A new national smokefree law increased calls to a national quitline.
BACKGROUND
A law making all indoor workplaces including bars and restaurants smokefree became operational in New Zealand in December 2004. New Zealand has a national free-phone Quitline Service which has been operational since 1999. Previous work has shown that the number of calls to the Quitline are influenced by marketing of the service through media campaigns. We set out to investigate if the smokefree law increased calls to the Quitline.


METHODS
For 24 months prior to the law, and 12 months after the law, data were collected on: (i) Quitline caller registrations and the issuing of nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) vouchers by the Quitline Service; (ii) expenditure on Quitline-related television advertising; (iii) expenditure on other smokefree television advertising; and (iv) print media coverage of smoking in major New Zealand newspapers. These data were inputs to a time series analysis using a Box-Jenkins transfer function model. This used the law change as the intervention variable, with the response series being the monthly Quitline caller rates and monthly first time NRT voucher issue rates.


RESULTS
The monthly rates of Quitline caller registrations and NRT voucher issues were observed to increase in the months after the law change. The increase in both these outcomes was even greater when considered in terms of per level of Quitline advertising expenditure (though these patterns may have partly reflected marked reductions in advertising expenditure at the time of the law change and hence are of limited validity). In the more robust time series analyses, the law change (intervention variable) had a significant effect (p = 0.025) on increasing the monthly caller registration rate in December 2004. This was after adjusting for the possible effects of Quitline advertising expenditure, print media coverage, and other smoking-related advertising expenditure.


CONCLUSIONS
The new national smokefree law resulted in increased quitting-related behaviour. This would suggest there is an extra opportunity for health agencies to promote quitting at such times.
Wilson
Nick
N
Department of Public Health, Otago University Wellington, Wellington South, New Zealand. nwilson@actrix.gen.nz
Sertsou
Gabriel
G
Edwards
Richard
R
Thomson
George
G
Grigg
Michele
M
Li
Judy
J
D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D019538:Health Care Surveys; D015277:Hotlines / Q000191:economics / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D006801:Humans; D008402:Mass Media; D008875:Middle Aged; D009520:New Zealand / Q000453:epidemiology; D009538:Nicotine / Q000627:therapeutic use; D015397:Program Evaluation; D011634:Public Health / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D011639:Public Opinion; D012147:Restaurants / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence* / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D012907:Smoking / Q000453:epidemiology / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence; D016540:Smoking Cessation / Q000379:methods / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D000074606:Smoking Prevention; D011049:Social Control Policies; D040241:Social Marketing; D014028:Tobacco Smoke Pollution / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence / Q000517:prevention & control*
D014028:Tobacco Smoke Pollution; D009538:Nicotine