Mind the gap! Three approaches to scarcity in health care.
This paper addresses two ways in which scarcity in health care turns up and three ways in which this dual condition of scarcity can be approached. The first approach is the economic approach, which focuses on the causes of cost-increase in health care and on developing various mechanisms of rationing and priority-setting in health care. The second approach is the justice approach, which interprets scarcity as one of the Humean [Symbol: see text]Circumstances of Justice.' Whereas these approaches interpret scarcity as a given fact, the third approach casts doubt on this interpretation. Rather, it interprets scarcity as a social, anthropological, and technologically induced construction of Modernity. This paper supports the theories of Hans Achterhuis, Ivan Illich, and Nicholas Xenos but also further elaborates their views with regard to health care by offering an approach to scarcity that interprets it as an economic translation of finitude. I argue that this approach, which entails a contemporary revaluation of the ancient Socratic attitude on human life and finitude, will be better able to deal with the pressing contemporary issues of setting limits on health care because it mitigates contemporary health care's tendency toward infinity in meeting - and creating - health care needs.
Denier
Yvonne
Y
Centre for Biomedical Ethics and Law, Catholic University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium. yvonne.denier@med.kuleuven.be
D003695:Delivery of Health Care / Q000458:organization & administration*; D004470:Economics, Medical / Q000458:organization & administration; D015276:Health Care Rationing / Q000458:organization & administration; D006292:Health Priorities / Q000458:organization & administration; D006801:Humans; D012935:Social Justice; D012962:Sociology, Medical