Strategic differences in algebraic problem solving: neuroanatomical correlates.
In this study, we built on previous neuroimaging studies of mathematical cognition and examined whether the same cognitive processes are engaged by two strategies used in algebraic problem solving. We focused on symbolic algebra, which uses alphanumeric equations to represent problems, and the model method, which uses pictorial representation. Eighteen adults, matched on academic proficiency and competency in the two methods, transformed algebraic word problems into equations or models, and validated presented solutions. Both strategies were associated with activation of areas linked to working memory and quantitative processing. These included the left frontal gyri, and bilateral activation of the intraparietal sulci. Contrasting the two strategies, the symbolic method activated the posterior superior parietal lobules and the precuneus. These findings suggest that the two strategies are effected using similar processes but impose different attentional demands.
Lee
Kerry
K
National Institute of Education, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore. kerry.lee@nie.edu.sg
Lim
Zee Ying
ZY
Yeong
Stephanie H M
SH
Ng
Swee Fong
SF
Venkatraman
Vinod
V
Chee
Michael W L
MW
D000328:Adult; D001288:Attention / Q000502:physiology*; D001921:Brain / Q000033:anatomy & histology* / Q000502:physiology*; D003071:Cognition; D004493:Education; D006801:Humans; D008279:Magnetic Resonance Imaging; D008433:Mathematics; D011340:Problem Solving; D013060:Speech