Anonymity in connection with sperm donation.
Since Sweden abolished anonymity in connection with sperm donation in 1985, a number of other countries have followed suit. A legal provision still exists in Denmark to the effect that the donor must be anonymous. Arguments given in a Danish context against retaining the present scheme involving anonymous sperm donation will be discussed. The biggest problem with sperm donation seems to be non-disclosure. Current and important arguments in favour ofabolishing anonymity are that it sends out a clear signal that non-disclosure is unacceptable and that, in principle, all citizens should have access to the information available about themselves. However, the arguments can be criticised both from theoretical (legal) and several practical (medical) points of view. A substantive alternative to abolishing anonymity might be to inform parents about avoiding non-disclosure--and to design information material for the children, to support the parents.
Jørgensen
H K
HK
The Danish Council of Ethics, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Hartling
O J
OJ
D003219:Confidentiality / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D003718:Denmark; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D013094:Spermatozoa; D014019:Tissue Donors / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*