were then asked to respond to some items and not to think of other items when shown their cues 1, 8, or 16times. During a final recall test, they were cued with either asame (direct)probe (ordeal-__) or a n independent(indirect) probe (insect-r__) . None of our experiments showed reliable suppression effects with either the same or independent-probe tests. Suppression is apparently not a robust experimental phenomenon in the think/no-think paradigm.
authors.affiliation: Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri, USA. john.bulevich@colby.edu
authors.forename: John B
authors.initials: JB
authors.lastname: Bulevich
authors.forename: Henry L
authors.initials: HL
authors.lastname: Roediger
authors.forename: David A
authors.initials: DA
authors.lastname: Balota
authors.forename: Andrew C
authors.initials: AC
authors.lastname: Butler
mesh_terms: D003071:Cognition; D006801:Humans; D008568:Memory; D011589:Psychology, Experimental / Q000379:methods*; D012094:Repression, Psychology; D013850:Thinking