Between "design" and "bricolage": genetic networks, levels of selection, and adaptive evolution.
The extent to which "developmental constraints" in complex organisms restrict evolutionary directions remains contentious. Yet, other forms of internal constraint, which have received less attention, may also exist. It will be argued here that a set of partial constraints below the level of phenotypes, those involving genes and molecules, influences and channels the set of possible evolutionary trajectories. At the top-most organizational level there are the genetic network modules, whose operations directly underlie complex morphological traits. The properties of these network modules, however, have themselves been set by the evolutionary history of the component genes and their interactions. Characterization of the components, structures, and operational dynamics of specific genetic networks should lead to a better understanding not only of the morphological traits they underlie but of the biases that influence the directions of evolutionary change. Furthermore, such knowledge may permit assessment of the relative degrees of probability of short evolutionary trajectories, those on the microevolutionary scale. In effect, a "network perspective" may help transform evolutionary biology into a scientific enterprise with greater predictive capability than it has hitherto possessed.
Wilkins
Adam S
AS
BioEssays Editorial Office, 10/11 Tredgold Lane, Napier Street, Cambridge CB1 1HN, United Kingdom. awilkins@bioessays.demon.co.uk
D000220:Adaptation, Biological; D000818:Animals; D005075:Biological Evolution; D053263:Gene Regulatory Networks / Q000235:genetics*; D007700:Kinetics; D008957:Models, Genetic; D009154:Mutation / Q000235:genetics; D012641:Selection, Genetic