title: Foundational issues concerning taxa and taxon names.
abstract: In a series of articles, Rieppel (2005, Biol. Philos. 20:465-487; 2006a, Cladistics 22:186-197; 2006b, Systematist 26:5-9), Keller et al. (2003, Bot. Rev. 69:93-110), and Nixon and Carpenter (2000, Cladistics 16:298-318) criticize the philosophical foundations of the PhyloCode. They argue that species and higher taxa are not individuals, and they reject the view that taxon names are rigid designators. Furthermore, they charge supporters of the individuality thesis and rigid designator theory with assuming essentialism, committing logical inconsistencies, and offering proposals that render taxonomy untestable. These charges are unsound. Such charges turn on confusions over rigid designator theory and the distinction between kinds and individuals. In addition, Rieppel's, Keller et al.'s, and Nixon and Carpenter's proposed alternatives are no better and have their own problems. The individuality thesis and rigid designator theory should not be quickly abandoned.
authors.affiliation: Department of Philosophy, University of Calgary, 2500 University Drive, NW Calgary, Alberta, T2N 1N4, Canada. ereshefs@ucalgary.ca
authors.forename: Marc
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Ereshefsky
mesh_terms: D002965:Classification / Q000379:methods; D008954:Models, Biological; D010802:Phylogeny; D009626:Terminology as Topic