Crisis or creation?a systematic examination of "false memory syndrome".
In 1992, the False Memory Syndrome Foundation (FMSF), an advocacy organization for people claiming to be falsely accused of sexual abuse, announced the discovery of a new syndrome involving iatrogenically created false memories of childhood sexual abuse. This article critically examines the assumptions underlying &#0147;False Memory Syndrome&#0148; to determine whether there is sufficient empirical evidence to support it as a valid diagnostic construct. Epidemiological evidence is also examined to determine whether there is data to support its advocates' claim of a public health crisis or epidemic. A review of the relevant literature demonstrates that the existence of such a syndrome lacks general acceptance in the mental health field, and that the construct is based on a series of faulty assumptions, many of which have been scientifically disproven. There is a similar lack of empirical validation for claims of a &#0147;false memory&#0148; epidemic. It is concluded that in the absence of any substantive scientific support, &#0147;False Memory Syndrome&#0148; is best characterized as a pseudoscientific syndrome that was developed to defend against claims of child abuse.
Dallam
S J
SJ
, Cynwyd, PA, 19004, sjd.scout@worldnet.att.net.