Separating cue encoding from target processing in the explicit task-cuing procedure: are there "true" task switch effects?
Six experiments were conducted to separate cue encoding from target processing in explicitly cued task switching to determine whether task switch effects could be separated from cue encoding effects and to determine the nature of the representations produced by cue encoding. Subjects were required to respond to the cue, indicating which cue was presented (Experiments 1, 3a, and 4a) or which task was cued (Experiments 2, 3b, and 4b), before performing the cued task on the target. Cue encoding was successfully separated from target processing when the cue response indicated which task was cued but not when it indicated which cue was presented. Task switch effects were found when this separation was successful, suggesting that there are "true" task switch effects independent of cue encoding. Analysis of the conditions required for successful separation suggested that cue encoding results in a semantic categorical representation of the task to be performed rather than verbal or phonological representations of individual cues. Implications for the authors' past modeling of task-switching performance are discussed.
Arrington
Catherine M
CM
Lehigh University.
Logan
Gordon D
GD
Schneider
Darryl W
DW
D032882:Comprehension; D003210:Concept Formation; D003463:Cues; D007839:Functional Laterality; D006801:Humans; D011939:Mental Recall; D010364:Pattern Recognition, Visual; D010700:Phonetics; D011340:Problem Solving; D011597:Psychomotor Performance; D011930:Reaction Time; D012193:Reversal Learning; D012660:Semantics; D014705:Verbal Behavior