title: Primary percutaneous transluminal coronary intervention compared with intravenous thrombolysis in patients with ST segment elevation myocardial infarction.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Primary percutaneous transluminal coronary intervention (PCI) and thrombolytic therapy (TT) are alternative means of achieving reperfusion in patients with acute ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI).
  
  
  OBJECTIVE
  To compare the outcomes between both reperfusion strategies. The authors sought to compare in-hospital outcomes after PCI or TT for patients with acute STEMI.
  
  
  METHODS
  From August 2002 through June 2004, data from all patients who received reperfusion therapy for acute STEMI were collected prospectively. The decision regarding type of reperfusion strategy was at the attending cardiologist's discretion. The patient's data on demographics, procedures, medications, and in-hospital outcomes were analyzed.
  
  
  RESULTS
  From August 2002 through June 2004, 234 patients were admitted to the authors' institute with the diagnosis of acute STEMI. Of the 146 patients who received reperfusion therapy, 91 were treated with primary PCI and 55 received intravenous TT as the reperfusion modality. In the TT group, 51 (93%) patients received streptokinase and 11 (21.6%) underwent rescue angioplasty. The two groups had similar baseline characteristics. Both patient groups had frequent presence of diabetes (PCI 44.2% vs. TT 39.6%, p = 0. 6). Cardiogenic shock on admission was present in 11% of the PCI patients and 7.3% of the TT patients (p = ns). In-hospital mortality was not significantly different in the two groups (PCI 14.3% vs. TT 10. 9%, p = 0.56). In the TT group, there was a trend toward a higher rate of major bleeding (PCI 6.6% vs. TT 16.4%, p = 0.06) and stroke (PCI 2.2% vs. TT 7.3%, p = 0.13) complications without statistical significance.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The present findings suggest that both PCI and TT are comparable alternative methods of reperfusion among STEMI patients in terms of in-hospital mortality. In certain subgroups that are at increased risk of bleeding or stroke, primary PCI may be the preferred treatment strategy.
authors.affiliation: Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand. siwts@mahidol.ac.th
authors.forename: Wiwun
authors.initials: W
authors.lastname: Tungsubutra
authors.forename: Damras
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Tresukosol
authors.forename: Rungroj
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Krittayaphong
authors.forename: Pradit
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Panchavinnin
authors.forename: Rewat
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Phankingtongkhum
authors.forename: Chunhakasem
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Chotnaiwattarakul
mesh_terms: D015906:Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; D004562:Electrocardiography; D006801:Humans; D009203:Myocardial Infarction / Q000628:therapy*; D013300:Streptokinase / Q000627:therapeutic use*; D015912:Thrombolytic Therapy / Q000009:adverse effects*; D013997:Time Factors; D016896:Treatment Outcome
chemical_list: D013300:Streptokinase