Separate mechanisms recruited by exogenous and endogenous spatial cues: evidence from a spatial Stroop paradigm.
The present experiments tested whether endogenous and exogenous cues produce separate effects on target processing. In Experiment 1, participants discriminated whether an arrow presented left or right of fixation pointed to the left or right. For 1 group, the arrow was preceded by a peripheral noninformative cue. For the other group, the arrow was preceded by a central, symbolic, informative cue. The 2 types of cues modulated the spatial Stroop effect in opposite ways, with endogenous cues producing larger spatial Stroop effects for valid trials and exogenous cues producing smaller spatial Stroop effects for valid trials. In Experiments 2A and 2B, the influence of peripheral noninformative and peripheral informative cues on the spatial Stroop effect was directly compared. The spatial Stroop effect was smaller for valid than for invalid trials for both types of cues. These results point to a distinction between the influence of central and peripheral attentional cues on performance and are not consistent with a unitary view of endogenous and exogenous attention.
Funes
María Jesús
MJ
Department of Experimental Psychology and Physiology of Behavior, University of Granada, Granada, Spain. mjfunes@um.es
Lupiáñez
Juan
J
Milliken
Bruce
B
D001288:Attention; D003463:Cues; D006801:Humans; D011581:Psychological Tests; D011930:Reaction Time; D013028:Space Perception; D014796:Visual Perception