title: Impact factors in urology. How well do our journals stack up against other medical and surgical journals?
abstract: BACKGROUND
  The purpose of our analysis was to assess the performance of urological journals in terms of the standardized measures created by the Institute of Scientific Information (ISI) Journal Citation Report (JCR) in comparison to other medical and surgical fields. Additionally, an evaluation of all original articles, clinical or experimental, published in the year 2005, assessing the time interval needed from submission to publication, submission to acceptance, and acceptance to publication of a manuscript was conducted for all urologic journals.
  
  
  METHODS
  The study was conducted with the help of the ISI JCR and the University of Erlangen Medical Center's library (and on-line library).
  
  
  RESULTS
  The field of urology demonstrates satisfactory measures created by the (ISI) JCR in comparison with various fields of medicine. In comparison with the surgical field, urological journals demonstrate outstanding results.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The impact factor is a measure of the importance of scientific journals. Urological journals stack up quite well against other medical and especially surgical journals.
authors.affiliation: Department of Urology, Martha Maria Medical Center, Academic Hospital of Erlangen University, Nuremberg, Germany. Labanaris@web.de
authors.forename: Apostolos P
authors.initials: AP
authors.lastname: Labanaris
authors.forename: Reinhard
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Kuhn
authors.forename: Gunter E
authors.initials: GE
authors.lastname: Schott
authors.forename: Vahudin
authors.initials: V
authors.lastname: Zugor
mesh_terms: D015706:Bibliometrics; D006801:Humans; D010506:Periodicals as Topic / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D014572:Urology