Numerical dosimetry ELF: accuracy of the method, variability of models and parameters, and the implication for quantifying guidelines.
In situ electric fields and current densities are investigated by numerical simulations for exposure to ELF electric and magnetic fields. Computations are based on the finite-difference time-domain method (FDTD). The computational uncertainty is determined by comparison of analytical and numerical results and amounts to a worst-case expanded uncertainty (95% confidence interval) of +/-9.89 dB for both dosimetric quantities (E, J). Detailed investigations based on the Visible Human body model with a resolution of 2 mm show a strong influence of the tissue boundaries on the simulation results, which is caused by the numerical method. For the tissue specific in situ electric field and current density changes in excess of 10 dB are observed when comparing the results with and without evaluation of the dosimetric quantities at tissue boundaries. Moderate sensitivities with respect to tissue boundaries are observed only for low conductivity tissues when evaluating the in situ electric field whereas this behavior is observed for high conductivity tissues when evaluating the current density. For exposure to a 50 Hz magnetic field corresponding to the ICNIRP reference level, the simulated current density for central nervous system (CNS) tissue is in compliance with the ICNIRP guidelines. Exposure to a 50 Hz electric field may exceed the ICNIRP basic restriction for CNS tissue at least in a worst-case scenario (grounded human body, vertical electric field, tissue boundaries included for the evaluation of the current density). The in situ electric field is the more stable dosimetric quantity with respect to changes of the tissue conductivity of the Visible Human body model. The maximum conductivity sensitivity coefficient amounts to +122% for the current density whereas the maximum sensitivity coefficient for the in situ electric field is -20%. For electric field exposure the in situ electric field remains comparable (-6% to -4%), the averaged current density change ranges from -57% to -16% for the tissues under investigation. Magnetic field exposure of a scaled model of a five year old child leads to a decrease of the dosimetric quantities (J: -74% to -45%, E: -42% to -23%) compared to the Visible Human results.
Bahr
A
A
IMST, Kamp-Lintfort, Germany.
Bolz
T
T
Hennes
C
C
D001822:Body Burden; D004574:Electromagnetic Fields; D004781:Environmental Exposure / Q000032:analysis* / Q000592:standards; D006801:Humans; D008954:Models, Biological; D017410:Practice Guidelines as Topic; D011829:Radiation Dosage; D011834:Radiation Monitoring / Q000379:methods* / Q000592:standards; D011835:Radiation Protection / Q000379:methods* / Q000592:standards; D012062:Relative Biological Effectiveness; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D012680:Sensitivity and Specificity; D014915:Whole-Body Counting / Q000379:methods* / Q000592:standards